Abstract
Triumphal policing in the 60 s and 50 s BCE was unusually intense. During this period, nearly all triumphatores were forced to wait for years ad urbem (outside the pomerium) while their petitions were obstructed by their opponents, a trend that certainly contributed to an historically low rate of processions (an average of around one every three years). No figure appears as frequently in our evidence for triumphal policing and obstruction in the late Republic as Cato the Younger. Whereas scholarship has previously discussed his triumphal interventions through familiar (and problematic) lenses (e. g., Cato the “arch-conservative,” Cato the “political nemesis of Caesar,” Cato the “unrealistic citizen of Plato’s Republic”), this piece offers a new reading of Cato’s letter on the topic (Fam. 15.5), contending that Cato’s interest in the triumph was motivated by his anxiety over the use of military achievement to legitimize aristocratic political power. When read correctly and in context, Cato’s beliefs and actions regarding the triumph were revisionist, not conservative; ideological, not personal; and genuinely interested in bringing about tangible change in Roman political culture.
Acknowledgment
I am grateful to Robert Morstein-Marx, Ranjani Atur, Robert Cioffi, and the anonymous referees at JAH for their thoughtful and valuable comments on earlier versions of this article. Of course, any errors remain my own.
Bibliography
Afzelius, A. “Die politische Bedeutung des jüngeren Catos.” C&M 4 (1941): 100–203. Search in Google Scholar
Alexander, M. Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto, 1990Search in Google Scholar
Arena, V. and J. Prag, editors. A Companion to the Political Culture of the Roman Republic. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2022. 10.1002/9781119673675Search in Google Scholar
Badian, E. Roman Imperialism in the Late Republic, Second Ed. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1968.Search in Google Scholar
Badian, E. “Additional notes on Roman magistrates.” Athenaeum 48 (1970): 3–14.Search in Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. Consular provinces under the Late Republic, I. General considerations.” JRS 29 (1939): 57–73. 10.2307/296421Search in Google Scholar
Barber, C. Politics in the Roman Republic. Boston: Brill, 2022.Search in Google Scholar
Bastien, J.-L. Le Triomphe Romain et Son Utilisation Politique. Rome: Écoles Françaises d’Athènes et de Rome, 2007. Search in Google Scholar
Beard, M. The Roman Triumph. Cambridge: Harvard U. P., 2007.10.4159/9780674020597Search in Google Scholar
Beck, H. “Consular power and the Roman constitution: the case of imperium reconsidered.” In Consuls and Res Publica, edited by H. Beck, M. Jehne and F. Pina Polo, 77–96. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511736124.006Search in Google Scholar
Bell, C. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1992. Search in Google Scholar
Bellemore, J. “The quaestorship of Cato and the tribunate of Memmius.” Hist. 45 (1996): 504–508. Search in Google Scholar
van den Berg, C. The Politics and Poetics of Cicero’s Brutus. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2021.10.1017/9781108856447Search in Google Scholar
Bleicken, J. Gesammelte Schriften. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Blösel, W. “Die Demilitarisierung der Römischen Nobilität von Sulla bis Caesar.” In Von der militia equestris zur militia urbana, edited by W. Blösel and K.-J. Hölkeskamp, 55–80. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Blösel, W. “Provincial commands and money in the Late Roman Republic.” In Money and Power in the Roman Republic, edited by H. Beck, M. Jehne and J. Serrati, 66–81. Brussels: Latomus, 2016. Search in Google Scholar
Bonnefond-Coudry, M. Le sénat de La république Romaine de La Guerre d’Hannibal A` Auguste. Paris: Écoles Françaises d’Athènes et de Rome, 1989. 10.3406/befar.1989.1277Search in Google Scholar
Botsford, G. The Roman Voting Assemblies. New York: Macmillan, 1909.Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, T. The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2001. 10.1093/oso/9780195114591.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. “’Let the trumpets roar!’ The Roman triumph.” In The Art of Ancient Spectacle, edited by B. Bergmann and C. Kondoleon, 221–229, New Haven: Yale U. P., 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, J. Triumph in Defeat. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2014. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199336548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Cotton, H. and G. Rodgers, editors. Rome, the Greek World, and the East. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2002. Search in Google Scholar
Crawford, M. Roman Statutes. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Dighton, A. “Mutatio vestis: clothing and political protest in the Late Republic.” Phoenix 71 (2017): 345–369.10.1353/phx.2017.0023Search in Google Scholar
Drogula, F. Commanders and Command in the Roman Republic and Early Empire. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2015. 10.5149/northcarolina/9781469621265.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Drogula, F. Cato the Younger. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome. Berkeley: University of California, 2006.10.1525/9780520932302Search in Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, C. “Caesar’s first triumph?” Prudentia 19 (1987): 50–56. Search in Google Scholar
Fears, J. “The theology of victory at Rome: approaches and problems.” ANRW 2 (1981): 736–826. 10.1515/9783110850680-006Search in Google Scholar
Fehrle, R. Cato Uticensis. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftlich Buchgesellschaft, 1983. Search in Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley: University of California, 1998. 10.1525/9780520919693Search in Google Scholar
