Home Einführung und Modifikation von Genrebegriffen als Wertungsstrategien im literarischen Feld
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Einführung und Modifikation von Genrebegriffen als Wertungsstrategien im literarischen Feld

  • Rafał Pokrywka EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 6, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the first part of the paper, the interconnection of evaluation and classification in the literary field is discussed. Genre constitutes one of the central notions in Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of literature. Werner Michler’s suggestion to regard genres not as theoretical models or collections of features, but as classifications by agents of the literary field, is expanded by the aspect of genre evaluation. Both processes of classification and evaluation seem intertwined and could be understood as evaluation strategies by agents and communities of the literary field. Introduction of new genre terms and their modification are popular strategies of revaluation of genres, works, authors, and audiences. In the paper, four groups of agents of the generic process identified by Michler (producers, distributors, non-professional recipients, and professional agencies of evaluation) are analysed in view of their power of revaluation. Furthermore, they are placed in the contemporary German literary field on the basis of Heribert Tommek’s model and depicted as hypothetical members of evaluative genre communities. These communities consist of agents and groups (e. g. fandoms) that defend and support genres, seeing in them a stake in the game which is the illusio, the faith in the principles of the field.

In the second part, agents, communities, and their evaluative strategies are presented. First of all, it is the reception mechanisms which decide on the attribution of values to genres and affect the production of literature. Therefore, the authors write their texts with regard to conventional classifications and take part as well, more or less directly, in the processes of revaluation of genres they want to be associated with. The avant-garde is either interested in original genre terms or it avoids any ascriptions whatsoever. In comparison, the mainstream and the subfield of mass production concentrate on medially attractive or conventional and recognizable terms. Authors which have accumulated large symbolic capital can also revaluate genres with their prestige. The potential of terms and evaluations is also reflected in the structure of the field as seen by distributors of literature. Paratexts, advertisements, blurbs, and brands change according to their place on the aesthetic or economic pole of the field. This way, audiences that can choose genres, values and evaluations on the basis of the existing classifications are created and influenced. Even if their symbolic power is small, they manage to formulate evaluative classifications, first of all in the flexible area (forums, blogs) close to the professional agencies of evaluation. Genres are re- and devaluated also in the literary studies and by the critics. Here, the conscious usage of genre terms characterizes the profession. Literary critics and reviewers often choose new, original terms in order to prove their professional abilities of classification. In the structure of the field, between the avant-garde and the subfield of mass production, struggles for symbolic capital and the right to establish new classifications and evaluations take place. In these struggles, there are various agents of the generic process with their specific strategies involved. Many of them can be grasped as members of more or less stable evaluative communities.

In the third part, the mainly theoretical explanations are complemented by two case studies of a weak (the so-called Aussteigerroman) and a strong (dystopian science fiction) revaluation of the genre in the last decades. Behind the career of the Aussteigerroman (novel about an outsider) there is of course the outsider-trend returning regularly since the 60’s, however, no strong evaluative communities in the form of institutions, media, or genre-oriented critics. In comparison, the career and popularity of dystopian fiction in all its variety and terminological modifications of the recent years cannot be reduced to external factors (like fear of the uncertain future, terrorism or pandemics), but it should be primarily explained in view of the influence exerted by agents and communities revaluating the genre. Both careers are cursorily depicted at the end of the paper.

Literatur

Baßler, Moritz, Interpretation und Gattung, in: Rüdiger Zymner (Hg.), Handbuch Gattungstheorie, Stuttgart 2010, 54–56.Search in Google Scholar

Bekh, Wolfgang Johannes/Reinhard Wittmann, Wolfgang Johannes Bekh. Schriftsteller im Gespräch mit Dr. Reinhard Wittmann, alpha-Forum, Bayrischer Rundfunk, 26.10.1998, https://www.br.de/fernsehen/ard-alpha/sendungen/alpha-forum/wolfgang-johannes-bekh-gespraech100~attachment.pdf (26.07.2021).Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Die feinen Unterschiede. Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft [1979], übers. von Bernd Schwibs, Achim Russer, Frankfurt a.M. 262018.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Die Regeln der Kunst. Genese und Struktur des literarischen Feldes [1992], übers. von Bernd Schwibs, Achim Russer, Frankfurt a.M. ²2001.Search in Google Scholar

Brigg, Peter, The Span of Mainstream and Science Fiction. A Critical Study of a New Literary Genre, Jefferson 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Degner, Uta, Virtuose des Trash. Dietmar Daths Entwurf einer »Ästhetik der Drastik« in kultursoziologischer Perspektive, in: Thomas Wegmann/Norbert Christian Wolf (Hg.), »High« und »low«. Zur Interferenz von Hoch- und Populärkultur in der Gegenwartsliteratur, Berlin 2012, 171–182.10.1515/9783110255614.171Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, Jacques/Pascal Durand, Champ littéraire et classes de textes, Littérature 70 (1988), 5–23.10.3406/litt.1988.2277Search in Google Scholar

Eichhorn, Kristin, Einleitung. Reaktionen auf den Ernsthaftigkeitsdiskurs in der aktuellen Literaturproduktion, in: Kristin Eichhorn (Hg.), ›Neuer‹ Ernst in der Literatur? Schreibpraktiken in deutschsprachigen Romanen der Gegenwart, Frankfurt a.M. 2014, 9–14.10.3726/978-3-653-03907-8Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Alexander, Wider das System. Der gesellschaftliche Aussteiger in Genazinos »Ein Regenschirm für diesen Tag« und literarische Verwandte bei Kleist und Kafka, Bamberg 2012.10.20378/irb-405Search in Google Scholar

