Home Past storyworld possible selves and the autobiographical reformulation of Dante’s myth in Lorine Niedecker’s “Switchboard Girl”
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Past storyworld possible selves and the autobiographical reformulation of Dante’s myth in Lorine Niedecker’s “Switchboard Girl”

  • María-Ángeles Martínez EMAIL logo and Esther Sánchez-Pardo
Published/Copyright: March 27, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This essay focuses on the autobiographical reformulation of Dante’s myth in the short story “Switchboard Girl”, by the Objectivist American poet Lorine Niedecker (1903–1970). Within the cognitive linguistics paradigm of storyworld possible selves, or SPSs (Martínez, María-Ángeles. 2014. Storyworld possible selves and the phenomenon of narrative immersion. Testing a new theoretical construct. Narrative 22 (1). 110–131, Martínez, María-Ángeles. 2018. Storyworld possible selves. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter), the study explores the projection of a past Dantean SPS as key to individuals’ perspectival alignment with the narrator, and concomitantly, with the author’s fictionalized formulation of the realities of American working-class women in the 1950s. The linguistic anchoring of this Dantean SPS is also analysed and discussed. The results highlight Niedecker’s concern with drawing readers into sharing the personal hell of an intelligent, rural middle-class, mature woman with a serious visual disability, who is unsuccessfully applying for a menial job as a switchboard operator. The analysis also prompts a revision of the original SPS typology to include the author SPSs likely to be generated by readers of autobiographical narratives.

References

Abbott, H. Porter. 2008 [2005]. Narration. In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie- Laure Ryan (eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, 339–344. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Alighieri, Dante. 2014 [1320]. The divine comedy. In Teodolinda Barolini, Meredith Levin, Julie van Peteghem, Akash Kumar & Grace Delmolino (eds.), Digital Dante. New York: Columbia University. (Translation by Allen Mandelbaum) https://digitaldante.columbia.edu/dante/divine-comedy/ [Accessed 15 May 2018].Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, Cristina V. 2016. Reading readers: Living and leaving fictional worlds. Narrative 24. 351–369.10.1353/nar.2016.0021Search in Google Scholar

Ciardi, John. 2003. How to read Dante. In Dante Alighieri (ed.), The divine comedy: The inferno, the purgatorio, and the paradiso, ix-xviii. New York: New American Library.Search in Google Scholar

Conte, Joseph. 1991. Unending design: The forms of postmodern poetry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davie, Donald. 1991. Postmodernism and Lorine Niedecker. PN Review 18 (2). 43–45.Search in Google Scholar

Dunkel, Curtis & Jennifer Kerpelman. 2006. Possible selves: Theory, research and applications. New York: Nova Science.Search in Google Scholar

Emmott, Catherine. 1992. Splitting the referent: An introduction to character enactors. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 221–228. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Feyaerts, Kurt. 2013. A cognitive grammar of creativity. In Tony Veale, Kurt Feyaerts & Charles Forceville (eds.), Creativity and the agile mind. A multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon, 205–227. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110295290.205Search in Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 2011. The category of ‘person’ in fiction: You and we. Narrative multiplicity and indeterminacy of reference. In Greta Olson (ed.), Current trends in narratology, 101–144. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110255003.101Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2004. Halliday’s Introduction to functional grammar. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, Chloe. 2017. Cognitive grammar in contemporary fiction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.26Search in Google Scholar

Herman, David. 2002. Story logic. problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jennison, Ruth. 2012. The Zukofsky Era: Modernity, Margins, and the Avant-Garde. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.10.1353/book.15127Search in Google Scholar

Jossa, Stefano. 2012. Politics vs. literature: The myth of Dante and the Italian national identity. In Aida Aude & Nick Havely (eds.), Dante in the long nineteenth century: Nationality, identity, and appropriation, 30–50. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584628.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Margolin, Uri. 2012. Character. In David Herman (ed.), The cambridge companion to narrative, 66–79. Cambridge &New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521856965.005Search in Google Scholar

Markus, Hazel R. 1977. Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (2). 63–78.10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63Search in Google Scholar

