Home Pre-eclampsia and maternal health through the prism of low-income countries
Article Publicly Available

Pre-eclampsia and maternal health through the prism of low-income countries

  • Edin Medjedovic ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Asim Kurjak , Milan Stanojević and Edin Begic
Published/Copyright: October 10, 2022

Abstract

Hypertensive syndrome in pregnancy complicates up to 15% of pregnancies, and preeclampsia (PE) occurs in about 3–10% of pregnant women. Inadequate prenatal care is associated with higher mortality from PE, possibly due to reduced monitoring, detection, and missed opportunities for early intervention. The imperative of the clinician’s work is to monitor the symptoms and clinical signs of PE, and stratification of patients in relation to the risk of PE is essential. PE represents a multisystem inflammatory response, and the consequences can be expected in all organs. The question of the effect of PE on long-term maternal health is raised. The aim of the paper is to present the effect of PE on the patient’s health through the prism of low-income countries.

Introduction

Countries in transition, burdened by the past with an imposed irrational and dysfunctional organizational system, must imperatively solve the model of health insurance and health care protection. The development of all democratic societies in the world tends to regulate social systems, not only through laws but also by using other methods. Modern health care always includes a four-member relationship with interaction (patient, doctor, service provider institution, and the one who pays). Indeed, the health insurance model is a fundamental social issue.

Essentially, an ideal healthcare system does not exist. The aim is to find an optimal mode in each health system to promote the satisfaction of the user and the provider of health services. Although there is a lot of talk about the concept of health rights and the quality of health care, knowledge of the patient’s rights as part of mandatory health insurance is still debatable.

The health care system is a pillar of the functioning of society as a whole. The level of development of the health care system directly indicates the level of development of a country. Health reform (capacity, profiling of groups of health workers, faster recruitment, as well as faster orientation, better organizations of primary, secondary, and tertiary care, better coverage of insurance, and better connection with the economy) is probably a step that is already delayed in most low-income countries. Prevention programs should go toward the prevention of basic pathology of the population. For instance, when it comes to pregnant women, there is a problem of arterial hypertension.

Hypertensive syndrome in pregnancy complicates up to 15% of pregnancies, and preeclampsia (PE) occurs in about 3–10% of pregnant women [1, 2]. Given that delivery is the only treatment for PE, it presents the leading cause of iatrogenic preterm birth and low birth weight [1]. Inadequate prenatal care is associated with higher mortality from PE, possibly due to reduced monitoring, detection, and missed opportunities for early intervention. Preeclampsia is defined as hypertension (systolic pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ≥90 mm Hg) after the 20th week of gestation and with at least one of the following symptoms: proteinuria, organ dysfunction (including kidney and liver, followed by hematological or neurological complications), with sometimes the presence of fetal growth restriction [1, 3]. In the event of a grand mal seizure in a patient, we refer to eclampsia. In contrast, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets) syndrome is identified when hemolysis (with microangiopathic blood smear), elevated liver enzymes, and thrombocytopenia prevail over hypertension, central nervous system, or renal dysfunction [1, 4]. The imperative of the clinician’s work is monitoring the symptoms and clinical signs of PE. Also, stratification of patients in relation to the risk of PE is essential. The definitive treatment of PE is childbirth, and the management of PE presents the treatment of high blood pressure and seizure prevention, with timely delivery and adequate postpartum follow-up [1, 5]. The question of the effect of PE on long-term maternal health is raised.

Preeclampsia and its effect on the cardiovascular system

During pregnancy, the organism adjusts primarily with blood volume, which begins to increase in the sixth week, increases in the second trimester, and stabilizes in the last eight weeks. Due to blood volume expansion, the increase in red cell mass values ​​(even in the late stages) is not so discernible (hematocrit values ​​are around 33–34%, and hemoglobin is 11–12 g/dL). At the same time, it should be noted that an increase in hemoglobin in the first and second half of pregnancy can be one of the predictors of preeclampsia [6].

In the last trimester, due to physiology, sodium may increase because of the effect of aldosterone, while in patients with PE, decreased sodium values ​​are verified [7].

Additionally, cardiac output increases by up to 40% due to increased stroke volume and heart rate (from 10 to 20% from resting heart rate values), though the opposite happens if intrauterine growth restriction occurs [8]. The appearance of tachyarrhythmias is possible primarily due to the secretion of catecholamines [9]. Low-resistance uteroplacental circulation causes a drop in mean aortic pressure, affecting the mother’s peripheral and pulmonary vascular resistance, which is reduced; in PE, however, the opposite happens, and resistance in the uteroplacental circulation will increase [10].

