Home A note on torsion length and torsion subgroups
Article Publicly Available

A note on torsion length and torsion subgroups

  • Ian J. Leary and Ashot Minasyan EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 16, 2022

Abstract

Answering Questions 19.23 and 19.24 from the Kourovka notebook, we construct polycyclic groups with arbitrary torsion lengths and give examples of finitely presented groups whose quotients by their torsion subgroups are not finitely presented.

1 Introduction

Given a group 𝐺, the torsion subgroup Tor ( G ) is the normal subgroup of 𝐺 generated by all elements of finite order. The torsion length of 𝐺 is defined as follows. Let G 0 = G and G n + 1 = G n / Tor ( G n ) for n 0 . The torsion length of 𝐺, TorLen ( G ) , is the smallest n 0 such that G n is torsion-free. If no such 𝑛 exists, then we define TorLen ( G ) = ω . Torsion length was defined and studied by Chiodo and Vyas in [3], and in [4], the same authors constructed finitely presented groups of arbitrary torsion length.

Chiodo and Vyas asked in [6, Questions 19.23 and 19.24] whether there exist finitely presented soluble groups of torsion length greater than 2 and whether there exists a finitely presented group 𝐺 such that G / Tor ( G ) is not finitely presented. Versions of these questions also appeared in [3, Subsection 3.3] and [4, Question 1]. In this note, we answer both questions affirmatively.

2 Polycyclic groups of arbitrarily large torsion length

2.1 Neutral homomorphisms and automorphisms of semidirect products

In this subsection, we develop a few tools that will be used in the main construction.

Definition 2.1

Let 𝐾 be a group and let β : K K be an endomorphism.

  • We define the map Δ β : K K by Δ β ( k ) = k - 1 β ( k ) for all k K .

  • We denote by N ( β ) K the normal closure of the subset

    Δ β ( K ) = { k - 1 β ( k ) k K } .

  • If 𝐶 is another group and ϕ : K C is a homomorphism, we say that 𝜙 is 𝛽-neutral if ϕ β = ϕ , i.e., if ϕ ( β ( k ) ) = ϕ ( k ) for all k K .

The map Δ β can be thought of as a (non-abelian) 1-cocycle from 𝐾 to 𝐾, where 𝐾 acts on itself by conjugation (cf. [8, Section I.5.1]).

Lemma 2.2

Suppose that 𝐾 is a group generated by a set 𝑋 and β End ( K ) .

  1. If ϕ : K C is a group homomorphism, then 𝜙 is 𝛽-neutral if and only if N ( β ) ker ϕ if and only if Δ β ( X ) ker ϕ .

  2. N ( β ) is the normal closure in 𝐾 of the subset Δ β ( X ) = { x - 1 β ( x ) x X } .

Proof

Claim (i) follows from the observation that, for each k K , ϕ ( β ( k ) ) = ϕ ( k ) is equivalent to ϕ ( k - 1 β ( k ) ) = 1 and the fact that two homomorphisms from 𝐺 to 𝐶 are equal if and only if they agree on 𝑋.

For claim (ii), let C = K / N , where 𝑁 is the normal closure of Δ β ( X ) in 𝐾, and let ϕ : K C be the natural epimorphism. Then, according to claim (i), 𝜙 is 𝛽-neutral and N ( β ) ker ϕ = N . Clearly, N N ( β ) by definition; hence N ( β ) = N . ∎

Definition 2.3

Let K , H be two groups, let β Aut ( K ) be an automorphism of 𝐾, and let ϕ : K Aut ( H ) be a homomorphism. Denote by 𝐴 the semidirect product H ϕ K . We define the extension of 𝛽 to 𝐴 as the map β A : A A , given by

β A ( ( h , k ) ) = ( h , β ( k ) ) for all h H and all k K .

In this paper, we regard the semidirect product A = H ϕ K as the set H × K , with the multiplication

( h 1 , k 1 ) ( h 2 , k 2 ) = ( h 1 ϕ ( k 1 ) ( h 2 ) , k 1 k 2 ) for all ( h 1 , k 1 ) , ( h 2 , k 2 ) A .

