Home Propagation of SH waves in a regular non-homogeneous monoclinic crustal layer lying over a non-homogeneous semi-infinite medium
Article Open Access

Propagation of SH waves in a regular non-homogeneous monoclinic crustal layer lying over a non-homogeneous semi-infinite medium

  • Munish Sethi EMAIL logo , Arvind Sharma , Vishal Sharma and Anupamdeep Sharma
Published/Copyright: June 25, 2016

Abstract

This study discusses the dispersion equation for SH waves in a non-homogeneous monoclinic layer over a semi-infinite isotropic medium. The wave velocity equation has been obtained. In the isotropic case, when the non-homogeneity is absent, the dispersion equation reduces to a standard SH wave equation. The dispersion curves are depicted by means of graphs for different values of non-homogeneity parameters for the layer and semi-infinite medium.

1 Introduction

The formulations and solutions of many problems of linear wave propagation for homogeneous media are available in the literature of continuum mechanics of solids. In recent years, however, sufficient interest has risen in the problem connected with bodies whose mechanical properties are functions of space, i.e. non-homogeneous bodies. This interest is mainly due to the advent of solid rocket propellants, polymeric materials and growing demand for engineering and industrial applications.

The propagation of surface waves in elastic media is of considerable importance in earthquake engineering and seismology on account of the occurrence of stratification in the earth’s crust, as the earth is made up of different layers. As a result, the theory of surface waves has been developed by Stoneley [1], Bullen [2], Ewing et al. [3], Hunter [4] and Jeffreys [5].

Many results of theoretical and experimental studies revealed that the real earth is considerably more complicated than the models presented earlier. This has led to a need for more realistic representation as a medium through which the seismic waves propagate. The wave propagation in crystalline media plays a very interesting role in geophysics and also in ultrasonic and signal processing. Monoclinic medium is an example of a body where the non-homogeneity characteristic is one of the most important features. Many authors have studied the propagation of different waves in different media with non-homogeneity.

Sezawa [6] studied the dispersion of elastic waves propagating on curved surfaces. The transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid medium was first studied by Thomson [7]. Haskell [8] examined the dispersion of surface waves in multilayered media. Biot [9] studied the influence of gravity on Rayleigh waves, assuming that the force of gravity creates a type of initial stress of a hydrostatic nature and the medium is incompressible.

Propagation of Love waves in a non-homogeneous stratum of finite depth sandwiched between two semi-infinite isotropic media had been studied earlier by Sinha [10]. Roy [11] studied wave propagation in a thin two-layered laminated medium with couple stress under initial stress, while Datta [12] studied the effect of gravity on Rayleigh wave propagation in a homogeneous, isotropic elastic solid medium. The effects of irregularities on the propagation of guided SH waves was studied by Chattopadhyay et al. [13]. Goda [14] examined the effect of non-homogeneity and anisotropy on Stoneley waves, while Gupta et al. [15] investigated the influence of linearly varying density and rigidity on torsional surface waves in an inhomogeneous crustal layer.

Some of the recent notable works on the propagation of seismic waves in various media with different geometries are due to Chattopadhyay et al. [16], [17], [18].

Recently, Sethi et al. [19] investigated the surface waves in homogeneous viscoelastic media of a higher order under the influence of surface stresses.

In this study, we consider the propagation of SH waves in a regular monoclinic crustal layer over an isotropic semi-infinite medium. The dispersion relation is found in closed form and matched with the classical Love wave equation as a particular case. The dispersion curves are depicted by means of graphs for different values of the non-homogeneity parameters. The influence of non-homogeneity parameters, wave number and layer thickness on the dimensionless phase velocity has been studied.

2 Formulation of the problem

Let us denote by ρi, ui (i=1, 2), the densities and displacements in a monoclinic layer (of thickness H) and semi-infinite isotropic medium, respectively. The z-axis is taken along the interface between the layer and the semi-infinite medium, while the y-axis is taken vertically downwards as shown in Figure 1.

First, we will deduce the equation of motion for the propagation of SH waves in the monoclinic layer. We have the following strain-displacement relations:

(1)S1=ux, S2=vy, S3=wz, S4=wy+vz, S5=uz+wx,S6=vx+uy, (1)

where u, v, w are displacements along the x, y, z axes, respectively and Si (i=1, 2,…, 6) denote the strain components.

