Home Revisiting the Government as Plaintiff
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Revisiting the Government as Plaintiff

In Response to Adam S. Zimmerman, The Corrective Justice State
  • Elizabeth Chamblee Burch EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 17, 2014
Journal of Tort Law
From the journal Journal of Tort Law Volume 5 Issue 1-2

Published Online: 2014-4-17
Published in Print: 2012-1-1

©2012 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Special Issue in Honor of Richard A. Nagareda
  4. Article
  5. Mass Litigation Governance in the Post-Class Action Era: The Problems and Promise of Non-removable State Actions in Multi-district Litigation
  6. Comment
  7. Using State Test Cases to Settle Multidistrict Litigation? A Comment on “Mass Litigation Governance in the Post-Class Action Era”
  8. Article
  9. The Mass Tort Bankruptcy: A Pre-History
  10. Comment
  11. Models of Closure in Mass Torts: A Comment on “The Mass Tort Bankruptcy: A Pre-History”
  12. Article
  13. Settlement, ADR, and Class Action Superiority
  14. Comments
  15. Replacing Class Actions with Private ADR: A Comment on “Settlement, ADR, and Class Action Superiority”
  16. How Valuable Are Negative Value Claims?
  17. Article
  18. Repeat Players in Federal Multidistrict Litigation
  19. Comments
  20. Tribal Rituals of the MDL
  21. What Can We Learn by Studying Lawyers’ Involvement in Multidistrict Litigation?
  22. Article
  23. The Corrective Justice State
  24. Comments
  25. Revisiting the Government as Plaintiff
  26. Keeping the Regulatory Faith
https://doi.org/10.1515/jtl-2014-0004

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Special Issue in Honor of Richard A. Nagareda
  4. Article
  5. Mass Litigation Governance in the Post-Class Action Era: The Problems and Promise of Non-removable State Actions in Multi-district Litigation
  6. Comment
  7. Using State Test Cases to Settle Multidistrict Litigation? A Comment on “Mass Litigation Governance in the Post-Class Action Era”
  8. Article
  9. The Mass Tort Bankruptcy: A Pre-History
  10. Comment
  11. Models of Closure in Mass Torts: A Comment on “The Mass Tort Bankruptcy: A Pre-History”
  12. Article
  13. Settlement, ADR, and Class Action Superiority
  14. Comments
  15. Replacing Class Actions with Private ADR: A Comment on “Settlement, ADR, and Class Action Superiority”
  16. How Valuable Are Negative Value Claims?
  17. Article
  18. Repeat Players in Federal Multidistrict Litigation
  19. Comments
  20. Tribal Rituals of the MDL
  21. What Can We Learn by Studying Lawyers’ Involvement in Multidistrict Litigation?
  22. Article
  23. The Corrective Justice State
  24. Comments
  25. Revisiting the Government as Plaintiff
  26. Keeping the Regulatory Faith
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 4.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jtl-2014-0004/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button