Abstract
As rural entrepreneurs in China are disadvantaged, compared to other entrepreneurs, the local and central governments provide a host of incentives to promote their success. Rural entrepreneurs are information poor and it is possible that their information behaviors differ from others, causing them to lag behind. The study aims to develop a framework of information inequality among rural entrepreneurs in China, based on the information capability approach. Grounded in thematic content analysis of 44 interviews with these entrepreneurs about their information behaviors, the study proposes a comprehensive framework for understanding information inequality among rural Chinese entrepreneurs. The framework includes two components: 1) eight major information functionings, where information inequality occurs; and 2) three factors that affect information functioning. By focusing on information functionings, and specifically effective information use, the framework allows for a more nuanced understanding of information inequality. Findings suggest that ICTs adoption is not the decisive factor in information functionings, and instead finds blurred boundaries between online and offline information functionings. As such, the study proposes to avoid technological determinism in understanding the impact of ICTs on information inequality, and instead uses social informatics lenses to account for both online and offline information functionings in this context.
Funding source: National Social Sciences Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 20BTQ077
Acknowledgments
The Social Sciences Foundation of China Project No. 20BTQ077 supports this study. We offer sincere thanks to student interviewers from Nankai University and participants from different provinces in mainland China in the long-term field study. We are also grateful for scholars’ intellectual support and encouragement at the Rob Kling Center for Social Informatics at Indiana University, Bloomington.
References
Aday, L. A. 1994. “Health Status of Vulnerable Populations.” Annual Review of Public Health 15 (1): 487–509, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.002415.Suche in Google Scholar
Allen, J. P. 2017. Technology and Inequality: Concentrated Wealth in a Digital World. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56958-1.Suche in Google Scholar
Álvarez, A. M. O., M. T. G. Merino, and M. V. S. Álvarez. 2015. “Information: The Source of Entrepreneurial Activity.” Social Science Information 54 (3): 280–98.10.1177/0539018415580879Suche in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2008. “The Forms of Capital.” In Readings in Economic Sociology, 280–91. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.10.1002/9780470755679.ch15Suche in Google Scholar
Brandtzaeg, P. B., J. Heim, and A. Karahasanović. 2011. “Understanding the New Digital Divide: A Typology of Internet Users in Europe.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69 (3): 123–38.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.11.004Suche in Google Scholar
Britz, J. J. 2004. “To Know or Not to Know: A Moral Reflection on Information Poverty.” Journal of Information Science 30 (3): 192–204, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504044666.Suche in Google Scholar
Bure, C. 2006. “Digital Inclusion without Social Inclusion: The Consumption of ICTs within Homeless Subculture in Scotland.” Journal of Community Informatics 1 (2): 116–33.10.15353/joci.v2i2.2078Suche in Google Scholar
Chatman, E. A. 1987. “The Information World of Low-Skilled Workers.” Library & Information Science Research 9 (4): 265–83.Suche in Google Scholar
Childers, T., and J. A. Post. 1975. The Information-Poor in America. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Cui, H., and F. Zheng. 2014. A Theoretical and Empirical Study on the Entrepreneurial Behavior of Migrant Workers in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. https://doi.org/10.1190/igcbeijing2014-152.Suche in Google Scholar
Farias, M. G. G., A. V. Varela, and I. M. Freire. 2013. “Information Mediation for Social Inclusion in a Poor Urban Community in Brazil.” Libri 63 (3): 179–89.10.1515/libri-2013-0014Suche in Google Scholar
Fichman, P., and M. R. Sanfilippo. 2013. “Multiculturalism and Information and Communication Technology.” Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 5 (5): 1–101, https://doi.org/10.2200/s00543ed1v01y201310icr030.Suche in Google Scholar
Fichman, P., M. R. Sanfilippo, and H. Rosenbaum. 2015. “Social Informatics Evolving.” Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 7 (5): 1–108, https://doi.org/10.2200/s00668ed1v01y201509icr046.Suche in Google Scholar
Galtrud, Å. G., and K. Byström. 2020. “Information-rich, but Time-Poor: Exploring Members of Parliament’s Approaches to Information by Chatman’s ‘Small World’ Conception.” Journal of Documentation 76 (2): 409–23.10.1108/JD-03-2019-0057Suche in Google Scholar
Gibson, A. N., and J. D. Martin. 2019. “Re-situating Information Poverty: Information Marginalization and Parents of Individuals with Disabilities.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 70 (5): 476–87, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24128.Suche in Google Scholar
Gladkova, A., and M. Ragnedda. 2020. “Exploring Digital Inequalities in Russia: An Interregional Comparative Analysis.” Online Information Review 44 (4): 767–86, https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-04-2019-0121.Suche in Google Scholar
