Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to investigate if gestational weight gain was altered during the early COVID-19 pandemic period.
Methods
This a retrospective cohort study evaluating gestational weight gain among individuals delivering during the early COVID-19 pandemic epoch (March 10–December 31, 2020) compared to temporally matched pre-pandemic (matched months in 2018 and 2019) controls using electronic medical record data from a large tertiary care hospital. The primary outcome was gestational weight gain defined as a categorical measure representing below, meeting, or above Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria with further adjustment for gestational age at delivery. The early-pandemic exposure group was also categorized by gestational age at the start period (<14 weeks’ and 14–20 weeks’) to assess if duration of exposure affected gestational weight gain risks with the use of multinominal logistic regression.
Results
Among 5,377 individuals 3,619 (67.3 %) and 1,758 (32.7 %) were in the pre and early pandemic epochs respectively. Overall, 934 (17.4 %) individuals gained below recommended, 1,280 (23.8 %) met recommendations, and 3,163 (58.8 %) gained above IOM recommended gestational weight gain. Compared to the pre-pandemic epoch, the early pandemic period was not associated with weight gain below (OR 1.06, 95 % Cl 0.89–1.27) or above (OR 1.03, 95 % Cl 0.89–1.19) IOM recommendations. This was also true when the early pandemic group was stratified based on gestational age at the start of the early pandemic period (<14 weeks’ and 14–20 weeks’).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated no significant difference in maternal weight gain between pre and early COVID-19 pandemic periods.
Introduction
Gestational weight gain is an important controllable factor in maternal and fetal outcomes. Low or excessive gestational weight gain are risk factors for increased adverse pregnancy outcomes [1]. The most recent data from the US reporting on gestational weight gain showed the prevalence of low weight gain was 21 % and for excessive weight gain was 48 %. The prevalence of excessive gestational weight gain was exacerbated in overweight and obese individuals [2].
In the US, guidelines for normal gestational weight gain are provided by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) which are based on type of gestation (singleton vs. multiple) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) with ranges for underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese as defined by the World Health organization (WHO) [3]. Excessive gestational weight gain is associated with increased risk of numerous pregnancy complications including gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, venous thromboembolism, preterm birth, labor dystocia, cesarean section, hemorrhage, and infection [4]. Infants born to individuals with excessive gestational weight gain are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to effects of prematurity, large for gestational age, and low birthweight, even in the absence of co-occurring pregnancy and maternal complications. For pregnant individuals with low gestational weight gain, the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight is significantly higher even in the absence of other co-morbidities [4]. The start of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted many aspects of routine life. Individuals were limited in their usual level of physical activity, due to stay at home recommendations. Additionally, gym closures and social distancing further limited individuals’ usual physical activity levels. Decreased physical activity is a known risk factor for excessive gestational weight gain [5]. In addition to the limitations on physical activity, increased isolation, which was also seen at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic was found to impact the incidence of obesity and gestational weight gain in pregnant populations in China, Italy, and Austria [6], [7], [8], [9].
The effects of COVID-19 pandemic and resultant shutdowns and social distancing polices on gestational weight gain in the US are mixed based on prior research conducted in the US. Two national-level studies, along with research from Louisiana and Washington state, showed a slight increase in gestational weight gain during the pandemic [10], [11], [12], [13]. In contrast, a study from New York reported a decrease in gestational weight gain during the same period [14], while studies from Tennessee and South Carolina, as well as a randomized controlled trial involving military personnel and their dependents, found no significant effect of the pandemic on gestational weight gain [15], [16], [17]. One of the limitations of the national-level studies is the data was not stratified by state to understand the impact the COVID-19 pandemic had on individual states. We sought to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted gestational weight gain in pregnant individuals in our local community.
Materials and methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with singleton gestations who were delivered at an urban academic medical center in Connecticut before and during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study excluded individuals with missing data on pre-pregnancy BMI as well as those with a diagnosis of pre-gestational diabetes. These data were obtained from the hospital electronic medical record (EMR).
