Home Kant’s Position on the Wide Right to Abortion
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Kant’s Position on the Wide Right to Abortion

  • Samuel Kahn EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 28, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, I explicate Kant’s position on the wide right to abortion. That is, I explore the extent to which, according to Kant’s practical philosophy, abortion is punishable, even if it involves an unjust infringement of the right to life. By focusing on the state’s right to punish, rather than the right to life or the onset of personhood, I use Kant to expose a novel range of issues and questions about the legal status of abortion (and criminal punishment more generally). The article is divided into four sections. In the first, I lay the groundwork for Kant’s theory of rights and briefly canvass some of the literature on Kantian approaches to abortion. In the second, I look at Kant’s discussion of equivocal rights. In the third, I turn to Kant’s discussions of capital punishment and suicide. In the fourth, I examine Kant on honor killings, and I use his position on infanticide in order to extrapolate and explain his ideas about the right to punish in the context of abortion.

Bibliography

Baier, Annette (1993). “Moralism and Cruelty.” Ethics 103, 436–457.10.1086/293520Search in Google Scholar

Brassington, Iain (2006). “Killing people.” Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (10), 571–574. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.015420.10.1136/jme.2005.015420Search in Google Scholar

Branum, Amy, Ahrens, Katherine (2017). “Trends in Timing of Pregnancy Awareness Among US Women.” Maternal Child Health Journal 21, 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2155-110.1007/s10995-016-2155-1Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard (1999). “Kants Forderung der Todesstrafe bei Duell- und Kindesmord.” In: Das Recht der Republik. Hrsg. von Hauke Brunkhorst, Peter Niesen. Frankfurt a.M., 268–287.Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, Reinhard (2004). “Kants Ehe- und Kindesrecht.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 52 (2), 199–220.10.1524/dzph.2004.52.2.199Search in Google Scholar

Byrd, B. Sharon (1989). “Kant’s Theory of Punishment.” Law and Philosophy 8, 151–200.10.1007/BF00160010Search in Google Scholar

Byrd, B. Sharon and Hruschka, Joachim (2012). Kant’s Doctrine of Right. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Helen (2018). “A Brief History of Anglo-Western Suicide.” Southern University Law Review 46 (1), 150–194.Search in Google Scholar

Cholbi, Michael (2017). “Suicide.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/suicide/.Search in Google Scholar

Denis, Lara (2007). “Abortion and Kant’s Formula of Universal Law.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (4), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjp.2008.000110.1353/cjp.2008.0001Search in Google Scholar

Denis, Lara (2008). “Animality and Agency.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76, 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00117.x10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00117.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ellis, Anthony (2003). “A Deterrence Theory of Punishment.” The Philosophical Quarterly 53, No. 212, 337–351.10.1111/1467-9213.00316Search in Google Scholar

Frowe, Helen (2014). Defensive Killing. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609857.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gensler, Harry (1986). “A Kantian Argument against Abortion.” Philosophical Studies 49 (1), 83–98. www.jstor.org/stable/431981110.1007/BF00372885Search in Google Scholar

Geismann, Georg (2004). “Kant und ein vermeintes Recht des Embryos.” Kant-Studien 95, 443–469.10.1515/kant.2004.027Search in Google Scholar

Hare, R. M. (1989). “A Kantian Approach to Abortion.” Social Theory and Practice 15 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract1989151610.5840/soctheorpract19891516Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Christoph (2014). Nichtideale Normativität. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Hursthouse, Rosalind (1991). “Virtue Theory and Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (3), 223–246. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i313772Search in Google Scholar

Kühl, Kristian (2006). “Zur Abgrenzung des Rechts von Sittlichkeit, guten Sitten und Tugend.” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 14, 243–258.Search in Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina. 2012. “Agreement and Consent in Kant and Habermas.” The Philosophical Forum, Volume e3 (3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2012.00425.x10.1111/j.1467-9191.2012.00425.xSearch in Google Scholar

Locke, John (1980). Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis, IN.Search in Google Scholar

Lechner, Christina (2014). Der Schwangerschaftsabbruch aus ethischer Sicht. Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer Magistra der Philosophie an der Geisteswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Search in Google Scholar

Lohner, Alexander (2000). Personalität und Menschenwürde. Friedrich Pustet.Search in Google Scholar

Manninen, Bertha (2008). “Are human embryos Kantian persons?” Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-3-410.1186/1747-5341-3-4Search in Google Scholar

