Permission and obligation intertwined: The twofold modal meaning of the Finnish jussive from a discourse perspective

References

van der Auwera, Johan, Nina Dobrushina & Valentin Goussev. 2004. A semantic map for imperative-hortatives. In Dominique Willems, Bart Defrancq, Timothy Colleman & Dirk Noel (eds.), Contrastive analysis in language: Identifying linguistic units of comparison, 44–68. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230524637_3Search in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, Petar Kehayov & Alice Vittrant. 2009. Acquisitive modals. In Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Cross-linguistics semantics of tense, aspect, and modality, 271–302. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.148.11auwSearch in Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2. 79–124.10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79Search in Google Scholar

Birjulin, Leonid A. & Viktor S. Xrakovskij. 2001. Imperative sentences: Theoretical problems. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of imperative constructions (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 9), 3–50. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110219036Search in Google Scholar

Breu, Walter. 2010. Mood in Albanian. In Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe, 447–472. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.120.25breSearch in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 1990. Tense and mood in English: A comparison with Danish. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110860184Search in Google Scholar

Duvallon, Outi & Rea Peltola. 2013. Konsessiiviset vaikka-lausumat: Virtuaalisesta faktuaaliseen [Concessive vaikka clauses: From the virtual to the factual]. Virittäjä 177. 317–345.Search in Google Scholar

Duvallon, Outi & Rea Peltola. 2014. Les énoncés concessifs en finnois: Hypothèse sur le passage du virtuel au réel. In Catherine Moreau, Jean Albrespit & Frédéric Lambert (eds.), Du réel à l’irréel 1: Diversité des langues et représentations métalinguistiques (Travaux linguistiques du CerLiCO 25), 207–226. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Search in Google Scholar

Egan, Thomas. 2012. Analytic permissives in Present-day English. In Jaakko Leino & Ruprecht von Waldenfels (eds.), Analytical causatives: From ‘give’ and ‘come’ to ‘let’ and ‘make’ (LINCOM Studies in Language Typology 24), 65–104. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Erelt, Mati & Helle Metslang. 2004. Grammar and pragmatics: Changes in the paradigm of the Estonian imperative. Linguistica Uralica 40. 161–178.10.3176/lu.2004.3.01Search in Google Scholar

Forsberg, Hannele. 1998. Suomen murteiden potentiaali: Muoto ja merkitys [The potential mood in Finnish dialects: Form and function]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Forsberg, Hannele. forthcoming. Imperatiivi kannanottona: Varoituksesta paheksuntaan [The imperative as stance-taking: From warning to disapproval]. In Markku Haakana & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), Tunteet käytössä: Tutkimuksia kielenkäytön affektiivisuudesta [Emotions in use: Studies on affectivity in language use]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Fortuin, Egbert. 2005. From necessity to possibility: The modal spectrum of the dative-infinitive construction in Russian. In Björn Hansen & Petr Karlík (eds.), Modality in Slavonic languages: New perspectives, 39–60. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Search in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 1993. Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4. 223–272.10.1515/cogl.1993.4.3.223Search in Google Scholar

Gosselin, Laurent. 2005. Temporalité et modalité. Bruxelles: Duculot.10.3917/dbu.gosse.2005.01Search in Google Scholar

Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [Comprehensive Finnish Grammar]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. http://scripta.kotus.fi/visk/etusivu.php (accessed 3 June 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Hans-Bianchi, Barbara. 2012. The causative construction in Early New High German: The hidden link between semantics and grammaticalisation. In Jaakko Leino & Ruprecht von Waldenfels (eds.), Analytical causatives: From ‘give’ and ‘come’ to ‘let’ and ‘make’ (LINCOM Studies in Language Typology 24), 125–160. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Vol. II, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König. 1998. Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 563–640. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610.563Search in Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 2009. Modals in Turkic. In Björn Hansen & Ferdinand de Haan (eds.), Modals in the languages of Europe, 487–510. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kauppinen, Anneli. 1998. Puhekuviot, tilanteen ja rakenteen liitto: Tutkimus kielen omaksumisesta ja suomen konditionaalista [Figures of speech, the union of situation and structure: Study of language acquisition and the Finnish conditional]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Kehayov, Petar & Reeli Torn-Leesik. 2009. Modal verbs in Balto-Finnic. In Björn Hansen & Ferdinand de Haan (eds.), Modals in the languages of Europe, 363–401. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard. 1986. Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: Areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Aliceter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), On conditionals, 229–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753466.013Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, Lea. 1988. Pitääkö vai saako – modaaliverbin kaksoissidos [Modal verb in a double bind]. Virittäjä 92. 57–83.Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, Lea. 1992. Välttämättömyys ja persoona: Suomen murteiden nesessiivisten rakenteiden semantiikkaa ja kielioppia [Necessity and person: The semantics and grammar of necessitative structures in Finnish dialects]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, Lea. 2006. Zero person in Finnish: A grammatical resource for construing human reference. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Lyle Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the human perspective: Case, space and person in Finnish, 209–231. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.277.15laiSearch in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1987 [1971]. Meaning and the English verb, 2nd edn. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Lehtinen, Tapani. 2007. Kielen vuosituhannet: Suomen kielen kehitys kantauralista varhaissuomeen [The millenia of a language: The evolution of Finnish from Proto-Uralic to Early Finnish]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Leino, Jaakko. 2003. Antaa sen muuttua: Suomen kielen permissiivirakenne ja sen kehitys [Let it change: The Finnish permissive construction and its history]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Leino, Jaakko. 2005. Frames, profiles and constructions: Two collaborating CGs meet the Finnish Permissive Construction. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 89–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.3.05leiSearch in Google Scholar

