Home The influence of race on cervical length in pregnant women in Brazil
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The influence of race on cervical length in pregnant women in Brazil

  • Evelyn Minis EMAIL logo , Antonio Fernandes Moron ORCID logo , Alan Hatanaka , Stephanno G. P. Sarmento , Marcelo Santucci , Francisco H. C. Carvalho , Tatiana K. Hamamoto , Rosiana Mattar , Iara M. Linhares , Ester C. Sabino , Larry J. Forney and Steven S. Witkin
Published/Copyright: October 22, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

Short cervical length is a predictor of preterm birth. We evaluated if there were racial differences in variables associated with cervical length in pregnant Brazilian women.

Methods

Cervical length was determined by vaginal ultrasound in 414 women at 21 weeks gestation. All women were seen at the same clinic and analyzed by the same investigators. Women found to have a short cervix (≤25 mm) received vaginal progesterone throughout gestation. Composition of the vaginal microbiome was determined by analysis of the V1–V3 region of the gene coding for bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA. Demographic, clinical and outcome variables were determined by chart review. Subjects were 53.4% White, 37.2% mixed race and 9.4% Black.

Results

Pregnancy, medical history and education level were similar in all groups. Mean cervical length was shorter in Black women (28.4 mm) than in White (32.4 mm) or mixed race (32.8 mm) women (p≤0.016) as was the percentage of women with a short cervix (23.1, 12.2, 7.8% in Black, White, mixed race respectively) (p≤0.026). Mean cervical length increased with maternal age in White (p=0.001) and mixed race (p=0.045) women but not Black women. There were no differences in bacterial dominance in the vaginal microbiota between groups. Most women with a short cervix delivered at term.

Conclusions

We conclude that Black women in Brazil have a shorter cervical length than White or mixed race women independent of maternal age, pregnancy and demographic history or composition of the vaginal microbiome.


Corresponding author: Evelyn Minis, MD, Division of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, 185 South Orange Avenue, MSB E-506, Newark, NJ 07101-1709, USA; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Newark, NJ, USA, E-mail:

Funding source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: 401626/2013-0

Funding source: Ministério da Saúde

Funding source: National Research Council

Funding source: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Funding source: University of Idaho

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Ann Marie Bongiovanni for data collection and coordination.

  1. Research funding: This study was supported by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Brazilian Ministry of Health (DECIT) and the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq – grant 401626/2013-0). Sequence data collection and analyses were performed by the IBEST Genomics Resources Core at the University of Idaho which is supported in part by NIH COBRE grant P30GM103324.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at The Federal University of São Paulo. In addition, the study was performed in compliance with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration.

References

1. Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Oestergaard, MZ, Chou, D, Moller, AB, Narwal, R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012;379:2162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60820-4.Search in Google Scholar

2. Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008;371:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60074-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Rubems, CE, Sadovsky, Y, MugliaL, Gravett, MG, Lackritz, E, Gravett, C. Prevention of preterm birth: harnessing science to address the global epidemic. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:262sr5. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3009871.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, Mercer, BM, Moawad, A, Das, A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567–72. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199602293340904.Search in Google Scholar

5. Fonseca, EB, Celik, E, Parra, M, Singh, M, Nicolaides, KH. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med 2007;357:462–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067815.Search in Google Scholar