Heinrichs, Benjamin, Der geometrische Alptraum. Jean-Philippe Toussaints Miniaturroman »Das Badezimmer«, Die Zeit 42 (1987), https://www.zeit.de/1987/42/der-geometrische-alptraum/komplettansicht (26.07.2021).Search in Google Scholar

Hempfer, Klaus W., Zum begrifflichen Status der Gattungsbegriffe: von ›Klassen‹ zu ›Familienähnlichkeiten‹ und ›Prototypen‹, Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 120 (2010), 14–32.10.25162/zfsl-2010-0002Search in Google Scholar

Hielscher, Martin, Geschichte und Kritik. Die neue Lesbarkeit und ihre Notwendigkeit, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 124 (2001), 65–71.10.1007/BF03379284Search in Google Scholar

Jabłkowska, Joanna, Literatur ohne Hoffnung. Die Krise der Utopie in der deutschen Gegenwartsliteratur, Wiesbaden 1993.10.1007/978-3-322-96309-3Search in Google Scholar

Karasek, Tom, Texttypen, Kapitalien, soziale Felder, in: Stephan Habscheid (Hg.), Textsorten, Handlungsmuster, Oberflächen. Linguistische Typologien der Kommunikation, Berlin 2011, 70–97.10.1515/9783110229301.70Search in Google Scholar

Michels, Volker, »… um wieder mal ein flottes Stück Leben um mich brausen zu hören«. Hermann Hesse und München [2013], http://hesse.projects.gss.ucsb.edu/magazine2011.html (26.07.2021).Search in Google Scholar

Michler, Werner, Kulturen der Gattung. Poetik im Kontext 1750–1950, Göttingen 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Neuhaus, Stefan, Vom Anfang und Ende der Literaturkritik. Das literarische Feld zwischen Autonomie und Kommerz [2015], https://literaturkritik.de/id/20276 (26.07.2021).Search in Google Scholar

Pokrywka, Rafał, Familien- und Generationenroman als Wertungsbegriffe. Österreichische Texte in der professionellen Rezeption, in: Anke Bosse/Elmar Lenhart (Hg.), Literatur JETZT. Sechs Perspektiven auf die zeitgenössische österreichische Literatur, Klagenfurt 2020a, 15–39.Search in Google Scholar

Pokrywka, Rafał, Rhetorik der Genrewertung in Zeiten der Enthierarchisierung, in: Joanna Ławnikowska-Koper/Anna Majkiewicz (Hg.), Literarisierung der Gesellschaft im Wandel. Koordinaten der Gegenwartsprosa, Göttingen 2020b, 223–236.10.14220/9783737012225.223Search in Google Scholar

Rauen, Christoph, Einleitung: Prestige-Science Fiction. Neue deutschsprachige Romane zwischen Kunstanspruch und Unterhaltung, in: Christoph Rauen unter Mitarbeit von Sina Röpke (Hg.), Prestige-Science Fiction – Neue deutschsprachige Romane zwischen Kunstanspruch und Unterhaltung, Berlin 2020, 7–29.10.3726/b17699Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Jost, Sozialgeschichte des Lesens. Zur historischen Entwicklung und sozialen Differenzierung der literarischen Kommunikation in Deutschland, Berlin 2004.10.1515/9783110896480Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Jost, Leser, Hörer, Zuschauer, in: Gabriele Rippl/Simone Winko (Hg.), Handbuch Kanon und Wertung. Theorien, Instanzen, Geschichte, Stuttgart 2013, 259–263.Search in Google Scholar

Tommek, Heribert, Der lange Weg in die Gegenwartsliteratur. Studien zur Geschichte des literarischen Feldes in Deutschland von 1960 bis 2000, Berlin 2015.10.1515/9783110359084Search in Google Scholar

Welzer, Harald, Schön unscharf. Über die Konjunktur der Familien- und Generationenromane, Literatur. Beilage zum Mittelweg 36:1 (2004), 53–64.Search in Google Scholar

Witzke, Juliane, Paratext, Literaturkritik, Markt. Inszenierungspraktiken der Gegenwart am Beispiel Judith Hermanns, Würzburg 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, Gary K., Evaporating Genres. Essays on Fantastic Literature, Middletown 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Worthmann, Friederike, Literarische Wertungen. Vorschläge für ein deskriptives Modell, Wiesbaden 2004.10.1007/978-3-322-81301-5Search in Google Scholar

Zähringer, Raphael, Hidden Topographies. Traces of Urban Reality in Dystopian Fiction, Berlin 2017.10.1515/9783110535853Search in Google Scholar

Zeyringer, Klaus, Vermessen. Zur deutschsprachigen Rezeption der »Vermessung der Welt«, in: Gunther Nickel (Hg.), Daniel Kehlmanns »Die Vermessung der Welt«. Materialien, Dokumente, Interpretationen, Reinbek b.H. 2008, 78–94.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Hans Dieter, Schema-Literatur. Ästhetische Norm und literarisches System, Stuttgart 1979.Search in Google Scholar

Zymner, Rüdiger, Gattungsvervielfältigung. Zu einem Aspekt der Gattungsdynamik, in: Marion Gymnich/Birgit Neumann/Ansgar Nünning (Hg.), Gattungstheorie und Gattungsgeschichte, Trier 2007, 101–116.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-11-06
Published in Print: 2021-12-31

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jlt-2021-2009/html
Scroll to top button