Manninen, Bertha (2014). “A Kantian defense of abortion rights with respect for intrauterine life.” Diametros 39, 70–92. https://doi.org/10.13153/diam.39.2014.565Search in Google Scholar

Mertens, Thomas (2017). “Emergencies and Criminal Law in Kant’s Legal Philosophy.” Ethic@ 16 (3), 459–474.10.5007/1677-2954.2017v16n3p459Search in Google Scholar

Minois, Georges (2001). History of Suicide. Trans. by Lydia Cochrane. Baltimore, MD.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, Jeffrie (1970). Kant. London.Search in Google Scholar

Murray, Alexander (2009). Suicide in the Middle Ages Volume I. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Murray, Alexander (2011). Suicide in the Middle Ages Volume II. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. London.Search in Google Scholar

Oduncu, Fuat (2003). “Stem cell research in Germany.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102258521771010.1023/A:1022585217710Search in Google Scholar

Papadaki, Lina. 2012. “Abortion and Kant’s Formula of Humanity.” Humana Menta Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (22), 145–166. http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/176Search in Google Scholar

Seabourne, A., and Seabourne, G. (2001). “Suicide or accident – self-killing in medieval England.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 178 (1), 42–47. 10.1192/bjp.178.1.42Search in Google Scholar

Seymour Fahmy, Melissa (2021). “Shadow Students in Georgia.” Journal of Philosophy of Education: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12609 10.1111/1467-9752.12609Search in Google Scholar

Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1971). “A Defense of Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1), 47–66.10.1007/978-1-4615-6561-1_6Search in Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens (2022). “The Quandary of Infanticide in Kant’s ‘Doctrine of Right’.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2021-003410.1515/agph-2021-0034Search in Google Scholar

Tunick, Mark (1996). “Is Kant a Retributivist?” History of Political Thought 17 (1), 60–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26217122Search in Google Scholar

Uleman, Jennifer (2000). “On Kant, Infanticide, and Finding Oneself in a State of Nature.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 54 (2), 173–195.Search in Google Scholar

Ulbricht, Otto (1990). Kindsmord und Aufklärung in Deutschland. Boston/Berlin.10.1515/9783486825541Search in Google Scholar

van Dülmen, Richard (1991). Frauen vor Gericht. Frankfurt a.M.Search in Google Scholar

Varden, Helga (2020). Sex, Love, and Gender. Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198812838.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-05-28
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Titelseiten
  2. Abhandlungen
  3. Immanuel Kant und Andrea Bina: Ein Autor, missverstanden und übersehen
  4. Wieweit lässt sich Kants theoretische Philosophie heute noch verteidigen?
  5. Greift Ludwig Heinrich Jakobs Grundriß der allgemeinen Logik und kritische Anfangsgründe der allgemeinen Metaphysik auf mindestens eine Nachschrift von Kants Logikkolleg zurück? – Eine Ergänzung zur sekundären Überlieferung des Kant’schen Logikkorpus
  6. Am I certain that others have done wrong? Kant on judging misdeeds (of others)
  7. Kant’s Position on the Wide Right to Abortion
  8. Berichte und Diskussionen
  9. Von der Empfindung zum Ding an sich – Idealismus-Kritik bei Kant und Riehl (mit einem Ausblick auf den amerikanischen Realismus des frühen 20. Jahrhunderts)
  10. Buchbesprechungen
  11. Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling: Historisch-kritische Ausgabe. Reihe I: Werke. Band 14. Vorlesungen ueber die Methode des academischen Studium. Philosophie und Religion. Und andere Texte (1803 – 1805). Hrsg. v. Patrick Leistner und Alexander Schubach. Stuttgart 2021. ISBN: 978-3-7728-2644-3. XII, 552 S., 2 Abb.
  12. Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel. Edited by James A. Clarke and Gabriel Gottlieb. Cambridge: CUP, 2021 [online], 2022 [print]. 285 pp. ISBN: 9781108703284.
  13. Owen Ware: Kant’s Justification of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. 192 pages. ISBN: 9780198849933.
  14. Mitteilungen
  15. Kant in Olsztyn – Onlinepräsentation von Kant-Beständen aus dem Staatsarchiv Olsztyn
  16. Mitgliederversammlung der Kant-Gesellschaft
Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/kant-2024-2011/html
Scroll to top button