Flaig, E. Ritualisierte Politik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2003.10.13109/9783666367007Search in Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. The Roman Nobility. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 1969.Search in Google Scholar
Giovannini, A. Consulare Imperium. Basel: F. Reinhardt, 1983.Search in Google Scholar
Greenidge, A. The Legal Procedure of Cicero’s Time. Oxford: Clarendon, 1901. Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, M. Philosophia Togata. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1989. Search in Google Scholar
Grillo, L. Cicero’s de Provinciis Consularibus Oratio. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Gruen, E. Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 BC. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1968.10.4159/harvard.9780674284210Search in Google Scholar
Gruen, E. “Some criminal trials of the Late Republic: political and prosopographical problems.” Athenaeum 49 (1971): 54–69.Search in Google Scholar
Gruen, E. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley: University of California, 1974.10.1525/9780520342033Search in Google Scholar
Halkin, L. La Supplication d’action de Grâces Chez Les Romains. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1953.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, W. War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–79 B.C. Oxford: Clarendon, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Hillman, T. “When did Lucullus retire?” Hist. 42 (1993): 211–228.Search in Google Scholar
Hillman, T. “Plutarch and Dio on the postponed consular elections for 61.” Hermes 124 (1996): 313–320.Search in Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. Cicero’s Correspondence, a Literary Study. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1998. 10.1093/oso/9780198150664.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. Reconstructing the Roman Republic. Trans. By H. Heitmann-Gordon. Princeton: Princeton U. P., 2012. Search in Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. “Political culture: the career of a concept.” In Arena and Prag (2022), 4–20. 10.1002/9781119673675.ch1Search in Google Scholar
Itgenshorst, T. Tota Illa Pompa. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2005.10.13109/9783666252600Search in Google Scholar
Jehne, M. “Einführung: zur Debatte um die Rolle des Volkes in der römischen Politik.” In Demokratie in Rom?, edited by M. Jehne, 1–10, Stuttgart: Steiner, 1996. Search in Google Scholar
Jehne, M. “Methods, models, and historiography.” In Rosenstein and Morstein-Marx (2006), 3–28.10.1002/9780470996980.ch1Search in Google Scholar
Kallet-Marx, R. Hegemony to Empire. Berkeley: University of California, 1995, 10.1525/9780520408265Search in Google Scholar
Keaveney, A. Lucullus. New York: Routledge, 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Konrad, C. “Notes on Roman also-rans.” In Imperium Sine Fine, edited by J. Linderski, 103–144, Stuttgart: Steiner, 1996. Search in Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. Crossing the Pomerium. Princeton: Princeton U. P., 2020.10.1515/9780691197494Search in Google Scholar
Lange, C. “Mock the triumph: Cassius Dio, triumph and triumph-like celebrations.” In Cassius Dio, edited by C. Lange and J. Madsen, 92–114, Leiden: Brill, 2020. 10.1163/9789004335318_007Search in Google Scholar
Lange, C. and F. Vervaet, editors. The Roman Republican Triumph. Rome: Edizioni Quasar, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Linderski, J. “The dramatic date of Varro ‘de re rustica.’ Book III and the elections of 54.” Hist. 34 (1985): 248–254.Search in Google Scholar
Linderski, J. Roman Questions. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Lintott, A. The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Magie, D. Roman Rule in Asia Minor. Princeton: Princeton U. P., 1950.10.1515/9781400849796Search in Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. Fragmentary Republican Latin: Oratory, vol. 4 pt. 2. Cambridge: Harvard U. P., 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Martelli, F. “The triumph of letters: rewriting Cicero in ad Fam. 15.” JRS 107 (2017): 90–115.10.1017/S0075435817000302Search in Google Scholar
Meier, C. Res Publica Amissa. Weisbaden: Steiner, 1966. Search in Google Scholar
de Mello, W. Plautus. Amphitryon, The Comedy of Asses, The Pot of Gold, The Two Bacchides, The Captives. Cambridge: Harvard U. P., 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Millar, F. The Crowd in Late Roman Republic. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. The History of Rome. 5 vols. Translated by W. Dickson, Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1863/2009.10.31826/9781463226688Search in Google Scholar
Morrell, K. Pompey, Cato, and the Governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 201710.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755142.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511482878Search in Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. “Caesar’s alleged fear of prosecution and his ‘ratio absentis’ in the approach to the Civil War.” Hist. 56 (2007): 168, 2007.10.25162/historia-2007-0013Search in Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. Julius Caesar and the Roman People. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2021.10.1017/9781108943260Search in Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. Plebs and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2001.10.1017/CBO9780511482885Search in Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. Politics in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2017.10.1017/9781139410861Search in Google Scholar
North, J. “Politics and aristocracy in the Roman Republic,” CPhil. 85 (1990): 277–287.10.1086/367213Search in Google Scholar
