Home Design and analysis of 2D 4 × 4 mesh NoC architecture with novel bufferless router for optical communication
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Design and analysis of 2D 4 × 4 mesh NoC architecture with novel bufferless router for optical communication

  • Ramanamma Parepalli , Sanjeev Sharma EMAIL logo and Mohan Kumar Naik
Published/Copyright: May 6, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

One common connectivity technology in large-scale tiled chip multiprocessors (TCMPs) is network-on-chip (NoC). There are two main types of NoC routers namely buffered and bufferless. Because of its hardware efficiency, lower energy usage, and simplified design, the latter presents a possible option. This paper suggests a new bufferless NoC router design for a 2D 4 × 4 mesh NoC architecture. Each of the four nearby peers (North, South, East, and West) and one processing element are linked to the routers that make up the suggested mesh network. The crossbar switch, input buffers, and output buffers are removed from the suggested router architecture. The combination of bufferless architecture, XY routing and dynamic prioritization establishes bufferless NoC as a robust and scalable solution for modern computing demands. Dynamic prioritization is a key feature in the proposed NoC architecture, which focuses on ensuring that data packets are processed efficiently and fairly, especially in scenarios with high traffic loads. Optical NoCs are based on optical interconnects and optical routers, and have significant bandwidth and power advantages. Our results indicate that the proposed bufferless router can lead to significant area (30.3 %) reduction over the standard BLESS. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed architecture in terms of throughput, latency, and energy efficiency.


Corresponding author: Sanjeev Sharma, Department of ECE, New Horizon College of Engineering, Bengaluru, 560103, India, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: Not applicable.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: Not applicable.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Karthikeyan, A, Senthil, P. Kumar, GALS implementation of randomly prioritized buffer-less routing architecture for 3D NOC. Clust Comput 2018;21:177–87.10.1007/s10586-017-0979-0Search in Google Scholar

2. Parepalli, R, Naik, MK. Design alternatives of Network-on-Chip (NoC) router microarchitecture for future communication system. In: 2022 International conference on advances in computing, communication and applied informatics (ACCAI), Chennai, India; 2022:1–7 pp.10.1109/ACCAI53970.2022.9752659Search in Google Scholar

3. Parepalli, R, Sharma, S, Naik, MK. Bufferless NoC router design for optical networks-on-chip. J Opt Commun 2024. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2024-0264.Search in Google Scholar

4. Nachiar, CC. Evaluation of bufferless Network-on-Chip with parallel port allocator. Int Res J Adv Sci Hub 2021;3:101–7. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjash.2021.074.Search in Google Scholar

5. Tatas, K. Towards an analytical model of latency in deflection routing: a stochastic process approach for bufferless NoCs. In: 2021 10th International conference on modern circuits and systems technologies (MOCAST). IEEE; 2021:1–5 pp.10.1109/MOCAST52088.2021.9493370Search in Google Scholar

6. Majeed, ND, Mahdi, SQ, Kadhim, MA. Design and implementation of high performance 2D mesh NoC based on new proposed router using FPGA. In: 7th International conference on contemporary information technology and mathematics (ICCITM). IEEE; 2021.10.1109/ICCITM53167.2021.9677773Search in Google Scholar

7. Xiang, X, Sigdel, P, Tzeng, N-F. Bufferless Network-on-Chips with bridged multiple subnetworks for deflection reduction and energy savings. IEEE Trans Comput 2020;69. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2019.2959307.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kunthara, RG, James, RK, Sleeba, SZ, Jose, J. Traffic aware routing in 3D NoC using interleaved asymmetric edge routers. Nano Commun Netw 2020; 27:100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2020.100334.Search in Google Scholar

9. Chen, C, Tao, Z, San Miguel, J. Bufferless NoCs with scheduled deflection routing. In: 2020 14th IEEE/ACM international symposium on Networks-on-Chip (NOCS), IEEE; 2020:1–6 pp.10.1109/NOCS50636.2020.9241585Search in Google Scholar

10. Wang, L, Wang, X, Wang, Y. An approximate bufferless network-on-chip. IEEE Access 2019;7:141516–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2943922.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kunthara, RG, James, RK, Sleeba, SZ, Jose, J. ReDC: reduced deflection CHIPPER router for bufferless NoCs. In: 2018 8th International symposium on embedded computing and system design (ISED), IEEE; 2018:204–9 pp.10.1109/ISED.2018.8704012Search in Google Scholar

12. Tatas, K. High-performance 3D NoC bufferless router with approximate priority comparison. In: 2018 7th International conference on modern circuits and systems technologies (MOCAST), Thessaloniki, Greece; 2018:1–4 pp.10.1109/MOCAST.2018.8376617Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-03-03
Accepted: 2025-04-05
Published Online: 2025-05-06

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2025-0072/pdf
Scroll to top button