The primary exposure was the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, and this epoch was defined as March 10, 2020, to December 31, 2020. The pandemic epoch was compared to matched months in 2018 and 2019, which was defined as the pre-pandemic epoch [18]. Individuals were included if their LMP was≤20 weeks’ gestation at the start of these periods with estimated due dates at the end of the defined period (March to December of each year included). The pandemic period was further stratified to groups with individuals who were <14 weeks’ gestation and between 14 and ≤20 weeks gestational age (GA) at the start of pandemic exposure to permit assessment of the effects of timing of antenatal exposure on gestational weight gain.
Demographic characteristics included age, self-reported race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Asian/other), insurance type (commercial, other (Medicaid/Medicare, other, unknown, self-pay, missing)), and marital status (married, not married (single, divorced, widowed, live as married, other).
Pre-pregnancy BMI was classified as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kgm2) per WHO criteria [19]. At our institution, pre-pregnancy BMI was measured at the first prenatal if the first trimester or self-reported if the first prenatal visit was after the first trimester. Height is typically self-reported or pulled from existing data except if not known by the individual or are new in the health system.
ICD codes were used to identify patients with gestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. At our institution, the diagnosis of gestational diabetes is determined from glucose tolerance test between 24 and 28 weeks’ gestation per Carpenter-Coustan criteria [20]. Our hypertension variable was a mutually exclusive four-level categorical variable defined as no evidence of any hypertensive disease, chronic hypertension, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and both chronic hypertension and superimposed pregnancy induced hypertension. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy encompass gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome as described in the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology practice bulletin [21]. Additional demographic and clinical information abstracted from the EMR included smoking status, metformin use in pregnancy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use, any encounter for telehealth visits during prenatal care (only available after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and was optional or offered at the discretion of the provider) and nutrition consult during pregnancy. Nutrition consults in our practice consist of a 60 min in-person or telehealth visit with a registered dietician where individuals receive counseling on recommended weight gain in pregnancy as well as food and meal suggestions to reach recommended macronutrient targets and are offered to individuals with obesity or other medical conditions during pregnancy.
The primary outcome was maternal weight gain at delivery which was measured prior to delivery in the hospital. IOM recommends 28–40 pounds weight gain for underweight individuals, 25–35 pounds for normal weight individuals, 15–25 pounds for overweight individuals and 11–20 pounds for obese individuals in a singleton pregnancy [3]. To account for variable gestational weight gain at the time of delivery, methods adjusting for specific weight gain by gestational week of delivery to each class or pre-pregnancy BMI, as described in Woolfolk et al. were applied. The algorithm utilized IOM recommendation for weight gain per trimester, pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational age at delivery to determine the expected gestational weight gain at the time of delivery [22]. Using this approach to categorize gestational weight gain, individuals were classified as ‘below’, ‘met’, and ‘above’ IOM recommendations.
Bivariate analyses of maternal characteristics and COVID-19 exposure were performed using chi-square tests of association with two-category exposure and three-category variable based on gestational age at the start of the pandemic. Multinominal logistic regression modeling was used to examine the association between pandemic exposure, both dichotomized (≤20 weeks’ gestation at the start of the pandemic vs. pre pandemic) and categorical (<14 weeks’ gestation vs. 14–20 weeks’ gestation at the start of the pandemic vs. pre pandemic), with gestational weight gain categories using those who met recommendations as the reference group. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4. This study was approved by the Yale University Institutional Review Board with waiver of informed consent.
Results
A total of 5,377 individuals met the inclusion criteria. 67.3 % (n=3,619) were in the pre-pandemic group and 32.7 % (n=1,758) in the pandemic group. Most individuals in the study (42.0 %; n=2,256) had a pre-pregnancy BMI classified as normal. A small percentage (0.7 %; n=36) of individuals had a BMI classified as underweight, 27.3 % (n=1,467) had a BMI classified as overweight, and 28.9 % (n=1,554) had a BMI classified as obese, according to WHO criteria [19].
