Home The (mis)use of development in international investment law: understanding the jurist’s limits to work with development issues
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The (mis)use of development in international investment law: understanding the jurist’s limits to work with development issues

  • Nitish Monebhurrun EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 29, 2017

Abstract

The decolonization period was characterized by the adoption of investment protection agreements with the objective of serving the purposes of both transnational corporations and newly decolonized States. These agreements are primarily meant to protect private international investments and, incidentally, they have been presented as instruments of development: protecting international investments to foster development. Many newly decolonized States signed and ratified such treaties with the aim of attracting foreign investors – but also to maintain existing ones; what was expected in return was a contribution to their development. This article studies the legal relationship which consequently exists between international investment law and development, but at the same time, it highlights the flagrant misuse of the concept of development in practice. In this law field, both the Global North and the Global South tend to envision development in a way which is deprived of all technical and scientific grounds. The paper firstly explains how the objective of development, rooted in such investment agreements, acquired a legal function. Bilateral investment agreements were a means to forge newly decolonized States’ expectations and belief concerning the paramount necessity to protect foreign investments so as to benefit in terms of development. In the international investment legal practice, the contribution to the host State’s development by the foreign investor has been frequently used as a criterion to identify an investment: to be protected by an investment agreement any activity must necessarily be identified as an investment. As the latter knows no definition some tribunals have considered that one of the criteria to identify an investment is a contribution to the development of the host State by the potential investor. Theoretically, this seems to consider the interests of developing States in their relationship with transnational corporations. However, and this is the second point, development has itself never really been defined – and still is not in this law field. It is hence used and applied as an undefined concept. Development is in fact referred to as an image, as a symbol, but never in its technical aspects. Accordingly, such reference made to the concept of development in international investment law is far from convincing and forges skepticism on its intrinsic necessity and use. In this vein, it raises the thorny question of the jurist’s technical competence to assess what development is and how it can – technically – be used in law.

Published Online: 2017-7-29
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction
  3. Law and Development as a Field of Study: Connecting Law with Development
  4. Development and the Rule of Law
  5. Human Rights for Women in Liberia (and West Africa): Integrating Formal and Informal Rule of Law Reforms through the Carter Center’s Community Justice Advisor Project
  6. Overcoming Extreme Poverty by Social Protection Floors – Approaches to Closing the Right to Social Security Gap
  7. Profit, Persuasion, and Fidelity: Why People Follow the Rule of Law
  8. Justice and the Common Good in Dispute Resolution Discourse in the United States and the People’s Republic of China
  9. Developmental State
  10. The Power to Judge, the Power to Act: the Argentine Supreme Court as a Policymaker
  11. Developmental State No Birth Right: South Africa’s Post-1994 Economic Development Story
  12. Development and Environment
  13. Multilateral Development Banks and Sustainable Development: On Emulation, Fragmentation and a Common Law of Sustainable Development
  14. Environmental Degradation and Economic Development in China: An Interrelated Governance Challenge
  15. Trade, Investment, and Regional Integration
  16. The (mis)use of development in international investment law: understanding the jurist’s limits to work with development issues
  17. Corruption and Development
  18. Creating an anti-corruption norm in Africa: Critical reflections on legal instrumentalization for development
  19. Clientelism, Law and Politics. Considerations in the Light of the Argentine Case
  20. Rising Issues
  21. The Role of Copyright in Creative Industry Development
  22. Foreign Aid Reciprocity Agreements: Committing Developing Countries to Improve the Effectiveness of Aid When They Become Donors
  23. Helping Working Children through Consumocratic LawA Global South Perspective
  24. Book Review
  25. Sung-Hee Jwa: A General Theory of Economic Development: Towards a Capitalist Manifesto – A Critical Review
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ldr-2017-0021/html
Scroll to top button