Kant and the Production of the Antinomy of Pure Reason

Bibliography

Allison, Henry (2004): Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven and London.10.2307/j.ctt1cc2kjcSearch in Google Scholar

Allison, Henry (1976): “Kant’s Refutation of Realism”. In: Dialectica 30 (2/3), 223–253.10.1111/j.1746-8361.1976.tb00730.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl (2006): “The Critique of Metaphysics: The Structure and Fate of Kant’s Dialectic”. In: Paul Guyer, Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge, 269–302.10.1017/CCOL052182303X.009Search in Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl (1985): “Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy”. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46, 1–35.10.1017/CBO9781139173346.007Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan (1974): Kant’s Dialectic. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781316492949Search in Google Scholar

Caimi, Mario (2012): “The Logical Structure of Time according to the Chapter on the Schematism”. In: Kant-Studien 103, 415–428.10.1515/kant-2012-0031Search in Google Scholar

de Boer, Karin (2004): “The dissolving force of the concept: Hegel’s ontological logic”. In: The Review of Metaphysics 57, 787–822.Search in Google Scholar

de Boer, Karin (2010): On Hegel. The sway of the negative. Hampshire.10.1057/9780230283282Search in Google Scholar

Erdmann, Benno (1884): “Die Entwicklungsperioden von Kants theoretischer Philosophie”; Erdmann, Benno, Reflexionen Kants zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Falkenburg, Brigitte (2000): Kants Kosmologie. Die wissenschaftliche Revolution der Naturphilosophie im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Feist, Hans (1932): Der Antinomiegedanke bei Kant und seine Entwicklung in den vorkritischen Schriften. Borna-Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar

Grier, Michelle (2001): Kant’s doctrine of transcendental illusion. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511498145Search in Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul (1987): Kant and the claims of knowledge. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511624766Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (2008): Wissenschaft der Logik. Die Lehre vom Sein (1832). Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar

Heimsoeth, Heinz (1966–1971): Transzendentale Dialektik. Ein Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. IV Bd. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Herszenbaun, Miguel Alejandro (2018): La antinomia de la razón pura en Kant y Hegel. Madrid, Ediciones Alamanda.Search in Google Scholar

Herszenbaun, Miguel Alejandro (2017): “La lectura hegeliana de la Antinomia de la razón pura”. In: Ideas y Valores. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía 66, 35–56.10.15446/ideasyvalores.v66n165.67804Search in Google Scholar

Herszenbaun, Miguel Alejandro (2019): “Skepticism, Knowledge and Metaphysics in Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason”. In: The Philosophy of Kant. Ed. by Ricardo Gutiérrez Aguilar. New York, 37–52.Search in Google Scholar

Hinske, Norbert (1966): “Kants Begriff der Antinomie und die Etappen seiner Ausarbeitung”. In: Kant-Studien 56, 485–496.10.1515/kant.1965.56.3-4.485Search in Google Scholar

Hinske, Norbert (1970): Kants Weg zur Transzendentalphilosophie. Der dreißigjährige Kant. Stuttgart/Berlin/Köln/Mainz.Search in Google Scholar

Hinske, Norbert (1971): “Antinomie”, “Antithetik”. In: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Joachim Ritter, Bd. 1. Basel/Darmstadt, 393–396, 416–418.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel (1996): Critique of pure reason. Trans. Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel (1998): Critique of pure reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511804649Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel (2002): Critique of practical reason. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511809576.004Search in Google Scholar

Klimmek, Nikolai F. (2005): Kants System der transzendentalen Ideen. Berlin/New York.10.1515/9783110919301Search in Google Scholar

Kreimendahl, Lothar (1990): Kant. Der Durchbruch von 1769. Köln.Search in Google Scholar

Kreimendahl, Lothar (1998): “Die Antinomie der reinen Vernunft, 1. und 2. Abschnitt”. In: Mohr, Georg/Willaschek, Markus, Klassiker Auslegen. Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin, 413–446.10.1524/9783050050386.413Search in Google Scholar

Moore, Adrian William (1988): “Aspects of the Infinite in Kant”. In: Mind 97, 205–223.10.1093/mind/XCVII.386.205Search in Google Scholar

Pissis, Jannis (2012): Kants transzendentale Dialektik. Zu ihrer systematischen Bedeutung. Berlin/Boston.10.1515/9783110281712Search in Google Scholar

Posy, Carl (2008): “Intuition and Infinity: A Kantian Theme with Echoes in the Foundations of Mathematics”. In: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 63, 165–193.10.1017/S135824610800009XSearch in Google Scholar

Renaut, Alain (1998): “Transzendentale Dialektik, Einleitung und Buch I”. In: Mohr, Georg/Willaschek, Marcus: Klassiker Auslegen. Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin, 353–370.10.1524/9783050050386.353Search in Google Scholar

Rohlf, Michael (2010): “The ideas of pure reason”. In: Guyer, Paul: The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of pure Reason. Cambridge, 190–209.10.1017/CCOL9780521883863.009Search in Google Scholar

Schmauke, Stephan (2002): “Wohlthätigste Verirrung”. Kants kosmologische Antinomien. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Schmucker, Wolfgang (1990): Das Weltproblem in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Sedgwick, Sally (1991): “Hegel’s Strategy and Critique of Kant’s Mathematical Antinomies”. In: History of philosophy quarterly 8, 423–440.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric (1998): “The Antinomy of Pure Reason, Sections 3–8”. In: Mohr, Georg/Willaschek, Markus: Klassiker Auslegen. Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Berlin, 446–464.10.1524/9783050050386.447Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric (2016): “Kant on Materialism”. In: British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24, 1035–1052.10.1080/09608788.2016.1230091Search in Google Scholar

Willaschek, Marcus (2018): Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics. The Dialectic of Pure Reason. Cambridge.10.1017/9781108560856Search in Google Scholar