Home Discordia Concors. Immersion and Artifice in the Lyric
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Discordia Concors. Immersion and Artifice in the Lyric

  • Eva Zettelmann EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 10, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Descriptions of the lyric have been stressing its artificial, self-referential character, constructing it as an intrinsically a-temporal, non-kinetic, non-mimetic and anti-illusionist mode. While the lyric certainly derives much of its effect from its horizontally superimposed patterns of formal equivalence, our pleasure as readers does not solely derive from the physical re-enactment of a poem’s sound patterns or the cognitive appreciation of its formal mastery. Many lyric texts are immersive; they project a fictional universe and prompt readers to emulate a speaker’s strongly perspectivized vision and subjective vantage point. This paper examines the lyric’s world building potential. It investigates the conditioning factors and referential components of lyric illusion, reviewing in particular the genre’s alleged inability to produce narrative sequence, embodiment and experientiality (Fludernik). Conceiving of the lyric speaker as an innovative cognitive blend (Turner/Fauconnier) provides a possible alternative to biographical constructions of the lyric self. Possible worlds theory (Ryan) is used as a way to approach the genre’s marked tendency towards cognitive mapping and conceptual innovation, towards foregrounding the human endeavour of mentally grasping and representing the world.


I dwell in Possibility

A fairer House than Prose

(Emily Dickinson)


References

Alber, Jan, Unnatural Narratology. The Systematic Study of Anti-Mimeticism, Literature Compass 10:5 (2013), 449–460.10.1111/lic3.12065Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland, L’Effet de Réel, Communications 11 (1968), 84–89.10.3406/comm.1968.1158Search in Google Scholar

Bortolussi, Marisa/Peter Dixon, Psychonarratology, Cambridge 2003.10.1017/CBO9780511500107Search in Google Scholar

Byron, Glennis, Dramatic Monologue, London 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan, Theory of the Lyric, Cambridge, MA 2015.10.4159/9780674425781Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto, The Role of the Reader. Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts, Bloomington, IN 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika, Towards a ›Natural‹ Narratology, London 1996.10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard, Frontières du récit, Communications 8 (1966), 152–163.10.3406/comm.1966.1121Search in Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard, Narrative Discourse. An Essay in Method, Ithaca, NY 1980.Search in Google Scholar

Hühn, Peter, Plotting the Lyric. Forms of Narration in Poetry, in: Eva Müller-Zettelmann/Margarete Rubik (eds.), Theory into Poetry. New Approaches to the Lyric, Amsterdam/New York 2005, 147–172.Search in Google Scholar

Hühn, Peter/Jens Kiefer, The Narratological Analysis of Lyric Poetry, Berlin/New York 2005.10.1515/9783110897623Search in Google Scholar

Hühn, Peter/Roy Sommer, Narration in Poetry and Drama, in: P.H. et al. (ed.), the living handbook of narratology, Hamburg 2013, http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/narration-poetry-and-drama (10.05.2016).10.1515/9783110316469.419Search in Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang, Die Appellstruktur der Texte. Unbestimmtheit als Wirkungsbedingung literarischer Prosa, Konstanz 1970.Search in Google Scholar

Jahn, Manfred, Poems, Plays, and Prose. A Guide to the Theory of Literary Genres, English Department, University of Cologne 2008, http://www.uni-koeln.de/~ame02/ppp.htm (10.05.2016).Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, Closing Statement. Linguistics and Poetics, in: Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, Cambridge, MA 1960, 350–377, 435–449.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances, in: R.J., On Language [1965], ed. by Linda R. Waugh/Monique Monville-Burston, Cambridge/London 1990, 115–133.Search in Google Scholar

Keats, John, Ode to a Nightingale [1819], in: J.K., The Complete Poems, ed. by John Barnard, Harmondsworth et al. 1977, 346–348.Search in Google Scholar

Margolin, Uri, Person, in: David Herman et al. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, London/New York 2008, 422–423.Search in Google Scholar

Müller-Zettelmann, Eva, Lyrik und Metalyrik. Theorie einer Gattung und ihrer Selbstbespiegelung anhand von Beispielen aus der englisch- und deutschsprachigen Dichtkunst, Heidelberg 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Müller-Zettelmann, Eva, Deconstructing the Self? – Late Twentieth-Century British Poetry and the Fiction of Authenticity, European Journal of English Studies 6:1 (2002), 69–84 (Müller-Zettelmann 2002a).10.1076/ejes.6.1.71.4794Search in Google Scholar

Müller-Zettelmann, Eva, Lyrik und Narratologie, in: Vera Nünning/Ansgar Nünning (eds.), Erzähltheorie transgenerisch, intermedial, interdisziplinär, Trier 2002, 129–153 (Müller-Zettelmann 2002b).Search in Google Scholar

Pfister, Manfred, Das Drama. Theorie und Analyse [1977], München 81994.Search in Google Scholar

Pfister, Manfred, ›As an unperfect actor on the stage‹. Notes Towards a Definition of Performance and Performativity in Shakespeare’s Sonnets, in: Eva Müller-Zettelmann/Margarete Rubik (eds.), Theory into Poetry. New Approaches to the Lyric, Amsterdam/New York 2005, 207–228.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure, Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory, Bloomington, IN 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure, Narrative as Virtual Reality. Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media, Baltimore 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure, Tellability, in: David Herman et al. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, London/New York 2008, 589–591.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure, The Text as World Versus the Text as Game. Possible Worlds Semantics and Postmodern Theory, Journal of Literary Semantics 27:3 (2009), 137–163.10.1515/jlse.1998.27.3.137Search in Google Scholar

Schank, Roger C./Robert P. Abelson, Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Hillsdale, NJ 1977.Search in Google Scholar

Stanzel, Franz-Karl, A Theory of Narrative [1979], Cambridge 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark, The Literary Mind, Oxford 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark/Gilles Fauconnier, The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Walton, Kendall L., Mimesis as Make-Believe. On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Cambridge 1990.10.2307/2108134Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Werner, Das Problem der Narrativität in Literatur, bildender Kunst und Musik. Ein Beitrag zu einer intermedialen Erzähltheorie, in: Vera Nünning/Ansgar Nünning (eds.), Erzähltheorie transgenerisch, intermedial, interdisziplinär, Trier 2002, 23–104.Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Werner, Illusion (Aesthetic), in: Peter Hühn et al. (ed.), the living handbook of narratology, Hamburg 2014, http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/illusion-aesthetic (10.05.2016).10.1515/9783110316469.270Search in Google Scholar

Zettelmann, Eva, Poetry, Narratology, Meta-Cognition, in: Greta Olson (ed.), Current Trends in Narratology, Berlin/New York 2011, 232–253.10.1515/9783110255003.232Search in Google Scholar

Zettelmann, Eva, Apostrophe, Speaker Projection and Lyric World-Building, Poetics Today 38:1 (2017) (forthcoming).10.1215/03335372-3716316Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-3-10
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jlt-2017-0015/html
Scroll to top button