PE is an indicator of maternal susceptibility to develop some cardiovascular pathology (the possibility of the influence of PE on organ damage should be taken into account) [11].

It is also considered that the frequency of major coronary events (MCE) is higher in women with a history of PE [12].

Patients with PE experience twice the rate of cardiovascular (CVD) events and have a 2.2-fold increased rate of chronic hypertension, an 80% increased rate of type 2 diabetes, and a 30% increased rate of elevated cholesterol [13]. PE is related to future incident heart failure and a 2-fold increased risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and death due to coronary heart or cardiovascular disease [14].

Pulmonary edema is a condition that usually occurs in severe forms of PE and occurs more often in older preeclamptic pregnant women [15], [16], [17]. PE that develops in pregnant women with multifetal gestation is a special risk compared to single pregnancy [15]. Clinical characteristics are difficulty breathing, cough, psychomotor restlessness, chest pain, palpitations, and excessive sweating [15]. The severity of these symptoms is related to the outcome, while the etiological basis of pulmonary edema in PE is multifactorial [17]. A decrease in oncotic pressure, which is potentiated by hypoproteinemia with an increase in pulmonary vascular hydrostatic pressure, is one of the pathophysiological mechanisms [15, 17]. Endothelial dysfunction with heart failure and malignant hypertension can directly lead to pulmonary edema. Volume load caused by the treatment of patients with PE can be one of the causes of pulmonary edema [15], [16], [17].

Preeclampsia and venous thromboembolism

PE is considered to be associated with 3-to-12-fold increases in risks of pulmonary embolism and stroke [18]. Endothelial dysfunction of blood vessels leads to increased permeability of blood vessels, which leads to hypercoagulability and reduced blood viscosity. The appearance of proteinuria, which leads to hypoproteinemia, further worsens the condition of hypercoagulability. The need for hospitalization of patients with PE, along with the described pathophysiological changes, additionally provokes the occurrence of thrombosis and thromboembolic incidents [18]. Acute pulmonary embolism affects circulation and gas exchange and is followed by hypoxia, hypocapnia, and disturbance in the acid-base status. Moreover, right heart failure due to acute pressure overload is regarded as the primary cause of death in severe PE [19]. Complications of pulmonary embolism include sudden death, respiratory failure, pulmonary infarction, heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension [19].

Preeclampsia and previous cardiac pathology

Maternal risk assessment is critical if the mother has previous cardiovascular morbidity. High-risk patients should be treated in specialized centers. Pregnancy is contraindicated if there is pulmonary arterial hypertension for any reason, if there is left ventricular systolic dysfunction [ejection fraction of left ventricle (EFLV) <30%, New York Heart Association (NYHA) III and IV], if there is previous peripartum cardiomyopathy with residual left ventricular dysfunction, if there is severe mitral or severe aortic stenosis, dilatation of the aorta (generally >5.0 cm, in Marfan syndrome or aortopathy >4.5 cm), in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, in coarctation of the aorta (or recoarctation), in right heart failure, or in Fontan with complications [20].

Volume load can additionally lead to the progression of the previous valvular defect, and echocardiography should take into account volume overload in pregnancy when interpreting the grade of the valvular pathology [21]. During pregnancy, the mitral and tricuspid valves are subjected to increased hemodynamic stress, rendering the patient at increased risk of rhythm disturbances, acute heart failure, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [2122]. There is no clear data that PE is associated with a higher risk of the acute coronary syndrome, although it is a fact that it can often be missed [22]. Also, in the case of the acute coronary syndrome, coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention will be performed, if necessary, as quickly as possible, and the pregnant uterus should be protected from direct radiation, while cardiac surgery is performed if the mother’s life is threatened [21]. All of this has an effect on the increased risk of MACE for the rest of life. It is believed that patients with PE will be complicated with increased levels of angiotensin II (ANG-II) sensitivity and elevated levels of the pro-fibrotic factors interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), triglycerides and free fatty acids, while in the postpartum period is followed by increased levels of leptin and decreased levels of the anti-fibrotic factor adiponectin, which represents etiological factors that could lead to systolic dysfunction [23].