The stress-strain relations for a rotated y-cut quartz plate, which exhibits monoclinic symmetry with x being the diagonal axis are as follows:

(2)T1=C11S1+C12S2+C13S3+C14S4,T2=C12S1+C22S2+C13S3+C14S4,T3=C13S1+C23S2+C33S3+C34S4,T4=C14S1+C24S2+C34S3+C44S4,T5=C55S5+C56S6,T6=C56S5+C66S6, (2)

where Ti (i=1, 2,…, 6) are stress components and Cij=Cji (i, j=1, 2,…, 6) are the elastic constants.

The equations of motion in the absence of body forces are as follows:

T1x+T6y+T5z=ρ2ut2,T6x+T2y+T4z=ρ2vt2,

and

(3)T5x+T4y+T3z=ρ2wt2, (3)

where ρ is the density of the upper monoclinic layer.

For SH waves propagating in the z-direction with the displacement only in the x-direction, we have

(4)u=u(y, z, t), v=0, w=0. (4)

Introducing Eq. (4) to Eq. (1), we obtain

(5)S1=0, S2=0, S3=0, S4=0, S5=uz, S6=uy, (5)

Introducing Eq. (5) to Eq. (2), we obtain

(6)T1=T2=T3=T4=0, T5=C55uz+C56uyand T6=C56uz+C66uy (6)

3 Solution for monoclinic layer

Let the non-homogeneities for the monoclinic layer be considered as

(7)C66=C66emy, C56=C56emy, C55=C55emy,ρ=ρ1emy. (7)

Introducing Eqs. (4), (6) and (7) into Eq. (3), we obtain the non-vanishing equation of motion as follows:

(8)C662u1y2+2C562u1yz+C552u1z2+mC56u1z+mC66u1y=ρ12u1t2. (8)

We seek a solution of Eq. (8) is of the following form:

(9)u1(y, z, t)=U1(y)eiK(z-ct), (9)

where K is the wave number and c is the velocity of SH waves.

By inserting Eq. (9) into Eq. (8), we obtain

(10)d2U1dy2+(2iKC56C66+m)dU1dy+[C55(-k2)+ikmC56+ρ1ω2C66]U1=0 (10)

Using U1=V(y)e-a1y/2, where a1=(2iKC56C56+m) in Eq. (10), we obtain

(11)d2Vdy2+[-a124-C55C66K2+iKmC56C66+ρ1ω2C66]V=0. (11)

The solution of Eq. (11) is given by following expression:

V(y)=(A cos Ty+B sin Ty),

where

T2=K2[-m24K2+(C56C66)2-C55C66+c2β12]

with

β12=C66ρ1.

Hence, for the upper monoclinic layer, the desired solution is given by the following expression:

(12)u1(y, z, t)=[A cos Ty+B sin Ty]e-a1y/2ei(Kz-ωt) (12)

4 Solution for semi-infinite half space

For propagation of Love waves, we have

(13)u=w=0 and v=v(y, z, t). (13)

The equation governing the propagation of Love waves in homogeneous isotropic elastic medium in the absence of body forces are as follows:

(14)xτxx+yτyx+zτzx=ρ2ut2,xτxy+yτyy+zτzy=ρ2vt2,xτxz+yτyz+zτzz=ρ2wt2, (14)

The stress-strain relations for general isotropic, elastic medium are

(15)τij=λΔδij+2μεij, (15)

where (λ, μ) are the Lame’s constants and Δ is the dilatation.

(16)εij=12[uixj+ujxi]. (16)

Introducing Eqs. (4), (15) and (16) into Eq. (14), we obtain

(17)y(μu2y)+z(μu2z)=ρ2u2t (17)

For a wave propagating in the z-direction, we seek a solution of Eq. (17) in the form

(18)u2=W(y) ei(kz-wt) (18)

By inserting Eq. (18) into Eq. (17), we obtain

(19)d2Wdy2+1μdμdydWdy+K2(ρc2μ-1)W=0 (19)

To eliminate dWdy, we introduce W=W1μ in Eq. (19), to obtain:

(20)d2W1dy2-12μd2μdy2W1+14μ2(dμdy)2W1+k2(ρc2μ-1)W1=0 (20)

We assume variations in rigidity and density as follows:

(21)μ=μ2(1+ny)2;ρ=ρ2(1+ny)2 (21)

Introducing Eq. (21) in Eq. (20), we obtain

(22)d2W1dy2-T12W1=0;where T12=K2(1-c2β22),β2=μ2ρ2 (22)

Thus, the solution of Eq. (22) is given by the following expression:

W1=eT1y+e-T1y.