Oakley, S. A Commentary on Livy Books VI-X. Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Ogilvie, M. A Commentary on Livy, Books 1–5. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.Search in Google Scholar
Osgood, J. “Julius Caesar and Spanish triumph-hunting.” In Lange and Vervaet (2014), 149–162.Search in Google Scholar
Osgood, J. Uncommon Wrath. New York: Basic, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. Staging the World. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2009.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215973.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Padilla Peralta, D.-E. Divine Institutions. Princeton: Princeton U. P., 2020.10.1515/9780691200828Search in Google Scholar
Pandey, N. The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2018.10.1017/9781108525152Search in Google Scholar
Pelling, C. Plutarch: Caesar. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2011. 10.2307/j.ctvvnbp5Search in Google Scholar
Pittenger, M. Contested Triumphs. Berkeley: University of California, 2008.10.1525/9780520942776Search in Google Scholar
Rafferty, D. Provincial Allocations in Rome. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2019.10.25162/9783515121248Search in Google Scholar
Rawson, E. Cicero. Bristol: Bristol Classical, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
Rich, J. “The triumph in the Roman Republic: frequency, fluctuation and policy.” In Lange and Vervaet (2014), 197–258.Search in Google Scholar
Richardson, J. “The triumph of Metellus Scipio and the dramatic date of Varro, RR 3.” CQ 33 (1983): 456–463.10.1017/S0009838800034728Search in Google Scholar
Rodgers, G. “Introduction: Polybius was right.” In Cotton and Rodgers (2002), xi-xvi.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. Imperatores Victi. Berkeley: University of California, 1990. 10.1525/9780520334014Search in Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. Rome at War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. “Aristocratic values.” In Rosenstein and Morstein-Marx (2006), 365–382. 10.1002/9780470996980.ch17Search in Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. “Military command, political power, and the Republican elite.” In A Companion to the Roman Army, edited by P. Erdkamp, 132–147, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.10.1002/9780470996577.ch9Search in Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. “Armies and political culture.” In Arena and Prag (2022), 236–247. 10.1002/9781119673675.ch17Search in Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. and R. Morstein-Marx, editors. A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2006.10.1002/9780470996980Search in Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. Domi Militiae. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990.Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, F. “The tribunate of C. Memmius L. F.” Hermes 123 (1995): 293–302.Search in Google Scholar
Segal, N. Military Achievement and Late-Republican Aristocratic Values, 81–49 BCE. Diss. University of California, Santa Barbara, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Shackleton-Bailey, D. Cicero. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1971.Search in Google Scholar
SB = Shackleton-Bailey, D. Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares. Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1977.Search in Google Scholar
Shatzman, I. “Four notes on Roman magistrates,” Athenaeum 46 (1968): 345–354.Search in Google Scholar
Simón, F. “Religion and rituals in Republican Rome.” In Arena and Prag (2022), 455–469.10.1002/9781119673675.ch33Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. To Take Place. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Staveley, E. “The constitution of the Roman Republic, 1940–1954.” Hist. 5 (1956): 74–122. Search in Google Scholar
Steel, C. “The ‘Lex Pompeia de Provinciis’ of 52 BC: a reconsideration.” Hist. 61 (2012): 83–93.10.25162/historia-2012-0005Search in Google Scholar
Stockton, D. Cicero. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1971.Search in Google Scholar
Tyrrell, R. and L. Purser. The Correspondence of Cicero. Dublin: Dublin U. P., 1904.Search in Google Scholar
Versnel, H. Triumphus. Leiden: Brill, 1970.10.1163/9789004674738Search in Google Scholar
Vervaet, F. The High Command in the Roman Republic. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2014.10.25162/9783515107884Search in Google Scholar
Villoresi, M. Lucullo. Florence: Vallecchi, 1939.Search in Google Scholar
Weinrib, E. “The prosecution of Roman magistrates.” Phoenix 22 (1968): 32–56. 10.2307/1087035Search in Google Scholar
Westall, R. “Triumph and closure: between history and literature.” In Lange and Vervaet (2014), 33–52.Search in Google Scholar
Wistrand, M. Cicero Imperator. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. Elections and Electioneering in Rome. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1999. Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Xenophon’s Memorabilia and Greek historiography. A comparative approach
- The Dardanians and the Origin of the So-Called “Macedonian Phalanx”
- Cato as Disruptor: Republican ideology and the frustrated imperatores of the 60 s and 50 s BCE
- Augustus, Aediles and Censors in the Troubled Year of 22 BCE
- Novae erogationis ordinatio: Frontinus, Domitian, Nerva, and the Aqua Traiana
- Aspar and Apollonius–religion and politics in choosing the eastern consul for 460 CE
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Xenophon’s Memorabilia and Greek historiography. A comparative approach
- The Dardanians and the Origin of the So-Called “Macedonian Phalanx”
- Cato as Disruptor: Republican ideology and the frustrated imperatores of the 60 s and 50 s BCE
- Augustus, Aediles and Censors in the Troubled Year of 22 BCE
- Novae erogationis ordinatio: Frontinus, Domitian, Nerva, and the Aqua Traiana
- Aspar and Apollonius–religion and politics in choosing the eastern consul for 460 CE