Abstract
This study focuses on household disaster preparedness in New York City (NYC) prior to Superstorm Sandy occurrence on October 25, 2012. The purpose of our analysis is to explain the level and patterns of disaster preparedness before a relatively rare natural disaster event occurred and to investigate the factors that influenced the capacity of NYC households to prepare for emergencies and disasters. A random telephone (RDD) survey comprised of 2001 NYC residents across all five boroughs was conducted by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and completed before Sandy struck the City. These data were explored using frequencies, cross-tabs, and factor analysis to build a path model of household disaster preparedness. Findings indicate that household disaster preparedness levels in NYC are high, especially regarding the acquisition of emergency supplies and communication resources. A trust in local government and assistance from one’s social network are the strongest predictors of general household preparedness. Exogenous variables in our model – low income households and those with functional and access needs residents – will be more vulnerable during an actual disaster since they are less able to access communication technologies to search for self-protective disaster information and to communicate their needs during an emergency.
Funding source: US Department of Health and Human Services
Award Identifier / Grant number: HITEP 13000
Funding statement: US Department of Health and Human Services, Grant Number: Grant No. HITEP 13000.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through grant 5P01TP000288 and research contract 200-2014-60654 (Jonathan Links, principal investigator) and the Department of Health and Human Services under grant HITEP 130007-01-00 (James Kendra, principal investigator). The data were collected and provided by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The findings and interpretations are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of these agencies.
Appendix 1
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
| Disaster Preparedness Index (0–14) | Composite variable that combines the 14 preparedness items listed in the survey: |
| i) at least one location identified outside your home where you plan to reunite with family or friends | |
| ii) at least one out-of-state friend or relative who you and your family can call if you are separated during an emergency | |
| iii) an evacuation plan to exit your home and neighborhood | |
| iv) copies of important documents | |
| v) a list of what medications you take, and at what dosages | |
| vi) extra cash in the house in the event that ATMs and banks are not available | |
| vii) 3 days’ worth of drinking water per person in your house stored | |
| viii) non-perishable foods and snacks | |
| ix) a first aid kit | |
| x) a flashlight | |
| xi) a battery-operated radio | |
| xii) personal care and hygiene items | |
| xiii) a computer device (tablet, laptop, desktop, smartphone) in your home | |
| xiv) one computer device (tablet, laptop, desktop, smartphone) with internet access attached to a working printer | |
| Preparedness Supplies Sub-Index (0–6) | Composite variable that combines 6 variables that were loaded into factor one in the factorial analysis with the preparedness indicators: |
| i) personal care and hygiene items | |
| ii) non-perishable foods and snacks | |
| iii) a battery-operated radio | |
| iv) a flashlight | |
| v) a first aid kit | |
| vi) 3 days’ worth of drinking water per person in your house stored | |
| Evacuation Capability Sub-Index (0–5) | Composite variable that combines 5 variables that were loaded into factor two in the factorial analysis with the preparedness indicators: |
| i) at least one location identified outside your home where you plan to reunite with family or friends | |
| ii) an evacuation plan to exit your home and neighborhood | |
| iii) at least one out-of-state friend or relative who you and your family can call if you are separated during an emergency | |
| iv) copies of important documents | |
| v) extra cash in the house in the event that ATMs and banks are not available | |
| Communication Capability Sub-Index (0–2) | Composite variable that combines 2 variables that were loaded into factor three in the factorial analysis with the preparedness indicators: |
| i) a computer device in your home | |
| ii) one computer with internet access attached to a working printer | |
| Trust in Government Index (3–12) | Composite variable that combines 3 variables that were loaded into factor one in the factorial analysis with social capital indicators: |
| i) the city will respond fairly to your health needs, regardless of race, ethnicity, income or other personal characteristics | |
| ii) the city can respond effectively to protect the health of New Yorkers | |
