Home Ex nihilo responsabilitas fit, or the Miracles of Legal Metaphysics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Ex nihilo responsabilitas fit, or the Miracles of Legal Metaphysics

  • Pierre Widmer
Published/Copyright: August 8, 2011
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Journal of European Tort Law
From the journal Volume 2 Issue 2

Abstract

This article, after briefly showing how legal metaphysics are needed to transform non-feasance and non-existent causation into a basis for liability, discusses the pros and cons, and requirements, of liability for omissions, starting from the arguments put forward by Lord Hoffmann in a famous English decision of 1996. It further analyses the risk of continuously and retrospectively creating new duties of care which are then logically infringed when the damage occurs in a way that could have been prevented by complying with one of those very same duties. The article finally comes to the conclusion that liability for omissions is justified in circumstances where an intervention is required by the concept of ‘neighbourhood’ and where an abstention would be contrary to ‘human duties’.

Published Online: 2011-08-08
Published in Print: 2011-August
Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jetl.2011.135/html
Scroll to top button