Smallpox: A Comparative Analysis of the United States and Australia

Articles in the same Issue

1. Masthead
2. Masthead
3. Introduction
4. Introduction to Volume IV
5. Lead Article
6. Applying Scientific Evidence to Prosecuting Perpetrators of Well Contamination as Bio-Warfare Strategy
7. The Regulation of International and Accidental Biosecurity Events
8. A History of Global Biosecurity Law in Five Pathogens
9. West Nile Virus and Legal Responses: The Effects on Federal, State, Public Health Law, and Attribution
10. Attributing and Averting Agricultural Attacks: Why Federal Food Regulations Fail to Foster Food Security
11. Constitutional Protections for Scientific Research and Publication
12. A Dangerous Curiosity: Examining Constitutional Protection of Scientific Research
13. Does the United States Government Have a Right to Restrict Scientific Articles about the Research of Dangerous Viruses?
14. Legal Issues in National and Public Health Security
15. Use of Vaccines in a Public Health Emergency
16. Patent Protectability or Public Health?—An Examination of the Patent Compulsory License and Bioterrorism
17. U.S. Tort Liability When Bioweapons Escape: An Investigation into the Maureen Stevens Case
18. Regulation of Scientific Research
19. Mandatory Laboratory Regulations: Is the United States Over-Regulating Select Agent Research?
20. Comparative Analysis of the Legal Approaches to Biosecurity and Biosafety between Several Jurisdictions
21. A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Biosecurity Implications of GMOs in the United States and Uganda
22. Smallpox: A Comparative Analysis of the United States and Australia