Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
On the Necessity of Beauty
-
Linda Palmer
Published/Copyright:
September 5, 2011
Abstract
In the Critique of Judgment Kant argues that we may assume a certain ‘common inner sense’ on pain of skepticism. I present an interpretation of this argument, which holds that its skeptical threat involves the threat of a regress for judgment, that it argues for a principle underlying both empirical cognition and judgments of beauty, and that no ‘everything is beautiful problem’ results. This principle is essentially ‘epistemologically normative’ rather than moral, although in the end the moral raises its head. Kant's account is important not only for his aesthetic theory but for his theory of empirical cognition.
Published Online: 2011-09-05
Published in Print: 2011-September
© Walter de Gruyter 2011
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- The Paradox of Infinite Given Magnitude: Why Kantian Epistemology Needs Metaphysical Space
- The Development and Scope of Kantian Belief: The Highest Good, The Practical Postulates and The Fact of Reason
- On the Priority of the Right to the Good
- Verdinglichung und Menschenwürde. Kants Eherecht und das Recht der häuslichen Gemeinschaft
- On the Necessity of Beauty
- Kants Modell kausaler Beziehungen. Zu Watkins' Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality
- Placing Ugliness in Kant's Third Critique: A Reply to Paul Guyer
- Buchbesprechungen
Articles in the same Issue
- The Paradox of Infinite Given Magnitude: Why Kantian Epistemology Needs Metaphysical Space
- The Development and Scope of Kantian Belief: The Highest Good, The Practical Postulates and The Fact of Reason
- On the Priority of the Right to the Good
- Verdinglichung und Menschenwürde. Kants Eherecht und das Recht der häuslichen Gemeinschaft
- On the Necessity of Beauty
- Kants Modell kausaler Beziehungen. Zu Watkins' Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality
- Placing Ugliness in Kant's Third Critique: A Reply to Paul Guyer
- Buchbesprechungen