Linguistic categories and linguists categorizations
The article deals with the notion of category and the linguists operations for delimiting linguistic categories. A threefold organization is suggested that subdivides categories into features and features into values. Every word of a natural language can be categorically described via a matrix of values that represent the implementation of features that, in their turn, are categorial properties. Since there exist many nonclearcut cases, that is, items that may paradigmatically belong to more than one category, it is necessary to use both a functional and a formal approach in order to get a categorial definition of the items. The traditional parts of speech still seem to be the best categorization, in spite of the fact that typology has become acquainted with languages that show very different morphosyntactic structures.
Copyright (c)1999 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Contents
- Accusative case in passives
- Subject, topic, and agent: accounting for the addressee in instructions in English, German, and Spanish
- Restructured phonological phrases in French: evidence from clash resolution
- Diachronic viability of syntactic alternatives
- Sociolinguistic variation in southern French schwa
- Linguistic categories and linguists categorizations
- Book reviews
- Notice from the Board of Editors
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Contents
- Accusative case in passives
- Subject, topic, and agent: accounting for the addressee in instructions in English, German, and Spanish
- Restructured phonological phrases in French: evidence from clash resolution
- Diachronic viability of syntactic alternatives
- Sociolinguistic variation in southern French schwa
- Linguistic categories and linguists categorizations
- Book reviews
- Notice from the Board of Editors