Home Hydroxychloroquine pre-exposure prophylaxis provides no protection against COVID-19 among health care workers: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in North India
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Hydroxychloroquine pre-exposure prophylaxis provides no protection against COVID-19 among health care workers: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in North India

  • Shivani Juneja , Proteesh Rana EMAIL logo , Parvinder Chawla , Rekha Katoch , Kulvir Singh , Shobha Rana , Tamanna Mittal , Bhavnish Kaur and Simranjot kaur
Published/Copyright: January 7, 2022

Abstract

Objectives

The use of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) prophylaxis has been recommended by the National task force constituted by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for the prevention of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among healthcare workers (HCWs). However, this recommendation was based essentially on the preclinical data and limited clinical experience. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HCQ as a pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 infection among Indian HCWs.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among HCWs of a tertiary care hospital in north India. The HCQ prophylaxis was initiated among 996 HCWs and they were followed up to 8 weeks for conversion to COVID-19 positive status and any adverse drug reaction (ADR).

Results

About 10.3% of the study participants were tested positive for COVID-19 which was comparable to the positivity rate among HCWs not taking HCQ prophylaxis (9.7%).

Conclusions

HCQ was well tolerated at a weekly dose of 400 mg for 8 weeks but provided no additional benefit in prevention of COVID-19 among HCWs.


Corresponding author: Proteesh Rana, Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: Approval for the study was taken from the Institutional Ethics Committee.

References

1. COVID19 state wise status. Government of India. Available from: https://www.mygov.in/corona-data/covid19-statewise-status [Accessed 27 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

2. Recommendation for empiric use of hydroxy-chloroquine for prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2. Indian Council for Medical Research 2020. Available from: https://icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/upload_documents/HCQ_Recommendation_22March_final_MM_V2.pdf [Accessed 24 Apr 2020].Search in Google Scholar

3. Gio, J, Tian, Z, Yang, X. Breakthrough: chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends 2020;14:72–3.10.5582/bst.2020.01047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Revised advisory on the use of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as prophylaxis for COVID-19 infection. Available from: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/RevisedadvisoryontheuseofhydroxychloroquineasprophylaxisforSARSCOVID19infection.pdf [Accessed 24 Apr 2020].Search in Google Scholar

5. Ferner, RE, Aronson, JK. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19. BMJ 2020;369:1432. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1432.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Hartwig, SC, Siegel, J, Schneider, PJ. Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992;49:2229–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/49.9.2229.Search in Google Scholar

7. World Health Organization (WHO). Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardized case causality assessment. WHO. Available from: http://www.who-umc.org/graphics/4409.pdf [Accessed 24 Jun 2021].Search in Google Scholar

8. Abella, BS, Jolkovsky, EL, Biney, BT, Uspal, JE, Hyman, MC, Frank, I, et al.. Prevention and treatment of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine (PATCH) investigators. Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine vs placebo for pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis among health care workers: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6319.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Boulware, DR, Pullen, MF, Bangdiwala, AS, Pastick, KA, Lofgren, SM, Okafor, EC, et al.. A randomized trial of hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis for COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020;383:517–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2016638.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bhattacharyya, D, Raizada, N, Nagappa, B, Tomar, A, Maurya, P, Chaudhary, A, et al.. Chemoprophylaxis of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine: a study of health care workers attitude, adherence to regime and side effects. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.11.20126359v1 [Accessed 20 Jun 2020].Search in Google Scholar

11. Rana, P, Ghadlinge, M, Singh, P, Chandane, R, Khanna, A. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices on the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as prophylaxis for COVID-19 infection among medical doctors: a cross-sectional study. Pharm Biomed Res 2021;7:97–104.10.18502/pbr.v7i2.7362Search in Google Scholar

12. Jha, S, Batra, N, Siddiqui, S, Yadav, A, Misra, A, Loomba, M, et al.. HCQ prophylaxis in COVID-19 did not show any QTc prolongation in Healthcare workers. Indian Heart J 2021;73:74–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Toumi, M, Biernikiewicz, M, Liang, S, Wang, Y, Qiu, T, Han, R. A critical analysis and review of Lancet COVID-19 hydroxychloroquine study. J Mark Access Health Policy 2020;8:1809236. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2020.1809236.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Chen, Y, Li, MX, Lu, GD, Shen, HM, Zhou, J. Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine as therapeutics for COVID-19: truth under the mystery. Int J Biol Sci 2021;17:1538–46. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.59547.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-08-15
Accepted: 2021-12-20
Published Online: 2022-01-07

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Minireviews
  3. Characteristics and management of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections
  4. Perspectives into the possible effects of the B.1.1.7 variant of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on spermatogenesis
  5. Antibody-dependent enhancement of virus infection and disease: implications in COVID-19
  6. Reviews
  7. A new application of mTOR inhibitor drugs as potential therapeutic agents for COVID-19
  8. Increase in SARS-CoV-2 infected biomedical waste among low middle-income countries: environmental sustainability and impact with health implications
  9. A dossier on COVID-19 chronicle
  10. Vitamin supplementation as a potential adjunctive therapeutic approach for COVID-19: biological and clinical plausibility
  11. Original Articles
  12. COVID-19 infection in children with underlying malignancies in Iran
  13. Computational drug repurposing study of antiviral drugs against main protease, RNA polymerase, and spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 using molecular docking method
  14. COVID-19 disease in clinical setting: impact on gonadal function, transmission risk, and sperm quality in young males
  15. Hydroxychloroquine pre-exposure prophylaxis provides no protection against COVID-19 among health care workers: a cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in North India
  16. Letter to the Editors
  17. The “Delta Plus” COVID-19 variant has evolved to become the next potential variant of concern: mutation history and measures of prevention
  18. Can sulfasalazine as an old drug with immunomodulatory and anti‐inflammatory effects be effective in COVID‐19?
  19. Using of calcium channel blockers in patients with COVID-19: a magic bullet or a double-edged sword?
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbcpp-2021-0221/html
Scroll to top button