Peripartum (postpartum) cardiomyopathy

Cardiomyopathies are diseases of the heart muscle where the myocardium is structurally and functionally altered in the absence of coronary artery disease, valvular defects, or congenital heart anomalies [24]. Peripartum cardiomyopathy (cardiomyopathy associated with pregnancy) is a rare cause of heart failure that affects women in late pregnancy or the period after childbirth; it is idiopathic, with the most common dilated left ventricle, with possible complex arrhythmias as the first clinical sign [24]. The therapeutic modality is the same as in the treatment of heart failure, and additional therapy can be in the form of anticoagulant therapy or bromocriptine [24].

In patients with a diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy, decisions about the time and method of delivery should be based on the decision of a multidisciplinary team (cardiologist, gynecologist, obstetrician, anesthesiologist, pediatric neonatologist).

In patients with severely reduced EFLV, it makes sense to advise them not to breastfeed due to the potential adverse effect of prolactin and the high metabolic demands during breastfeeding. Patients with a diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy or the existence of it in the anamnestic data should be advised to use contraception because each new pregnancy poses a risk for acute heart failure and mortality of the pregnant woman. Progesterone-containing contraception can increase volume overload, which can worsen heart failure. Contraceptive pills containing estrogen should be avoided in women with persistent left ventricular dysfunction due to their potential to increase the risk of thromboembolism.

Patients with persistent left ventricular dysfunction with EFLV <50% or EFLV ≤25% at diagnosis should be advised to avoid subsequent pregnancy due to the risk of progression of heart failure and the high risk of mortality. The left ventricular function can be fully recovered (EFLV >50%).

After giving birth, it is necessary to treat the patient with therapy for heart failure and stop lactation by giving bromocriptine 2.5 mg twice a day for the first two weeks and then once a day for up to eight weeks [25].

It is a contraindication for the subsequent pregnancy, especially if there is residual systolic dysfunction. If the function of the left ventricle remains normal even after six months, the mineralocorticosteroid antagonist (spironolactone, eplerenone) can be excluded from therapy with the continuation of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and beta blockers. If the function of the left ventricle remains normal six months after the withdrawal of the mineralocorticosteroid antagonist, ACE inhibitors or ARBs can be excluded from the therapy, and the treatment continues with the beta blocker [13, 26]. Furthermore, echocardiographic controls should follow, and the function of the ventricle itself should be monitored with global longitudinal strain (GLS). Diuretics can be stopped at any time (even before full recovery of left ventricular function) if the patient has no congestive symptoms, and the appearance of congestive symptoms is an indication for the use of diuretic therapy.

Preeclampsia and liver enzymes

Increased activity of liver enzyme systems can be expected in 3% of pregnant women [27], while increased values are associated with PE and represent a characteristic of HELLP syndrome. Acute liver failure itself generally occurs in HELLP syndrome ≥20 weeks of gestation, whereas acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFL) occurs at the end of the third trimester or in the early postpartum period (maternal mortality is approximately 18%) [28]. It is considered that fatty liver infiltration is also a characteristic of PE [29], [30], [31].

Placental abruption

Placental abruption requires an immediate response [30]. It complicates 1% of pregnancies with PE, but in severe forms of PE, its incidence is up to 3% [30, 31]. Patients with hypertension have five times higher risk of abruption. It is characterized by the separation of the placenta from the decidual part [32, 33]. The presence of vaginal bleeding with abdominal pain, often accompanied by uterine contractions or hypertonus with maternal hypotension and poor general condition, are the main clinical features. Antihypertensive therapy reduces the risk of abruption. COVID-19 increases the risk of both preeclampsia and placental abruption [34, 35].

Preeclampsia and renal status

Renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate are expected to be reduced in PE (increased afferent arteriolar resistance or reduced ultrafiltration coefficient) [30, 36]. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels increase in preeclampsia, indicating acute kidney injury [31]. Decreased serum albumin levels affect hemostasis but also the pharmacokinetics of other pharmacological agents [37]. Transient oliguria (less than 100 mL over 4 h) is common in PE, but it often occurs during labor or passes 24 h after it. True oliguria occurs in severe forms of PE (<500 mL of urine/24 h) [36]. The glomerular filtration rate can drop by more than 25 percent. Oliguria, together with anuria, can be associated with renal cortical necrosis and can lead to hematuria.

