Home Note on the residual finiteness of Artin groups
Article Publicly Available

Note on the residual finiteness of Artin groups

  • Rubén Blasco-García EMAIL logo , Arye Juhász and Luis Paris
Published/Copyright: January 26, 2018

Abstract

Let A be an Artin group. A partition 𝒫 of the set of standard generators of A is called admissible if, for all X,Y𝒫, XY, there is at most one pair (s,t)X×Y which has a relation. An admissible partition 𝒫 determines a quotient Coxeter graph Γ/𝒫. We prove that, if Γ/𝒫 is either a forest or an even triangle free Coxeter graph and AX is residually finite for all X𝒫, then A is residually finite.

1 Introduction and statements

Let S be a finite set. A Coxeter matrix over S is a square matrix M=(ms,t)s,tS, indexed by the elements of S, with coefficients in {}, such that ms,s=1 for all sS and ms,t=mt,s2 for all s,tS, st. We represent M by a labelled graph Γ, called Coxeter graph, defined as follows. The set of vertices of Γ is S and two vertices s,t are connected by an edge labelled with ms,t if ms,t.

If a,b are two letters and m is an integer 2, we set

Π(a,b:m)={(ab)m2if m is even,(ab)m-12aif m is odd.

In other words, Π(a,b:m) denotes the word aba of length m. The Artin groupA=AΓ of Γ is defined by the presentation

A=SΠ(s,t:ms,t)=Π(t,s:ms,t) for all s,tS,st and ms,t.

Recall that a group G is residually finite if for each gG{1} there exists a group homomorphism φ:GK such that K is finite and φ(g)1. Curiously the list of Artin groups known to be residually finite is quite short. It contains the Artin groups of spherical type (because they are linear), the right-angled Artin groups (because they are also linear), the even Artin groups of FC type (see Blasco-Garcia, Martinez-Perez and Paris [1]) and groups that can be constructed from these families using standard operations that preserve the property of being residually finite. Within the framework of Artin groups, these operations are essentially of three kinds: taking a subgroup, taking a direct product, taking a free product (see Gruenberg [11]). The application of the second and third operations is quite obvious. The application of the first operation is less obvious, but examples of Artin groups embedded into Artin groups exist in the literature. Here are three examples (to our knowledge, these are the main ones). If X is a subset of S, then, by Van der Lek [14], the subgroup of A generated by X is an Artin group. We also know that the Artin group of type A~n is a subgroup of the Artin group of type An (see Charney and Peifer [5] for instance). Finally, there is a general construction of homomorphisms between Artin groups, called LCM homomorphisms, that are known to be injective in many cases, for example when the groups are of FC type (see Crisp [7] and Godelle [9]). Our purpose here is to increase this list of Artin groups known to be residually finite with an extra operation.

For XS we denote by ΓX the full subgraph of Γ spanned by X and by AX the subgroup of A generated by X. By Van der Lek [14], AX is the Artin group of ΓX. We say that Γ is even if ms,t is either even or for all s,tS, st. We say that Γ is triangle free if Γ has no full subgraph which is a triangle. Here by a partition of S we mean a set 𝒫 of pairwise disjoint subsets of S satisfying X𝒫X=S. We say that a partition 𝒫 is admissible if, for all X,Y𝒫, XY, there is at most one edge in Γ connecting an element of X with an element of Y. In particular, if sX and tY are connected in Γ by an edge and sX, ss, then s is not connected in Γ by an edge to any vertex of Y. An admissible partition 𝒫 of Γ determines a new Coxeter graph Γ/𝒫 defined as follows. The set of vertices of Γ/𝒫 is 𝒫. Two distinct elements X,Y𝒫 are connected by an edge labelled with m if there exist sX and tY such that ms,t=m ().

Our main result is the following.

Theorem 1.1.

Let Γ be a Coxeter graph, let A=AΓ, and let P be an admissible partition of S such that

  1. the group AX is residually finite for all X𝒫,

  2. the Coxeter graph Γ/𝒫 is either even and triangle free, or a forest.