6. Hassan, SS, Romero, R, Vidyadhan, D, Fusey, S, Baxter, JK, Khandelwal, M, et al. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.9017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Rozenberg, P. Universal cervical length screening for singleton pregnancies with no history of preterm delivery, or the inverse of the Pareto principle. BJOG 2017;124:1038–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14392.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Heath, VC, Southall, TR, Souka, AP, Novakov, A, Nicolaides, KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:304–11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050304.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Miller, ES, Tita, AT, Grobman, WA. Second-trimester cervical length screening among asymptomatic women. An evaluation of risk-based strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:61–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000864.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Buck, JN, Orzechowski, KM, Berghella, V. Racial disparities in cervical length for prediction of preterm birth in low risk population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:1851–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1228056.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Nasioudis, D, Forney, LJ, Schneider, GM, Gliniewicz, K, France, M, Boester, A, et al. Influence of pregnancy history on the vaginal microbiome of pregnant women in their first trimester. Sci Rep 2017;7:10201. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09857-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Ravel, J, Gajer, P, Abdo, Z, Schneider, GM, Koenig, SSK, McCulle, SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:4680–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002611107.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Romero, R, Hassan, SS, Gajer, P, Tarca, AL, Fadrosh, DW, Nikita, L, et al. The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women. Microbiome 2014;2:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-10.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Parra, FC, Amado, RC, Lambertucci, JR, Rocha, J, Antunes, CM, Pena, SDJ. Color and genomic ancestry in Brazilians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:177–82. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0126614100.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. de Neves Manta, FS, Pereira, R, Vianna, R, de Araujo, AR, Gital, DL, da Silva, DA, et al. Revisiting the genetic ancestry of Brazilians using autosomal AIM-Indels. PloS One 2013;8: e75145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075145.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Kindinger, LM, Bennett, PR, Lee, YS, Marchesi, JR, Smith, A, Cacciatore, S, et al. The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk. Microbiome 2017;5:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Nguyen, DP, Genc, M, Vardhana, S, Babula, O, Onderdonk, A, Witkin, SS. Ethnic differences of polymorphisms in cytokine and innate immune system genes in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000133486.85400.5e.Search in Google Scholar

18. Jaffe, S, Normand, N, Jayaran, A, Orfanelli, T, Doulaveris, G, Passos, M, et al. Unique variation in genetic selection among Black North American women and its potential influence on pregnancy outcome. Med Hypothesis 2013;81:91823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.08.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Beghini, J, Linhares, IM, Giraldo, PC, Ledger, WJ, Witkin, SS. Differential expression of lactic acid isomers, extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer, and matrix metalloproteinase-8 in vaginal fluid from women with vaginal disorders. BJOG 2015;122:1580–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13072.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Eglinton, GS, Herway, C, Skuski, DW, Bongiovanni, AM, Witkin, SS. Endocervical hyaluronan and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:214–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7756.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Kishida, T, Yamada, H, Furuta, I, Kobayashi, N, Hirayama, EK, Ebina, Y, et al. Factors affecting matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels in the vaginal and cervical fluids in the first and second trimester of pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2009;24:2693–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep284.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-02-17
Accepted: 2020-08-30
Published Online: 2020-10-22
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Clinical evaluation of labor: an evidence- and experience-based approach
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. How fever is defined in COVID-19 publications: a disturbing lack of precision
  6. Initial review of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 infection
  7. Usefulness of COVID-19 screen-and-test approach in pregnant women: an experience from a country with low COVID-19 burden
  8. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term X: microbiology, clinical signs, placental pathology, and neonatal bacteremia – implications for clinical care
  9. Cytokine profiling: variation in immune modulation with preterm birth vs. uncomplicated term birth identifies pivotal signals in pathogenesis of preterm birth
  10. Hyperechoic amniotic membranes in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes (p-PROM) and pregnancy outcome
  11. A novel technique for prediction of preterm birth: fetal nasal flow Doppler
  12. Pregnant women’s knowledge and behaviour to prevent cytomegalovirus infection: an observational study
  13. Reference intervals and reliability of cavum septi pellucidi volume measurements by three-dimensional ultrasound between 19 and 24 weeks’ gestation
  14. First-trimester presentation of ultrasound findings in trisomy 13 and validation of multiparameter ultrasound-based risk calculation models to detect trisomy 13 in the late first trimester
  15. Pre-operative tranexemic acid vs. etamsylate in reducing blood loss during elective cesarean section: randomized controlled trial
  16. External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study
  17. The influence of race on cervical length in pregnant women in Brazil
  18. Original Articles – Fetus
  19. A 24-segment fractional shortening of the fetal heart using FetalHQ
  20. Original Articles – Neonates
  21. Antenatal corticosteroids and short-term neonatal outcomes in term and near-term infants of diabetic mothers. Analysis of the Qatar PEARL-peristat registry
  22. Acute respiratory effect of transpyloric feeding for respiratory exacerbation in preterm infants
  23. Quality improvement for reducing utilization drift in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy management
  24. Letter to the Editor
  25. Cross transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and obstetric ultrasound
  26. ‘Getting to zero’ cross transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in obstetric ultrasound during COVID-19 pandemic
Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2020-0065/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button