No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the pre-pandemic and early pandemic groups as noted in Table 1 with the exception of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and frequency of nutrition encounters in pregnancy. Regarding hypertensive disorders category, the percentage of chronic hypertensive disorders alone was higher in the pandemic group (5.8 %, n=102) vs. (3.8 %, n=136); p=0.03. The percentage of individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy alone without pre-existing chronic hypertension was higher in the pandemic group, 15.5 % (n=273) vs. 14.3 % (n=519). The percentage of patients with chronic hypertension with superimposed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was lower in the early pandemic group (4.8 %) compared to those in the pre-pandemic (5.8 %) period. This trend reverses however with regard to nutritional counseling where more early pandemic patients had documented counselling (12.8 %) compared to those in the pre-pandemic period (9.7 %).
Baseline characteristics of the study population by COVID-19 Pandemic exposure and gestational age at start of the pandemic (n=5,377) - n (%).
Characteristics | COVID pandemic non-exposed n=3,619 (67.31) |
COVID pandemic exposed −≤20 weeks GAa n=1,758 (32.69) |
p-Valuee | COVID pandemic exposed GAa <14 weeks n=1,141 (21.22) |
COVID pandemic exposed GAa 14–≤20 weeks n=617 (11.47) |
p-Valuef |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age, years | ||||||
<35 ≥35 |
2,692 (74.4) 927 (25.6) |
1,323 (75.3) 435 (24.7) |
0.49 | 857 (75.1) 284 (24.9) |
466 (75.5) 151 (24.5) |
0.78 |
Pre-pregnancy BMI, kg/m2 | ||||||
<18.5 18.5–<25 25–<30 ≥30 |
71 (2.0) 1,548 (42.8) 981 (27.1) 1,019 (28.2) |
29 (1.7) 708 (40.3) 486 (27.7) 535 (30.4) |
0.2 | 18 (1.6) 452 (39.6) 318 (27.9) 353 (30.9) |
11 (1.8) 256 (41.5) 168 (27.2) 182 (29.5) |
0.49 |
Smoking | ||||||
No Yes |
3,346 (92.5) 273 (7.5) |
1,643 (93.5) 115 (6.5) |
0.18 | 1,066 (93.4) 75 (6.6) |
577 (93.5) 40 (6.5) |
0.40 |
Race/ethnicity | ||||||
Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian/other, non-Hispanic |
740 (20.5) 635 (17.6) 1,904 (52.6) 340 (9.4) |
381 (21.7) 301 (17.1) 1,033 (58.8) 143 (8.1) |
0.37 | 254 (22.3) 194 (17.0) 699 (52.5) 94 (8.24) |
127 (20.6) 107 (17.3) 334 (54.1) 49 (7.9) |
0.69 |
Insurance | ||||||
Commercial Other (Medicaid/Medicare, other, unknown, self-pay, missing) |
2,192 (60.6) 1,427 (39.4) |
1,109 (63.1) 649 (36.9) |
0.08 | 719 (63.0) 422 (37.0) |
390 (63.2) 227 (36.8) |
0.21 |
Parity | ||||||
Nulliparous Multiparous |
1,560 (43.1) 2,059 (56.9) |
756 (43.0) 1,002 (57.0) |
0.94 | 486 (32.6) 655 (57.4) |
270 (43.8) 347 (56.2) |
0.89 |
Marital status | ||||||
Not married (single, divorced, widowed, live as married, other, null) | 1,395 (38.5) | 677 (38.5) | 0.97 | 437 (38.3) | 240 (38.9) | 0.97 |
Married | 2,224 (61.5) | 1,081 (61.5) | 704 (61.7) | 377 (61.1) | ||
Fetal sex | ||||||
Female Male |
1,795 (49.6) 1,824 (50.4) |
872 (49.6) 886 (50.4) |
1.0 | 566 (49.6) 575 (50.4) |
306 (49.6) 311 (50.4) |
1.0 |
Hypertensive disorder | ||||||
No cHTNb or HDPc cHTNb only HDPc only cHTNb and HDPc |
2,780 (76.8) 136 (3.8) 519 (14.3) 184 (5.1) |
