Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Transmission Performance of 112 Gb/s POLMUX QPSK Signal in OOK/DPSK WDM System

  • , , EMAIL logo und
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. April 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this article, the impact of cross-phase modulation (XPM) and cross-polarization modulation (XpolM) on transmission of 112 Gb/s polarization multiplexed quadrature phase shift keying (POLMUX QPSK) signal in a wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) system has been investigated. This WDM system comprises of on-off keying (OOK) or differential phase shift keying (DPSK) channels. It is observed that the effects of XPM and XpolM are greatly reduced in a hybrid system of co-propagating OOK and DPSK channels. This is due to the dominance of phase modulation of DPSK signals rather than the intensity modulated OOK signals. The error vector magnitude (EVM) of the received optical signal is evaluated for the increase in number of neighbouring OOK and DPSK channels respectively within a bandwidth of 350 GHz. Also, the effect of increase in bit rate for two neighbouring OOK and DPSK channels has been observed individually on the 112 Gb/s POLMUX QPSK signal. It is concluded that DPSK signals display an improvement of −9.44 dB in EVM over OOK signals when there are eight neighbouring channels in the transmission system.

References

1. Bulow H, Buchali F, Klekamp A. Electronic dispersion compensation. J Lightw Technol. 2008;26:158–67.10.1109/JLT.2007.913066Suche in Google Scholar

2. Gnauck AH, Charlet G, Tran P, Winzer PJ, Doerr CR, Centanni JC, et al., “25.6 Tb/s C+L-band transmission of polarization-multiplexed RZ-DQPSK signals. In: Proc. OFC, Anaheim, CA, 2007, PDP19.10.1109/JLT.2007.912110Suche in Google Scholar

3. Laperle C, Villeneuve B, Zhang Z, McGhan D, Sun H, O’Sullivan M. Wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) and polarization mode dispersion (PMD) performance of a coherent 40 Gb/s dual polarization QPSK (DP-QPSK) Transceiver. OFC, 2007, PDP 16.10.1109/JLT.2007.913071Suche in Google Scholar

4. Charlet G, Renaudier J, Mardoyan H, Tran P, Pardo OB, Verluise F, et al. Transmission of 16.4 Tbit/s capacity over 2,550 km using PDM QPSK modulation format and coherent receiver. In: Proc. OFC, San Diego, CA, 2008, PDP 3.10.1109/JLT.2008.2005506Suche in Google Scholar

5. Bigo S, Charlet G, Pardo OB, Renaudier J. Characterization of the impact of non-linear effects in coherent transmission experiments. In: Digest of the IEEE/LEOS Summer Topical Meetings, July 2008: 125–26.10.1109/LEOSST.2008.4590521Suche in Google Scholar

6. Bertran-Pardo O, Renaudier J, Charlet G, Mardoyan H, Tran P, Bigo S. Nonlinearity limitations when mixing 40-Gb/s coherent PDM-QPSK channels with preexisting 10-Gb/s NRZ channels. IEEE Photon Technol Lett. 2008;20(15):1314–16.10.1109/LPT.2008.926936Suche in Google Scholar

7. Bononi A, Bertolini M, Serena P, Bellotti G. Cross-phase modulation induced by OOK channels on higher-rate DQPSK and coherent QPSK channels. J Lightw Technol. 2009;27(18):3974–83.10.1109/JLT.2009.2021537Suche in Google Scholar

8. Louchet H, Richter A, Koltchanov I, Mingaleev S, Karelin N, Kuzmin2 K. Comparison of XPM and XpolM-induced impairments in Mixed 10 G – 100 G transmission. In: 13th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), 201110.1109/ICTON.2011.5971063Suche in Google Scholar

9. Winter M, Bunge C-A, Setti D, Petermann K. A statistical treatment of cross-polarization modulation in DWDM systems. J Lightw Technol. 2009;27(17):3739–51.10.1109/JLT.2009.2025394Suche in Google Scholar

10. Karlsson M, Sunnerud H. Effects of nonlinearities on PMD-induced system impairments. J Lightw Technol. 2006;24(11):4127–37.10.1109/JLT.2006.884200Suche in Google Scholar

11. Kaur G, Patterh MS. Suppression of four wave mixing in wavelength division multiplexed system with hybrid modules. Elsevier Opt Int J Light Electron. 2014;125:2014.10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.01.164Suche in Google Scholar

12. Garg AK, Kaler RS. Performance analysis of an integrated scheme in optical burst switching high-speed networks. Chin Opt Lett. 2008;6(4):244–47.10.3788/COL20080604.0244Suche in Google Scholar

13. Bhatia EK, Kamal TS, Kaler RS. Peak-to-average power ratio reduction using coded signal in optical-orthogonal frequency division multiplexing systems. IET Optoelectron. 2012;6(5):250–54.10.1049/iet-opt.2011.0089Suche in Google Scholar

14. Singh S, Kaler RS. Placement of optimized semiconductor optical amplifier in fiber optical communication systems. Optik-International J Light Opt. 2008;119(6):296–302.10.1016/j.ijleo.2006.12.003Suche in Google Scholar

15. Sandhu HK, Kaler RS. Transmission of 112 Gb/s dual carrier PolMux DQPSK system. Optoelectron Adv Mat Rapid Commun. 2017;11(11):1–6.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Kaur G, Kaler RS, Singh S. Performance investigation of suppression of four wave mixing using optical phase conjugation with different modulation format in DWDM soliton communication system. JETP Lett. 2017;105(5):1–4.10.1134/S0021364017050010Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-09-13
Accepted: 2017-12-27
Published Online: 2018-04-06
Published in Print: 2020-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.4.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2017-0158/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen