Home Linguistics & Semiotics The New Indo-Aryan b-future and the early Middle Indo-Aryan of Aśokan inscriptions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The New Indo-Aryan b-future and the early Middle Indo-Aryan of Aśokan inscriptions

  • Eugen Hill EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 25, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The paper is aimed at clarifying the phonology of the b-future evolvement in the eastern part of the New Indo-Aryan language area. Traditionally the New Indo-Aryan b-future is assumed to reflect the Old Indo-Aryan gerundive formed with -(i)tavya-. However, the suffix -(i)tavya- is believed to have secondarily developed into -(i)taviya- preciselly in the eastern part of early Middle Indo-Aryan according to the evidence provided by late 3rd c. BCE Aśokan inscriptions. Since Middle Indo-Aryan -viya- cannot be assumed to yield -b- in eastern New Indo-Aryan, it has been proposed that the emergence of the eastern New Indo-Aryan b-future must be somehow due to an influence from western Indo-Aryan. This paper proposes a new scenario for the emergence of the New Indo-Aryan b-future. It starts from the observation that in Old Indo-Aryan the gerundive suffix usually transcribed as -(i)tavya- most probably ended in two vowels. It follows that -(i)taviya- in the eastern part of early Middle Indo-Aryan was not an innovation but rather an archaic trait, secondarily lost in the west of the language area. Accordingly, the development -(i)taviya- > -(i)tavya-, which has to be assumed for westerrn Middle Indo-Aryan, may be also suggested to have occurred, at a later date, in the eastern part of the language area. Subsequently, -vy- would regularly yield -b- in the New Indo-Aryan b-future.


Corresponding author: Eugen Hill, Institute of Linguistics, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Köln, Germany, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

Avanesov, R.I., S.V. Bromlej, L.N. Bulatova, K.F. Zaxarova, I.B. Kuz’mina, O.N. Moraxovskaja, E.V. Nemčenko, V.G. Orlova & T.G. Stroganova. 1965. Russkaja dialektologija, 2nd edn. Moskva: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Bashir, Elena, Thomas J. Conners & Brook Hefright. 2019. A descriptive grammar of Hindko, Panjabi, and Saraiki. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614512257Search in Google Scholar

Baums, Stefan. 2009. A Gāndhārī commentary on early buddhist verses: British library Kharoṣṭhī fragments 7, 9, 13 and 18. University of Washington PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bloch, Jules. 1965. Indo-Aryan from the Vedas to modern times. English edition, largely revised by the author and translated by Alfred Master. Paris: Librairie Adrien Maisonneuve.Search in Google Scholar

Bubenik, Vit. 1998. A historical syntax of late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa). Amsterdam/Philadephia: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.165Search in Google Scholar

Buddruss, Georg. 1960. Die Sprache von Woṭapūr und Kaṭārqalā. Linguistische Studien im afghanischen Hindukusch. Bonn: Orientalisches Seminar der Universität Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Buddruss, Georg. 1967. Die Sprache von Sau in Ostafghanistan. München: Kitzinger.Search in Google Scholar

Chatterji, Suniti K. 1970. The origin and development of the Bengali language. London: Allen & Unwin First published by Calcutta University Press 1926.Search in Google Scholar

Delbrück, Berthold. 1888. Altindische Syntax. Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Search in Google Scholar

Edgerton, Franklin. 1953. Buddhist hybrid sanskrit. Grammar and dictionary. Vol. I: Grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Geiger, Wilhelm. 1916. Pāli. Literatur und Sprache. Strassburg: Trübner.10.1515/9783111563916Search in Google Scholar

Grierson, George A. 1883. Seven grammars of the dialects and subdialects of the Bihárí language. Part III: Magadhí dialect of South Patna and Gaya. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grierson, George A. 1909. An introduction to the Maithilī dialect of the Bihārī language as spoken in North Bihār. Part I: Grammar, 2nd edn. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Hendriksen, Hans. 1944. Syntax of the infinite verb-forms of Pāli. Copenhage: Munksgaard.Search in Google Scholar

Hendriksen, Hans. 1986. Himachali studies. III. Grammar. København: Munksgaard.Search in Google Scholar

Hultzsch, Eugen. 1925. Corpus inscriptionum indicarum. Vol. I. Inscriptions of Asoka, New edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Kakati, Banikanta. 1962. Assamese, its formation and development. 2nd edn., revised and edited by Golock Ch. Goswami. Gauhati: Lawyer’s Book Stall.Search in Google Scholar

Khubchandani, Lachman M. 2003. Sindhi. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 622–658. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Valentin. 1967. Russische historische Grammatik. Band II: Die Entwicklung des Formensystems. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Liljegren, Henrik. 2016. A grammar of Palula. Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_611690Search in Google Scholar

Majumdar, Paresh Ch. 1970. A historical phonology of Oṛiyā. Calcutta: Sanskrit College.Search in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mehendale, Madhukar A. 1948. Historical grammar of inscriptional Prakrits. Poona: Deccan College.Search in Google Scholar

Oberlies, Thomas. 2001. Pāli. A grammar of the language of the Theravāda Tipiṭaka. With a concordance to Pischel’s Grammatik der Prakrit-Sprachen. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110870930Search in Google Scholar

Oberlies, Thomas. 2003. A grammar of Epic Sanskrit. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110899344Search in Google Scholar

Pischel, R. 1900. Grammatik der Prakrit-Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.10.1515/9783111700007Search in Google Scholar

Saksena, Baburam. 1971. Evolution of Awadi (a branch of Hindi), 2nd edn. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Ulrich. 1978. Die großen Felsen-Edikate Aśokas. Kritische Ausgabe, Übersetzung und Analyse der Texte. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Shevelov, George Y. 1964. A prehistory of Slavic: The historical phonology of Common Slavic. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Shevelov, George Y. 1979. A historical phonology of the Ukrainian language. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Shukla, Shaligram. 1981. Bhojpuri grammar. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sircar, D.C. 1979. Aśokan studies. Calcutta: Indian Museum.Search in Google Scholar

Speyer, J.S. 1896. Vedische und Sanskrit-Syntax. Strassburg: Trübner.10.1515/9783111581842Search in Google Scholar

Strnad, Jaroslav. 2013. Morphology and syntax of Old Hindī. Leiden/Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004254893Search in Google Scholar

Thakur, Gopal L. 2021. A grammar of Bhojpuri. Munich: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Thakur, Gopal. 2024. The primitive traces of the Bhojpuri language. Nepalese Linguistics 38(1). 144–155. https://doi.org/10.3126/nl.v38i1.71574.Search in Google Scholar

Tiwari, Udai N. 1960. The origin and development of Bhojpuri. Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Toulmin, Matthew. 2009. From linguistic to sociolinguistic reconstruction: The Kamta historical subgroup of Indo-Aryan. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Verma, Sheela. 2003. Magahi. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 498–514. London/New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

von Hinüber, Oskar. 1986. Das ältere Mittelindisch im Überblick. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Wackernagel, Jacob. 1896. Altinidische Grammatik. Bd. I. Lautlehre. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Wackernagel, Jacob & Albert Debrunner. 1954. Altinidische Grammatik. Bd. II, 2. Die Nominalsuffixe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Whitney, William D. 1879. Sanskrit grammar. Including both, the classical language, and the older dialects, of Veda and Brāhmaṇa. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Search in Google Scholar

Yadav, Ramawatar. 1996. A reference grammar of Maithili. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110811698Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-06-24
Accepted: 2025-10-25
Published Online: 2025-11-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jsall-2025-0009/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button