Home A cross-sectional observational study of the prevalence and characterization of potential QT-prolonging drug‒drug interactions in oncological outpatients
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A cross-sectional observational study of the prevalence and characterization of potential QT-prolonging drug‒drug interactions in oncological outpatients

  • Akash Agnihotri ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Biswadeep Das , Sachin Manocha , Manjunath Bidarolli and Bharati Vashisht
Published/Copyright: August 12, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

This study aims to assess the prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of potential QT-prolonging drug–drug interactions (pQT-DDIs) in cancer patients, including identifying drug combinations contributing to QT prolongation and key predictors.

Methods

In this hospital-based, cross-sectional observational study, all types of cancer patients, irrespective of age or sex, were included over 1 year. pQT-DDIs were identified using four drug interaction checker software tools. Predictors were analyzed using univariate logistic regression.

Results

A total of 1,331 cancer patients were included. The prevalence of pQT-DDIs was 67.6 %. Of these, 606 (45.5 %) had 1–2 pQT-DDIs, 126 (9.5 %) had 3–4, and 78 (5.9 %) had 5–6. Overall, 163 drug combinations were identified as causing QT prolongation; 122 were detected by Drugs.com. Significant predictors included >8 drugs prescribed (OR=6.46; CI=4.87–8.56; p<0.0001), >2 anticancer drugs (OR=1.68; CI=1.14–2.46; p=0.008), >6 adjuvant drugs (OR=6.83; CI=5.17–9.03; p<0.0001), solid cancers (OR=6.59; CI=4.59–8.80; p<0.0001), and cytotoxic drug use (OR=2.40; CI=1.52–3.77; p=0.0001).

Conclusions

There is a high prevalence of pQT-DDIs in cancer patients. Those receiving multiple anticancer and adjuvant drugs are at higher risk. Routine interaction screening is recommended before chemotherapy.


Corresponding author: Akash Agnihotri, MSc, PhD Scholar, Department of Pharmacology, Amrita School of Medicine, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Faridabad, 121002, Haryana, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Uttam Kumar Nath (Head, Medical Oncology and Hematology, AIIMS Rishikesh) and Mr Nishant (Nursing Officer-Oncology) for his invaluable assistance in the data collection process.

  1. Research ethics: The study received research and Ethical Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India, as documented in the approval letter AIIMS/IEC/20/610 dated September 12, 2020.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: No large language models, AI, or machine learning tools were used to generate the content of this manuscript.

  5. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: No funding has been taken for this study.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Siegel, RL, Giaquinto, AN, Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74:12–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21820.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Wondm, SA, Tamene, FB, Gubae, K, Dagnew, SB, Worku, AA, Belachew, EA, et al.. Potential drug–drug interaction and its determinants among patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy in oncology centres of northwest Ethiopia: an institutional-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2023;13:e077863. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077863.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. van Leeuwen, RWF, Brundel, DHS, Neef, C, van Gelder, T, Mathijssen, RHJ, Burger, DM, et al.. Prevalence of potential drug–drug interactions in cancer patients treated with oral anticancer drugs. Br J Cancer 2013;108:1071–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.48.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Cuni, R, Parrini, I, Asteggiano, R, Conte, MR. Targeted cancer therapies and QT interval prolongation: unveiling the mechanisms underlying arrhythmic complications and the need for risk stratification strategies. Clin Drug Invest 2017;37:121–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-016-0460-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Porta-Sánchez, A, Gilbert, C, Spears, D, Amir, E, Chan, J, Nanthakumar, K, et al.. Incidence, diagnosis, and management of QT prolongation induced by cancer therapies: a systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc Cardiovasc Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;6:e007724. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.007724.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Giraud, EL, Ferrier, KRM, Lankheet, NAG, Desar, IME, Steeghs, N, Beukema, RJ, et al.. The QT interval prolongation potential of anticancer and supportive drugs: a comprehensive overview. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:e406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045-22-00221-2.Search in Google Scholar