| iii) the city will provide honest information to the public | |
| Attachment to Place Index (4–16) | Composite variable that combines 4 variables that were loaded into factor two in the factorial analysis with social capital indicators: |
| i) I feel I belong in my community | |
| ii) people in this neighborhood generally don’t get along with each other | |
| iii) my neighbors and I want the same things from our community | |
| iv) very few of my neighbors know me | |
| Network Assistance Index (2–8) | Composite variable that combines 2 variables that were loaded into factor three in the factorial analysis with social capital indicators: |
| i) I would seek help and advice from other people | |
| ii) I know neighbors or people I can call on if I needed help immediately | |
| Risk Perception Salience (0–3) | Composite variable that measures the capacity of households to identify future emergencies triggered by floods and hurricanes in NYC, their level of concern with these emergencies, and their willingness to evacuate in the case of an imminent flood or hurricane. Questions used to create the variable: |
| i) What would you say is the biggest natural or man-made emergency that you think is most likely to affect New York City in the next year? And what is the second biggest emergency? (a – floods; b – hurricanes) | |
| ii) How concerned are you personally about each of the following natural or man-made emergencies? (a – floods; b – hurricanes) | |
| iii) What is the likelihood to evacuate when a hurricane is approaching? | |
| Perception of Emergencies (0 – No; 1 – Yes) | Dichotomous variable that measures the capacity of households to identify one or more emergencies that were likely to occur in NYC. Questions used to create the variable: |
| i) What would you say is the biggest natural or man-made emergency that you think is most likely to affect New York City in the next year? ii) And what is the second biggest emergency? | |
| Concern with Natural Hazards Index (3–12) | Composite variable that measures the level of concern towards three natural hazards. Questions used to create the variable: |
| i) How concerned are you personally about each of the following natural or man-made emergencies? | |
| a) an earthquake | |
| b) a hurricane or coastal storm | |
| c) a prolonged heat wave | |
| Concern with Technological Hazards Index (2–8) | Composite variable that measures the level of concern towards two technological hazards. Questions used to create the variable: |
| i) How concerned are you personally about each of the following natural or man-made emergencies? | |
| a) prolonged power outage | |
| b) radiation exposure | |
| Concern with Terrorism Index (2–8) | Composite variable that measures the level of concern towards terrorism. Questions used to create the variable: |
| i) How concerned are you personally about each of the following natural or man-made emergencies? | |
| a) a terrorist attack including an explosion or bomb | |
| b) a terrorist attack including chemicals or biological agents such as anthrax | |
| Concern with Biological Hazards (1–4) | Variable that measures the level of concern towards biological hazards. Question used to create the variable: |
| i) How concerned are you personally about each of the following natural or man-made emergencies? | |
| a) a severe flu outbreak | |
| Low Income Household (0 – No; 1 – Yes) | Dichotomous variable that distinguishes households in the lowest quartile income (≤ $20,000) from the remaining (≥ $ 20,000). Question used to create the variable: |
| a) What would you say is your total annual family income before taxes? | |
| Functional & access needs household (0 – No; 1 – Yes) | Dichotomous variable that distinguishes households with residents with functional and access needs from the ones without residents with functional and access needs. Question used to create the variable: |
| a) Is anyone in your household wounded, disabled to any degree, or living with a long-term physical or mental health condition? | |
| Senior Household (0 – No; 1 – Yes) | Dichotomous variable that distinguishes households with one or more seniors (≥65 years old) from the ones without seniors. Question used to create the variable: |
| a) How many seniors over the age of 65 do you currently have living in your household? | |
| Single Mother Household (0 – No; 1 – Yes) | Dichotomous variable that distinguishes households with single mothers from the ones without single mothers. Questions used to create the variable: |
| a) What is your gender? | |
| b) How many children under the age of 65 do you have currently living in your household? | |
| c) Including yourself, how many people of any age currently live in your household? | |
| Physical Vulnerability (0 – No; 1 – Yes) | Dichotomous variable that distinguishes households located within the Sandy inundation areas from the ones located outside the Sandy inundation. Question used to create the variable: |
