The Wolof argument-focus constructions as copulaless clefts

References

Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Studies on semantics in generative grammar. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110867589Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 1974. Topic-comment structure revisited. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Topic and Comment, Contextual Boundedness and Focus, 1–24. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Search in Google Scholar

de Swart, Henriette & Helen de Hoop. 2000. Topic and focus. In Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The first glot international state-of-the-article book: The Latest in Linguistics, 105–130. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110822861.105Search in Google Scholar

Dik, Simon. 2020. On the typology of focus phenomena. In Teun Hoekstra, Harry van der Hulst & Michael Moortgat (eds.), Perspectives on Functional Grammar, 41–74. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Diouf, Jean-Léopold. 2009. Grammaire du Wolof contemporain. Paris: L’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Diouf, Jean-Léopold. nd. Particularités du Lébu. Available at: https://senelangues.huma-num.fr/pdf/Diouf_ParticulariteLebou.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Feldhausen, Ingo & Maria Del Mar Vanrell. 2015. Oraciones hendidas y marcación del foco estrecho en español: Una aproximación desde la Teoría de la Optimidad Estocástica. Revista Internacional de Linguistica Iberoamericana 13(2(26)). 39–59. https://doi.org/10.31819/rili-2015-132604.Search in Google Scholar

Galand, Lionel. 2014. Typology of relative clauses: The case of Berber. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 67(1). 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2014-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Guérin, Maximilien. 2014. Les prédicats complexes en Wolof: Unités morphologiques ou constructions syntaxiques? Lingvisticae Investigationes 37(2). 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.02gue.Search in Google Scholar

Guérin, Maximilien. 2016. Les constructions verbales en Wolof: Vers une typologie de la prédication, de l’auxiliation et des périphrases. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris Cité dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K. 1977. Where do cleft sentences come from? Language 53(3). 543–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/413176.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K. & Thorstein Fretheim. 2006. Topic and focus. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 175–196. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch8Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kato, Mary A. & Ilza. Ribeiro. 2009. Cleft sentences from Old Portuguese to modern Portuguese. Focus and Background in Romance Languages 112. 123–154.10.1075/slcs.112.06katSearch in Google Scholar

Kihm, Alain. 1999. A study of what morphology may do to syntax. In Georges Rebuschi & Laurice Tuller (eds.), The grammar of focus, 245–273. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.24.09kihSearch in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lipps, Theodor. 1893. Grundzüge der Logik. Leipzig: Dürr.Search in Google Scholar

Martinović, Martina. 2013. The subject/non-subject asymmetry in Wolof. In Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 1, 309–322.Search in Google Scholar

N’Diaye-Corréard, Geneviève. 2003. Structure des propositions et système verbal en Wolof. SudLangues 3. 163–188.Search in Google Scholar

Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie. 2002. Relations entre fonctions syntaxiques et fonctions sémantiques en Wolof. Lyon: Université Lumière (Lyon II) dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Perrin, Loïc-Michel. 2005. Des représentations du temps en Wolof. Paris: Université Paris-Diderot (Paris VII) dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Robert, Stéphane. 2000. Le verbe Wolof ou la grammaticalisation du focus. In Bernard Caron (ed.), Topicalisation et focalisation dans les langues africaines, 229–267. Louvain: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Robert, Stéphane. 2016. Tense and aspect in the verbal system of Wolof. In Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), Aspectuality and temporality: Descriptive and theoretical issues, 171–230. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.172.06robSearch in Google Scholar

Russell, Margaret A. 2006. The syntax and placement of Wolof clitics. Champaign, IL: Urbana-Champaign University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Seuren, Pieter A. M. 1998. Western linguistics: An historical introduction. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781444307467Search in Google Scholar

Seuren, Pieter A. M. 2000. A discourse-semantic account of topic and comment. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4. 179–190.10.1075/cilt.189.20seuSearch in Google Scholar

Seuren, Pieter A. M. 2018. Saussure and Sechehaye: Myth and genius. Chapter 5, 160–196. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004378155_006Search in Google Scholar

Stout, George F. 1909. Analytical psychology, 2 vols. London: Sonnenschein & New-York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Torrence, Harold. 2013. A promotion analysis of Wolof clefts. Syntax 16(2). 176–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12000.Search in Google Scholar

Vallduví, Enric. 1993. Information packaging: A survey. Edinburgh: Human Communication Research Centre Publications.Search in Google Scholar

van Kuppevelt, Jan. 1995. Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics 31(1). 109–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002222670000058x.Search in Google Scholar

von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. University of Massachusetts dissertation.Search in Google Scholar