A Review on Strategic Positioning of Bottleneck around the Customer Order Decoupling Point and Issues on Production Planning in Supply Chain
-
Muhammad Saeed
Abstract
The decoupling point separates part of the supply chain oriented towards customer orders from the part based on forecast planning. This paper focuses on identification of bottlenecks and their positioning with respect to customer order decoupling point (CODP) in supply chain continuum. The research is based on a conceptual model that separates engineer to order (ETO), make to order (MTO), assemble to order (ATO) and make to stock (MTS) by a decoupling point. The important feature of this paper is that supply, demand and operational constraints are allocated in specific part of the supply chain, making it more versatile. Shifting bottleneck concepts, including impact of bottleneck position and issues concerning production and capacity planning, are studied extensively to stabilize the supply chain and reduce its complexity.
References
1. Olhager J. The role of the customer order decoupling point in production and supply chain management. Comput Ind 2010;61(9):863–8.10.1016/j.compind.2010.07.011Search in Google Scholar
2. Wikner J, Rudberg M. Integrating production and engineering perspectives on the customer order decoupling point. Int J Oper Prod Manage 2005;25(7):623–41.10.1108/01443570510605072Search in Google Scholar
3. Giesberts PM, Tang LVD. Dynamics of the customer order decoupling point: impact on information systems for production control. Prod Plann Control 1992;3(3):300–13.10.1080/09537289208919402Search in Google Scholar
4. Olhager J. Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. Int J Prod Econ 2003;85(3):319–29.10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00119-1Search in Google Scholar
5. Wortmann JC, Muntslag DR, Timmermans PJ. Why customer driven manufacturing. Netherlands: Springer, 1997.10.1007/978-94-009-0075-2_4Search in Google Scholar
6. Christopher M. Logistics and supply chain management: strategies for reducing cost and improving service., financial times: Pitman Publishing. London, 1998 ISBN 0 273 63049 0 (hardback) 294 + 1 × pp 1999.Search in Google Scholar
7. Sun X, Ji P, Sun L, Wang Y. Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network. Int J Prod Econ 2008;113(2):943–56.10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.11.012Search in Google Scholar
8. Olhager J, Wikner J. Production planning and control tools. Prod Plann Control 2000;11(3):210–22.10.1080/095372800232180Search in Google Scholar
9. Olhager J, Rudberg M, Wikner J. Long-term capacity management: linking the perspectives from manufacturing strategy and sales and operations planning. Int J Prod Econ 2001;69(2):215–25.10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00098-5Search in Google Scholar
10. Erens F, Hegge H, Van Veen E, Wortmann JC. Generative bills-of-material: an overview. Integr Prod Manage Syst 1992;7.Search in Google Scholar
11. Vollmann TE, Berry WL, Whybark DC, Jacobs FR. Manufacturing planning and control for supply chain management. Irwin, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2005.Search in Google Scholar
12. Nielsen P, Nielsen I, Steger-Jensen K. Analyzing and evaluating product demand interdependencies. Comput Ind 2010;61(9):869–76.10.1016/j.compind.2010.07.012Search in Google Scholar
13. Duwayri Z, Mollaghasemi M, Nazzal D, Rabadi G. Scheduling setup changes at bottleneck workstations in semiconductor manufacturing. Prod Plann Control 2006;17(7):717–27.10.1080/09537280600901426Search in Google Scholar
14. Roser C, Nakano M, Tanaka M. Productivity improvement: shifting bottleneck detection, in Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers, 2002;1079–86: Winter Simulation Conference.Search in Google Scholar
15. Soman CA, Van Donk DP, Gaalman G. Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production system. Int J Prod Econ 2004;90(2):223–35.10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00376-6Search in Google Scholar
16. Olhager J, Östlund B. An integrated push-pull manufacturing strategy. Eur J Oper Res 1990;45(2):135–42.10.1016/0377-2217(90)90180-JSearch in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- An Experimental and Numerical Study on Orthogonal Machining of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy
- Formation of Chromium-Containing Molten Salt Phase during Roasting of Chromite Ore with Sodium and Potassium Hydroxides
- Slag Formation – Thermodynamic Aspects and Experimental Observations
- A Slag Management Toolset for Determining Optimal Coal Gasification Temperatures
- A Review on Strategic Positioning of Bottleneck around the Customer Order Decoupling Point and Issues on Production Planning in Supply Chain
- Investigation on Effect of Machining Parameters of End Milling on Surface Finish and Temperature Using Taguchi Technique
- Multi-Objective Optimization of HAZ Characteristics for Submerged Arc Welding of Micro-Alloyed High Strength Pipeline Steel using GRA-PCA Approach
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- An Experimental and Numerical Study on Orthogonal Machining of Ti–6Al–4V Alloy
- Formation of Chromium-Containing Molten Salt Phase during Roasting of Chromite Ore with Sodium and Potassium Hydroxides
- Slag Formation – Thermodynamic Aspects and Experimental Observations
- A Slag Management Toolset for Determining Optimal Coal Gasification Temperatures
- A Review on Strategic Positioning of Bottleneck around the Customer Order Decoupling Point and Issues on Production Planning in Supply Chain
- Investigation on Effect of Machining Parameters of End Milling on Surface Finish and Temperature Using Taguchi Technique
- Multi-Objective Optimization of HAZ Characteristics for Submerged Arc Welding of Micro-Alloyed High Strength Pipeline Steel using GRA-PCA Approach