| a) What is your zip code? |
References
American Red Cross (ARC). 2013. Coastal Hurricane Preparedness Poll May 29, 2013. Accessed February 9. http://www.redcross.org/images/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m17747155_Hurricane-Preparedness-Poll.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Anton, C. E., and C. Lawrence. 2014. “Home is Where the Heart is: The Effect of Place of Residence on Place Attachment and Community Participation.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 40: 451–461.10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.10.007Search in Google Scholar
Anton, C. E., and C. Lawrence. 2016. “Does Place Attachment Predict Wildfire Mitigation and Preparedness? A Comparison of Wildland-Urban Interface and Rural Communities.” Environmental Management 57 (1): 148–162.10.1007/s00267-015-0597-7Search in Google Scholar
Baker, N. 2014. “Role of Explicit and Implicit Practices in the Production of Situated Preparedness for Disasters.” Natural Hazards Review 14 (4): 1–13.10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000127Search in Google Scholar
Basolo, V., L. Steinberg, R. J Burby, J. Levine, A. M. Cruz, and C. Huang. 2009. “The Effects of Confidence in Government and Information on Perceived and Actual Preparedness for Disasters.” Environment and Behavior 41 (3): 338–364.10.1177/0013916508317222Search in Google Scholar
Becker, J., D. Paton, D. M. Johnston, and K. R. Ronan. 2012. “A Model of Household Preparedness for Earthquakes: How Individuals Make Meaning of Earthquake Information and How this Influences Preparedness.” Natural Hazards 64 (1): 107–137.10.1007/s11069-012-0238-xSearch in Google Scholar
Bihari, M., and R. Ryan. 2012. “Influence of Social Capital on Community Preparedness for Wildfire.” Landscape and Urban Planning 106 (3): 253–261.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.011Search in Google Scholar
Bishop, B., D. Paton, G. Syme, and B. Nancarrow. 2000. “Coping with Environmental Degradation: Salination as a Community Stressor.” Network 12: 1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis, and B. Wisner. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People´s Vulnerability, and Disasters. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203428764Search in Google Scholar
Bourque, L. 2012. “An Examination of the Effect of Perceived Risk on Preparedness Behavior”. Environment and Behavior 45 (5): 615–649.10.1177/0013916512437596Search in Google Scholar
Bourque, L. 2013. “Household Preparedness and Mitigation.” International Journal of Emergencies and Disasters 31 (3): 360–372.10.1177/028072701303100304Search in Google Scholar
Byrnes, J. P., D. C. Miller, and W. D. Schafer. 1999. “Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 125: 367–383.10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367Search in Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2016. Emergency Preparedness and Response. Last modified Febrary 9. http://emergency.cdc.gov/.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, V., D. Banerjee, and L. Liu. 2012. “Do People Become Better Prepared in the Aftermath of a Natural Disaster? The Hurricane Ike Experience in Houston, Texas.” Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 18 (3): 241–249. .10.1097/PHH.0b013e31822d4bebSearch in Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” The American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.10.1086/228943Search in Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., B. J. Boruff, and W. L. Shirley. 2003. “Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards.” Social Science Quarterly 84: 242–261.10.1111/1540-6237.8402002Search in Google Scholar
Davis, M.S. 1989. “Living along the faultline: An update on earthquake awareness and preparedness in Southern California.” Urban Resources 5: 8–14.Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, R. 1997. An Urban Earthquake Disaster Risk Index. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report no. 121. Stanford, California: Blume Center.Search in Google Scholar
DeBastiani, S. D., T. W. Strine, S. J. Vagi, D. J. Barnett, and E. B. Kahn. 2015. “Preparedness Perceptions, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and Level of Household Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006–2010.” Health Security 13 (5): 317–326.10.1089/hs.2014.0093Search in Google Scholar
Diekman, S. T., S. P. Kearney, M. E. O’Neil, and K. A. Mack. 2007. “Qualitative Study of Homeowners’ Emergency Preparedness: Experiences, Perceptions, and Practices.” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 22 (6): 494–501.10.1017/S1049023X00005318Search in Google Scholar
Drabek, T. 1986. Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4960-3Search in Google Scholar
Drabek, T. 1999. “Understanding Disaster Warning Responses.” The Social Science Journal 36 (3): 515–523.10.1016/S0362-3319(99)00021-XSearch in Google Scholar