Lemma 2.4

Using the notation of Definition 2.3, suppose that 𝜙 is 𝛽-neutral. Then the following properties hold:

  1. the map β A is an automorphism of 𝐴 which has the same order as 𝛽;

  2. N ( β A ) = ( 1 , N ( β ) ) in 𝐴;

  3. the quotient A / N ( β A ) is naturally isomorphic to the semidirect product

    H ϕ ¯ ( K / N ( β ) ) ,

    where ϕ ¯ : K / N ( β ) Aut ( H ) is the homomorphism induced by 𝜙.

Proof

(a) Evidently, β A is a bijection with the same order as 𝛽. Consider any ( h 1 , k 1 ) , ( h 2 , k 2 ) A , where h 1 , h 2 H and k 1 , k 2 K , and observe that

β A ( ( h 1 , k 1 ) ( h 2 , k 2 ) ) = β A ( ( h 1 ϕ ( k 1 ) ( h 2 ) , k 1 k 2 ) ) = ( h 1 ϕ ( k 1 ) ( h 2 ) , β ( k 1 ) β ( k 2 ) ) .

On the other hand,

β A ( ( h 1 , k 1 ) ) β A ( ( h 2 , k 2 ) ) = ( h 1 , β ( k 1 ) ) ( h 2 , β ( k 2 ) ) = ( h 1 ϕ ( β ( k 1 ) ) ( h 2 ) , β ( k 1 ) β ( k 2 ) ) .

Since 𝜙 is 𝛽-neutral, we see that β A ( ( h 1 , k 1 ) ( h 2 , k 2 ) ) = β A ( ( h 1 , k 1 ) ) β A ( ( h 2 , k 2 ) ) ; hence β A is an automorphism of 𝐴.

(b) By Lemma 2.2 (i), N ( β ) ker ϕ , which means that the subgroup ( 1 , N ( β ) ) centralizes the subgroup ( H , 1 ) in 𝐴. Since N ( β ) K and 𝐴 is generated by ( H , 1 ) ( 1 , K ) , it follows that ( 1 , N ( β ) ) A . Now, according to Lemma 2.2 (ii), N ( β A ) is the normal closure in 𝐴 of the subset

Δ β A ( ( H , 1 ) ) Δ β A ( ( 1 , K ) ) = { ( 1 , 1 ) } ( 1 , Δ β ( K ) ) = ( 1 , Δ β ( K ) ) .

Therefore, N ( β A ) ( 1 , N ( β ) ) N ( β A ) , i.e., N ( β A ) = ( 1 , N ( β ) ) .

Claim (c) is a consequence of claim (b) and the fact that N ( β ) ker ϕ . ∎

2.2 Exact automorphisms

Throughout this subsection, we assume that 𝐹 is a group and β Aut ( F ) is an automorphism of finite order m N . We define the map Σ β : F F by

Σ β ( f ) = f β ( f ) β m - 1 ( f ) for all f F .

Remark 2.5

It is easy to check that the image Im Δ β is always contained in the kernel ker Σ β .

The above remark naturally motivates the following terminology, which was originally proposed to us by the referee.

Definition 2.6

We say the automorphism β Aut ( F ) is exact if Im Δ β = ker Σ β .

For example, the order 2 automorphism of Z 2 , which interchanges the standard generators, is exact. More generally, if 𝐹 is a direct product of 𝑛 copies of a group 𝐾 and 𝛽 is an automorphism of 𝐹 cyclically permuting the factors, then 𝛽 is exact. On the other hand, the automorphism of ℤ sending 1 to −1 is not exact.

We will use exact automorphisms to control torsion in extensions by 𝛽.