Then A is residually finite.

Corollary 1.2.

The following statements hold.

  1. If Γ is even and triangle free, then A is residually finite.

  2. If Γ is a forest, then A is residually finite.

Remark.

When Γ is a forest, the Artin group A is the fundamental group of a graph manifold with boundary by Gordon [10], and is thus virtually special by Przytycki and Wise [13], hence is linear and residually finite.

Remark.

Recall that the Coxeter groupW of Γ is the quotient of A by the relations s2=1, sS. We say that Γ is of spherical type if W is finite. We say that a subset X of S is free of infinity if ms,t for all s,tX. We say that Γ is of FC type if for each free of infinity subset X of S the Coxeter graph ΓX is of spherical type. Artin groups of FC type were introduced by Charney and Davis [4] in their study of the K(π,1) problem for Artin groups and there is an extensive literature on them. It is easily checked that any triangle free Coxeter graph (in particular any forest) is of FC type. So, all the groups that appear in Corollary 1.2 are of FC type. On the other hand, we know by Blasco-Garcia, Martinez-Perez and Paris [1] that all even Artin groups of FC type are residually finite (which gives an alternative proof to Corollary 1.2 (1)). The next challenge would be to prove that all Artin groups of FC type are residually finite. Another interesting challenge would be to prove that all three generators Artin groups are residually finite.

2 Proof of Theorem 1.1

The proof of Theorem 1.1 is based on the following.

Theorem 2.1 (Boler and Evans [2]).

Let G1 and G2 be two residually finite groups and let L be a common subgroup of G1 and G2. Assume that both G1 and G2 split as semi-direct products G1=H1L and G2=H2L. Then G=G1LG2 is residually finite.

The rest of the section forms the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Lemma 2.2.

If a Coxeter graph Γ has one or two vertices, then A=AΓ is residually finite.

Proof.

If Γ has only one vertex, then A which is residually finite. Suppose that Γ has two vertices s,t. If ms,t=, then A is a free group of rank 2 which is residually finite. If ms,t, then Γ is of spherical type, hence, by Digne [8] and Cohen and Wales [6], A is linear, and therefore A is residually finite. ∎

Lemma 2.3.

Let Γ be a Coxeter graph and let A=AΓ. Let sS. Set Y=S{s}, denote by Γ1,,Γ the connected components of ΓY and, for i{1,,}, denote by Yi the set of vertices of Γi. If AYi{s} is residually finite for all i{1,,}, then A is residually finite.

Proof.

We argue by induction on . If =1, then Y1{s}=S and AY1{s}=A, hence A is obviously residually finite. Suppose that 2 and that the inductive hypothesis holds. We set X1=Y1Y-1{s}, X2=Y{s} and X0={s}. Let G1=AX1, G2=AX2, and L=AX0. The groups G1 and G2 are residually finite by induction. It is easily seen in the presentation of A that A=G1LG2. Furthermore, the homomorphism ρ1:G1L which sends t to s for all tX1 is a retraction of the inclusion map LG1, hence G1 splits as a semi-direct product G1=H1L. Similarly, G2 splits as a semi-direct product G2=H2L. We conclude by Theorem 2.1 that A is residually finite. ∎

Lemma 2.4.

Let Γ be a Coxeter graph, let A=AΓ, and let P be an admissible partition of S such that

  1. the group AX is residually finite for all X𝒫,

  2. the Coxeter graph Γ/𝒫 has at most two vertices.

Then A is residually finite.

Proof.

If |𝒫|=1, there is nothing to prove. Suppose that |𝒫|=2 and one of the elements of 𝒫 is a singleton. We set 𝒫={X,Y} where X=S{t} and Y={t} for some tS. If there is no edge in Γ connecting t to an element of X, then A=AX*AY, hence A is residually finite. So, we can assume that there is an edge connecting t to an element sX. Note that this edge is unique by the definition of admissibility. We denote by Γ1,,Γ the connected components of ΓX{s} and, for i{1,,}, we denote by Xi the set of vertices of Γi. For all i{1,,} the group AXi{s} is residually finite since AXi{s}AX. On the other hand, A{s,t} is residually finite by Lemma 2.2. Noticing that the connected components of ΓS{s} are precisely Γ1,,Γ and {t}, we deduce from Lemma 2.3 that A is residually finite.