1,299 (73.9) 102 (5.8) 273 (15.5) 84 (4.8) |
0.03 | 838 (73.4) 66 (5.8) 181 (15.9) 56 (4.9) |
461 (74.7) 36 (5.8) 92 (14.9) 28 (4.5) |
0.03 |
Diabetes | ||||||
No GDMd GDMd Indeterminate |
3,053 (84.4) 280 (7.7) 286 (7.9) |
1,455 (82.8) 150 (8.5) 153 (8.7) |
0.33 | 933 (81.7) 101 (8.9) 107 (9.4) |
522 (84.6) 49 (7.9) 46 (7.5) |
0.30 |
Metformin use | ||||||
Before pregnancy During pregnancy No use |
50 (1.4) 46 (1.3) 3,523 (97.3) |
150 (0.9) 20 (1.1) 1,723 (98.0) |
0.23 | 10 (0.9) 13 (1.1) 1,118 (98) |
5 (0.8) 7 (1.1) 605 (98.1) |
0.56 |
Selective serotonin inhibitor use in pregnancy | ||||||
No Yes |
3,327 (91.9) 292 (8.1) |
1,622 (92.3) 136 (7.7) |
0.67 | 1,063 (93.2) 78 (6.8) |
559 (90.6) 58 (9.4) |
0.15 |
Telehealth prenatal encounter (n=5,331) | ||||||
Yes No |
0 (0.0) 3,594 (100.0) |
965 (55.6) 772 (44.4) |
<0.0001 | 586 (52.0) 541 (48.0) |
379 (62.1) 231 (37.9) |
<0.0001 |
Nutrition encounters (n=5,331) | ||||||
No Yes |
3,245 (90.3) 349 (9.7) |
1,515 (87.2) 222 (12.8) |
0.0007 | 969 (86.0) 158 (14.0) |
546 (89.5) 64 (10.5) |
0.0004 |
-
aGestational age. bChronic hypertension. cHypertensive disease of pregnancy. dGestational diabetes mellitus. ep-Value for COVID pandemic exposed vs. non exposed. fp-Value when COVID pandemic exposed group is divided by gestational age at the start of the pandemic.
In the study population, 17.4 % (n=934) of individuals were classified as below recommended gestational weight gain, 23.8 % (n=1,280) met recommendations and 58.8 % (n=3,176) exceeded recommendations for gestational weight gain based on their pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational age at delivery. The percentage of individuals that were classified as having above recommended gestational weight gain were similar in the pre-pandemic (58.8 %, n=2,127) and post-pandemic (58.9 %, n=1,036) groups (Table 2). Only about a quarter of individuals in each epoch met gestational weight gain recommendations (24 %, n=870) in the pre-pandemic group and (23.3 %, n=410) in the pandemic group. Individuals who met below recommended gestational weight gain were also similar, with 17.2 % (n=622) in the pre-pandemic group vs. 17.8 % (n=317) in the pandemic group. There were no statistical differences (p=0.78) between the pre-pandemic vs. pandemic group in individuals who met, exceeded, or were below recommended gestational weight gain.
Total gestational weight gain based on IOM recommendations and COVID-19 exposure - n (%).
Outcome | COVID pandemic non-exposed n=3,619 (67.31) |
COVID pandemic exposed −≤20 weeks GAa n=1,758 (32.69) |
p-Valueb | COVID pandemic exposed GAa <14 weeks n=1,141 (21.22) |
COVID pandemic exposed GAa 14–≤20 weeks n=617 (11.47) |
p-Valuec |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total gestational weight gain | ||||||
Below Met Above |
622 (17.2) 870 (24.0) 2,127 (58.8) |
312 (17.8) 410 (23.3) 1,036 (58.9) |
0.78 | 211 (18.5) 251 (22.0) 679 (59.5) |
101 (16.4) 159 (25.8) 357 (57.9) |
0.39 |
-
aGestational age. bp-Value for COVID, pandemic exposed vs. non exposed. cp-Value when COVID, pandemic exposed group is divided by gestational age at the start of the pandemic.
