Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Predicate-cleft constructions and why they aren’t what you might think
-
JOHN S. LUMSDEN
Published/Copyright:
November 22, 2009
Published Online: 2009-11-22
Published in Print: 1990
Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Sonstiges
- Titelei
- Introduction
- On the use of sociohistorical criteria in the comparison of creoles
- Toward an account of preclausal focus in some creole languages
- Controlling into purpose clauses the creole way
- Aspect in Kriyol and the theory of inflection
- The biclausal structure of Haitian clefts
- Predicate-cleft constructions and why they aren’t what you might think
- Creoles and universal grammar
- Verb syncopation and predicate raising in Mauritian Creole
- The grammatical items bin, fɔ, and mɔs in Sierra Leone Krio
- Features in the noun phrase common to the Atlantic creoles
- Question words in pidgin and creole languages
Articles in the same Issue
- Sonstiges
- Titelei
- Introduction
- On the use of sociohistorical criteria in the comparison of creoles
- Toward an account of preclausal focus in some creole languages
- Controlling into purpose clauses the creole way
- Aspect in Kriyol and the theory of inflection
- The biclausal structure of Haitian clefts
- Predicate-cleft constructions and why they aren’t what you might think
- Creoles and universal grammar
- Verb syncopation and predicate raising in Mauritian Creole
- The grammatical items bin, fɔ, and mɔs in Sierra Leone Krio
- Features in the noun phrase common to the Atlantic creoles
- Question words in pidgin and creole languages
