Searching for a Critical Metaphysics: Kantian Traces in Bradley’s Philosophy
-
Giulio M. Cavalli
Abstract
In this essay, I argue that Bradley’s engagement with Kant’s theoretical philosophy, often mediated by Herbart, Hamilton, and Lotze, led him to reassess his early Hegelianism and to develop a critical metaphysics. Bradley’s philosophy is examined diachronically, from early writings (2) to Appearance and Reality (4) through The Principles of Logic (3). I also provide a preliminary overview of Kant’s reception in Britain (1) to set the historical background for other sections. This essay explores a topic not previously investigated, as other contributions on Bradley and Kant compare them without historical concern. By focusing on Bradley’s sources, we can appreciate the influence of Kantianism through some understudied thinkers. In addition, I adopt a historical-diachronic approach that clarifies the development of Bradley’s philosophy by exploiting documents such as manuscripts and reading notes. In particular, I present the first analysis of a 1877–1878 manuscript – Bradley’s initial formulation of his peculiar metaphysics.
References
Allard, James W. 2005. The Logical Foundations of Bradley’s Metaphysics: Judgment, Inference, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498008Search in Google Scholar
Allard, James W. 2015. “Bradley’s Debt to Hamilton and Mansel.” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 21 (2): 135–55.Search in Google Scholar
Barbour, Kyle J. 2023. “The Hegelian Heritage of Bradley’s Degrees of Truth and Reality.” Idealistic Studies 53 (3): 197–212.10.5840/idstudies2023111157Search in Google Scholar
Barbour, Kyle J. 2024. “F. H. Bradley’s Feeling as Hegelian Phenomenology.” Hegel Bulletin. (online first view): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2024.39.Search in Google Scholar
Basile, P. 1999. Experience and Relations: An Examination of F. H. Bradley’s Conception of Reality. Bern: Haupt.Search in Google Scholar
Bedell, Gary. 1977. “Bradley and Hegel.” Idealistic Studies 7 (3): 262–90. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies19777313.Search in Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. 2014. The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism: 1796–1880. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722205.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bradley, Francis H. 1999. Collected Works (12 Vols.). Edited by C. A. Keene. Bristol: Thoemmes. [cited as BCW].Search in Google Scholar
Caird, E. 1877. A Critical Account of the Philosophy of Kant. Glasgow: Maclehose.Search in Google Scholar
Candlish, Stewart. 1989. “The Truth about F. H. Bradley.” Mind 99 (391): 331–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xcviii.391.331.Search in Google Scholar
Cavalli, Giulio M. 2024. “Dal concetto all’esperienza. L’universale concreto in Bradley e nel primo idealismo britannico (1865–1893).” Verifiche 53 (1–2): 193–218.Search in Google Scholar
Ferreira, P. 1999. Bradley and the Structure of Knowledge. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
Findlay, John N. 1956. “Some Merits of Hegelianism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.1.Search in Google Scholar
Gamache, Joseph. 2024. “Bradley, Irony, and Minimalist Metaphysics.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 41 (4): 323–39. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.41.4.02.Search in Google Scholar
Green, Thomas H. 1874. Collected Works (5 Vols.). Edited by P. Nicholson. Bristol: Thoemmes. [cited as GCW].Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul, and Rolf-Peter Horstmann. 2023. Idealism in Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192848574.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. 1852. Discussions on Philosophy and Literature, Education and University Reform. Edinburgh: Maclachlan & Stewart.Search in Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1968–2014. Gesammelte Werke. Schriften und Entwürfe (22 Vols.). Edited by W. Jaeschke et al. Hamburg: Meiner. [cited as HGW].Search in Google Scholar
Herbart, J. F. 1964. Sämtliche Werke (19 Vols.). Edited by K. Kerhback and O. Flügel. Aalen: Scientia. [cited as HSW].Search in Google Scholar
Herbert, Daniel. 2013. “Kant, Bradley and the Conditionality of Human Knowledge.” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 19 (1): 47–74.Search in Google Scholar
Hylton, P. 1990. Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ilodigwe, Damian. 2016. “Bradley’s Concept of Metaphysics.” Ekpoma Review 3: 116–37.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, H. 1895. A Critical Account of the Philosophy of Lotze: The Doctrine of Thought. Glasgow: Maclehose.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. [1781/1787] 2010. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Edited by J. Timmermann. Hamburg: Meiner. [cited as KrV].Search in Google Scholar
Kuehn, M. 1990. “Hamilton’s Reading of Kant.” In Kant and his Influence, edited by G. MacDonald Ross, and T. McWalter, 315–47. Bristol: Thoemmes.Search in Google Scholar
Leech, Jessica, and Emily Thomas. 2013. “Baking with Kant and Bradley.” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 19 (1): 75–94.Search in Google Scholar
Liebmann, O. [1865] 1912. Kant und die Epigonen. Edited by B. Bauch. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.Search in Google Scholar
Lightman, B. 1987. The Origins of Agnosticism: Victorian Unbelief and the Limits of Knowledge. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lotze, R. Hermann. [1874] 1912. Logik. Edited by G. Misch. Leipzig: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar
Lotze, R. Hermann. [1879] 1912. Metaphysik. Edited by G. Misch. Leipzig: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar
Maguire, T. 1882. The ‘Parmenides’ of Plato with Introduction, Analysis, and Notes. Dublin: Hodges, Figgis & Co.Search in Google Scholar
Mander, William J. 1994. An Introduction to Bradley’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198240907.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mander, William J. 2011. British Idealism: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559299.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mander, William J. 2020. The Unknowable: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198809531.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Manser, A. 1983. Bradley’s Logic. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Micheli, Giuseppe. 2014. “Kant and Zeno of Elea: Historical Precedents of the ‘Sceptical Method.” Transformação 37: 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31732014000300007.Search in Google Scholar
Misch, Georg. 1912. “Einleitung des Herausgebers.” In Lotze [1874] 1912, ix–xcii.Search in Google Scholar
Noras, Andrzej J. 2020. Geschichte des Neukantianismus. Berlin: Lang.10.3726/b17145Search in Google Scholar
Passmore, John. 1957. A Hundred Years of Philosophy. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar
Rockmore, Tom. 2007. Kant and Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300120080.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rosaye, Jean-Paul. 2012. F. H. Bradley et l’idéalisme britannique. Les années de formation (1865-1876). Arras: Artois Presses Université.10.4000/books.apu.8583Search in Google Scholar
Seth, A. 1887. Hegelianism and Personality. Edinburgh: Blackwood.10.1037/14306-000Search in Google Scholar
Stove, David C. 1991. The Plato Cult and Other Philosophical Follies. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Teichmüller, G. 1882. Die wirkliche und die scheinbare Welt. Neue Grundlegung der Metaphysik. Breslau: Koebner.Search in Google Scholar
Wellek, R. 1931. Immanuel Kant in England, 1793–1838. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