Compared to the pre-pandemic epoch individuals in the pandemic period did not experience weight gain below (OR 1.06, 95 % Cl 0.89–1.27) or above (OR 1.03, 95 % Cl 0.89–1.19) IOM weight gain recommendations, respectively (Table 3). When the pandemic group was stratified by gestational age, the individuals less than 14 weeks’ gestation did not experience a difference in weight again below (OR 1.18, 95 % Cl 0.95–1.45) or above (OR 1.1, 95 % Cl 0.94–1.31) the IOM recommendations. Similarly, individuals who were between 14 and ≤20 week’ gestation did not experience a difference in weight gain below (0.89, 95 % CI 0.68–1.16) or above (0.92, 95 % CI 0.75–1.13) the IOM recommendations.
Odds ratios estimates for gestational weight gain above and below IOM recommendations in COVID-19 pandemic exposed groups.
Recommended weight gain per IOM recommendations | Pandemic exposed GAa ≤20 weeks ORb (95 % CI) | Pandemic exposed GAa <14 weeks ORb (95 % CI) |
Pandemic exposed GAa 14–≤20 weeks ORb (95 % CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Below | 1.06 (0.89–1.27) | 1.18 (0.95–1.45) | 0.89 (0.68–1.16) |
Meeting | Reference | Reference | Reference |
Above | 1.03 (0.89–1.19) | 1.10 (0.94–1.31) | 0.92 (0.75–1.13) |
-
aGestational age. bOdds ratio.
Discussion
Principal findings
This study did not find an increased odds of gestational weight gain above IOM targets during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to a pre-pandemic population. When stratified by length of time of exposure to the pandemic as defined by gestational age (≤14 GA or 14≤20 GA), there was still no demonstrated difference in gestational weight gain in individuals delivering early in the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic population. These findings persisted after accounting for pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational age at delivery.
Results in the context of what is known
The COVID-19 pandemic altered many aspects of life for pregnant individuals around the world. Social distancing and shut-down policies resulted in changes in normal activity level and diet for all individuals [6], 7], 23]. Studies performed in Italy and Austria detected an increase in gestational weight gain during the COVID-19 pandemic [8], 9]. Both studies had a smaller population size and defined their pandemic and pre-pandemic epochs differently than in our study. In the Austrian study, the authors compared the last 2 months prior to the COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020 to the first 4 months into the lockdown, whereas in the Italian study, the authors defined the pandemic period like our study.
Studies involving the U.S. population reveal discrepant results. Two state-specific studies from South Carolina and Tennessee had outcomes similar to ours [16], 17]. Other state-specific studies have reported an increase in gestational weight gain, but a separate study in New York found decreased gestational weight gain during the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown [11], 12], 14]. one national-level and one multicenter study, which do not stratify results by state, show a slight overall increase in gestational weight gain. The differences between state-specific and national data suggest that some states may have been more negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic than others [10], 13]. Notably, a randomized controlled trial involving pregnant military personnel had an intervention group that followed a routine aimed at promoting healthy lifestyle choices to achieve normal weight gain during pregnancy [15]. This study evolved during the pandemic and was able to compare both groups before and after the pandemic, showing no differences in gestational weight gain between the two groups during either period [15].
The methodology of these US based studies differed from what we presented here. The pandemic and non-pandemic groups were defined differently in each study and did not necessarily include the same months in prior years like our study did. Additionally, these other studies did not include preterm deliveries as they did not adjust for gestational weight gain by gestational age at delivery. The national study also relied primarily on self-reported information, which increases the potential for recall bias.
