Lask on the Form of Judgement

Works by Emil Lask

Lask, E. 1923. Gesammelte Schriften. I. Band, edited by E. Herrigel. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

• Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte [1902], pp. 1–274. = FIGSearch in Google Scholar

Lask, E. 1923. Gesammelte Schriften. II. Band, edited by E. Herrigel. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

• Die Lehre vom Urteil [1912], pp. 283–463. = LvUSearch in Google Scholar

• Die Logik der Philosophie und die Kategorienlehre [1911], pp. 1–282. = LPKSearch in Google Scholar

Lask, E. 1924. Gesammelte Schriften. III. Band, edited by E. Herrigel. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

• Zum System der Logik, pp. 57–170. = ZSLSearch in Google Scholar

Other References

Ainbinder, B. 2015. “From Neo-Kantianism to Phenomenology. Emil Lask’s Revision of Transcendental Philosophy: Objectivism, Reduction, Motivation.” Studia Phaenomenologica 15: 433–56, https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen20151522.Search in Google Scholar

Beiser, F. 2008. “Emil Lask and Kantianism.” The Philosophical Forum 39 (2): 283–95, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2008.00296.x.Search in Google Scholar

Besoli, S. 2019. Forma categoriale e struttura del giudizio. Sull’incompiutezza del sistema di pensiero di Emil Lask. Macerata: Quodlibet.10.2307/j.ctv160bthpSearch in Google Scholar

Cassirer, E. 1993/1913. “Erkenntnistheorie nebst den Grenzfragen der Logik.” In Erkenntnis, Begriff, Kultur, edited by A. R. Bast, 1–76. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.10.28937/978-3-7873-2594-8Search in Google Scholar

Crowell, S. 1988. “Husserl, Lask, and the Idea of Transcendental Logic.” In Edmund Husserl and the Phenomenological Tradition. Essays in Phenomenology, edited by R. Sokolowski, 63–86. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.10.2307/j.ctv176fj.7Search in Google Scholar

Crowell, S. 1992. “Lask, Heidegger, and the Homelessness of Logic.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 23 (3): 222–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1992.11006996.Search in Google Scholar

Crowell, S. 1996. “Emil Lask: Alethiology as Ontology.” Kant-Studien 87 (1): 69–88.10.1515/kant.1996.87.1.69Search in Google Scholar

Crowell, S. 2010. “Transcendental Logic and Minimal Empiricism: Lask and McDowell on the Unboundedness of the Conceptual.” In Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, edited by R. A. Makkreel, and S. Luft, 150–74. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Emundts, D. 2008. “Emil Lask on Judgment and Truth.” The Philosophical Forum 39 (2): 263–81, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9191.2007.00295.x.Search in Google Scholar

Gauvry, C. 2017. “Catégorie constitutive et catégorie réflexive chez Emil Lask.” Les études philosophiques 3: 401–19, https://doi.org/10.3917/leph.173.0401.Search in Google Scholar

Gauvry, C. 2019. “Sensible and Non-sensible Given in Emil Lask’s Kategorienlehre.” In Emil Lask. An der Grenze des Kantianismus, edited by S. Besoli, G. Morrone, and R. Redaelli, 125–42. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar

Hobe, K. 1978. “Zwischen Rickert und Heidegger. Versuch über eine Perspektive des Denkens von Emil Lask.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 78 (2): 360–76.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. P. Guyer & A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649Search in Google Scholar

Locci, M. 2003. “Giudizio e soggettività in Emil Lask.” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 58 (4): 693–711.Search in Google Scholar

Lukàcs, G. 1918. “Emil Lask. Ein Nachruf.” Kant-Studien 22 (2): 349–70.10.1515/kant.1918.22.1-2.349Search in Google Scholar

Malter, R. 1969. “Heinrich Rickert und Emil Lask. Vom Primat der transzendentalen Subjektivität zum Primat des gegebenen Gegenstandes in der Konstitution der Erkenntnis.” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 23 (1): 86–97.Search in Google Scholar

Mohanty, J. N. 2000. “Lask’s Theory of Judgment.” In Phenomenology on Kant, German Idealism, Hermeneutics and Logic. Philosophical Essays in Honor of Thomas M. Seebohm, edited by O. K. Wiegand, R. J. Dostal, L. Embree, J. Kockelmans, and J. N. Mohanty, 171–88. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Motzkin, G. 1989. “Emil Lask and the Crisis of Neo-Kantianism. The Rediscovery of the Primordial World.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 94 (2): 171–90.Search in Google Scholar

Nachtsheim, S. 2019. “‘Die ,Strukturform‘. Eine Bemerkung zu Lasks Letzbegründungskonzept.” In Emil Lask. An der Grenze des Kantianismus, edited by S. Besoli, G. Morrone, and R. Redaelli, 125–43. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar

Redaelli, R. 2016. “Emil Lask. Soggettività e ricettività.” Rivista internazionale di filosofia e psicologia 7 (2): 212–24.Search in Google Scholar

Rickert, H. 1915. “Emil Lask. Ein Nachruf.” Frankfurter Zeitung 17 (October): 3–12.Search in Google Scholar

Schuhmann, K., and B. Smith. 1993. “Two Idealisms: Lask and Husserl.” Kant-Studien 84 (4): 448–66, https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1993.84.4.448.Search in Google Scholar

Schweitz, M. 1984. “Emil Lasks Kategorienlehre vor dem Hintergrund der Kopernikanischen Wende Kants.” Kant-Studien 75 (2): 213–27, https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1984.75.1-4.213.Search in Google Scholar