Preeclampsia and brain status

Seizures are a sign of eclampsia, and there is an opinion that women with a history of PE are susceptible to cognitive impairment later [38]. Eclamptic attacks are more common in patients with severe PE and occur in 1 in 50 patients with PE. The pathogenesis of PE includes changes in the brain that include hemorrhages, petechiae, edema, vasculopathy, ischemic damage, and the appearance of necrosis. PE has also been deemed a risk for vascular dementia, but recently there are more and more theories about the connection between PE and an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease [39, 40]. It is also associated with a higher risk of stroke [41]. The presence of migraine before the onset of PE increases the likelihood of stroke in pregnancy [42, 43].

In more severe forms of PE, the appearance of visual symptoms emphasizes the severity of the disease [44]. They are associated with retinal blood vessel angiopathy, as well as changes in cerebrovascular autoregulation. In addition to pulmonary edema, cerebral edema is one of the complications in the pathophysiological mechanism of preeclampsia. Its presence also leads to visual outbursts [44]. The spectrum of symptoms is represented by blurred vision, the appearance of flickering and light sparks, scotoma, diplopia, or even blindness in one or both eyes. Disorders at the level of arterial blood vessels in the retina lead to its ischemia, so retinal ablation accompanied by damage to the optic nerve can often occur in such forms. Patients have a hard time bearing these symptoms [44]. Cerebral hemorrhage is also accompanied by visual symptoms, so a quick distinction is imperative.

Discussion

The incidence of PE is much higher in low and middle-income countries [45, 46]. Early stratification of patients with early detection of factors that can be predictors of PE is essential [47]. There are numerous tests or markers but with limited sensitivity. Prevention of PE has not given adequate results so far. The time from the initial pathophysiological processes to the clinical manifestation of the disease is often very long. Adaptation of patients to the pathological condition often leads to a delay in appearing for an examination. PE is a condition that affects both the fetus and the pregnant woman. PE represents an entity with metabolic abnormalities (including dyslipidemia and insulin resistance) with increased inflammatory response, hypercoagulable state, and endothelial dysfunction [48]. Hypertension, as the main cause of PE, appears primarily due to higher peripheral vascular resistance, which is the result of arterial and venous vasoconstriction [49]. The second hemodynamic marker is a lower minute volume compared to a normotensive pregnancy. The third hemodynamic change is reduced total plasma volume, resulting from increased endothelial permeability and transudation of the plasma [49]. In addition to hemodynamic changes, one of the main characteristics of preeclampsia is the insufficiency of the uteroplacental circulation. PE probably induces injury of all organs and impacts long-term maternal health. Endothelial dysfunction alone and vasoconstriction lead to systemic hypertension and peripheral hypoperfusion. As a result of the reduced perfusion and inadequate exchange of oxygen in the tissue of the placenta, a dysbalance occurs between the humoral factors which regulate vascular tone because the oxygen free radicals already present are released in larger quantities in the placenta, and their effect is inactivation of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor, as a result of damage to the endothelium and the consumption of thrombocytes [49]. Lipid infiltration in the walls of spiral arteries alone is an indicator of atherosclerosis [50].

Preeclampsia and low-income countries

The picture of the appearance of PE should also be seen in relation to the patient’s economic status. Prevention is the aim and should be part of each healthcare system. Low-income countries present a big problem in the academic community because it seems that the problem is preventable, although clinical practice still does not have a clear answer. A solution that could be easily accessible and applicable to environments where health protection is not at a high level is being searched for.

Directions of development of preventive programs in low-income countries

There is also a theory that the use of vitamin and mineral supplementation would be meaningful. Oral magnesium supplementation did not reduce preeclampsia incidence in low-income and low-risk pregnant women [51]., although the use of magnesium was believed to be logical. Araujo et al. concluded on a sample of 318 patients in Brazil that the use of magnesium citrate supplementation has no effect on reducing the incidence of PE [51]. Oh et al. in a meta-analysis of seventy-two studies, indicated the possible benefit of calcium in reducing the incidence and risk of PE in patients in low- and middle-income countries [52]. Nevertheless, Hofmeyr et al. did not prove the same (the patients took the same before pregnancy until 20 weeks gestation), although some kind of benefit is probably possible in isolated cases [53]. In addition to the dilemma of calcium supplementation, adequate antihypertensive and probably magnesium sulphate therapy is necessary [54]. Nevertheless, considering the clear effect of anemia, the use of calcium is taken with caution, although the effect of calcium in acute inhibition of iron absorption has not been proven in a clinical sense in the population of low-income countries [55]. However, due to isolated cases, the use of calcium can be a form of proper prevention of PE, given that low-income countries must have low-cost screening programs, so probably even basic ones are with some sense [56]. Although not established, the development of inexpensive telemedicine solutions and inexpensive hardware could have benefits [57].

