Home The pragmatics of black–white conversations: Richard Wright’s representation of the African American experience
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The pragmatics of black–white conversations: Richard Wright’s representation of the African American experience

  • Yanwei Hu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 14, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Richard Wright represents the African American experience of white racism in his novel Native Son and autobiography Black Boy. In the two works, Wright delves into the psychic effects of white racism on young African Americans. From a pragmatic perspective, this article analyzes the conversations between whites and young African Americans in the two works, with the aim of exploring how the conversations can impact on how the young African Americans think about reality and about themselves in relation to whites, that is, how whites attempt to form black subjectivity through conversation. The conversational mechanisms of the formation of black subjectivity are investigated by building on research in pragmatics on conversational cooperation and interpersonal pragmatics. The article first examines the structural features of black-white conversations, and explains the conversational norms by using Grice’s theory of conversation as the explanatory framework. The analysis sheds light on the relative nature of Grice’s maxims and the inseparability of the informational and the relational aspects of conversation. The article examines the relationship dynamics of black-white conversations by drawing on studies in interpersonal pragmatics. From the stylistic feature of the use of address terms, the study delves into the interracial pragmatics of black–white conversations.


Corresponding author: Yanwei Hu, School of Foreign Languages, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China, E-mail:

References

Adams, Timothy Dow. 1993. I do believe him though I know he lies’: Lying as genre and metaphor in Black Boy. In Henry Louis GatesJr & K. A. Appiah (eds.), Richard Wright: Critical perspectives past and present, 302–315. New York: Amistad Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.167Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas Albert Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 253–276. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Carpio, Glenda R. 2019. Introduction: Richard Wright’s art and politics. In Glenda R. Carpio (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Richard Wright, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108567510.002Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, Siobhan. 2012. Towards a neo-Gricean stylistics: Implicature in Dorothy L. Sayers’s Gaudy night. Journal of Literary Semantics 41(2). 139–153, https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2012-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, Siobhan. 2014. Oh, do let’s talk about something else-’: What is not said and what is implicated in Elizabeth Bowen’s the Last September. In Siobhan Chapman & Billy Clark (eds.), Pragmatic literary stylistics, 36–54. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137023278_3Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, Siobhan. 2023. ‘I don’t know how it is best to put this thing down’: Uncooperative narration in Ford Madox Ford’s the Good Soldier. Language and Literature 32(4). 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470231183042.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3). 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and characterisation: People in plays and other texts. London: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 35–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar

Dow, William. 2013. Richard Wright. In Timothy Parrish (ed.), The Cambridge companion to American novelists, 156–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCO9781139003780.017Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, W. E. B. 1969. The souls of black folk. New York: The New American Library.Search in Google Scholar

Gates, Henry LouisJr., Nellie, Y. McKay, William, L. Andrews Houston, A. BakerJr., Barbara, T. Christian Frances, Smith Foster, Deborah, E. McDowell, Robert, G. O’Meally, Arnold Rampersad, Hortense Spillers, Richard Yarborough (eds.). 1997. The Norton anthology of African American literature. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. London: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence. 2001. A natural history of negation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Howe, Irving. 1970. Black boys and native sons. In Donald B. Gibson (ed.), Five black writers: Essays on Wright, Ellison, Baldwin, Hughes, and Le Roi Jones, 254–270. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Yanwei. 2021. Relational work in dispute: Negotiating norms, negotiating relationships. Journal of Politeness Research 17(2). 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2018-0039.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Yanwei. 2024. A socio-cognitive reinterpretation of Grice’s theory of conversation. Intercultural Pragmatics 21(1). 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2024-0004.Search in Google Scholar

JanMohamed, Abdul R. 1993. Negating the negation: The construction of Richard Wright. In Henry Louis GatesJr & K. A. Appiah (eds.), Richard Wright: Critical perspectives past and present, 285–301. New York: Amistad Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, H. 1945. Up from slavery: Richard Wright’s story. The Saturday Review of Literature 28(9). 9–10.Search in Google Scholar

Kukkonen, Karin. 2013. Flouting figures: Uncooperative narration in the fiction of Eliza Haywood. Language and Literature 22(3). 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947013489238.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. 2015. Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics 86. 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.010.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Sage L. Graham (eds.). 2010. Interpersonal pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110214338Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344.2.77Search in Google Scholar

McIntyre, Dan. 2004. Point of view in drama: A socio-pragmatic analysis of Dennis Potter’s Brimstone and Treacle. Language and Literature 13(2). 139–160, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947004041972.Search in Google Scholar

Ohashi, Jun & Wei-Lin Chang. 2017. (Im)politeness and relationality. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, 257–285. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_11Search in Google Scholar

Pratt, Mary Louise. 1996. Ideology and speech-act theory. In Jean J. Weber (ed.), The stylistics reader: From Roman Jakobson to the present, 181–193. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609213Search in Google Scholar

Semino, Elena. 2014. Pragmatic failure, mind style and characterisation in fiction about autism. Language and Literature 23(2). 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014526312.Search in Google Scholar

Short, Mick. 1996. Exploring the language of poems, plays and prose. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Short, Mick. 2014. Analysing dialogue. In Peter Stockwell & Sara Whiteley (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of stylistics, 344–359. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139237031.026Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34(5). 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00039-x.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2013. Relating at work: Facets, dialectics and face. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Shelley E., Susan T. Fiske, Nancy L. Etcoff & Audrey J. Ruderman. 1978. Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(7). 778–793. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.36.7.778.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny. 1995. Meaning in interaction. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 1984. Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.v.3Search in Google Scholar

Waligora-Davis, Nicole. 2011. Weaving jagged words: The black left, 1930s–1940s. In Maryemma Graham & Jerry W. WardJr (eds.), The Cambridge history of African American literature, 311–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521872171.017Search in Google Scholar

Ward, Jerry W.Jr. 2004. Everybody’s protest novel: The era of Richard Wright. In Maryemma Graham (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the African American novel, 173–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521815746.011Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, 43–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886542Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2002. Truthfulness and relevance. Mind 111. 583–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/111.443.583.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Richard. 1938. The ethics of living Jim Crow: An autobiographical sketch. In Richard Wright (ed.), Uncle Tom’s children, 9–22. Cleveland & New York: The World Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Richard. 1940. Native son. New York: Harper & Brothers.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Richard. 2006. Black boy (American hunger). New York: HarperCollins.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-10-14
Published in Print: 2024-10-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jls-2024-2008/html
Scroll to top button