Goldfarb, A., and J. Prince. 2008. “Internet Adoption and Usage Patterns Are Different: Implications for the Digital Divide.” Information Economics and Policy 20 (1): 2–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.05.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Goulding, A. 2001. “Information Poverty or Overload?” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 33 (3): 109–11, https://doi.org/10.1177/096100060103300301.Suche in Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. T., and F. Morgan. 2018. “Poor Information: How Economics Affects the Information Lives of Low-Income Individuals.” International Journal of Communication 12: 2832–50.Suche in Google Scholar
Hanson, E. C. 2004. “Globalization, Inequality and the Internet in India.” In The Political Economy of the Internet in Asia and the Pacific: Digital Divides, Economic Competitiveness, and Security Challenges, edited by J. Abbott. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar
Hasler, L., I. Ruthven, and S. Buchanan. 2014. “Using Internet Groups in Situations of Information Poverty: Topics and Information Needs.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (1): 25–36, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22962.Suche in Google Scholar
Haywood, T. 1995. Information Rich - Information Poor: Access and Exchange in the Global Information Society. London: Bowker-Saur.Suche in Google Scholar
Helsper, E. J. 2012. “A Corresponding Fields Model for the Links between Social and Digital Exclusion.” Communication Theory 22 (4): 403–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Hsieh, P.-A., A. Rai, and M. Keil. 2008. “Understanding Digital Inequality: Comparing Continued Use Behavioral Models of the Socio-Economically Advantaged and Disadvantages.” MIS Quarterly 32 (1): 97–126, https://doi.org/10.2307/25148830.Suche in Google Scholar
Jaeger, P. T., and G. Burnett. 2010. Information Worlds: Behavior, Technology, and Social Context in the Age of the Internet. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851630.Suche in Google Scholar
Jiao, H., Y. Cui, Y. Zhu, and J. Chen. 2014. “Building Entrepreneurs’ Innovativeness through Knowledge Management: The Mediating Effect of Entrepreneurial Alertness.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26 (5): 501–16, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.872774.Suche in Google Scholar
Karimi, S., H. J. A. Biemans, T. Lans, M. Chizari, and M. Mulder. 2016. “The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education: A Study of Iranian Students’ Entrepreneurial Intentions and Opportunity Identification.” Journal of Small Business Management 54 (1): 187–209, https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12137.Suche in Google Scholar
Kleine, D. 2013. Technologies of Choice? ICTs, Development, and the Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9061.001.0001.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuklys, W. 2005. Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. New York: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar
Lingel, J., and D. Boyd. 2014. “Keep it Secret, Keep it Safe: Information Poverty, Information Norms, and Stigma.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (5): 981–91.10.1002/asi.22800Suche in Google Scholar
Longley, P., R. Webber, and C. Li. 2006. The UK Geography of the E-Society: A National Classification. (CASA Working Paper Series 111). London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis University College London.Suche in Google Scholar
Marcella, R., and G. Chowdhury. 2018. “Eradicating Information Poverty: An Agenda for Research.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 52 (2): 366–81, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618804589.Suche in Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Morgan, B. 2010. “New Literacies in the Classroom: Digital Capital, Student Identity, and Third Space.” International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society 6 (2): 221–39, https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/v06i02/56094.Suche in Google Scholar
Mosco, V., and J. Wasko. 1988. The Political Economy of Information. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Park, S. 2017. Digital Capital. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59332-0.Suche in Google Scholar
Potnis, D. D. 2015. “Beyond Access to Information: Understanding the Use of Information by Poor Female Mobile Users in Rural India.” The Insformation Society 31 (1): 83–93, https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.976687.Suche in Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Suh, M., and G. Hsieh. 2019. “The “had Mores”: Exploring Korean Immigrants’ Information Behavior and ICT Usage When Settling in the United States.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 70 (1): 38–48, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24078.Suche in Google Scholar
Sweetland, J. H. 1993. “Information Poverty.” Database Magazine 16, (4): 8–10.Suche in Google Scholar
Tondeur, J., I. Sinnaeve, M. van Houtte, and J. van Braak. 2011. “ICT as Cultural Capital: The Relationship between Socio-Economic Status and the Computer-Use Profile of Young People.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 151–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810369245.Suche in Google Scholar
Turner, T. C., M. A. Smith, D. Fisher, and H. T. Welser. 2005. “Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10: 4, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00270.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Unwin, T. 2017. Reclaiming Information and Communication Technologies for Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795292.001.0001.Suche in Google Scholar