The point of view is that the key lies in increased availability of primary care, education of the population, patient stratification according to comorbidities, follow-up of high-risk patients or those with a history of PE, and adequate control of hypertension. Generally, the increased level of education of both doctors and the population extends through recommendations and guidelines toward progress in all low-income countries [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65].

Analysis of the complete blood count, platelet values​​, and liver function tests should also be performed during the antenatal and immediate postpartum period in patients diagnosed with PE (67). The same should be seen through the prism of HELLP syndrome, which represents a severe complication or progression of PE [6667].

The use of low-dose aspirin (81 mg/d) for the prevention of PE after 12 weeks of gestation in individuals who are at high risk for PE is probably the only evidence-based option [68].

Future directions in low-income countries

Warren et al. state that early detection is the key that must be improved, that staff should be more educated for evidence-based treatment and better availability of the service in places where it is lacking [67]. In addition, education in the public health sector should be forced because only public preventive campaigns can have a broader effect. Also, staff education is imperative. In addition to basic skills, advanced skills must also be enforced.

It should be borne in mind that PE in pregnancy is an established risk factor for an acute cardiovascular incident [24], and patients with a history of PE should be recognized as a high-risk population for an acute cardiovascular incident. This item would lead to a view of those patients with regard to the use of drugs for the purpose of primary prevention of an acute incident.

The view is that the prevalence of perinatal and maternal mortality in patients with hypertensive disorders is higher in low and middle-income countries than in high income [61]. The academic community, as well as national gynecological societies, must change this data in the next period.

Conclusions

PE is not a condition that passes through childbirth, and presents a condition that determines the health of the individual and in the rest of life, and represents etiological risk factor of a wide spectrum of pathologies of the entire organ systems. Individuals with a history of PE should be viewed through the prism of primary prevention of acute incidents.

In low-income countries, cheap screening programs are indicated, with a clear focus on education for both clinical workers and patients.


Corresponding author: Edin Medjedovic, MD, PhD, Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; and Department of Gynecology, School of Medicine, Sarajevo School of Science and Technology, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Medjedovic, E, Kurjak, A, Stanojevic, M, Salihagic-Kadic, A, Begic, E. Preeclampsia: still a disease of theories. Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022;16:138–47. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1922.Search in Google Scholar

2. Fox, R, Kitt, J, Leeson, P, Aye, CYL, Lewandowski, AJ. Preeclampsia: risk factors, diagnosis, management, and the cardiovascular impact on the offspring. J Clin Med 2019;8:1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101625.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American college of obstetricians and gynecologists’ task force on hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1122–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Wallace, K, Harris, S, Addison, A, Bean, C. HELLP syndrome: pathophysiology and current therapies. Curr Pharmaceut Biotechnol 2018;19:816–26. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389201019666180712115215.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Phipps, EA, Thadhani, R, Benzing, T, Karumanchi, SA. Preeclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol 2019;15:275–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0119-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Khoigani, MG, Goli, S, Hasanzadeh, A. The relationship of hemoglobin and hematocrit in the first and second half of pregnancy with pregnancy outcome. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2012;17:S165–70.Search in Google Scholar