Now assume that |𝒫|=2 and both elements of 𝒫 are of cardinality 2. Set 𝒫={X,Y}. If there is no edge in Γ connecting an element of X with an element of Y, then A=AX*AY, hence A is residually finite. So, we can assume that there is an edge connecting an element sX to an element tY. Again, this edge is unique. Let Ω1,,Ωp be the connected components of ΓX{s} and let Γ1,,Γq be the connected components of ΓY. We denote by Xi the set of vertices of Ωi for all i{1,,p} and by Yj the set of vertices of Γj for all j{1,,q}. The group AXi{s} is residually finite since Xi{s}X for all i{1,,p}, and, by the above, the group AYj{s} is residually finite for all j{1,,q}. It follows by Lemma 2.3 that A is residually finite. ∎

Remark.

Alternative arguments from Pride [12] and/or from Burillo and Martino [3] can be used to prove partially or completely Lemma 2.4.

Lemma 2.5.

Let Γ be a Coxeter graph, let A=AΓ, and let P be an admissible partition of S such that

  1. the group AX is residually finite for all X𝒫,

  2. the Coxeter graph Γ/𝒫 is even and triangle free.

Then A is residually finite.

Proof.

We argue by induction on the cardinality |𝒫| of 𝒫. The case |𝒫|2 is covered by Lemma 2.4. So, we can suppose that |𝒫|3 and that the inductive hypothesis holds. Since Γ/𝒫 is triangle free, there exist X,Y𝒫 such that none of the elements of X is connected to an element of Y. We set U1=SX, U2=SY, and U0=S(XY). We have A=AU1*AU0AU2 and, by the inductive hypothesis, AU1 and AU2 are residually finite. Since Γ/𝒫 is even, the inclusion map AU0AU1 admits a retraction ρ1:AU1AU0 which sends t to 1 if tY and sends t to t if tU0. Similarly, the inclusion map AU0AU2 admits a retraction ρ2:AU2AU0. By Theorem 2.1 it follows that A is residually finite. ∎

The following lemma ends the proof of Theorem 1.1.

Lemma 2.6.

Let Γ be a Coxeter graph, let A=AΓ, and let P be an admissible partition of S such that

  1. the group AX is residually finite for all X𝒫,

  2. the Coxeter graph Γ/𝒫 is a forest.

Then A is residually finite.

Proof.

We argue by induction on |𝒫|. The case |𝒫|2 being proved in Lemma 2.4, we can assume that |𝒫|3 plus the inductive hypothesis. Set Ω=Γ/𝒫. Let Ω1,,Ω be the connected components of Ω. For i{1,,} we denote by 𝒫i the set of vertices of Ωi and we set Yi=X𝒫iX and Γi=ΓYi. The set 𝒫i is an admissible partition of Yi and Γi/𝒫i=Ωi is a tree for all i{1,,}. Moreover, we have A=AY1**AY, hence A is residually finite if and only if AYi is residually finite for all i{1,,}. So, we can assume that Ω=Γ/𝒫 is a tree.