Dwyer, A., C. Zoppou, C. Nielsen, S. Day, and S. Robert. 2004. Quantifying Social Vulnerability: a Methodology for Identifying Those at Risk to Natural Hazards. Accessed February 10 http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA4267.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Eisenman, D. P., C. Wold, J. Fielding, A. Long, C. Setodji, S. Hickey, and L. Gelberg. 2006. “Differences in Individual-Level Terrorism Preparedness in Los Angeles County.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 30: 1–6.10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Enarson, E., A. Fothergill, and L. Peek. 2006. “Gender and disaster: Foundations and directions”. In Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, and R. Dynes, 130–146. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_8Search in Google Scholar
Faupel, C. E., S. P. Kelley, and T. Pete. 1992. “The impact of disaster education on household preparedness for Hurricane Hugo. ” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 10 (1): 5–24.10.1177/028072709201000101Search in Google Scholar
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2016. Plan and Prepare. Last modified February 9. http://www.fema.gov/plan-prepareSearch in Google Scholar
Fothergill, A. 1996. “Gender, Risk, and Disaster.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 14 (1): 33–56.10.1177/028072709601400103Search in Google Scholar
Fothergill, A. 1998. “The Neglect of Gender in Disaster Work: An Overview of the Literature.” In The Gendered Terrain of Disaster, edited by E. Enarson and B. H. Morrow, 11–25. Westport, C.T: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar
Fothergill, A. 2004. Heads Above Water: Gender, Class, and Family in the Grand Forks Flood, Albany, NY: SUNY Press .10.1353/book4836Search in Google Scholar
Global Strategy Group (GSG). 2012. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene OEPR Citywide Survey November, 2012, Draft Report. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Grootaert, C., D. Narayan, V. N. Jones, and M. Woolcock. 2004. Measuring Social Capital: An Integrated Questionnaire. World Bank Working Paper No. 18. World Bank, Washington, DC.10.1596/0-8213-5661-5Search in Google Scholar
Haddow, G., J.A. Bullock, and D. P. Coppola. 2013. Introduction to Emergency Management. Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.10.1016/B978-0-12-407784-3.00017-6Search in Google Scholar
Heller, K., D. B. Alexander, M. Gatz, B. G. Knight, and T. Rose. 2005. “Social and Personal Factors as Predictors of Earthquake Preparation: The role of Support Provision, Network Discussion, Negative Affect, Age, and Education.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35 (2): 399–422.10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02127.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hewitt, K. 1997. Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Holdsworth, L., and Y. A. Hartman. 2009. “Indicators of community cohesion in Australian County Town.” Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance 2: 76–97.10.5130/cjlg.v0i2.1009Search in Google Scholar
Houts, P. S., M. K. Lindell, T. W. Hu, P. D. Cleary, G. Tokuhata, and C. Flynn. 1984. “The Protective Action Decision Model Applied to Evacuation during the Three Mile Island Crisis.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 2 (1): 27–39.10.1177/028072708400200103Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, J. G., A. Wilke, and E. U. Weber. 2004. “Beyond a Trait View of Risk-Taking: A Domain-Specific Scale Measuring Risk Perceptions, Expected Benefits, and Perceived-Risk Attitude in German-Speaking Populations.” Polish Psychological Bulletin 35: 153–172.Search in Google Scholar
Kartez, J. D., and M. K. Lindell. 1987. “Planning for Uncertainty: The Case of Local Disaster Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 53: 487–498.10.1080/01944368708977138Search in Google Scholar
Kendra, J. M. 2007. “The Reconstitution of Risk Objects.” Journal of Risk Research 10 (1): 29–48.10.1080/13669870600995931Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Y. C., and J. Kang. 2010. “Communication, Neighborhood Belonging and Hurricane Preparedness.” Disasters 34 (2): 470–488.10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01138.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kimhi, S., and M. Shamai. 2004. “Community Resilience and the Impact of Stress: Adult Response to Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon.” Journal of Community Psychology 32 (4): 439–451.10.1002/jcop.20012Search in Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, A. 2004. “Generic Sources of Disaster Communities: a Social Network Approach”. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 24 (10/11): 94–129.10.1108/01443330410791073Search in Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, A. 2005. “Preparing for the Inevitable: Environmental Risk Perceptions and Disaster Preparedness.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 23: 97–127.10.1177/028072700502300204Search in Google Scholar