7. Powel, JE, Rosenthal, E, Roman, A, Chasen, ST, Berghella, V. Preeclampsia and low sodium (PALS): a case and systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020;249:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.052.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Tay, J, Foo, L, Masini, G, Bennett, PR, McEniery, CM, Wilkinson, IB, et al.. Early and late preeclampsia are characterized by high cardiac output, but in the presence of fetal growth restriction, cardiac output is low: insights from a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:517.e1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Melchiorre, K, Sharma, R, Thilaganathan, B. Cardiovascular implications in preeclampsia: an overview. Circulation 2014;130:703–14. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003664.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Ridder, A, Giorgione, V, Khalil, A, Thilaganathan, B. Preeclampsia: the relationship between uterine artery blood flow and trophoblast function. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:3263. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133263.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Paauw, ND, Lely, AT. Cardiovascular sequels during and after preeclampsia. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018;1065:455–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77932-4_28.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Riise, HK, Sulo, G, Tell, GS, Igland, J, Nygård, O, Vollset, SE, et al.. Incident coronary heart disease after preeclampsia: role of reduced fetal growth, preterm delivery, and parity. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e004158. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004158.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Wu, P, Haththotuwa, R, Kwok, CS, Babu, A, Kotronias, RA, Rushton, C, et al.. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017;10:e003497. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003497.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Stuart, JJ, Tanz, LJ, Missmer, SA, Rimm, EB, Spiegelman, D, James-Todd, TM, et al.. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and maternal cardiovascular disease risk factor development: an observational cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:224–32. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-2740.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Kaur, H, Kolli, M. Acute pulmonary edema in pregnancy - fluid overload or atypical pre-eclampsia. Cureus 2021;13:e19305. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19305.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Pordeus, ACB, Katz, L, Soares, MC, Maia, SB, Amorim, MMR. Acute pulmonary edema in an obstetric intensive care unit: a case series study. Medicine (Baltim) 2018;97:e11508. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011508.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Ram, M, Anteby, M, Weiniger, CF, Havakuk, O, Gilboa, I, Shenhav, M, et al.. Acute pulmonary edema due to severe preeclampsia in advanced maternal age women. Pregnancy Hypertens 2021;25:150–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2021.05.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Ros, HS, Lichtenstein, P, Bellocco, R, Petersson, G, Cnattingius, S. Pulmonary embolism and stroke in relation to pregnancy: how can high-risk women be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.119177.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Kim, NH, Delcroix, M, Jais, X, Madani, MM, Matsubara, H, Mayer, E, et al.. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019;53:1801915. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01915-2018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Regitz-Zagrosek, V, Roos-Hesselink, JW, Bauersachs, J, Blomström-Lundqvist, C, Cífková, R, De Bonis, M, ESC Scientific Document Group. ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3165–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Anthony, J, Schoeman, LK. Fluid management in preeclampsia. Obstet Med 2013;6:100–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X13486896.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Nabatian, S, Quinn, P, Brookfield, L, Lakier, J. Acute coronary syndrome and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1204–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000161059.48886.95.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Mohseni, Z, Derksen, E, Oben, J, Al-Nasiry, S, Spaanderman, MEA, Ghossein-Doha, C. Cardiac dysfunction after preeclampsia; an overview of pro- and anti-fibrotic circulating effector molecules. Pregnancy Hypertens 2021;23:140–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2020.12.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Davis, MB, Arany, Z, McNamara, DM, Goland, S, Elkayam, U. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:207–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Badianyama, M, Das, PK, Gaddameedi, SR, Saukhla, S, Nagammagari, T, Bandari, V, et al.. A systematic review of the utility of bromocriptine in acute peripartum cardiomyopathy. Cureus 2021;13:e18248. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18248.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Mubarik, A, Chippa, V, Iqbal, AM. Postpartum cardiomyopathy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. PMID: 30521191.Search in Google Scholar

27. Dacaj, R, Izetbegovic, S, Stojkanovic, G, Dreshaj, S. Elevated liver enzymes in cases of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Med Arch 2016;70:44–7. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.44-47.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Rath, W, Tsikouras, P, Stelzl, P. HELLP syndrome or acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a differential diagnostic challenge: common features and differences. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020;80:499–507. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1091-8630.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Dani, R, Mendes, GS, Medeiros Jde, L, Péret, FJ, Nunes, A. Study of the liver changes occurring in preeclampsia and their possible pathogenetic connection with acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:292–4.Search in Google Scholar

30. Jeyabalan, A, Conrad, KP. Renal function during normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Front Biosci 2007;12:2425–37. https://doi.org/10.2741/2244.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Kim, SM, Park, JS, Norwitz, ER, Jung, HJ, Kim, BJ, Park, CW, et al.. Circulating levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) correlate with the presence and severity of preeclampsia. Reprod Sci 2013;20:1083–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719113477480.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Parker, SE, Werler, MM, Gissler, M, Tikkanen, M, Ananth, CV. Placental abruption and subsequent risk of preeclampsia: a population-based case-control study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2015;29:211–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12184.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Mikuscheva, A, Strassding, F, MacKenzie, E. Three cases of severe placental abruption as a first symptom of preeclampsia. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2021;2021:3863607. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3863607.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Daclin, C, Carbonnel, M, Rossignol, M, Abbou, H, Trabelsi, H, Cimmino, A, et al.. Impact of COVID-19 infection in pregnancy and neonates: a case control study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2022;51:102366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102366.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Papageorghiou, AT, Deruelle, P, Gunier, RB, Rauch, S, García-May, PK, Mhatre, M, et al.. Preeclampsia and COVID-19: results from the INTERCOVID prospective longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:289.e1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Gupte, S, Wagh, G. Preeclampsia-eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2014;64:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0502-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Gojnic, M, Petkovic, S, Papic, M, Mostic, T, Jeremic, K, Vilendecic, Z, et al.. Plasma albumin level as an indicator of severity of preeclampsia. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2004;31:209–10.Search in Google Scholar

