Abstract
In this article, I describe a subset of complex predicates in Thulung (Kiranti, Nepal) which I call “predicate derivations” (after Post, Mark. 2010. Predicate derivations in the Tani languages: root, suffix, both or neither? In Mark Post & Stephen Morey (eds.), North East Indian linguistics, 175–197. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India). I argue that these constructions in Thulung are built on grammaticalized elements that can be synchronically considered to be derivational. I focus on their morphology, placing it within the context of simplex verbs, and highlighting certain features – multiple exponence, allomorphy of the derivational suffixes similar to that of simplex verbs – which suggest strongly a development from serial verb constructions. I discuss their functions, which cover valence changes, as well as the marking of associated motion and aspect/Aktionsart. Complex predicates are seen as a feature of South Asian languages, but the types found in Tibeto-Burman languages appear to be quite different, morphologically, from what is found in Indo-Aryan or Dravidian languages. This article therefore represents a language-specific description as a contribution to cross-linguistic research on the topic.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the editorial team of JSALL, as well as anonymous reviewers, for their constructive input on this article. I also wish to acknowledge Mark Post and Guillaume Jacques for useful comments on an earlier draft.
Appendix Inflectional paradigms
Intransitive paradigm: Non-past (middle column) and past (right column) indexes (all suffixal).[15]
| NPST | PST | |
|---|---|---|
| 1SG | ŋu | ŋoro/ŋro |
| 1DI | tsi | tsi/ttsi |
| 1DE | tsuku | tsoko/ttsoko |
| 1PI | i∼ɖi a | ɖi/iri |
| 1PE | ku | toko/ttoko |
| 2SG | na | na/nna |
| 2DU | tsi | tsi/ttsi |
| 2PL | ni | ni/nni |
| 3SG | - | ɖa/ira |
| 3DU | tsi | tsi/ttsi |
| 3PL | mi | miri/mri |
-
aSee Lahaussois (2011: 199) for details.
Transitive paradigm: Non-past indexesa (all suffixal).
A/P
|
1SG | 1DI | 1DE | 1PI | 1PE | 2SG | 2DU | 2PL | 3SG | 3DU | 3PL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1SG | ni | niʦi | nini | u ∼ pu a | uʦi ∼ putsi | umi ∼ pumi | |||||
| 1DI | ʦi | ʦimi | |||||||||
| 1DE | ʦuku | ʦukumi | |||||||||
| 1PI | i ∼ ɖi a | iʦi | imi | ||||||||
| 1PE | ku | kuʦi | kumi | ||||||||
| 2SG | ŋi | ʦiki | ki | na | naʦi | nami | |||||
| 2DU | ŋiʦi | ʦiki | kiʦi | ʦi | ʦimi | ||||||
| 2PL | ŋini | ʦikini | ki | ni | niʦi | nimi | |||||
| 3SG | ŋi | sa | ʦiki | sa | ki | na | ʦi | ni | ʉ ∼ ɖʉ a | ʉʦi ∼ ɖʉtsi a | ʉmi ∼ ɖʉmi a |
| 3DU | ŋiʦi | saʦi | ʦiki | saʦi | kiʦi | naʦi | ʦi | niʦi | ʦi | ʦimi | |
| 3PL | ŋimi | sami | ʦikimi | sami | kimi | nami | ʦini | nimi | mi | miʦi | mi |
-
aWhat is shown separated by/are variant forms (across or within speakers); markers separated by ∼ are used by different verb classes. Allomorphy is not shown in these tables, but is as follows: ɖ-initial markers change their initial to t/_s, k, p; to r/_r; to l/_l. Other markers do not undergo allomorphy.
Transitive paradigm: Past indexes (all suffixal).
| 1SG | 1DI | 1DE | 1PI | 1PE | 2SG | 2DU | 2PL | 3SG | 3DU | 3PL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1SG | ni/nni | nitsi/nniʦi | nini/nnini | to/uto | totsi/utotsi | tomi/utomi | |||||
| 1DI | ʦi/ttsi | tsimi/ttsimi | |||||||||
| 1DE | tsoko/tʦoko | tsokomi/ttsokomi | |||||||||
| 1PI | ɖi | ɖiʦi | ɖimi | ||||||||
| 1PE | toko/ttoko | tokotsi/ttoko(tsi) | toko/ttoko | ||||||||
| 2SG | ŋiri/ŋri | tsiki/tʦiki | tiki/ttiki | na/nna | natsi/nnatsi | nami/nnami | |||||
| 2DU | ŋiritsi/ŋriʦi | tsiki/tʦiki | tikitsi/ttikiʦi | tsi/tʦi | tsi/ttsi | tsimi/ttsimi | |||||
| 2PL | ŋirini/ŋrini | ʦikini/ttsikini | tikini/ttikini | ni/nni | nitsi(mi)/nnitsi(mi) | ni/nni | |||||
| 3SG | ŋiri/ŋri | saɖɖa | tsiki/tʦiki | saɖɖa | tiki/ttiki | na/nna | tsi/tʦi | ni/nni | ɖʉ | ɖʉʦi | ɖʉmi |
| 3DU | ŋiriʦi/ŋriʦi | saɖɖaʦi | ʦiki/tʦiki | saɖɖaʦi | tikiʦi/ttikiʦi | natsi/nnaʦi | tsi/tʦi | nitsi/nniʦi | ʦi/ttsi | tsi/tʦi | ʦimi/ttsimi |
| 3PL | ŋirimi/ŋrimi | saɖɖami | tsikimi/tʦikimi | saɖɖami | tikimi/ttikimi | nami/nnami | tsimi/ttsimi | nitsi(mi)/nnitsi(mi) | miri/mri | miritsi/mritsi | miri/mri |
References
Allen, Nicholas J. 1975. Sketch of Thulung grammar (Cornell University East Asia Papers 6). Ithaca, NY: China–Japan Program, Cornell University.Search in Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1996. Aspect, mood, and time in Belhare (Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 15). Zurich: Universität Zürich.Search in Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra Prasad Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai, Novel Kishore Rai & Sabine Stoll. 2007. Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83(1). 43–73.10.1353/lan.2007.0002Search in Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 1995. The structure of complex predicates in Urdu. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Search in Google Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa. Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1994. The structure of Kiranti languages (Arbeiten Des Seminars Für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 13). Zurich: Universität Zürich.Search in Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1997. A grammar of Athpare (Lincom Studies in Asian Linguistics 1). Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2016. Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20(1). 81–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0003.Search in Google Scholar