Lemma 2.7

Let 𝐺 be a group with a torsion-free normal subgroup F G and an element x G of finite order n N such that G = F , x . Let β Aut ( F ) denote the automorphism induced by conjugation by 𝑥. The following are equivalent:

  1. 𝛽 is an exact automorphism of 𝐹;

  2. if an element of the form f x for some f F has finite order in 𝐺, then it is conjugate to 𝑥 in 𝐺;

  3. 𝐺 contains exactly one conjugacy class of cyclic subgroups of order 𝑛.

Proof

By the assumptions, 𝛽 must have order m N in Aut ( F ) , where n = m l for some l N . Therefore, for any f F , we have

(2.1) ( f x ) n = f ( x f x - 1 ) ( x 2 f x - 2 ) ( x n - 1 f x - n + 1 ) x n = f β ( f ) β 2 ( f ) β n - 1 ( f ) = ( Σ β ( f ) ) l .

Let us show that (i) implies (ii). Suppose that 𝛽 is an exact automorphism of 𝐹 and f x G is an element of finite order for some f F . Equation (2.1) yields that Σ β ( f ) has finite order in 𝐹, and since 𝐹 is torsion-free, we can conclude that Σ β ( f ) = 1 . Hence f = Δ β ( h ) for some h F by exactness. Therefore,

f x = h - 1 β ( h ) x = h - 1 x h x - 1 x = h - 1 x h ,

so (ii) holds.

To show that (ii) implies (i), suppose that f ker Σ β in 𝐹. Then ( f x ) n = 1 by (2.1), so in view of (ii), there must exist an element g G such that f x = g - 1 x g . Now, g = x t h for some t Z and some h F because 𝐺 is generated by 𝐹 and 𝑥 and F G . Hence

f x = g - 1 x g = h - 1 x h = h - 1 β ( h ) x ,

so f = Δ β ( h ) . Thus β Aut ( F ) is exact, as required.

We have shown that (i) is equivalent to (ii). The equivalence between (ii) and (iii) is an easy consequence of the observation that every cyclic subgroup of order 𝑛 in 𝐺 contains precisely one element of the form f x for f F , which will generate this subgroup. ∎

The equivalence between (i) and (iii) in the previous lemma gives the following corollary.

Corollary 2.8

Suppose that 𝐹 is a torsion-free group with an automorphism 𝛽 of order m N . If 𝛽 is exact, then so is β p Aut ( F ) for any integer 𝑝 coprime to 𝑚.

Proof

Let G = F β be the natural semidirect product of 𝐹 with β C m . We identify 𝐹 with its image in 𝐺 and let x G denote the image of 𝛽. Then F G , G = F , x and x f x - 1 = β ( f ) for all f F .

Take any p Z coprime to 𝑚. Since 𝑥 has order 𝑚 in 𝐺, x p also has order 𝑚, so G = F , x p , and conjugation by x p induces the automorphism β p on 𝐹. If β Aut ( F ) is exact, then 𝐺 has exactly one conjugacy class of cyclic subgroups of order 𝑚 by Lemma 2.7. Therefore, the same lemma shows that β p Aut ( F ) is also exact. ∎

Remark 2.9

The results of this subsection can be expressed in terms of the first non-abelian cohomology group of the cyclic group C n with coefficients in a group 𝐹, which we compute using the presentation 2-complex associated to β β n rather than the general approach described in [8, Section I.5.1]. In this setting, the kernel of Σ β is the set of 1-cocycles, and the image of Δ β is the 1-coboundaries. The automorphism 𝛽 of 𝐹 is exact if and only if the pointed set H 1 ( C n ; F ) has just one element, and Lemma 2.7 is closely related to [8, Exercise 1 in Section I.5.1].

The final lemma in this subsection verifies that extensions of exact automorphisms to semidirect products, as discussed in Subsection 2.1, are again exact.

Lemma 2.10

Let K , H be groups, let β Aut ( K ) be a finite order automorphism. Suppose that ϕ : K Aut ( H ) is a 𝛽-neutral homomorphism and A = H ϕ K is the corresponding semidirect product. If 𝐻 is torsion-free and 𝛽 is an exact automorphism of 𝐾, then its extension β A , given by Definition 2.3, is an exact automorphism of 𝐴.