38. Fields, JA, Garovic, VD, Mielke, MM, Kantarci, K, Jayachandran, M, White, WM, et al.. Preeclampsia and cognitive impairment later in life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:74.e1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Basit, S, Wohlfahrt, J, Boyd, HA. Preeclampsia and risk of dementia later in life: nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2018;363:k4109. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4109.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Wang, K, Guo, K, Ji, Z, Liu, Y, Chen, F, Wu, S, et al.. Association of preeclampsia with incident dementia and Alzheimer’s disease among women in the framingham offspring study. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2022. https://link.springer.com/article/10.14283/jpad.2022.62.10.14283/jpad.2022.62Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. de Havenon, A, Delic, A, Stulberg, E, Sheibani, N, Stoddard, G, Hanson, H, et al.. Association of preeclampsia with incident stroke in later life among women in the framingham heart study. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e215077. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5077.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Adeney, KL, Williams, MA. Migraine headaches and preeclampsia: an epidemiologic review. Headache 2006;46:794–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00432.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Sanchez, SE, Qiu, C, Williams, MA, Lam, N, Sorensen, TK. Headaches and migraines are associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia in Peruvian women. Am J Hypertens 2008;21:360–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2007.46.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Stern, EM, Blace, N. Ophthalmic pathology of preeclampsia. In: StatPearls [Internet] [Updated 2022 May 15]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576389/.Search in Google Scholar

45. Firoz, T, Sanghvi, H, Merialdi, M, von Dadelszen, P. Pre-eclampsia in low and middle income countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011;25:537–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.04.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Duley, L. The global impact of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2009;33:130–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Medjedovic, E, Stanojevic, M, Kurjak, A, Begic, E, Iglica, A, Jonuzovic-Prosic, S. Association between maternal thyroid function and risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. J Perinat Med 2022;50:904–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0121.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Hu, M, Li, J, Baker, PN, Tong, C. Revisiting preeclampsia: a metabolic disorder of the placenta. FEBS J 2022;289:336–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15745.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Nirupama, R, Divyashree, S, Janhavi, P, Muthukumar, SP, Ravindra, PV. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology and management. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021;50:101975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101975.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Staff, AC, Dechend, R, Pijnenborg, R. Learning from the placenta: acute atherosis and vascular remodeling in preeclampsia-novel aspects for atherosclerosis and future cardiovascular health. Hypertension 2010;56:1026–34. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.157743.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

51. de Araújo, CAL, de Sousa Oliveira, L, de Gusmão, IMB, Guimarães, A, Ribeiro, M, Alves, JGB. Magnesium supplementation and preeclampsia in low-income pregnant women - a randomized double-blind clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02877-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

52. Oh, C, Keats, EC, Bhutta, ZA. Vitamin and mineral supplementation during pregnancy on maternal, birth, child health and development outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2020;12:491. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020491.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

53. Hofmeyr, GJ, Betrán, AP, Singata-Madliki, M, Cormick, G, Munjanja, SP, Fawcus, S. Calcium and Pre-eclampsia Study Group. Prepregnancy and early pregnancy calcium supplementation among women at high risk of preeclampsia: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019;393:330–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31818-X.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

54. von Dadelszen, P, Firoz, T, Donnay, F, Gordon, R, Justus Hofmeyr, G, Lalani, S, et al.. Preeclampsia in low and middle income countries-health services lessons learned from the PRE-EMPT (PRE-Eclampsia-Eclampsia Monitoring, Prevention and Treatment) project. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34:917–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35405-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Omotayo, MO, Dickin, KL, O’Brien, KO, Neufeld, LM, De Regil, LM, Stoltzfus, RJ. Calcium supplementation to prevent preeclampsia: translating guidelines into practice in low-income countries. Adv Nutr 2016;7:275–8. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.010736.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