7. Khan, Q, Ismail, M, Khan, S. Frequency, characteristics and risk factors of QT interval prolonging drugs and drug-drug interactions in cancer patients: a multicenter study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2017;18:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-017-0181-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Smithburger, PL, Kane-Gill, SL, Seybert, AL. Drug-drug interactions in cardiac and cardiothoracic intensive care units. Drug Saf 2010;33:879–88. https://doi.org/10.2165/11532340-000000000-00000.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Agnihotri, A, Ramasubbu, SK, Bandyopadhyay, A, Bidarolli, M, Nath, UK, Das, B, et al.. Prevalence, attributes, and risk factors of QT-Interval-Prolonging drugs and potential drug-drug interactions in cancer patients: a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital. Cureus 2024;16:e60492. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.60492.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. van Leeuwen, RWF, Swart, EL, Boven, E, Boom, FA, Schuitenmaker, MG, Hugtenburg, JG, et al.. Potential drug interactions in cancer therapy: a prevalence study using an advanced screening method. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 2011;22:2334–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq761.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Kim, P, Masha, L, Olson, A, Iliescu, C, Karimzad, K, Hassan, S, et al.. QT prolongation in cancer patients. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021;8:613625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.613625.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Das, B, Rawat, VS, Ramasubbu, SK, Kumar, B. Frequency, characteristics and nature of risk factors associated with use of QT interval prolonging medications and related drug-drug interactions in a cohort of psychiatry patients. Therapie (Paris) 2019;74:599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2019.03.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Das, B, Ramasubbu, SK, Agnihotri, A, Kumar, B, Rawat, VS. Leading 20 drug–drug interactions, polypharmacy, and analysis of the nature of risk factors due to QT interval prolonging drug use and potentially inappropriate psychotropic use in elderly psychiatry outpatients. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2021;15:https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447211058892, 17539447211058892.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Ramasubbu, SK, Mahato, SK, Agnihotri, A, Pasricha, RK, Nath, UK, Das, B, et al.. Prevalence, severity, and nature of risk factors associated with drug-drug interactions in geriatric patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: a prospective study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021;26:100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100277.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Drugs.com drug interaction checker. https://www.drugs.com/drug_interactions.html [Accessed 31 May 2024].Search in Google Scholar

16. Epocrates drug interaction checker. https://www.epocrates.com/online/interaction-check [Accessed 31 May 2024].Search in Google Scholar

17. Medscape drug interaction checker. https://reference.medscape.com/drug-interactionchecker [Accessed 31 May 2024].Search in Google Scholar

18. UpToDate lexicomp drug interaction checker. https://www.uptodate.com/drug-interactions/#di-druglist [Accessed 31 May 2024].Search in Google Scholar

19. van Leeuwen, RWF, Jansman, FGA, van den Bemt, PMLA, de Man, F, Piran, F, Vincenten, I, et al.. Drug-drug interactions in patients treated for cancer: a prospective study on clinical interventions. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 2015;26:992–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Moghaddas, A, Adib-Majlesi, M, Sabzghabaee, AM, Hajigholami, A, Riechelmann, R. Potential drug–drug interactions in hospitalized cancer patients: a report from the middle-east. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2021;27:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155220910209.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Sheikh-Taha, M, Asmar, M. Polypharmacy and severe potential drug-drug interactions among older adults with cardiovascular disease in the United States. BMC Geriatr 2021;21:233. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02183-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Yalçın, N, Özdemir, N, Çak Esen, HT, Çengel Kültür, SE, Demirkan, K. Potential drug-drug interactions with psychotropic drugs in paediatric inpatients: a cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75:e14107. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14107.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Hefner, G, Hahn, M, Hiemke, C, Toto, S, Wolff, J, Roll, SC, et al.. Pharmacodynamic drug–drug interactions of QT-prolonging drugs in hospitalized psychiatric patients. J Neural Transm 2021;128:243–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-020-02291-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Bjerrum, L, Andersen, M, Petersen, G, Kragstrup, J. Exposure to potential drug interactions in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2003;21:153–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430310001806.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Viktil, KK, Blix, HS, Moger, TA, Reikvam, A. Polypharmacy as commonly defined is an indicator of limited value in the assessment of drug-related problems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:187–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02744.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Stoll, P, Kopittke, L. Potential drug–drug interactions in hospitalized patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pharm 2015;37:475–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0083-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Riechelmann, RP, Moreira, F, Smaletz, Ò, Saad, ED. Potential for drug interactions in hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2005;56:286–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-004-0998-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Osman, MA, Abdalla, MA, Mohamed, AA, Yousef, BA. Assessment of drug–drug interactions between chemotherapeutic and chronically used medications at Khartoum oncology hospital. Matrix Sci Medica 2020;4:79. https://doi.org/10.4103/mtsm.mtsm-17-20.Search in Google Scholar

29. Suriyapakorn, B, Chairat, P, Boonyoprakarn, S, Rojanarattanangkul, P, Pisetcheep, W, Hunsakunachai, N, et al.. Comparison of potential drug-drug interactions with metabolic syndrome medications detected by two databases. PLoS One 2019;14:e0225239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225239.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Benjanuwattra, J, Siri-Angkul, N, Chattipakorn, SC, Chattipakorn, N. Doxorubicin and its proarrhythmic effects: a comprehensive review of the evidence from experimental and clinical studies. Pharmacol Res 2020;151:104542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104542.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2024-06-21
Accepted: 2025-07-11
Published Online: 2025-08-12

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbcpp-2024-0104/html
Scroll to top button