Hence, the desired displacement component for the non-homogenous half space is given by the following expression:

(23)u2(y, z, t)=Ce-T1y1+nyei(Kz-wt) (23)

5 Boundary conditions

The boundary conditions are as follows:

  1. The upper monoclinic layer is stress-free, i.e. T6=0, at y=-H;

    (24)C56u1z+C66u1y=0   at y=-H, (24)
  2. The stresses are continuous at the common interface;

    (25)C56u1z+C66u1y=μ2u2y   at y=0, (25)
  3. The displacements are continuous at the common interface;

    (26)u1=u2   at y=0, (26)

Applying boundary conditions (24), (25) and (26) to Eqs. (12) and (23), the following system of equations is obtained:

(27)A[C66T sin TH+(C56ik-a12C66)cos TH]+B[(-ikC56+a12C66)sin TH+C66T cos TH]=0 (27)
(28)A[C56ik-a12C66]+BC66T=-μ2(T1+n)C, (28)
(29)A=C, (29)

Finally, eliminating the constants A, B, C from Eqs. (27), (28) and (29), we obtain

(30)Det(Dij)=0, where i, j=1,2,3, (30)

where

D11=C66 TsinTH-m2C56cosTH;D12=m2C56sinTH+C66TcosTH; D13=0;D21=-m2C56; D22=C66T; D23=(T1+n)μ2;D31=1; D32=0; D33=-1.

After simplification, Eq. (30) takes the form

(31)tan(TH)=A1A2 (31)

where

A1=T(T1+n)μ2C66A2=T2+m24-(T1+n)μ2C66m2

Finally, introducing the values of T and T1 in Eq. (31), we obtain

(32)tan(KH[-m24K2+(C56C66)2-C55C66+c2β12])=A1A2 (32)

where

A1=μ2C66[1-c2β22+nk][-m24K2+(C56C66)2-C55C66+c2β12]A2=(C56C66)2-C55C66+c2β12-μ2C66m2K[1-c2β22+nK]

Here, Eq. (32) represents the dispersion equation for the propagation of SH waves in a non-homogeneous monoclinic layer lying over an isotropic non-homogeneous semi-infinite medium.

6 Particular cases

Case (I): When C66=C55=μ1,C56=0,

Eq. (32) reduces to the form

(33)tan(KH-1+c2β12)=A3A4, (33)

where

A3=μ2μ1[1-c2β22+nK],A4=-1+c2β12.

Here, Eq. (33) represents the wave velocity equation for propagation of SH waves in a non-homogeneous isotropic layer lying over an isotropic non-homogeneous semi-infinite medium.

Case (II): When m=0, C66=C55=μ1,

C56=0, Eq. (32) takes the following form:

(34)tan(KHc2β12-1)=A5A6, (34)

where

A5=μ2μ1[1-c2β22+nK],A6=c2β12-1.

Here, Eq. (34) represents the dispersion relation for the propagation of SH waves in an isotropic homogeneous layer lying over an isotropic non-homogeneous semi-infinite medium.

Case (III): When m=0, n=0,

C66=C55=μ1,C56=0,

Eq. (32) takes the following form:

(35)tan(KHc2β12-1)=A7A8, (35)

where

A7=μ2μ1[1-c2β22],A8=c2β12-1

Here, Eq. (35) represents the dispersion equation for propagation of SH waves in an isotropic homogeneous layer lying over an isotropic homogeneous semi-infinite medium, which is in complete agreement with the corresponding classical result for Love waves.

Case (IV): When m=0, Eq. (32) takes the following form:

(36)tan(KHc2β12+(C56C66)2-C55C66)=A9A10 (36)

where

A9=μ2C66[1-c2β22+nK],A10=[(C56C66)2-C55C66]+c2β12.

Here, Eq. (36) represents the dispersion relation for the propagation of SH waves in a homogeneous monoclinic layer lying over an isotropic non-homogeneous semi-infinite medium.

