Evaluating the suitability of the firefly algorithm for optimization in optical and IoT networks
-
Rajni Rani
and
Sharad Sharma
Abstract
The Internet of things (IoT) is a quickly developing field that is defined by networked smart devices that communicate with one another to carry out intelligent tasks. Because of the energy, latency, and bandwidth limits, these networks must be optimized efficiently. This study investigates whether the firefly algorithm (FA), a metaheuristic inspired by nature, is appropriate for optimizing crucial parameters in IoT networks. The paper provides a thorough examination of the algorithm’s routing ability, energy economy, and convergence. The FA’s advantages and disadvantages in several IoT settings are illustrated through comparative analyses with alternative optimization methods like PSO and GA. According to the findings, FA offers a favorable trade-off between computational cost and performance, which makes it appropriate for lightweight and flexible IoT optimization tasks.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere gratitude to Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, for providing the necessary resources and support to conduct this research.
-
Research ethics: This research does not involve human or animal participants, and hence ethical approval was not required.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable. The study did not involve human participants requiring informed consent.
-
Author contributions: R.R. conceptualized the research, conducted the simulations, and wrote the manuscript. S.S. supervised the research work and contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version.
-
Use of large language models, AI and machine learning tools: No content generation or data analysis was performed by AI tools.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this publication.
-
Research funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in.
-
Data availability: Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
1. Yang, XS. Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Beckington, UK: Luniver Press; 2008.Search in Google Scholar
2. Jain, S, Agrawal, A. A survey on energy-efficient routing protocols for Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2020;8:8341–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968293.Search in Google Scholar
3. Kiani, MG, Zain, AFM. Routing protocols for Internet of Things (IoT): a review. Comput Netw 2019;149:28–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.12.008.Search in Google Scholar
4. Bastani, FB, Akbar, MR. Energy efficient resource management for IoT in smart cities. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2020;16:1323–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2891374.Search in Google Scholar
5. Sharma, P, Kumar, D. Optimization of IoT networks using edge computing for low latency. IEEE Internet Things J 2020;7:4873–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2987890.Search in Google Scholar
6. Chowdhury, KR, Fernandes, SL. Adaptive routing protocols for IoT networks: a survey. J Netw Comput Appl 2018;102:125–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.11.017.Search in Google Scholar
7. Xie, L, Liu, Y. Energy-aware routing protocols for IoT: challenges and solutions. Wirel Commun Mobile Comput 2019;2019, Article ID 9712703. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9712703.Search in Google Scholar
8. Hossain, MS, Razzaque, MA. Cloud computing for IoT: resource management challenges and solutions. IEEE Internet Things J 2021;8:2513–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2979311.Search in Google Scholar
9. Yang, Z, Niyato, D. Energy harvesting and management for IoT networks. IEEE Trans Green Commun Netw 2020;6:672–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGCN.2020.2973192.Search in Google Scholar
10. Liu, J, Zhang, Y. Energy-efficient wireless communication in IoT: a survey. Wirel Netw 2021;27:1241–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02398-5.Search in Google Scholar
11. Sandhu, RS, McFarlane, DC. Machine learning applications in IoT: a survey. Int J Comput Sci Inf Secur 2020;18:159–71. [Available on Scopus].Search in Google Scholar
12. Yaqoob, A, Imran, MA. The role of machine learning in IoT networks. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutor 2021;23:1124–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.3038366.Search in Google Scholar
13. Zhang, H, Zhuang, W. Routing and resource management for the Internet of Things: a survey. IEEE Access 2019;7:144256–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946024.Search in Google Scholar
14. Ghoneim, MA, Ahmed, F. Nature-inspired optimization algorithms for IoT networks. IEEE Trans Comput Intell AI Games 2020;12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2020.2975097.Search in Google Scholar