Markus, Hazel R. & Paula Nurius. 1986. Possible selves. American Psychologist 41. 954–969.10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954Search in Google Scholar

Martínez, María-Ángeles. 2014. Storyworld possible selves and the phenomenon of narrative immersion. Testing a new theoretical construct. Narrative 22 (1). 110–131.10.1353/nar.2014.0004Search in Google Scholar

Martínez, María-Ángeles. 2015. Double deixis, inclusive reference, and narrative engagement: The case of you and one. Babel Afial 24. 145–163.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez, María-Ángeles. 2018a. Storyworld possible selves. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110571028Search in Google Scholar

Martínez, María-Ángeles. 2018b. Empathy vs. engagement: A storyworld posible selves approach to narrative discourse. In Mª de los Ángeles Gómez González & Lachlan MacKenzie (eds.), The construction of discourse as verbal interaction, 251–272. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Meisel, Perry. 2010. The myth of popular culture: From Dante to Dylan. Malden & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444317497Search in Google Scholar

Mildorf, Jarmila. 2013. Studying writing in second person: A response to Joshua Parker. Connotations 23 (1). 63–78.Search in Google Scholar

Mucha, Katharina. 2016. Diskurs-konstruktionen als mentale raumkonstruktionen. Zur emotiven funktion von literatur aus der perspektive kognitionslinguistischer theoriebildungen. Journal of Literary Theory 10 (2). 271–302.10.1515/jlt-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar

Niedecker, Lorine. 2002. Switchboard girl. In Jenny Penberthy (ed.), Lorine Niedecker. Collected works, 335–336. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520935426Search in Google Scholar

Nurra, Cécile & Daphna Oyserman. 2017. From future self to current action: An identity-based motivation perspective. Self and Identity 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1375003 [Accessed 12 November 2017].Search in Google Scholar

Oatley, Keith. 2016. Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (8). 618–628.10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Pallarés-García, Elena. 2012. Narrated perception revisited: The case of Jane Austen’s. Emma. Language & Literature 21 (2). 170–188.10.1177/0963947011435862Search in Google Scholar

Penberthy, Jennie. 1996. Lorine Niedecker: Woman and poet. Orono: National Poetry Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Penberthy, Jenny. 2002. Lorine Niedecker. Collected works. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520935426Search in Google Scholar

Peters, Margot. 2012. Lorine Niedecker. A poet’s life. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez-Pardo, Esther. 2013. Surreal Niedecker: Avant-garde poetics on the periphery. International Papers on English Studies 1. 11–24.Search in Google Scholar

Singleton, Charles S. 1949. Dante and myth. Journal of the History of Ideas 10 (4). 482–502.10.2307/2707186Search in Google Scholar

Stangherlin, Nicholas. 2016. Nemesis and the persistence of tragic framing: Bucky cantor as job, hebrew prometheus, and reverse oedipus. Philip Roth Studies 12 (1). 73–87.10.5703/philrothstud.12.1.73Search in Google Scholar

Stanton, Richard. 2017. Corporate strategic communication. A general social and economic theory. London: Palgrave.10.1057/978-1-137-54408-7Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 2014. The origin of ideas: blending, creativity and the human spark. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Twitchell-Waas, Jeffrey. 2015. What were the “Objectivist” poets? Modernism/ Modernity 22 (2). 315–341.10.1353/mod.2015.0047Search in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity. Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2007. Construal and perspectivization. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 49–81. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wake, Paul. 2016. Life and death in the second person: Identification, empathy and antipathy in the gamebook. Narrative 24 (2). 190–210.10.1353/nar.2016.0009Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Workers of the Writers’ Program. 1941. Wisconsin: A Guide to the Badger State. New York, NY: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.Search in Google Scholar

Zima, Elisabeth. 2013. Online semantic creativity in parliamentary debates. In Tony Veale, Kurt Feyaerts & Charles Forceville (eds.), Creativity and the agile mind. A multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon, 139–158. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110295290.139Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-03-27
Published in Print: 2019-04-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jls-2019-2008/html
Scroll to top button