The probability of external causation: An empirical account of crosslinguistic variation in lexical causatives

References

Aboh, Enoch. 2009. Clause structure and verb series. Linguistic Inquiry 40(1). 1–33.10.1162/ling.2009.40.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2006. On (anti-)causative alternations. Paper presented at Ecole d’automne de linguistique, Paris: University of Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2010. On the morpho-syntax of (anti-)causative verbs. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics and event structure, 177–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. The problem with internally caused change-of-state verbs. Linguistics 52(4). 879–909.10.1515/ling-2014-0011Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 187–212. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197723.4.187Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach (Oxford studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron. 2012. The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48. 1–34.10.1017/S0022226711000338Search in Google Scholar

Alsina, Alex. 1997. A theory of complex predicates: Evidence from causatives in Bantu and Romance. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 203–247. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baroni, Marco & Silvia Bernardini. 2006. A new approach to the study of translationese: Machine-learning the difference between original and translated text. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21(3). 259–274.10.1093/llc/fqi039Search in Google Scholar

Bouma, Gerlof, Lilja Øvrelid & Jonas Kuhn. 2010. Towards a large parallel corpus of cleft constructions. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), Valletta: European Language Resources Association.Search in Google Scholar

Bowerman, Melissa & William Croft. 2008. The acquisition of the English causative alternation. In Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds.), Crosslinguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, 279–306. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 22–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 1997. Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 461–497.Search in Google Scholar

Dempster, Arthur P., Nan M. Laird & Donald B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39(1). 1–38.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. WALS online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Ken & Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical representation of syntactic relations. In Ken Hale & Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, 53–110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, vol. 23, 87–121. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSearch in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33.10.1515/COG.2008.001Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Elif Bamyac. 2014. Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: A form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50(3). 587–625.10.1017/S0022226714000255Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1986. A comparative typology of English and German: Unifying the contrasts. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Heidinger, Steffen. 2015. Causalness and the encoding of the causative–Anticausative alternation in French and Spanish. Journal of Linguistics 51(3). 562–594.10.1017/S0022226714000607Search in Google Scholar

Horvath, Julia & Tal Siloni. 2011. Anticausatives: Against reflexivization. Lingua 121. 2176–2186.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Kallulli, Dalina. 2006. A unified analysis of passives, anticausatives and reflexives. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics, 271–301. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 2005. Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. In Giglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 3–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Koehn, Philipp. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the tenth Machine Translation Summit, 79–86. Phuket: Asia-Pacific Association for Machine Translation.Search in Google Scholar

Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(1). 77–138.10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 2009. Further explorations of the landscape of causation: Comments on the paper by Alexiadou and Anagnostopoulou. In Proceedings of the workshop on Greek syntax and semantics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49), 239–266. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1994. A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English. Lingua 92. 35–77.10.1016/0024-3841(94)90337-9Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2013. Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Boban Arsenijević, Berit Gehrke & Rafael Marín (eds.), Subatomic semantics of event predicates, 49–70. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5983-1_3Search in Google Scholar

Marelj, Marijana. 2004. Middles and argument structure across languages. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Merlo, Paola & Susanne Stevenson. 2001. Automatic verb classification based on statistical distribution of argument structure. Computational Linguistics 27(3). 373–408.10.1162/089120101317066122Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, David Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8. 149–212.10.1515/lity.2004.005Search in Google Scholar

Nivre, Joakim, Johan Hall, Jens Nilsson, Chanev Atanas, Gülsen Eryigit, Sandra Kübler, Svetoslav Marinov & Erwin Marsi. 2007. MaltParser: A language-independent system for data-driven dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering 13(2). 95–135.10.1017/S1351324906004505Search in Google Scholar

Och, Franz Josef & Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Computational Linguistics 29(1). 19–52.10.1162/089120103321337421Search in Google Scholar

Pado, Sebastian. 2007. Cross-lingual annotation projection models for role-semantic information. Saarbrücken: University of the Saarland dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Martha, Daniel Gildea & Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics 31(1). 71–105.10.1162/0891201053630264Search in Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher. 2001. A finer look at the causative-inchoative alternation. In Brendan Jackson, Rachel Hastings & Zsofia Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory, vol. 11, 346–364. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v11i0.2858Search in Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2014. Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua 141. 8–29.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2012. Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Mareli & Tal Siloni (eds.), The theta system, 150–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602513.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system – An overview. Theoretical linguistics 28. 229–290.10.1515/thli.28.3.229Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni. 2004. Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Studies on the syntax-lexicon interface, 159–181. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Stuart J. & Peter Norvig. 2010. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Samardžić, Tanja & Paola Merlo. 2010. Cross-linguistic variation of light verb constructions: Using parallel corpora and automatic alignment for linguistic research. In Proceedings of the workshop of the ACL workshop NLP and Linguistics: finding the common ground, 52–60. Uppsala: Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Samardžić, Tanja & Paola Merlo. 2012. The meaning of lexical causatives in cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 7(12). 1–14.10.33011/lilt.v7i.1281Search in Google Scholar

Samardžić, Tanja & Paola Merlo. 2014. Likelihood of external causation in the structure of events. In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on Computational Approaches to Causality in Language, 40–47. Gothenburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.3115/v1/W14-0706Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.126Search in Google Scholar

Schäfer, Florian. 2009. The causative alternation. In Language and linguistics compass, 3(2), 641–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00127.x10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00127.xSearch in Google Scholar

Stevenson, Suzanne & Paola Merlo. 1997. Lexical structure and parsing complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 12(2/3). 349–399.10.1080/016909697386880Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1997. Lexical and syntactic complex predicates. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 13–29. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Phillip, Ga-Hyun Jeon & Yu Li. 2009a. Causal agents in English, Korean and Chinese: The role of internal and external causation. Language and Cognition 12(2). 165–194.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Phillip & Tatyana Ventura. 2009b. When Russians learn English: How the semantics of causation may change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(2). 153–176.10.1017/S1366728909004040Search in Google Scholar