Hook, Peter. 1974. The compound verb in Hindi. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2018. Bipartite verbs in Japhug and other Trans-Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41(2). 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.17012.jac.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Aimée Lahaussois. 2018. Ambulatives in Kiranti. In Paper presented at Events and Space: Associated motion and posture: Université Paris Diderot, 5 December.Search in Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois & Shuya Zhang. In press. Associated motion in Sino-Tibetan, with a focus on Gyalrongic and Kiranti. In Guillaume Antoine & Harold Koch (eds.), Associated motion as a grammatical category in linguistic typology (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110692099-021Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. Forthcoming. Reflexive constructions in Thulung. In Katarzyna Janic, Nicoletta Puddu & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Reflexive constructions (Studies in Diversity Linguistics). Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2002. Aspects of the grammar of Thulung Rai: An endangered Himalayan language. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00004761/document.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2003. Ergativity in Thulung Rai: A shift in the position of pronominal split. In David Bradley, Randy LaPolla, Michailovsky Boyd & Thurgood Graham (eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff, 101–112. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2011. The Thulung Rai verbal system: An account of verb stem alternation. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 40(2). 189–224. https://doi.org/10.1163/1960602811X00024.Search in Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée. 2016. Reflexive derivations in Thulung. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39(1). 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.1.03lah Search in Google Scholar
Masica, Colin. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1988. La langue Hayu (Sciences Du Langage). Paris: Editions du CNRS.Search in Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 2017. Kiranti languages. In Thurgood Graham & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (Routledge Language Family Series 3), 2nd edn., 646–679. Oxford & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean Robert. 2004. A grammar of Wambule: Grammar, lexicon, texts and cultural survey of a Kiranti tribe of Eastern Nepal (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 5/2). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047414131Search in Google Scholar
Post, Mark. 2010. Predicate derivations in the Tani languages: Root, suffix, both or neither? In Mark Post & Stephen Morey (eds.), North East Indian linguistics, 175–197. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.10.1017/UPO9788175968554.012Search in Google Scholar
Puttaswamy, Chaitra. 2018. Complex predicates in South Asian languages: An introduction. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 5(1). 1–3.10.1515/jsall-2018-0004Search in Google Scholar
Rutgers, Roland. 1998. Yamphu: Grammar, texts, lexicon (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 2). Leiden: Research School CNWS.Search in Google Scholar
Schackow, Diana. 2015. A grammar of Yakkha (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 7). Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603340Search in Google Scholar
Slade, Benjamin. 2013. The diachrony of light and auxiliary verbs in Indo-Aryan. Diachronica 30(4). 531–578. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.4.04sla.Search in Google Scholar
Slade, Benjamin. 2016. Compound verbs in Indo-Aryan. In Hans Henrich Hock & Elena Bashir (eds.), The languages and linguistics of South Asia: a comprehensive guide (The World of Linguistics 7), 559–567. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 1987. A grammar of Limbu (Mouton Grammar Library 4). Berlin, New York & Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846812Search in Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 1993. A grammar of Dumi (Mouton Grammar Library 10). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110880915Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- The relator noun construction in Assamese
- Cape Town Gujarati and its relation to Gujarati dialectology: A study of retroflex boosting
- Predicate derivations in Thulung
- Religion and language preservation: the case of Sora
- Sanskritization in Pāli
- Book Reviews
- Philippe Swennen: Démons iraniens: Actes du colloque international organisé à l’Université de Liège les 5 et 6 février 2009 à l’occasion des 65 ans de Jean Kellens
- Natalia Chalisova, Natalia Aleksandrova & Maksim Rusanov: Ya evaṃ veda … Kto tak znaet … Pamjati Vladimira Nikolaeviča Romanova
- Khochung Okhup Aimol: Aimol Dictionary (Aimual Chongriabuk). Aimol – English Dictionary
- Obituary
- In memoriam Johanna Narten (1930–2019)
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- The relator noun construction in Assamese
- Cape Town Gujarati and its relation to Gujarati dialectology: A study of retroflex boosting
- Predicate derivations in Thulung
- Religion and language preservation: the case of Sora
- Sanskritization in Pāli
- Book Reviews
- Philippe Swennen: Démons iraniens: Actes du colloque international organisé à l’Université de Liège les 5 et 6 février 2009 à l’occasion des 65 ans de Jean Kellens
- Natalia Chalisova, Natalia Aleksandrova & Maksim Rusanov: Ya evaṃ veda … Kto tak znaet … Pamjati Vladimira Nikolaeviča Romanova
- Khochung Okhup Aimol: Aimol Dictionary (Aimual Chongriabuk). Aimol – English Dictionary
- Obituary
- In memoriam Johanna Narten (1930–2019)
A/P