Words Can Be Deceiving: A Review of Variation among Legally Effective Medical Marijuana Laws in the United States
-
Rosalie L. Pacula
Abstract
When voters in two US states approved the recreational use of marijuana in 2012, public debates for how best to promote and protect public health and safety started drawing implications from states’ medical marijuana laws (MMLs). However, many of the discussions were simplified to the notion that states either have an MML or do not; little reference was made to the fact that legal provisions differ across states. This study seeks to clarify the characteristics of state MMLs in place since 1990 that are most relevant to consumers/patients and categorizes those aspects most likely to affect the prevalence of use, and consequently the intensity of public health and welfare effects. Evidence shows treating MMLs as homogeneous across states is misleading and does not reflect the reality of MML making. This variation likely has implications for use and health outcomes, and thus states’ public health.
References
ADS. 1996. “1996 Ballot Propositions: Your Future, Your Choice,” Arizona Department of State. [online]. http://www.azsos.gov/election/1996/General/1996BallotPropsText.htm.Search in Google Scholar
ASA. 2013. The Medical Cannabis Advocate’s Handbook 2013. Washington, DC: American for Safe Access.Search in Google Scholar
B18-622 (D.C. 2010).Search in Google Scholar
Conant v.Walters, 309 F.2d 629, 632 (9th Cir. 2002).Search in Google Scholar
Lipscomb, D.2009. “D.C. Officials Cautious on Legal Marijuana,” The Washington Times, December 10. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/10/council-cautious-on-legal-marijuana/.Search in Google Scholar
McCaffrey, B.1996. “The Administration’s Response to the Passage of California Proposition 215 and Arizona Proposition 200,” Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar
MPP. 2011a. Model Medical Marijuana Bill. Washington, DC: Marijuana Policy Project.Search in Google Scholar
MPP. 2011b. State-by-State Medical Marijuana Laws. Washington, DC: Marijuana Policy Project.Search in Google Scholar
NCSL. 2013. “State Medical Marijuana Laws,” National Conference of State Legislatures, Denver, CO. [online]. Accessed September 2013. http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-medical-marijuana-laws.aspx.Search in Google Scholar
Office For Medicinal Cannabis [online]. Accessed May 21, 2013. http://www.cannabisbureau.nl/en/.Search in Google Scholar
S.B. 420 (Cal. 2003).Search in Google Scholar
S.B. 308 (Md. 2012).Search in Google Scholar
S.B. 423 (Mont. 2011).Search in Google Scholar
S.B. 5073 (Wash. 2012).Search in Google Scholar
S.B. 76 (Vt. 2004).Search in Google Scholar
State v. McQueen, 828 N.W.2d 644, 647–8 (Mich. 2013).Search in Google Scholar
State v. McQueen, 811 N.W. 2d 513 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011).Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by De Gruyter