Since |𝒫|3, Ω has a vertex X of valence 2. Choose Y𝒫 connected to X by an edge of Ω. Let sX and tY such that s and t are connected by an edge of Γ. Recall that by definition s and t are unique. Let Q be the connected component of Ω𝒫{X} containing Y, let 𝒫Q be the set of vertices of Q, let U=Z𝒫QZ, let U=U{s}, and let 𝒫Q=𝒫Q{{s}}. Observe that 𝒫Q is an admissible partition of U, that AZ is residually finite for all Z𝒫Q, that ΓU/𝒫Q is a tree, and that |𝒫Q|<|𝒫|. By the inductive hypothesis it follows that AU is residually finite. Let R be the connected component of Ω𝒫{Y} containing X, let 𝒫R be the set of vertices of R, and let V=Z𝒫RZ. Observe that 𝒫R is an admissible partition of V, that AZ is residually finite for all Z𝒫R, that ΓV/𝒫R is a tree, and that |𝒫R|<|𝒫|. By the inductive hypothesis it follows that AV is residually finite. Let Δ1,,Δq be the connected components of ΓS{s}. Let i{1,,q}. Let Zi be the set of vertices of Δi. It is easily seen that either Zi{s}U, or Zi{s}V, hence, by the above, AZi{s} is residually finite. We conclude by Lemma 2.3 that A is residually finite. ∎


Communicated by Pierre-Emmanuel Caprace


Funding statement: The first named author was partially supported by Gobierno de Aragón, European Regional Development Funds, MTM2015-67781-P (MINECO/ FEDER) and by the Departamento de Industria e Innovación del Gobierno de Aragón and Fondo Social Europeo Phd grant.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the referee for pointing out to them that the fact that A is residually finite when Γ is a forest follows from Gordon [10] and Przytycki and Wise [13] (see the remark after Corollary 1.2).

References

[1] R. Blasco-Garcia, C. Martinez-Perez and L. Paris, Poly-freeness of even Artin groups of FC type, Groups Geom. Dyn., to appear. 10.4171/GGD/486Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. Boler and B. Evans, The free product of residually finite groups amalgamated along retracts is residually finite, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 37 (1973), 50–52. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1973-0306329-3Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. Burillo and A. Martino, Quasi-potency and cyclic subgroup separability, J. Algebra 298 (2006), no. 1, 188–207. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.01.040Search in Google Scholar

[4] R. Charney and M. W. Davis, The K(π,1)-problem for hyperplane complements associated to infinite reflection groups, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1995), no. 3, 597–627. 10.1090/S0894-0347-1995-1303028-9Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. Charney and D. Peifer, The K(π,1)-conjecture for the affine braid groups, Comment. Math. Helv. 78 (2003), no. 3, 584–600. 10.1007/s00014-003-0764-ySearch in Google Scholar

[6] A. M. Cohen and D. B. Wales, Linearity of Artin groups of finite type, Israel J. Math. 131 (2002), 101–123. 10.1007/BF02785852Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Crisp, Injective maps between Artin groups, Geometric Group Theory Down Under (Canberra 1996), de Gruyter, Berlin (1999), 119–137. 10.1515/9783110806861.119Search in Google Scholar

[8] F. Digne, On the linearity of Artin braid groups, J. Algebra 268 (2003), no. 1, 39–57. 10.1016/S0021-8693(03)00327-2Search in Google Scholar

[9] E. Godelle, Morphismes injectifs entre groupes d’Artin–Tits, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 2 (2002), 519–536. 10.2140/agt.2002.2.519Search in Google Scholar

[10] C. M. Gordon, Artin groups, 3-manifolds and coherence, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana (3) 10 (2004), 193–198. Search in Google Scholar

[11] K. W. Gruenberg, Residual properties of infinite soluble groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 7 (1957), 29–62. 10.1112/plms/s3-7.1.29Search in Google Scholar

[12] S. J. Pride, On the residual finiteness and other properties of (relative) one-relator groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), no. 2, 377–386. 10.1090/S0002-9939-07-09160-5Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Przytycki and D. T. Wise, Graph manifolds with boundary are virtually special, J. Topol. 7 (2014), no. 2, 419–435. 10.1112/jtopol/jtt009Search in Google Scholar

[14] H. Van der Lek, The homotopy type of complex hyperplane complements, Ph.D. thesis, Nijmegen, 1983. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-10-10
Revised: 2017-12-22
Published Online: 2018-01-26
Published in Print: 2018-05-01

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2017-0049/html
Scroll to top button