Proof

Suppose that 𝛽 has order m N in Aut ( K ) . Then β A Aut ( A ) , and it has the same order 𝑚 by Lemma 2.4 (a). Observe that, for any h H and k K , we have

(2.2) Σ β A ( ( h , k ) ) = ( h , k ) ( h , β ( k ) ) ( h , β m - 1 ( k ) ) = ( h ϕ ( k ) ( h ) ϕ ( k β ( k ) ) ( h ) ϕ ( k β ( k ) β m - 2 ( k ) ) ( h ) , k β ( k ) β m - 1 ( k ) ) = ( h ϕ ( k ) ( h ) ϕ ( k 2 ) ( h ) ϕ ( k m - 1 ) ( h ) , Σ β ( k ) ) ,

where in the last equality we used the fact that 𝜙 is 𝛽-neutral.

Now, assume that Σ β A ( ( h , k ) ) = ( 1 , 1 ) . Then Σ β ( k ) = 1 by (2.2), so we have k = Δ β ( u ) , for some u K , by exactness. Lemma 2.2 (i) implies that ϕ ( k ) = Id H , so (2.2) shows that

Σ β A ( ( h , k ) ) = ( h m , 1 ) = ( 1 , 1 ) .

Thus h m = 1 , whence h = 1 as 𝐻 is torsion-free. Consequently,

( h , k ) = ( 1 , u - 1 β ( u ) ) = ( 1 , u ) - 1 β A ( ( 1 , u ) ) Δ β A ( A ) .

Therefore, ker Σ β A = Δ β A ( A ) , as required. ∎

2.3 The main construction

The building block for our examples will be the group 𝐾, given by the presentation

K = a , s , b , t a s = a - 1 , b t = b - 1 , [ a , b ] = [ a , t ] = [ s , b ] = [ s , t ] = 1 ,

where we write a s = s a s - 1 and [ a , b ] = a b a - 1 b - 1 .

Clearly, K π × π , where π = a , s a s = a - 1 is the fundamental group of the Klein bottle. In particular, 𝐾 is torsion-free, metabelian and polycyclic of Hirsch length 4.

We define β Aut ( K ) to be the order 2 automorphism interchanging the two copies of 𝜋, i.e., β ( a ) = b , β ( s ) = t , β ( b ) = a and β ( t ) = s .

Let C 2 be the cyclic group of order 2, generated by an element 𝛼, and let ϕ : K C 2 be the homomorphism sending 𝑎 and 𝑏 to 𝛼 and 𝑠 and 𝑡 to 1. Verification of the following elementary properties is left for the reader (Lemma 2.2 (ii) may be useful for claim (ii)).

Lemma 2.11

The group 𝐾, its automorphism 𝛽 and the homomorphism 𝜙 enjoy the following properties.

  1. ϕ β = ϕ , i.e., 𝜙 is 𝛽-neutral.

  2. The quotient K / N ( β ) is isomorphic to C 2 × C , where C 2 is generated by the image of 𝑎 and C is generated by the image of 𝑠.

  3. The automorphism 𝛽 of 𝐾 is exact.

We now construct auxiliary torsion-free polycyclic groups H n as iterated semidirect products of 𝐾 with itself 𝑛 times. These extensions will be defined by induction on 𝑛.

Construction 2.12

Set H 0 = { 1 } , and let β 0 Aut ( H 0 ) be the identity automorphism; set H 1 = K , and let β 1 Aut ( H 1 ) be the automorphism 𝛽 defined above. Now suppose that the group H n - 1 and an order 2 automorphism

β n - 1 Aut ( H n - 1 )

have already been constructed for some n 2 . We define the group H n as the semidirect product

H n = H n - 1 ϕ n - 1 K ,

where ϕ n - 1 : K Aut ( H n - 1 ) is essentially the homomorphism 𝜙 defined above, whose image is the cyclic subgroup β n - 1 .

