Abstract
Analysis of huge data and detection of scintillation events by human visualization is expensive and time consuming process and also unfeasible in real time. In this paper, classical approaches namely Hard, Semi-Hard and Manual annotation rules are used for detection of the scintillations. For this, one week data is acquired from Septentrio PoLaRx5S GNSS scintillation monitoring Receiver corresponding to various constellations. Seven constellations namely GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, SBAS, BeiDou, QZSS and IRNSS-L5 signals during pre-sunset and post sunset hours are considered. The occurrence of scintillations due to pre-sunset and post sunset period by using hard and semi hard detection rules are analysed. It is observed that the occurrence of scintillations is more in post-sunset hours as compared to pre-sunset hours in all constellations. The performances of Semi Hard and Hard detection rules are compared with manual annotation by using confusion matrices statistical parameters namely accuracy, misclassification and precision. Identified scintillation signals coming from the least and worst affected directions. These results would be useful for early detection of scintillation without human inspection of scintillation events.
Acknowledgments
The work presented in this paper is carried out under the project entitled “A New Model for Short Term Forecasting of Scintillations using Machine Learning Approach and Generation of Regional Scintillation Maps” sponsored by Department of Science and Technology under SERB-CRG scheme, vide sanction letter no: CRG/2021/001660, dated: February 11, 2022. All views expressed are those of the authors and not of the funding Agency.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors declare they have no financial interests that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
-
Research funding: In this paper, the work carried out under the sponsored project funded by Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, Govt. of India. However, there is no funding for publication processing fee under this project.
-
Data availability: A PoLaRx5S scintillation monitoring receiver data were acquired from the R&E Hub of CBIT, Gandipet, Hyderabad, Telangana State-500075. Receiver data are available from the corresponding author based on reasonable requests.
References
1. Sreeja, V, Aquino, M, De Jong, K, Visser, H. Effect of the 24 September 2011 solar radio burst on precise point positioning service. Space Weather 2014;12:143–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013sw001011.Search in Google Scholar
2. Zhang, X, Guo, F, Zhou, P. Improved precise point positioning in the presence of ionospheric scintillation. GPS Solut 2014;18:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0309-1.Search in Google Scholar
3. Neelakantham, AM, Kuruva, L, Sarma Achanta, D, Pant, TK. Analysis of correlation between ROTI and S4 using GAGAN data. Prog Electromagn Res M 2021;99:23–34. https://doi.org/10.2528/pierm20101405.Search in Google Scholar
4. Swamy, KCT, Sarma Achanta, D, Supraja Reddy, A, Satya Srinivas, V, Somasekhar Rao, PVD. Modelling of GPS signal scintillations with polynomial coefficients over the Indian region. Indian J Radio Space Phys 2013;42:167–74.Search in Google Scholar
5. Sarma Achanta, D, Sultana, Q, Vemuri, SS. Augmentation of Indian regional navigation satellite system to improve dilution of precision. J Navig 2010;63:313–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s037346330999035x.Search in Google Scholar
6. Dubey, S, Wahi, R, Mingkhwan, E, Gwal, AK. Study of amplitude and phase scintillation at GPS frequency. Indian J Radio Space Phys 2005;34:402–7.Search in Google Scholar
7. Beniguel, Y, Adam, J-P. Effects of scintillations in GNSS operation. Courbevoie, France: Springer Netherlands, IEEA; 2007.10.1007/1-4020-5446-7_18Search in Google Scholar
8. Spogli, L, Alfonsi, L, De Franceschi, G, Romano, V, Aquino, MHO, Dodson, A. Climatology of GPS ionospheric scintillations over high and mid-latitude European regions. Ann Geophys 2009;27:3429–37. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3429-2009.Search in Google Scholar
9. Aarons, J. Global morphology of ionospheric scintillation. Proc. IEEE 1982;70:360–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1982.123414.Search in Google Scholar
10. Basu, S. Equatorial scintillations–are view. J Atmos Terr Phys 1981;43:473–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9169(81)90110-0.Search in Google Scholar
11. Lee, J, Morton, YTJ, Lee, J, Moon, H-S, Seo, J. Monitoring and mitigation of ionospheric anomalies for GNSS based safety critical systems: a review of up-to-date signal processing techniques. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2017;34:96–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2017.2716406.Search in Google Scholar
12. Van Dierendonck, AJ, Quyen, H. Measuring ionospheric scintillation effects from GPS signals. In: Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the institute of navigation; 2001.Search in Google Scholar
13. Avram, A, Volker, S, Noha El, G. Experimental results of multipath behavior for GPS L1-L2 and Galileo E1-E5b in static and kinematic scenarios. J Appl Geodesy 2019;13:279–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2019-0010.Search in Google Scholar
14. Moreno, B, Radicella, S, de Lacy, MC, Herraiz, M, Rodriguez-Caderot, G. On the effects of the ionospheric disturbances on precise point positioning at equatorial latitudes. GPS Solut 2011;15:381–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-010-0197-1.Search in Google Scholar
15. Kazmierski, K, Dominiak, K, Marut, G. Positioning performance with dual-frequency low-cost GNSS receivers. J Appl Geodesy 2023;17:255–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0042.Search in Google Scholar
16. Naveen Kumar, P, Dattatreya Sarma, A, Supraja Reddy, A. Modelling of ionospheric time delay of GPS signals using taylor series expansion for GPS aided geo augmented navigation applications. IET Radar, Sonar Navig 2014;8:1081–90. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2013.0351.Search in Google Scholar
