Abstract
Objectives
To identify when obstetricians would deliver a fetus with antenatal hydronephrosis and normal liquor. Designed as snap-shot survey. Setting: Survey Monkey link. Population/sample were obstetrics and fetal medicine consultants who received the survey link via closed professional forums on the North West Coast Maternity Clinical Network, Facebook, and publicly on Twitter.
Methods
Survey link publicised as above, obstetric consultants were asked at what gestation would they deliver a fetus with antenatal hydronephrosis and normal liquor; and what criteria would they use to make that decision. Main outcome measures were number of years in practice, gestation at delivery, anteroposterior diameter (APD) of renal pelvis.
Results
A total of 44/102 respondents (43%) would deliver prior to 40 weeks (median no. of years as consultant 10 years [IQR 5–17]) vs. those who would not (median years as consultant 5.5 [IQR 3–12]). Re APD threshold of delivery: 17 indicated delivery if the APD were 20 mm, 10 if it were 21–30 mm and 16 if it were >30 mm. Re gestation at which they would deliver: 13 indicated 37–38 weeks, 13 indicated 38–39 weeks and 17 indicated 39–40 weeks. Reasons selected for delivery before term were obstetric anxiety n=2, maternal request n=2, maternal anxiety n=2 and concern about fatal renal damage/renal damage n=34.
Conclusions
A surprising number of respondents would consider early delivery of a fetus with hydronephrosis and normal liquor despite the lack of evidence of benefit. The evidence supporting term delivery means that early term delivery is only indicated for obstetric reasons in this scenario.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. HC conceived the study, co-designed the survey, supervised analysis of the responses and critically revised the manuscript. RW analysed the survey responses and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. UA co-designed the survey, circulated the survey link and promoted the survey on Twitter and critically reviewed and edited the manuscript.
-
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.
-
Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.
References
1. Dudley, JA, Haworth, JM, McGraw, ME, Frank, JD, Tizard, EJ. Clinical relevance and implications of antenatal hydronephrosis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;76:F31–4. PMID: 9059183; PMCID: PMC1720612. https://doi.org/10.1136/fn.76.1.f31.Search in Google Scholar
2. Weerakkody, Y. Fetal hydronephrosis|Radiology reference article|Radiopaedia.org [Internet]. Radiopaedia.org. 2021. Available from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/fetal-hydronephrosis?lang=gb [Accessed 22 Aug 2021].Search in Google Scholar
3. Sinha, A, Bagga, A, Krishna, A, Bajpai, M, Srinivas, M, Uppal, R, et al.. Revised guidelines on management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Indian J Nephrol 2013;23:83–97. PMID: 23716913; PMCID: PMC3658301. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.109403.Search in Google Scholar
4. Shastry, SM, Kolte, SS, Sanagapati, PR. Potter’s sequence. J Clin Neonatol 2012;1:157–9. PMID: 24027716; PMCID: PMC3762025. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4847.101705.Search in Google Scholar
5. Morris, RK, Malin, GL, Quinlan-Jones, E, Middleton, LJ, Hemming, K, Burke, D, et al.. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet 2013;382:1496–506. PMID: 23953766; PMCID: PMC3898962. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60992-7.Search in Google Scholar
6. Morris, RK, Malin, GL, Khan, KS, Kilby, MD. Systematic review of the effectiveness of antenatal intervention for the treatment of congenital lower urinary tract obstruction. BJOG 2010;117:382–90. PMID: 20374578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02500.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Passerotti, CC, Kalish, LA, Chow, J, Passerotti, AM, Recabal, P, Cendron, M, et al.. The predictive value of the first postnatal ultrasound in children with antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:128–36. PMID: 20951094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.09.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Woodward, M, Frank, D. Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int 2002;89:149–56. PMID: 11849184. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.woodward.2578.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Braga, LH, Mijovic, H, Farrokhyar, F, Pemberton, J, DeMaria, J, Lorenzo, AJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections in antenatal hydronephrosis. Pediatrics 2013;131:e251–61. PMID: 23248229. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-1870.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. MacKay, DF, Smith, GC, Dobbie, R, Pell, JP. Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407,503 schoolchildren. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000289. PMID: 20543995; PMCID: PMC2882432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000289.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11. Bilsteen, JF, Taylor-Robinson, D, Børch, K, Strandberg-Larsen, K, Nybo Andersen, AM. Gestational age and socioeconomic achievements in young adulthood: a Danish population-based study. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1:e186085. PMID: 30646301; PMCID: PMC6324359. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6085.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Saving babies’ lives version care bundle version two (SBLCBv2). Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/saving-babies-lives-care-bundle-version-two-v5.pdf [Accessed 22 Aug 2021].Search in Google Scholar