56. Salam, RA, Das, JK, Ali, A, Bhaumik, S, Lassi, ZS. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia in community settings in low and middle-income countries. J Fam Med Prim Care 2015;4:501–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.174265.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

57. Shahil Feroz, A, Afzal, N, Seto, E. Exploring digital health interventions for pregnant women at high risk for preeclampsia and eclampsia in low-income and-middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022;12:e056130. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056130.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Bauserman, M, Thorsten, VR, Nolen, TL, Patterson, J, Lokangaka, A, Tshefu, A, et al.. Maternal mortality in six low and lower-middle income countries from 2010 to 2018: risk factors and trends. Reprod Health 2020;17:173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00990-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

59. Ishaku, SM, Jamilu, T, Innocent, AP, Gbenga, KA, Lamaran, D, Lawal, O, et al.. Persistent hypertension up to one year postpartum among women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in a low-resource setting: a prospective cohort study. Glob Heart 2021;16:62. https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.854.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

60. Vestering, A, de Kok, BC, Browne, JL, Adu-Bonsaffoh, K. Navigating with logics: care for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in Ghana. Soc Sci Med 2021;289:114402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114402.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Mersha, AG, Abegaz, TM, Seid, MA. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019;19:458. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2617-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

62. Adu-Bonsaffoh, K, Obed, SA, Seffah, JD. Maternal outcomes of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy at Korle Bu teaching hospital, Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014;127:238–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.06.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

63. Dempsey, A, Sripad, P, Sultana, K, Kirk, K, Hossain, SMI, Warren, C. Pathways to service access for preeclampsia and eclampsia in rural Bangladesh: exploring women’s care-seeking. PLoS One 2021;16:e0245371. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

64. Machano, MM, Joho, AA. Prevalence and risk factors associated with severe preeclampsia among postpartum women in Zanzibar: a cross-sectional study. BMC Publ Health 2020;20:1347. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09384-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

65. Demissie, M, Molla, G, Tayachew, A, Getachew, F. Risk factors of preeclampsia among pregnant women admitted at labor ward of public hospitals, low income country of Ethiopia; case control study. Pregnancy Hypertens 2022;27:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2021.12.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

66. Alese, OM, Naicker, T, Moodley, J. Liver enzyme patterns in maternal deaths due to eclampsia: a South African cohort. Pregnancy Hypertens 2019;17:15–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2019.05.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

67. Warren, CE, Hossain, SMI, Ishaku, S, Armbruster, D, Hillman, E. A primary health care model for managing preeclampsia and eclampsia in low- and middle- income countries. Reprod Health 2020;17:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0897-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

68. US Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson, KW, Barry, MJ, Mangione, CM, Cabana, M, Caughey, AB, Davis, EM, et al.. Aspirin use to prevent preeclampsia and related morbidity and mortality: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2021;326:1186–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.14781.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-09-07
Accepted: 2022-09-15
Published Online: 2022-10-10
Published in Print: 2023-02-23

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Is lowering of maternal mortality in the world still only a “dream within a dream”?
  4. Articles
  5. International Academy of Perinatal Medicine (IAPM) guidelines for screening, prediction, prevention and management of pre-eclampsia to reduce maternal mortality in developing countries
  6. Why maternal mortality in the world remains tragedy in low-income countries and shame for high-income ones: will sustainable development goals (SDG) help?
  7. Maternal mortality in the city of Berlin: consequences for perinatal healthcare
  8. New Jersey maternal mortality dashboard: an interactive social-determinants-of-health tool
  9. The study of healthcare facility utilization problems faced by pregnant women in urban north India
  10. Impediments to maternal mortality reduction in Africa: a systemic and socioeconomic overview
  11. Reducing maternal mortality: a 10-year experience at Mpilo Central Hospital, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
  12. Strategies for the prevention of maternal death from venous thromboembolism clinical recommendations based on current literature
  13. Maternal plasma cytokines and the subsequent risk of uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage
  14. What is already done by different societies in reduction of maternal mortality? Are they successful at all?
  15. Use and misuse of ultrasound in obstetrics with reference to developing countries
  16. Biological therapies in the prevention of maternal mortality
  17. Pre-eclampsia and maternal health through the prism of low-income countries
  18. Comparison of in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 between pregnant and non-pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2: a historical cohort study
  19. How does COVID-19 affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2022-0437/html
Scroll to top button