15. Li, X, Wu, J. Energy-efficient communication protocols for IoT networks. Future Gener Comput Syst 2020;109:569–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.06.019.Search in Google Scholar
16. Kumar, PMP, Prasad, SVSS. A survey of bio-inspired routing protocols for IoT networks. J Commun Network 2020;22:195–209. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCN.2020.0001001.Search in Google Scholar
17. Xu, Z, Zhang, Y. Optimization of IoT networks using genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 2020;19:2005–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2019.2943041.Search in Google Scholar
18. Khoufi, MDZ, Tavafi, MDMK. Design and performance evaluation of routing protocols for IoT networks. J Sens Actuat A: Phys 2020;303:112–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.111785.Search in Google Scholar
19. Chui, CK, Wang, D. A survey on edge computing and its applications in IoT networks. IEEE Access 2020;8:78130–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991154.Search in Google Scholar
20. Rahman, AKMA, Rehmani, MH. Sustainable IoT networks: challenges and solutions. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2020;39:717–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13245.Search in Google Scholar
21. Pandey, S, Kim, KH. Nature-inspired algorithms for IoT applications: a comprehensive survey. Swarm Evol Comput 2020;56:100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100071.Search in Google Scholar
22. Elmahi, AI, Hassan, ES, Shuaib, TZ. Smart IoT systems for green energy management: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J 2023;10. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3236117.Search in Google Scholar
23. Fister, I, Yang, XS, Brest, J. A comprehensive review of Firefly Algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 2013;13:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2013.06.001.Search in Google Scholar
24. Gandomi, AH, Yang, XS. Firefly Algorithm: a comparative review. J Fut Generat Comp Syst 2014;29:324–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2012.09.017.Search in Google Scholar
25. Yadav, V, Gupta, A. Particle Swarm optimization for energy-efficient IoT routing: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 2020;17:2768–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2020.3027681.Search in Google Scholar
26. Kumar, S, Ghosh, S. A comprehensive review of ant colony optimization for IoT routing protocols. Soft Comput 2021;25:3565–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-04758-5.Search in Google Scholar
27. Tariq, M, Khan, F, Hybrid nature-inspired algorithms for IoT, Gao, J, Wang, Q. Nature-inspired algorithms for IoT network optimization: a survey of recent advances. Comput Environ Urban Syst 2021;89:101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101665.Search in Google Scholar
28. Ishikawa, M, Kim, S. Comparative analysis of nature-inspired routing protocols for IoT: a comprehensive review. J Netw Comput Appl 2023;207:103451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2023.103451.Search in Google Scholar
29. Zang, H, Zhang, S, Hapeshi, K. A review of nature-inspired algorithms. J. Bionic Eng. 2010;7:S232–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1672-6529-09-60240-7.Search in Google Scholar
30. Zhang, L, Wang, M, Zhang, S. Nature-inspired computing for IoT data management: a comprehensive review. IEEE Access 2024;10.Search in Google Scholar
31. Ghanbari, A. Hybrid metaheuristic approaches in IoT and smart grid: applications and future directions. IEEE Access 2022;10:47812–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3173815.Search in Google Scholar
32. Hasim, MM. Nature-inspired optimization algorithms in IoT: a review. Comput Environ Urban Syst 2022;89:101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101665.Search in Google Scholar
33. Xue, W. A review of nature-inspired algorithms for big data in IoT: trends and challenges. J Netw Comput Appl 2022;207:103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2023.103506.Search in Google Scholar
34. Yang, XS. Nature-inspired algorithms for smart cities: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Internet Things J 2023;10.Search in Google Scholar
35. Zhang, Q. A Firefly Algorithm based approach for the multi-objective optimization in IoT networks. Soft Comput 2023;27:5107–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06036-1.Search in Google Scholar
36. Prasad, NR. An improved Firefly Algorithm for IoT data routing in a smart grid environment. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2023;14:4275–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2023.3278364.Search in Google Scholar
37. Khraisat, A. Nature-inspired computing for IoT devices: a systematic review. J Netw Comput Appl 2023;220:103409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2023.103409.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