These studies show variation in gestational weight gain during the pandemic period among the US population and suggest that the pandemic affected individuals of certain socioeconomic classes and in certain environments (i.e., urban vs. rural) differently. Adherence to prenatal visits and counseling via telehealth may also account for variations in study outcomes. Telehealth services expanded during the pandemic, which may have led to adherence to prenatal visits as evidenced by a systematic review that revealed telehealth is an effective way in monitoring and curbing some lifestyle behaviors in pregnancy, including reducing gestational weight gain in pregnancy [24]. As observed in our study, nutrition consults increased in the pandemic and may have contributed to why our population did not experience a difference in gestational weight gain during the pandemic. Another point of consideration is low-income individuals who were still required to work in person due to holding service industry jobs and did not observe a decrease in their daily physical activity.
In our study, the percentage of individuals with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was significantly higher in the pandemic epoch, which has been reported in some studies [25], 26]. Other studies have also reported increased rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in patients with COVID-19 infection, which may explain the increase in their prevalence seen in the pandemic [27], 28].
Clinical implications
There are differences in results of studies investigating the association between gestational weight gain and the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. These studies took place in various states, which may account for these differences, possibly due to how lockdowns were handled in those states during the COVID-19 pandemic [6], 7], 23]. It will be important to examine how the pandemic impacted pregnant individuals at the state and city levels within the US to direct necessary resources in the event of another pandemic and help ensure health equity.
The percentage of individuals in our study above the recommendation for gestational weight gain according to IOM is higher than that of the US population. According to the 2016 National Vital Statistics System birth data, the prevalence of women above the recommended gestational weight gain nationally is 48 % [29]. This highlights a potential area of intervention in our population, outside of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Strengths and limitations
This study had several strengths, especially in comparison to the other US based studies on gestational weight gain during the COVID-19 pandemic. The definition of the COVID-19 pandemic epoch ensured that the study population was able to have adequate exposure time in the pandemic period by using specific dating and then matching the pandemic exposure months to the 2 years prior. The study population has a close racial representation to the crude US population, which improves generalizability to other states in the US. Data from a single center allows for uniformity in data collection when using a single EMR. The study was able to capture preterm and term deliveries compared to most similar studies that excluded preterm deliveries. The study also accounted for differences in gestational weight gain by gestational age at delivery through using the adjustment methodology adapted from Woolfolk et al. [22].
There are also several limitations to this study. Given the retrospective study design, we could not account for other confounders, such as activity level or dietary choices, which were not captured in the EMR. We were not able to account for new diagnoses or worsening of preexisting psychiatric disease, such as depression and anxiety, which can impact activity and dietary habits. We also were not able to account for changes in employment status or place of work as this information was not in the EMR. Pre-pregnancy BMI is sometimes self-reported by patients in our healthcare system, which may lead to inaccurate data. As this was a single-center study, there are limits to generalizability to other populations inside and outside of the US from various demographic and clinical practice perspectives.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates no significant difference in meeting recommended maternal weight gain before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, duration spent in the early COVID-19 pandemic did not demonstrate a significant difference in gestational weight gain. Further studies are needed to assess how activity levels and dietary habits may have been altered during the pandemic period. In general, most individuals in our population exceeded IOM recommendations for weight gain in pregnancy based on pre-pregnancy BMI, especially when compared to the national average, and should be an area of focus for improvement of care.