Koh, H. K, and R. O. Cadigan. 2009. “Disaster Preparedness and Social Capital.” In Social Capital and Health, edited by I. Kawachi, S. V. Subramanian and D. Kim, 273–285. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-71311-3_13Search in Google Scholar
Lee, J. E. C. and L. Lemyre. 2009. “A Social-Cognitive Perspective of Terrorism Risk Perception and Individual Response in Canada.” Risk Analysis 29: 1265–1280.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01264.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lindell, M. K., and R. W. Perry. 2000. “Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazards: A Review of Research.” Environment and Behavior 32: 590–630.10.1177/00139160021972621Search in Google Scholar
Lindell, M. K., and C. S. Prater. 2000. “Household Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments: A Comparison of Residents in Two States.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 18: 317–338.10.1177/028072700001800203Search in Google Scholar
Lindell, M. K., and D. J. Whitney. 2000. “Correlates of Household Seismic Hazard Adjustment Adoption.” Risk Analysis, 20 (1): 13–25.10.1111/0272-4332.00002Search in Google Scholar
Lindell, M. R., and R. W. Perry. 2012. “The Protective Active Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence.” Risk Analysis 32 (4): 616–632.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.xSearch in Google Scholar
Martins, V. N., D. Sousa e Silva, and P. Cabral. 2012. “Social Vulnerability Assessment to Seismic Risk Using Multicriteria Analysis: the Case Study of Vila Franca do Campo (São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal).” Natural Hazards 62: 385–404.10.1007/s11069-012-0084-xSearch in Google Scholar
McGee, T. K. and S. Russell. 2003. “‘It’s Just a Natural Way of Life...’ An Investigation of Wildfire Preparedness in Rural Australia.” Environmental Hazards 5: 1–12.10.1016/j.hazards.2003.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Mertler, C. A., and R. A. Vannatta. 2005. Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods. 3rd ed. London: Pyrczak Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Miceli, R., I. Sotgiu, and M. Settanni. 2008. “Disaster Preparedness and Perception of Flood Risk: A Study in an Alpine Valley in Italy.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 28 (2): 164–173.10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.006Search in Google Scholar
Mileti, D. S. 1999. Disasters by design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mileti, D. S., and J. D. Darlington. 1995. “Societal Response to Revised Earthquake Probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Area.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 13 (2): 119–145.10.1177/028072709501300201Search in Google Scholar
Mishra, S., S. Mazumdar, and D. Suar. 2010. “Place Attachment and Flood Preparedness.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (2): 187–197.10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.005Search in Google Scholar
Morrow, B. H. 1999. “Identifying and Mapping Community Vulnerability.” Disasters 23 (1): 11–18.10.1111/1467-7717.00102Search in Google Scholar
Morrow, B. H., and E. Enarson. 1994. “Making the Case for Gendered Disaster Research.” Paper presented at the 13th World Congress of Sociology, Bielefeld, Germany, July.Search in Google Scholar
Mulilis, J., and T. S. Duval. 1995. “Negative Threat Appeals and Earthquake Preparedness: A Person Relative-to-Event (PrE) Model of Coping with Threat.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25 (15): 1319–1339.10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02620.xSearch in Google Scholar
Myers, K. N. 1996. Total Contingency Planning for Disasters: Managing Risk – Minimizing Loss – Ensuring Business Continuity. London: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y. and R. Shaw. 2004. “Social Capital: A Missing Link to Disaster Recovery.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 22 (1): 5–34.10.1177/028072700402200101Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien, P., and D. S. Mileti. 1992. “Citizen Response in Emergency Response During the Loma Prieta Earthquake.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies 10 (1): 71–91.10.1177/028072709201000104Search in Google Scholar
Ozdemir, O. and C. Yilmaz. 2011. “Factors Affecting Risk Mitigation Revisited: The Case of Earthquake in Turkey.” Journal of Risk Research 14: 17–46.10.1080/13669871003782751Search in Google Scholar
Paton, D. 2003. “Disaster Preparedness: A Social-Cognitive Perspective.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 12 (3): 210–216.10.1108/09653560310480686Search in Google Scholar