By Lemma 2.11 (i), ϕ n - 1 is 𝛽-neutral, so we can use Definition 2.3 and Lemma 2.4 to define an automorphism β n Aut ( H n ) as the extension β H n of 𝛽 to H n . Thus

β n ( ( h , k ) ) = ( h , β ( k ) ) for all h H n - 1 and all k K .

Proposition 2.13

For all n N , the group H n satisfies the following properties:

  1. H n is torsion-free;

  2. the quotient H n / N ( β n ) is isomorphic to

    ( H n - 1 β n - 1 ) × C ,

    where β n - 1 Aut ( H n - 1 ) is the cyclic subgroup of order 2 generated by β n - 1 ;

  3. β n is an exact automorphism of H n .

Proof

When n = 1 , the claims follow from the definition of H 1 and Lemma 2.11. For n 2 , (i) holds because the extension of a torsion-free group by a torsion-free group is again torsion-free, (ii) is an easy consequence of Lemma 2.4 (c) and the definition of ϕ n - 1 , and claim (iii) follows from Lemma 2.10. ∎

Theorem 2.14

For every integer n 1 , there exists a polycyclic group G n of torsion length 𝑛.

Proof

For each n 0 , we define the group G n + 1 as follows:

(2.3) G n + 1 = H n , x x 2 = 1 , x g x - 1 = β n ( g ) for all g H n H n β n ,

where H n and β n Aut ( H n ) are provided by Construction 2.12. Thus H n is a subgroup of G n + 1 of index 2. Note that H n is a polycyclic group of Hirsch length 4 n by definition; hence so is G n + 1 .

Let us show that the torsion length of G n + 1 is n + 1 by induction on 𝑛. When n = 0 , G 1 C 2 has torsion length 1; thus we can further assume that n 1 .

Recall that H n is torsion-free and β n Aut ( H n ) is an exact automorphism by Proposition 2.13. Therefore, according to Lemma 2.7, every non-trivial finite order element of G n + 1 must be conjugate to 𝑥. Thus Tor ( G n + 1 ) is the normal closure of 𝑥 in G n + 1 . The definition of G n + 1 , given in (2.3), implies that the quotient G n + 1 / Tor ( G n + 1 ) is clearly isomorphic to the quotient of H n by N ( β n ) . So Proposition 2.13.(ii) yields that

G n + 1 / Tor ( G n + 1 ) ( H n - 1 β n - 1 ) × C G n × C .

Evidently, the torsion length of G n × C is the same as the torsion length of G n , which equals 𝑛 by induction. Therefore, the torsion length of G n + 1 is n + 1 , as claimed. ∎

Remark 2.15

It is not difficult to show that the groups H n and G n , constructed above, are, in fact, virtually abelian. A more careful analysis reveals that, for every n 1 , the group G n contains a free abelian normal subgroup F n such that G n / F n is isomorphic to the direct power ( C 2 C 2 ) n - 1 . It follows that, for each n N , G n is soluble of derived length 3; hence the (restricted) direct product × n = 1 G n is a countable soluble group of derived length 3 with infinite torsion length.

Remark 2.16

It is easy to see that the torsion length of a polycyclic group 𝐺 is at most h ( G ) + 1 , where h ( G ) denotes the Hirsch length of 𝐺. In particular, the torsion length of any polycyclic group is finite.

In [3, Subsection 3.3], Chiodo and Vyas asked whether there exists a finitely generated soluble group with infinite torsion length. This interesting question remains open. As Remark 2.16 shows, such a group cannot be polycyclic.

3 Finitely presented groups 𝐺 with G / Tor ( G ) not finitely presented

In [4, Question 1] and [6, 19.24], it was asked whether there is a finitely presented group 𝐺 so that G / Tor ( G ) is recursively presented but not finitely presented. We give two different constructions of such a group, one of which is soluble and the other of which is virtually torsion-free.