-
Research ethics: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Teede, HJ, Bailey, C, Moran, LJ, Bahri Khomami, M, Enticott, J, Ranasinha, S, et al.. Association of antenatal diet and physical activity-based interventions with gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2022;182:106–14.10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6373Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2. Driscoll, AK, Gregory, ECW. Increases in prepregnancy obesity: United States, 2016–2019. NCHS Data Brief No. 392. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2020.Search in Google Scholar
3. Rasmussen, KM, Catalano, PM, Yaktine, AL. New guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy: what obstetrician/gynecologists should know. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:521–6.10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332d24eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Santos Monteiro, S, Santos, TS, Fonseca, L, Saraiva, M, Pichel, F, Pinto, C, et al.. Inappropriate gestational weight gain impact on maternofetal outcomes in gestational diabetes. Ann Med 2023;55:207–14.10.1080/07853890.2022.2159063Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Restall, A, Taylor, RS, Thompson, JM, Flower, D, Dekker, GA, Kenny, LC, et al.. Risk factors for excessive gestational weight gain in a healthy, nulliparous cohort. J Obes 2014;2014:148391.10.1155/2014/148391Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Zhang, J, Zhao, A, Ke, Y, Huo, S, Ma, Y, Zhang, Y, et al.. Dietary behaviors in the post-lockdown period and its effects on dietary diversity: the second stage of a nutrition survey in a longitudinal Chinese study in the COVID-19 era. Nutrients 2020;12:3269.10.3390/nu12113269Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Zhang, J, Zhang, Y, Huo, S, Ma, Y, Ke, Y, Wang, P, et al.. Emotional eating in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with dietary intake and gestational weight gain. Nutrients 2020;12:2250.10.3390/nu12082250Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
8. La Verde, M, Torella, M, Riemma, G, Narciso, G, Iavarone, I, Gliubizzi, L, et al.. Incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus before and after the Covid-19 lockdown: a retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022;48:1126–31.10.1111/jog.15205Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Kirchengast, S, Hartmann, B. Pregnancy outcome during the first COVID 19 lockdown in Vienna, Austria. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18:3782.10.3390/ijerph18073782Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Abdelwahab, M, Voest, JA, Metz, TD, Hughes, BL, Grobman, WA, Saade, GR, et al.. Gestational weight gain and neonatal biometry during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicenter observational cohort. Am J Perinatol 2024. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2335-2480.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11. Nethery, E, Hutcheon, JA, Kotaska, A, Law, MR, Janssen, P. Weight gain in pregnancy and infant birthweight after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2023;117:364–72.10.1016/j.ajcnut.2022.09.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Harville, EW, Kracht, CL, Cohen, NL, Sutton, EF, Kebbe, M, Redman, LM. Trends in gestational weight gain in Louisiana, March 2019 to March 2022. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2331277.10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31277Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Cao, W, Sun, S, Danilack, VA. Analysis of gestational weight gain during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2230954.10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30954Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Collins-Smith, A, Prasannan, L, Shan, W, Dori, E, Katzow, M, Blitz, MJ. Effect of lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic on maternal weight gain, gestational diabetes, and newborn birth weight. Am J Perinatol 2022.10.1055/a-1925-1347Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
15. McPhail, A, Hare, ME, Talcott, GW, Little, MA, Bursac, Z, Krukowski, RA. Gestational weight gain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Matern Child Health J 2023;27:1454–9.10.1007/s10995-023-03730-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Tori, ME, Gosdin, L, Shih, Y, Hung, P, Li, X, Liu, J. Association of COVID-19 pandemic societal closures with gestational weight gain among women in South Carolina, 2018–2021. Ann Epidemiol 2024;91:51–7.10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.02.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Mirsky, EL, Mastronardi, AM, Paudel, A, Young, ML, Zite, NB, Maples, JM. The COVID-19 pandemic and prevalence of gestational diabetes: does gestational weight gain matter? Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023;5:100899.10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100899Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18. Mullin, AM, Handley, SC, Lundsberg, L, Elovitz, MA, Lorch, SA, McComb, EJ, et al.. Changes in preterm birth during the COVID-19 pandemic by duration of exposure and race and ethnicity. J Perinatol 2022;42:1346–52.10.1038/s41372-022-01488-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19. WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;894:1–253.Search in Google Scholar
20. ADA. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. J Clin Appl Res Edu 2017;40:S11–24.10.2337/dc17-S005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. ACOG. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. ACOG practice bulletin No. 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e237–260.10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Woolfolk, CL, Harper, LM, Flick, L, Mathews, K, Chang, JJ. Gestational weight gain and preterm birth: disparities in adolescent pregnancies. J Perinatol 2016;36:1055–60.10.1038/jp.2016.149Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Zhang, X, Warner, ME. COVID-19 policy differences across US states: shutdowns, reopening, and mask mandates. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2020;17:9520.10.3390/ijerph17249520Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