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. 1997. Universal Service from the Perspective of Consumers and Citizens: Report to the Information Society Forum. Brussels: European Commission/ISPO7.Suche in Google Scholar
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. 2000. “Widening Information Gaps and Policies of Prevention.” In Digital Democracy. Issues of Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446218891.n10Suche in Google Scholar
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. 2013. “A Theory of the Digital Divide.” In The Digital Divide: The Internet and Social Inequality in International Perspective, edited by M. Ragnedda, and G. W. Muschert, 49–72. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203069769-10Suche in Google Scholar
Walsham, G. 2012. “Are We Making a Better World with ICTs? Reflections on a Future Agenda for the IS Field.” Journal of Information Technology 27 (2): 87–93, https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2012.4.Suche in Google Scholar
Warren, M. 2007. “The Digital Vicious Cycle: Links between Social Disadvantage and Digital Exclusion in Rural Areas.” Telecommunications Policy 31 (6–7): 374–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. 2003. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Watkins, S. C., A. Lombana-Bermudez, A. Cho, V. Shaw, J. R. Vickery, and L. Weinzimmer. 2018. The Digital Edge: How Black and Latino Youth Navigate Digital Inequality. New York: New York University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Watling, S. 2011. “Digital Exclusion: Coming Out from behind Closed Doors.” Disability & Society 26 (4): 491–5, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2011.567802.Suche in Google Scholar
Wei, K.-K., H.-H. Teo, H. C. Chan, and B. C. Y. Tan. 2011. “Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide.” Information Systems Research 22 (1): 170–87, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0273.Suche in Google Scholar
Witte, J. C., and S. E. Mannon. 2010. The Internet and Social Inequalities. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861639.Suche in Google Scholar
Yan, H., W. Zhou, and S. Han. 2013. “Social Capital, Digital Inequality, and a Global Community Informatics Project in Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, Gansu Province.” Library Trends 62 (1): 234–60, https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2013.0031.Suche in Google Scholar
Yu, L. 2006. “Understanding Information Inequality: Making Sense of the Literature of the Information and Digital Divide.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 38 (4): 229–52, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000606070600.Suche in Google Scholar
Yu, L. 2010. “How Poor Informationally are the Information Poor? Evidence from an Empirical Study of Daily and Regular Information Practices of Individuals.” Journal of Documentation 66 (6): 906–33, https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011087869.Suche in Google Scholar
Yu, L. 2011. “The Divided Views of the Information and Digital Divides: A Call for Integrative Theories of Information Inequality.” Journal of Information Science 37 (6): 660–79, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551511426246.Suche in Google Scholar
Yu, L. 2012. “Towards a Reconceptualization of the Information Worlds of Individuals.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 44 (1): 3–18, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611424586.Suche in Google Scholar
Yu, T.-K., M.-L. Lin, and Y.-K. Liao. 2017. “Understanding Factors Influencing ICT Adoption Behavior: The Moderators of Information Literacy and Digital Skills.” Computers in Human Behavior 71: 196–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Zenebe, A., F. M. Alsaaty, and D. Anyiwo. 2018. “Relationship between Individual’s Entrepreneurship Intention, and Adoption and Knowledge of Information Technology and its Applications: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship 30 (3): 215–32, https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2017.1397441.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Y. Zhang, M. Cheng, N. Yu, X. Wei, and Z. Zhang. 2019. “Impact of Information Access on Poverty Alleviation Effectiveness: Evidence from China.” IEEE Access 7: 149013–25, https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2946652.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Cognitive Authority as an Instance of Informational and Expert Power
- Technological Readiness and Computer Self-efficacy as Predictors of E-learning Adoption by LIS Students in Nigeria
- Information Inequality among Entrepreneurs in Rural China
- Fostering Knowledge Sharing Behavior Among Pakistani Engineering Students: Role of Individual and Classroom Related Factors
- Digital Literacy of EFL Students: An Empirical Study in Vietnamese Universities
- Desired Affordances of Scholarly E-Articles: Views from Scholars Based on Open-Ended Answers
- Dostoevsky and the Word “Jew”: A Quantitative Analysis of F.M. Dostoevsky’s Greatest Novels
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Cognitive Authority as an Instance of Informational and Expert Power
- Technological Readiness and Computer Self-efficacy as Predictors of E-learning Adoption by LIS Students in Nigeria
- Information Inequality among Entrepreneurs in Rural China
- Fostering Knowledge Sharing Behavior Among Pakistani Engineering Students: Role of Individual and Classroom Related Factors
- Digital Literacy of EFL Students: An Empirical Study in Vietnamese Universities
- Desired Affordances of Scholarly E-Articles: Views from Scholars Based on Open-Ended Answers
- Dostoevsky and the Word “Jew”: A Quantitative Analysis of F.M. Dostoevsky’s Greatest Novels