Construction 3.1

First we construct a soluble group 𝐺. In this case, one starts with Abels’ group 𝐻, which is a finitely presented torsion-free soluble group of 4 × 4 upper-triangular matrices over Z [ 1 / p ] for a fixed prime 𝑝 such that the centre Z = Z ( H ) is isomorphic to the additive group Z [ 1 / p ] (see [1]). Let 𝐶 be an infinite cyclic subgroup with C Z , and let G = H / C . The matrix representation of 𝐻 gives rise to a sequence Z = H 1 < H 2 < H 3 < H 4 = H of normal subgroups of 𝐻 with each H i + 1 / H i torsion-free abelian, and so H / Z is torsion-free. Hence the subgroup Tor ( G ) is equal to Z / C Z [ 1 / p ] / Z . This subgroup of H / C is central and not finitely generated. It follows that G / Tor ( G ) H / Z is a non-finitely presented soluble group. Since 𝑍 is clearly recursively generated, H / Z is recursively presented.

The virtually torsion-free examples rely on Bestvina–Brady groups [2], so we start by recalling these groups. Let 𝐿 be a finite flag simplicial complex, i.e., a clique complex. The right-angled Artin group A L is the group with generators the vertices of 𝐿 subject only to the relations that the ends of each edge of 𝐿 commute. There is a homomorphism f L : A L Z that sends each generator to 1 Z , and the kernel of 𝑓 is the Bestvina–Brady group BB L . Bestvina–Brady show that BB L is finitely generated if and only if 𝐿 is connected, and finitely presented if and only if 𝐿 is simply-connected [2].

Construction 3.2

Let 𝐿 be a finite connected flag complex with non-trivial finite fundamental group 𝜋, and let 𝐾 be the universal cover of 𝐿. The action of 𝜋 on 𝐾 by deck transformations induces an action on A K and on BB K . The group 𝐺 will be the semidirect product G = BB K π . Let G ¯ = A K π , and note that 𝐺 is a normal subgroup of G ¯ with G ¯ / G Z . It follows that every torsion element of G ¯ is in 𝐺. It is easy to see that G ¯ / Tor ( G ¯ ) = A L , and hence G / Tor ( G ) = BB L , a non-finitely presented subgroup of the group A L . Thus the group 𝐺 contains infinitely many conjugacy classes of subgroups isomorphic to 𝜋 (see also [7, Theorem 3] for another proof of this fact). An explicit presentation for G / Tor ( G ) = BB L with generators the directed edges of 𝐿 is given in [5].

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous referee for suggesting changes that led to the concepts introduced in Subsections 2.1 and 2.2.

  1. Communicated by: Evgenii I. Khukhro

References

[1] H. Abels, An example of a finitely presented solvable group, Homological Group Theory (Durham 1977), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 36, Cambridge University, New York (1979), 205–211. 10.1017/CBO9781107325449.008Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Bestvina and N. Brady, Morse theory and finiteness properties of groups, Invent. Math. 129 (1997), no. 3, 445–470. 10.1007/s002220050168Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Chiodo and R. Vyas, A note on torsion length, Comm. Algebra 43 (2015), no. 11, 4825–4835. 10.1080/00927872.2014.974249Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. Chiodo and R. Vyas, Torsion, torsion length and finitely presented groups, J. Group Theory 21 (2018), no. 5, 949–971. 10.1515/jgth-2018-0022Search in Google Scholar

[5] W. Dicks and I. J. Leary, Presentations for subgroups of Artin groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1999), no. 2, 343–348. 10.1090/S0002-9939-99-04873-XSearch in Google Scholar

[6] E. I. Khukhro and V. D. Mazurov, The Kourovka Notebook, 19th ed., Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[7] I. J. Leary and B. E. A. Nucinkis, Some groups of type V F , Invent. Math. 151 (2003), no. 1, 135–165. 10.1007/s00222-002-0254-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] J.-P. Serre, Galois Cohomology, Springer, Berlin 1997. 10.1007/978-3-642-59141-9Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-10
Revised: 2022-09-30
Published Online: 2022-12-16
Published in Print: 2023-07-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2022-0009/html
Scroll to top button