17. Alfredo, F, Alessandro, F, Nicola, L, Fabio, D. A machine learning approach to GNSS scintillation detection: automatic soft inspection of the events. In: 30th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation. Portland, Oregon; 2017.Search in Google Scholar
18. Nicola, L, Alessandro, F, Alfredo, F, Fabio, D. Detection of GNSS ionospheric scintillations based on machine learning decision tree. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst 2019;55:303–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2018.2850385.Search in Google Scholar
19. Jiao, Y, Hall, JJ, Morton, YT. Automatic equatorial GPS amplitude scintillation detection using a machine learning algorithm. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst 2017;99:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2017.2650758.Search in Google Scholar
20. Shaikh, MM, Fernini, I, Gopakumar, G, Alameri, NM. Occurrence of pre-sunset L-band scintillation due to strong presence of sporadic-E over Arabian Peninsula. Adv Space Res 2020;65:2412–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.02.011.Search in Google Scholar
21. Olugbon, B, Oyeyemi, OE, Kashcheyev, A. Case studies on the day-to-day variability in the occurrence of post-sunset equatorial spread F. Space Weather 2022;20:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021SW002996.Search in Google Scholar
22. Tsunoda, RT, Ecklund, WL. On the post-sunset rise of the equatorial F layer and superposed upwellings and bubbles. Geophys Res Lett 2007;34:L04101. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028832.Search in Google Scholar
23. Gomez Socola, J, Rodrigues, FS. ScintPi 2.0 and 3.0: low-cost GNSS-based monitors of ionospheric scintillation and total electron content. Earth Planets Space 2022;74:185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01743-x.Search in Google Scholar
24. Guo, L, Wang, F, Sang, J, Lin, X, Gong, X, Zhang, W. Characteristics analysis of raw multi-GNSS measurement from Xiaomi Mi 8 and positioning performance Improvement with L5/E5 frequency in an urban environment. Remote Sens 2020;12:744. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040744.Search in Google Scholar
25. Ram Kumar, V, Kanaka Durga, R, Kumar Panda, S. Multi-constellation GNSS ionospheric scintillation monitoring through PolaRx5S receiver at a low latitude station in India. In: IEEE international women in engineering (WIE) conference on electrical and computer engineering (WIECON-ECE); 2021.Search in Google Scholar
26. Knight, M, Anthony, F. Impact of ionospheric scintillations on GPS performance. In: 9th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation, ION GPS-1996:1996; 555–64 pp.Search in Google Scholar
27. Japkowicz, N, Shah, M. Evaluating learning algorithms: a classification perspective. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2011.10.1017/CBO9780511921803Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Research Articles
- Ionospheric TEC modeling using COSMIC-2 GNSS radio occultation and artificial neural networks over Egypt
- Regional GPS orbit determination using code-based pseudorange measurement with residual correction model
- Analysis of different combinations of gravity data types in gravimetric geoid determination over Bali
- Assessment of satellite images terrestrial surface temperature and WVP using GNSS radio occultation data
- GNSS positioning accuracy performance assessments on 1st and 2nd generation SBAS signals in Thailand
- Differential synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry for detection land subsidence in Derna City, Libya
- Advanced topographic-geodetic surveys and GNSS methodologies in urban planning
- Detection of GNSS ionospheric scintillations in multiple directions over a low latitude station
- Spatiotemporal postseismic due to the 2018 Lombok earthquake based on insar revealed multi mechanisms with long duration afterslip
- Practical implications in the interpolation methods for constructing the regional mean sea surface model in the eastern Mediterranean Sea
- Validation of a tailored gravity field model for precise quasigeoid modelling over selected sites in Cameroon and South Africa
- Evaluation of ML-based classification algorithms for GNSS signals in ocean environment
- Development of a hybrid geoid model using a global gravity field model over Sri Lanka
- Implementation of GAGAN augmentation on smart mobile devices and development of a cooperative positioning architecture
- On the GPS signal multipath at ASG-EUPOS stations
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Research Articles
- Ionospheric TEC modeling using COSMIC-2 GNSS radio occultation and artificial neural networks over Egypt
- Regional GPS orbit determination using code-based pseudorange measurement with residual correction model
- Analysis of different combinations of gravity data types in gravimetric geoid determination over Bali
- Assessment of satellite images terrestrial surface temperature and WVP using GNSS radio occultation data
- GNSS positioning accuracy performance assessments on 1st and 2nd generation SBAS signals in Thailand
- Differential synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry for detection land subsidence in Derna City, Libya
- Advanced topographic-geodetic surveys and GNSS methodologies in urban planning
- Detection of GNSS ionospheric scintillations in multiple directions over a low latitude station
- Spatiotemporal postseismic due to the 2018 Lombok earthquake based on insar revealed multi mechanisms with long duration afterslip
- Practical implications in the interpolation methods for constructing the regional mean sea surface model in the eastern Mediterranean Sea
- Validation of a tailored gravity field model for precise quasigeoid modelling over selected sites in Cameroon and South Africa
- Evaluation of ML-based classification algorithms for GNSS signals in ocean environment
- Development of a hybrid geoid model using a global gravity field model over Sri Lanka
- Implementation of GAGAN augmentation on smart mobile devices and development of a cooperative positioning architecture
- On the GPS signal multipath at ASG-EUPOS stations