Case (V): When m=0, n=0, Eq. (32) takes the following form:

(37)tan(KHc2β12+(C56C66)2-C55C66)=A11A12, (37)

where

A11=μ2C66[1-c2β22],A12=[(C56C66)2-C55C66]+c2β12.

Here, Eq. (37) represents the wave velocity equation for propagation of SH waves in a homogeneous monoclinic layer lying over an isotropic homogeneous semi-infinite medium, which is in complete agreement with the corresponding classical result given by Chattopadhyay et al. [13].

7 Numerical computations and discussion

To study the effects of various dispersion non-homogeneities on the propagation of SH waves propagating in a non-homogeneous monoclinic layer lying over a non-homogeneous semi-infinite media, the phase velocity is calculated numerically with the help of MATLAB for Eq. (32). We assume the following values for the constants:

For the monoclinic layer (Tierstein [20])

C55=94×109N/m2,C56=-11×109N/m2,C66=93×109N/m2,ρ1=7450Kg/m3.

For the semi-infinite medium (Gubbins [21])

μ2=6.54×1010N/m2,ρ2=3409Kg/m3.

The effect of exponentially varying elastic parameters and density on SH waves in a non-homogeneous monoclinic crustal layer over a non-homogeneous half space is discussed in the following way by means of the respective graphs.

Figure 1: The geometry of the problem.
Figure 1:

The geometry of the problem.

Figure 2 shows the effect of the non-homogeneity parameter m/2K measuring the rigidity of the monoclinic crustal layer when the non-homogeneity of the half space (i.e. rigidity and density varying quadratically with depth) is taken into consideration. The following observations and effects are notable and discussed below.

  1. For a particular dimensionless wave number KH and a fixed value of the non-homogeneity of the half space, i.e. n/K=0.1, the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 of SH waves increases, as the value of m/2K increases from 0.1 to 0.5.

  2. For various values of m/2K and a fixed value of n/K, the phase velocity (c/β1)2 increases as the wave number decreases in all curves 1–3.

  3. Curve 1 (for m/2K=0.1) is steeper than curve 2 (for m/2K=0.3) which, in turn, is steeper than curve 3 (for m/2K=0.5). This reveals that the dimensionless non-homogeneity factor m/2K has a prominent effect on SH wave propagation.

  4. Curve 1 (m/2K=1.0, n/K=0.1), Curve 2 (m/2K=0.3, n/K=0.1) and Curve 3 (m/2K=0.5, n/K=0.1) coincide as the wave number approaches 0.4.

Figure 2: Variation of the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 against the dimensionless wave number KH, demonstrating the influence of non-homogeneity associated with the monoclinic crustal layer.
Figure 2:

Variation of the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 against the dimensionless wave number KH, demonstrating the influence of non-homogeneity associated with the monoclinic crustal layer.

Figure 3 shows the effect of the non-homogeneity parameter n/K accounting for the rigidity and density of the non-homogeneous half-space when the elastic parameters and density vary exponentially with depth. The following observations and effects are notable and discussed below.

  1. For a particular dimensionless wave number KH and a fixed value of the non-homogeneity of the layer, i.e. m/2K=0.5, the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 of SH waves increases, as the value of n/K increases from 0.1 to 0.5.

  2. For various values of n/K and a fixed value of m/2K, the phase velocity increases as the wave number decreases in all curves 1–3.

  3. Curve 1 (for n/K=0.1) is steeper than the curve 2 (for n/K=0.3) which, in turn, is steeper than curve 3 (for n/K=0.5). This reveals that the dimensionless non-homogeneity factor n/K has a prominent effect on SH wave propagation.

Figure 3: Variation of the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 against the dimensionless wave number KH, demonstrating the influence of non-homogeneity associated with the half-space.
Figure 3:

Variation of the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 against the dimensionless wave number KH, demonstrating the influence of non-homogeneity associated with the half-space.

