Abstract
In this work, a neutronic analysis estimation of a Multi-Application Small Light Water Reactor (MASLWR) core with the minimum possible modifications in the geometry will be presented. In this study, many cases are investigated, in the first case the reactor core is fuelled by uranium with enrichment 4.95 %. For the second case the reactor core is fuelled by uranium with enrichment 4.95 % and a mixture of 50 % uranium and 50 % thorium. For this case, five different core distributions are modeled. For the third case, a seed and blanket design is investigated where the middle positions of each assembly are fuelled with 4.95 % enriched UO2 while the boundary positions are fuelled once with 50 % ThO2 + 4.95 % enriched UO2 and second with 30 % ThO2 + 4.95 % enriched UO2. MCNP6 code has been used to calculate neutronic parameters such as effective multiplication coefficient (Keff), cycle length for reactor core, the nuclear fuel evolution during the burnup, total neutron flux, kinetic parameters such as delayed neutrons fraction and prompt neutron lifetime and finally, the power peaking factor of the MASLWR different cores. The results show that the utilization of thorium fuel improves the overall performance characteristics of the MASLWR without burnable poisons. The results are compared with the uranium core enrichment 4.95 %. All thorium cases have better conversion and longer reactor cycle and higher fuel burn-up, and the most attractive feature is its resistance to nuclear proliferation.
-
Research ethics: This work is original and has not been published elsewhere.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The authors have the all contribution in this research paper.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: There are no conflicts of interest associated with this work.
-
Research funding: No funding.
-
Data availability: Data available on request.
References
Akbari, R., Maiorino, J.R., D’Auria, F., and Rezaei, D. (2018). Conversion of small modular reactors fuel to use mixed (UTh)O2 fuel. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the Croatian nuclear society Zadar, Croatia, 3-6 June 2018 Paper No. 110.Search in Google Scholar
Akbari-Jeyhouni, R., Ochbelagh, D.R., Maiorino, J.R., D’Auria, F., and Laranjo de Stefani, G. (2018). The utilization of thorium in small modular reactors –part I: neutronic assessment. Ann. Nucl. Energy 120: 422–430, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.06.013.Search in Google Scholar
Ali, A.M.M., Abou-Gabal, H.H., Mohamed, N.M.A., and Elshahat, A.E. (2021). Study of the effects of moderators on the accelerator-driven sub-critical system performance. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 195: 509–519, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1839248.Search in Google Scholar
IAEA (2007). Status of small reactor designs without on-Site refueling, IAEA-TECDOC-1536. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1536_web.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Maiorino, J.R., D’Auria, F., Laranjo de Stefani, G., and Akbari-Jeyhouni, R. (2018). The utilization of thorium in advanced PWR – from small to big reactors. In: Proceedings of innovative designs and technologies of nuclear power V ISTC NIKIET – 2018, at October 2–5, 2018, Moscow.Search in Google Scholar
Soldatov, A. and Palmer, T.S. (2011). A five-year core for a small modular light water reactor. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 167: 77–90, https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE09-39.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston