Home Idioms: The type-sensitive storage model
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Idioms: The type-sensitive storage model

  • Julia Horvath EMAIL logo and Tal Siloni
Published/Copyright: June 8, 2019

Abstract

Idiom surveys conducted on both English and Hebrew motivate a distinction between phrasal idioms, which are headed by a lexical head, and clausal idioms, which involve sentential functional material. The surveys show that these two types of idioms have different patterns of distribution across diathesis alternations. A verbal passive phrasal idiom necessarily shares its idiomatic meaning with the corresponding transitive, while the unaccusative, adjectival passive and transitive can head their own phrasal idioms. This behavior of phrasal idioms contrasts with the strong tendency of clausal idioms to be specific to a single diathesis. The Type-Sensitive Storage (TSS) model, which we propose, accounts for these findings, by motivating a different storage (lexical listing) strategy for each idiom-type. Phrasal idioms are argued to be stored as subentries, while clausal idioms are independent entries. Assuming the verbal passive is derived post-lexically, thus lacking its own lexical entry, the model explains why it cannot host idiomatic meanings specific to it. In contrast, the adjectival passive, unaccusative and transitive have their own lexical entries under the model, and thus can have their own idiomatic meanings. Clausal idioms are stored as independent entries, and therefore their storage does not depend on the existence of other lexical entries.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Grant No 2009269 from the United States–Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF). Earlier versions of this article were presented at the TAU-GU workshop on Relative Clauses and Idioms, Goethe University (Frankfurt, November 2014), at the 8th Brussels Conference on Generative Linguistics (BCGL): The Grammar of Idioms, CRISSP KU Leuven (Brussels, June 2015), at the Potsdam Workshop on Idioms, Potsdam University (Potsdam, November 2015), and at The Syntax of Idioms Workshop, Utrecht University (Utrecht, January 2017). We would like to thank the audiences at these presentations, as well as two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments.

References

Abney, Steven P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 219–251.10.4324/9781315310572-8Search in Google Scholar

Baltin, Mark. 1987. Heads and projections. In Mark Baltin & Anthony Kroch (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 1–16. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth. 2008. On written expository and narrative texts produced by school children, adolescents, and adults (Cross-linguistic comparisons): The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language 35. 735–771.10.1017/S0305000908008787Search in Google Scholar

Birger, Eugenia 2014. Idioms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 22–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1980. Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2). 81–120.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dekel, Nurit. 2014. Colloquial Israeli Hebrew: A corpus-based survey. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110364484Search in Google Scholar

Dubinsky, Stanley & Silvester Ron Simango. 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar’. Language 72. 749–781.10.2307/416101Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph. 2000. Lexicon and grammar: The English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872996Search in Google Scholar

Everaert, Martin. 2010. The lexical encoding of idioms. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax and event structure, 76–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Fadlon, Julie, Julia Horvath, Tal Siloni & Kenneth Wexler. 2018. The acquisition of Hebrew idioms: Stages, internal composition, and implications for storage. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1). 99. DOI:http://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.542.Search in Google Scholar

Fadlon, Julie, Julia Horvath, Tal Siloni & Kenneth Wexler. Forthcoming. Idiom storage and the verbal passive: No unique phrasal idioms. In András Bárány, Theresa Biberauer, Jamie Douglas & Sten Vikner (eds.), Clausal architecture and its consequences: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Glasbey, Sheila R. 2003. Let’s paint the town red for a few hours: Composition of aspect in idioms. In Alan M. Wallington (ed.), Proceedings of the ACL workshop on lexicon and figurative language, 42–48. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3115/1118975.1118981.Search in Google Scholar

Glasbey, Sheila R. 2007. Aspectual composition in idioms. In Louis de Saussure, Jacques Moeschler & Genoveva Puskás (eds.), Recent advances in the syntax and semantics of tense, aspect and modality, 71–87. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1991. Extended projection Ms. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Extended projection and locality. In Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, 115–133. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.197.07griSearch in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2. 31–70.10.1075/livy.2.04harSearch in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2013. The ‘Bundling’ hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. Paper presented at the little v workshop, Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, 25–26 October.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 1999. State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology. GLOT International 4. 3–9.Search in Google Scholar

Härtl, Holden. 2003. Conceptual and grammatical characteristics of argument alternations: The case of decausative verbs. Linguistics 41. 883–916.10.1515/ling.2003.029Search in Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni. 2008. Active lexicon: Adjectival and verbal passives. In Sharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon & Susan Rothstein (eds.), Current issues in generative Hebrew linguistics, 105–134. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.134.05actSearch in Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni. 2009. Hebrew idioms: The organization of the lexical component. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1. 283–310.10.1163/187666309X12491131130666Search in Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni. 2011. Causatives across components. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 657–704. DOI:10.1007/s11049-011-9135-3.Search in Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni. 2016. The thematic phase and the architecture of grammar. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Eric Reuland (eds.), Concepts, syntax and their interface, 129–174. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034135.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni. 2017. ‘Constructions’ and grammar: Evidence from idioms. In Claire Bowern, Laurence Horn & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), On looking into words (and beyond): Structures, relations, analyses, 471–489. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.495462.Search in Google Scholar

Jisa, Harriet, Judy S. Reilly, Ludo Verhoeven, Elisheva Baruch & Elisa Rosado. 2002. Passive voice constructions in written texts: A cross-linguistic developmental study. Written Language and Literacy 5. 163–181.10.1075/wll.5.2.03jisSearch in Google Scholar

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27. 77–138.10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 335–391.10.4324/9780203429204-7Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport. 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 623–661.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport-Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadis & Laura Siegle (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, 201–225. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar

McGinnis, Martha. 2002. On the systematic aspect of idioms. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 665–672.10.1162/ling.2002.33.4.665Search in Google Scholar

Meltzer-Asscher, Aya. 2011. Adjectival passives in Hebrew: Evidence for the parallelism between the verbal and adjectival systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29. 815–855.10.1007/s11049-011-9138-0Search in Google Scholar

Meltzer-Asscher, Aya. 2012. Verbal passives in English and Hebrew: A comparative study. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds.), The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, 279–307. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Mishani-Uval, Yael & Tal Siloni. 2017. Ditransitive idioms in Hebrew. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35. 715–749. DOI:10.1007/s11049-016-9354-8.Search in Google Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan Sag & Thomas Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70. 491–538.10.1353/lan.1994.0007Search in Google Scholar

O’Grady, William. 1998. The syntax of idioms. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16. 279–312.10.1023/A:1005932710202Search in Google Scholar

Punske, Jeffrey & Megan Stone. 2014. Idiomatic expressions, passivization and gerundivization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the LSA, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2–5 January.Search in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 229–290.10.1515/thli.28.3.229Search in Google Scholar

Rothstein, Susan. 1992. Case and NP licensing. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10. 119–139.10.1007/BF00135360Search in Google Scholar

Ruwet, Nicolas. 1991. On the use and abuse of idioms in syntactic argumentation. In John Goldsmith (ed.), Syntax and human experience, 171–251. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas. 1977. Transformation and the lexicon. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 327–360. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Idiom Dictionaries

Ammer, Christine. 2013. The American heritage dictionary of idioms. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar

Heacock, Paul. 2003. Cambridge dictionary of American idioms. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Sprachen. http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Search in Google Scholar

Spears, Richard. A. 2006. McGraw-Hill’s dictionary of American idioms and phrasal verbs. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.Search in Google Scholar

White, James Gordon. 1998. Cambridge international dictionary of idioms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-06-08
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2019-0017/html
Scroll to top button