Leino, Jaakko. 2012. Analytical expressions for permissive causation in Finnish. In Jaakko Leino & Ruprecht von Waldenfels (eds.), Analytical causatives: From ‘give’ and ‘come’ to ‘let’ and ‘make’ (LINCOM Studies in Language Typology 24), 221–245. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Leipzig Glossing Rules. 2015. Department of Linguistics of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Linguistics of the University of Leipzig. http://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php (accessed 3 June 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Leskinen, Heikki. 1970. Imperatiivin muodostus itämerensuomalaisissa kielissä 1: suomi (Forming the imperative in the Balto-Fennic languages 1: Finnish). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Lindstedt, Jouko. 2010. Mood in Bulgarian and Macedonian. In Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe, 409–421. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.120.23linSearch in Google Scholar

Linell, Per. 2012. On the nature of language: Formal written-language-biased linguistics vs. dialogical language sciences. In Alexander Kravchenko (ed.), Cognitive dynamics in linguistic interactions, 107–124. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Makkonen-Craig, Henna. 2011. Connecting with the reader: Participant-oriented metadiscourse in newspaper texts. Text & Talk 31. 683–704.10.1515/text.2011.033Search in Google Scholar

Malygina, Ljudmila V. 2001. Imperative sentences in Modern Hebrew. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of imperative constructions (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 9), 268–286. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Metslang, Helle & Maria-Maren Sepper. 2010. Mood in Estonian. In Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe, 528–550. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.120.29metSearch in Google Scholar

Nasilov, Dmitrij M., Xoršid F. Isxakova, Šaxrijor S. Safarov & Irina A. Nevskaja. 2001. Imperative sentences in Turkic languages. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of imperative constructions (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 9), 181–220. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan. 2005. Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In William Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 1–26. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197570.1Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo & Janneke Diepeveen. 2005. On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: A case study of Dutch mogen and moeten (Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 110). Department of Linguistics, University of Antwerp. http://uahost.uantwerpen.be/apil/apil110/apil110.pdf (accessed 3 June 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Ogloblin, Alexander K. 2001. Imperative sentences in Javanese. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of imperative constructions (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 9), 221–242. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139167178Search in Google Scholar

Peltola, Rea. 2011. Cohésion modale et subordination: Le conditionnel et le jussif finnois au miroir de la valeur sémantique et discursive du subjonctif français. University of Helsinki, Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies dissertation. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-7376-2 (accessed 3 June 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Radden, Günter & René Dirven. 2007. Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/clip.2Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Scholze, Lenka. 2010. Mood in Sorbian. In Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe, 376–393. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.120.21schSearch in Google Scholar

Seppänen, Eeva-Leena. 1998. Läsnäolon pronominit: Tämä, tuo, se ja hän viittaamassa keskustelun osallistujaan [The pronouns of presence: tämä, tuo, se and hän in reference to participants in conversation]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Search in Google Scholar

Souesme, Jean-Claude. 2009. MAY in concessive contexts. In Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Modality in English: Theory and description, 159–176. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213331.159Search in Google Scholar

Spatar, Natalia M. 2001. Imperative constructions in Cambodian. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of imperative constructions (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 9), 475–484. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, Mario. 2010. Mood in Italian. In Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe, 237–250. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.120.13squSearch in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12. 49–100.10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2Search in Google Scholar

Thieroff, Rolf. 2010. Moods, moods, moods. In Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe, 1–29. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.120Search in Google Scholar

Tommola, Hannu. 2010. Mood in Finnish. In Björn Rothstein & Rolf Thieroff (eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe, 511–527. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.120.28tomSearch in Google Scholar

Tragel, Ilona & Külli Habicht. 2012. Grammaticalization of Estonian saama ‘to get’. Linguistics 50. 1371–1412.10.1515/ling-2012-0043Search in Google Scholar

Tuggy, David. 1993. Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4. 273–290.10.1515/cogl.1993.4.3.273Search in Google Scholar

Vaxtin, Nikolaj B. 2001. Imperative sentences in Asiatic Eskimo. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typology of imperative constructions (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 9), 129–144. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Viberg, Åke. 2012. Language-specific meanings in contrast: A corpus-based contrastive study of Swedish få ‘get’. Linguistics 50. 1413–1461.10.1515/ling-2012-0044Search in Google Scholar

von Waldenfels, Ruprecht. 2012. Finnish antaa and Russian davat’ ‘to give’ as causatives: a contrastive analysis. In Jaakko Leino & Ruprecht von Waldenfels (eds.), Analytical causatives: From ‘give’ and ‘come’ to ‘let’ and ‘make’ (LINCOM Studies in Language Typology 24), 187–220. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1951. Deontic logic. Mind 60. 1–15.10.4324/9781315823027-4Search in Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 1999. Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.46Search in Google Scholar