Home Dogon adjective-numeral inversion
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dogon adjective-numeral inversion

  • Jeffrey Heath EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 6, 2016

Abstract

In several Dogon languages, the ordering of simple N-Adj-Num DPs is strict. Adjectives and numerals also differ from each other in morphology and tonosyntax. When an inversion licensor (usually a reference restrictor) is addèd, N-Adj-Num is optionally inverted to N-Num-Adj. Pronominal possessors are also subject to reordering in some of the languages. The order of two adjectives in N-Adj1-Adj2 is free, so a syntactically conditioned stem-class merger between numerals, adjectives, and pronominal possessors would account for optional inverted orderings. However, morphological and tonosyntactic processes follow inversion and are sensitive to stem-class categories, showing that inversion cannot be postsyntactic. This suggests that the relevant word-classes belong to a supercategory medial modifier that is activated in linearization by an inversion licensor, but is disregarded by morphology and tonosyntax. Typological comparisons, e.g. to Slavic numerals, are superficial, so the approach here is micro-typological, focusing on variations within a broadly shared family-specific system.

References

Anderson, Stephen. 2005. Aspects of the theory of clitics (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 11). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2010. Adjectives: An introduction. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Ora Matushansky (eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, 1–26. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.153Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 1978. Problems in the syntax of Slavonic numerals. The Slavonic and East European Review 56(1). 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Culy, Christopher. 1990. Grammatical relations and verb forms in internally headed relative clauses. In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick Farrell & Errapel Mejias-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical relations: A cross-theoretical perspective, 83–93. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 2011. Cambodian (Khmer) (London Oriental and African Language Library 16.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.16Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 2008. A grammar of Jamsay (Mouton Grammar Library 45). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207224Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. forthcoming. Dogon noncompositional constructional tonosyntax. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey & Laura McPherson. 2013. Tonosyntax and reference restriction in Dogon NPs. Language 89(2). 265–296.10.1353/lan.2013.0020Search in Google Scholar

Matthewson, Lisa. 2013. Strategies of quantification in St’at’imcets and the rest of the world. In Kook-Hee Gil, Steve Harlow & George Tsoulas (eds.), Strategies of quantification (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 44.), 15–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692439.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

McPherson, Laura. 2013. A grammar of Tommo So. (Mouton Grammar Library 62.) Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/eegSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-1-6
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2015-0040/html
Scroll to top button