13. Liu, DB, Armstrong, WR3rd, Maizels, M. Hydronephrosis: prenatal and postnatal evaluation and management. Clin Perinatol 2014;41:661–78. PMID: 25155734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2014.05.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Herndon, CD, Ferrer, FA, Freedman, A, McKenna, PH. Consensus on the prenatal management of antenatally detected urological abnormalities. J Urol 2000;164:1052–6. PMID: 10958739. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200009020-00032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Nguyen, HT, Herndon, CD, Cooper, C, Gatti, J, Kirsch, A, Kokorowski, P, et al.. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 2010;6:212–31. PMID: 20399145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.02.205.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Baker, ZG, Hannallah, A, Trabold, M, Estell, D, Deng, C, Chang, AY, et al.. Association between severity of prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis and receipt of surgical intervention postnatally among patients seen at a fetal-maternal center. BMC Urol 2021;21:54. PMID: 33827528; PMCID: PMC8028200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00822-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Parikh, LI, Reddy, UM, Männistö, T, Mendola, P, Sjaarda, L, Hinkle, S, et al.. Neonatal outcomes in early term birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:265.e1–11. PMID: 24631438; PMCID: PMC4149822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18. Engle, WA. Morbidity and mortality in late preterm and early term newborns: a continuum. Clin Perinatol 2011;38:493–516. PMID: 21890021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2011.06.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Risnes, K, Bilsteen, JF, Brown, P, Pulakka, A, Andersen, AN, Opdahl, S, et al.. Mortality among young adults born preterm and early term in 4 Nordic nations. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4: e2032779. Erratum in: JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e210068. PMID: 33416885; PMCID: PMC7794670. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32779.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Venous thrombosis risk factors in pregnant women
- Ethical considerations of maternal-fetal surgery
- Opinion Paper
- John Stuart Mill is relevant to COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy today
- Corner of Academy
- Excellent perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twin pregnancy with timely diagnosis and optimal management – a retrospective cohort study
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- Giving birth alone due to COVID-19-related hospital restrictions compared to accompanied birth: psychological distress in women with caesarean section or vaginal birth – a cross-sectional study
- COVID-19 and its effect on Instagram adoption by #OBGYN residency programs
- The role of the placenta in spontaneous preterm labor and delivery with intact membranes
- New ultrasonographic midtrimester scoring method for predicting spontaneous preterm birth in uncomplicated asymptomatic twin pregnancies
- Antenatal corticosteroids and neonatal outcomes in preterm birth in the United States
- Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes among women with psoriatic arthritis, a population based study
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with inflammatory myopathies
- Outcomes of pregnancies at high-risk for placenta accreta spectrum following negative diagnostic imaging
- Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in patients with retained placenta: building a predict model
- Prediction of insulin therapy in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- Timing of delivery in antenatal fetal hydronephrosis: a snap shot social media survery of obstetric and fetal medicine practice
- Original Article – Neonates
- Is low cerebral near infrared spectroscopy oximetry associated with neurodevelopment of preterm infants without brain injury?
- Short Communication
- Postpartum depression, mode of delivery, and indication for unscheduled cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study
- Letters to the Editor
- Peripartum cephalocenthesis in a large fetal hydranencephaly
- John Stuart Mill and COVID-19 vaccination
- Letter reply “John Stuart Mill and COVID-19 vaccination”
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Venous thrombosis risk factors in pregnant women
- Ethical considerations of maternal-fetal surgery
- Opinion Paper
- John Stuart Mill is relevant to COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy today
- Corner of Academy
- Excellent perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twin pregnancy with timely diagnosis and optimal management – a retrospective cohort study
- Original Articles – Obstetrics
- Giving birth alone due to COVID-19-related hospital restrictions compared to accompanied birth: psychological distress in women with caesarean section or vaginal birth – a cross-sectional study
- COVID-19 and its effect on Instagram adoption by #OBGYN residency programs
- The role of the placenta in spontaneous preterm labor and delivery with intact membranes
- New ultrasonographic midtrimester scoring method for predicting spontaneous preterm birth in uncomplicated asymptomatic twin pregnancies
- Antenatal corticosteroids and neonatal outcomes in preterm birth in the United States
- Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes among women with psoriatic arthritis, a population based study
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with inflammatory myopathies
- Outcomes of pregnancies at high-risk for placenta accreta spectrum following negative diagnostic imaging
- Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage in patients with retained placenta: building a predict model
- Prediction of insulin therapy in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- Timing of delivery in antenatal fetal hydronephrosis: a snap shot social media survery of obstetric and fetal medicine practice
- Original Article – Neonates
- Is low cerebral near infrared spectroscopy oximetry associated with neurodevelopment of preterm infants without brain injury?
- Short Communication
- Postpartum depression, mode of delivery, and indication for unscheduled cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study
- Letters to the Editor
- Peripartum cephalocenthesis in a large fetal hydranencephaly
- John Stuart Mill and COVID-19 vaccination
- Letter reply “John Stuart Mill and COVID-19 vaccination”