Paton, D., and D. Johnston. 2001. “Disasters and Communities: Vulnerability, Resilience and Preparedness.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 10 (4): 270–277.10.1108/EUM0000000005930Search in Google Scholar
Paton, D., L. Smith, and D. M. Johnston. 2000. “Volcanic Hazards: Risk Perception and Preparedness.” New Zealand Journal of Psychology 29 (2): 86–91.Search in Google Scholar
Paton, D., M. Millar, and D. Johnston. 2001. “Community Resilience to Volcanic Hazard Consequences.” Natural Hazards, 24: 157–169.10.1023/A:1011882106373Search in Google Scholar
Paton, D., L. M. Smith, and D. M. Johnston. 2005. “When good intentions turn bad: promoting natural hazard preparedness.” The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 20: 25–30.Search in Google Scholar
Paul, B. K., and R. H. Bhuiyan. 2010. “Urban Earthquake Hazard: Perceived Seismic Risk and Preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.” Disasters 34 (2): 337–359.10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01132.xSearch in Google Scholar
Phillips, B. 2011. “Research Methods and the Practice of Emergency Management”. In Introduction to Emergency Management, edited by B. Phillips, D. M. Neal and G. R. Webb, 59–96. Florida: CRC Press.10.1201/b14888Search in Google Scholar
Putnam, R. 1995. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” Political Science and Politics 28 (4): 664–683.10.1017/S1049096500058856Search in Google Scholar
Quarantelli, E. P. 1993. “Community Crises: An Exploratory Comparison of the Characteristics and Consequences of Disasters and Riots”. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 1 (2): 67–78.10.1111/j.1468-5973.1993.tb00009.xSearch in Google Scholar
Quarantelli, E. P. 1994. Preparedness and Disasters: A Very Complex Relationship. Delaware, United States: Preliminary Paper 209, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, L. A., J. D. Goltz, and L. Bourque. 1995. “Preparedness and Hazard Mitigation Activities Before and After Two Earthquakes.” Environment and Behavior 27: 744–770.10.1177/0013916595276002Search in Google Scholar
Starkweather, J. and R. Herrington. 2014. Research and Statistical Support. University of North Texas. Retrieved December 2, 2017. (http://www.unt.edu/rss/class/Jon/SPSS_SC/Module9/M9_FA/SPSS_M9_FA1.htm)Search in Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. J., V. Basolo, R. Burby, and A. Cruz. 2004. “Joint Seismic and Technological Disasters: Possible Impacts and Community Preparedness in an Urban Setting.” Natural Hazards Review 5 (4): 159–169.10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:4(159)Search in Google Scholar
Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1979. “Rating the Risks.” Environment 21 (3): 14–39.10.1007/978-1-4899-2168-0_17Search in Google Scholar
Tierney, K. J. 1993. Socio-Economic Aspects of Hazard Mitigation. Delaware, United States: Preliminary Paper 190, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.Search in Google Scholar
Tierney, K. J., M. K. Lindell, and R. W. Perry. 2001. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, R., J. Nigg, and D. Heller-Paz. 1986. Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in Southern California. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520329850Search in Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, S., B. Temple, M. Milliron, C. Vasquez, B. Packard, and B. Rudy. 2007. “The Lack of Disaster Preparedness by the Public and it’s Affect on Communities.” The Internet Journal of Rescue and Disaster Medicine 7 (2): 1–8.10.5580/21f7Search in Google Scholar
Wisconsin Office of Justice Assistance (WOJA). 2011. Emergency Preparedness in Wisconsin Households 2011, Survey Responses. Wisconsin.Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Pre-Disaster Established Trust and Relationships: Two Major Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Implementing the ICS
- Household Disaster Preparedness in New York City before Superstorm Sandy: Findings and Recommendations
- C2 Agility for Emergency Management: Examining the Katrina and Sandy Responses
- An Analysis of the Emergency Fire Response to the Colorado 2012 Waldo Canyon and 2013 Black Forest Fires
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Full-Scale Exercise of Epidemiologic Capacity for Bioterrorism Response
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Pre-Disaster Established Trust and Relationships: Two Major Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Implementing the ICS
- Household Disaster Preparedness in New York City before Superstorm Sandy: Findings and Recommendations
- C2 Agility for Emergency Management: Examining the Katrina and Sandy Responses
- An Analysis of the Emergency Fire Response to the Colorado 2012 Waldo Canyon and 2013 Black Forest Fires
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Full-Scale Exercise of Epidemiologic Capacity for Bioterrorism Response