24. DeNicola, N, Grossman, D, Marko, K, Sonalkar, S, Butler Tobah, YS, Ganju, N, et al.. Telehealth interventions to improve obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:371–82.10.1097/AOG.0000000000003646Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
25. Molina, RL, Tsai, TC, Dai, D, Soto, M, Rosenthal, N, Orav, EJ, et al.. Comparison of pregnancy and birth outcomes before vs during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2226531.10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26531Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26. Rao, MG, Toner, LE, Stone, J, Iwelumo, CA, Goldberger, C, Roser, BJ, et al.. Pregnancy during a pandemic: a cohort study comparing adverse outcomes during and before the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Perinatol 2023;40:445–52.10.1055/a-1877-5973Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Baracy, MJr, Afzal, F, Szpunar, SM, Tremp, M, Grace, K, Liovas, M, et al.. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertens Pregnancy 2021;40:226–35.10.1080/10641955.2021.1965621Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Jeong, Y, Kim, MA. The coronavirus disease 2019 infection in pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2023;66:587.10.5468/ogs.22323.e1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
29. MMWR. Gestational weight gain among women with full-term, singleton births, compared with recommendations- 48 states and the District of Columbia. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016. 2015;65:1121.10.15585/mmwr.mm6540a10Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The Journal of Perinatal Medicine is switching its publication model to open access
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- The early COVID-19 pandemic period and associated gestational weight gain
- Evaluation of fetal growth and birth weight in pregnancies with placenta previa with and without placenta accreta spectrum
- Nutritional guidance through digital media for glycemic control of women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial
- Adverse perinatal outcomes related to pregestational obesity or excessive weight gain in pregnancy
- Maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant women with endometriosis
- The role of the lower uterine segment thickness in predicting preterm birth in twin pregnancies presenting with threatened preterm labor
- Effect of combination of uterine artery doppler and vitamin D level on perinatal outcomes in second trimester pregnant women
- Contemporary prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in a regional perinatal center lacking onsite pediatric cardiac surgery: obstetrical and neonatal outcomes
- How time influences episiotomy utilization and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)
- The first 2-year prospective audit of prenatal cell-free deoxyribonucleic screening using single nucleotide polymorphisms approach in a single academic laboratory
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Evaluating fetal pulmonary vascular development in congenital heart disease: a comparative study using the McGoon index and multiple parameters of fetal echocardiography
- Antenatal corticosteroids for late small-for-gestational-age fetuses
- A systematic catalog of studies on fetal heart rate pattern and neonatal outcome variables
- Original Articles – Neonates
- Comparison of cord blood alarin levels of full-term infants according to birth weight
- Reviewer Acknowledgment
- Reviewer Acknowledgment
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- The Journal of Perinatal Medicine is switching its publication model to open access
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- The early COVID-19 pandemic period and associated gestational weight gain
- Evaluation of fetal growth and birth weight in pregnancies with placenta previa with and without placenta accreta spectrum
- Nutritional guidance through digital media for glycemic control of women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial
- Adverse perinatal outcomes related to pregestational obesity or excessive weight gain in pregnancy
- Maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant women with endometriosis
- The role of the lower uterine segment thickness in predicting preterm birth in twin pregnancies presenting with threatened preterm labor
- Effect of combination of uterine artery doppler and vitamin D level on perinatal outcomes in second trimester pregnant women
- Contemporary prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in a regional perinatal center lacking onsite pediatric cardiac surgery: obstetrical and neonatal outcomes
- How time influences episiotomy utilization and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)
- The first 2-year prospective audit of prenatal cell-free deoxyribonucleic screening using single nucleotide polymorphisms approach in a single academic laboratory
- Original Articles – Fetus
- Evaluating fetal pulmonary vascular development in congenital heart disease: a comparative study using the McGoon index and multiple parameters of fetal echocardiography
- Antenatal corticosteroids for late small-for-gestational-age fetuses
- A systematic catalog of studies on fetal heart rate pattern and neonatal outcome variables
- Original Articles – Neonates
- Comparison of cord blood alarin levels of full-term infants according to birth weight
- Reviewer Acknowledgment
- Reviewer Acknowledgment