8 Conclusions

Here, we have studied the propagation of SH waves in a non-homogeneous monoclinic crustal layer lying over a non-homogeneous semi-infinite medium. Closed form solutions have been derived separately for the displacements in the monoclinic layer and the half-space. By using the asymptotic expansion of Whittaker’s function, we have derived the wave velocity equation for SH waves in a compact form. The dimensionless phase velocity is calculated numerically with the help of MATLAB. The effect of various dimensionless elastic parameters and non-homogeneity factors on the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 have been shown graphically. Our main observations are listed below:

  1. For various values of m/2K and fixed value of n/K, the phase velocity (c/β1)2 increases as the wave number decreases.

  2. For a particular dimensionless wave number KH and a fixed value of the non-homogeneity parameter of half space, i.e. n/K, the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 of SH waves increases, as the value of m/2K increases.

  3. For a particular dimensionless wave number KH and a fixed value of the non-homogeneity parameter of the layer, i.e. m/2K, the dimensionless phase velocity (c/β1)2 of SH waves increases, as the value of n/K increases.

  4. In the absence of all non-homogeneities (in the density and rigidity of the monoclinic layer, as well as in the semi-infinite/half-space), the dispersion equation for the propagation of SH waves in a homogeneous monoclinic layer lying over an isotropic homogeneous semi-infinite medium is in complete agreement with the classical dispersion equation.

  5. In the absence of all non-homogeneities (in density and rigidity and C66=C55=μ1,C56=0), the dispersion equation for the propagation of SH waves in an isotropic homogeneous layer lying over an isotropic homogeneous semi-infinite medium is in complete agreement with the classical dispersion equation of Love waves.

The wave propagation in crystalline media (monoclinic media) plays a very important role in geophysics and also in ultrasonic and signal processing. This study may be helpful in understanding the cause and estimate the damage due to earthquakes. This study may help in predicting the behavior of SH waves in non-homogeneous crystalline geological media.

References

[1] Stoneley R. Proc. R. Soc. 1924, A806, 416–428.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bullen KE. Theory of Seismology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ewing WM, Jardetzky WS, Press F. Elastic Waves in LayeredMedia. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hunter SC. In: Sneddon IN, Hill R, eds. ViscoelasticWaves, Progress in Solid Mechanics, I. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Jeffreys H. The Earth. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sezawa K. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo 1927, 3, 1–18.10.1017/S0007485300019775Search in Google Scholar

[7] Thomson W. J. Appl. Phys. 1950, 21, 89–93.10.1063/1.1699629Search in Google Scholar

[8] Haskell NA. Bull. Seis. Soc. Amer. 1953, 43, 17–34.10.1785/BSSA0430010017Search in Google Scholar

[9] Biot MA. Mechanics of Incremental Deformations, John Wiley and Sons, NewYork/London/Sydney, 1965.10.1115/1.3627365Search in Google Scholar

[10] Sinha N. Pure Appl. Geophys. 1967, 67, 65–70.10.1007/BF00880562Search in Google Scholar

[11] Roy PP. Acta Mech. 1984, 54, 1–21.10.1007/BF01190592Search in Google Scholar

[12] Datta BK. Rev. Roumaine Sci. Tech. Ser. Mec. Appl. 1986, 31, 369–374.10.1111/j.1834-7819.1986.tb01225.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Chattopadhyay A, Chakraborty M, Pal AK. Jr. de Mecanique Theo. et appl. 1983, 2, 215–225.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Goda MA. Acta Mech. 1992, 93, 89–98.10.1007/BF01182575Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gupta S, Vishwakarma SK, Majhi DK, Kundu S. Appl. Math. Mech. Engl. Ed. 2012, 33, 1239–1252.10.1007/s10483-012-1618-7Search in Google Scholar

[16] Chattopadhyay A, Gupta S, Singh AK, Sahu SA. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2009, 1, 228–244.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Chattopadhyay A, Gupta S, Sahu SA, Singh AK. Int. J. Theor Appl. Mech. 2010, 5, 27–45.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chattopadhyay A, Gupta S, Singh AK, Sahu SA. Appl. Math. Sci. 2010, 4, 2157–2170.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Sethi M, Gupta KC, Rani Monika Vasudeva A. J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 2013, 22, 185–191.10.1515/jmbm-2013-0025Search in Google Scholar

[20] Tierstein HF. Linear Piezoelectric Plate Vibrations. Plenum Press: New York, 1969.10.1007/978-1-4899-5594-4Search in Google Scholar

[21] Gubbins D. Seismology and Plate Tectonics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-6-25
Published in Print: 2016-8-28

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jmbm-2016-0014/html
Scroll to top button