Immune response in glioma’s microenvironment
-
Houminji Chen
,
Yongsheng Zhong
Abstract
Objectives
Glioma is the most common tumor of the central nervous system. In this review, we outline the immunobiological factors that interact with glioma cells and tumor microenvironment (TME), providing more potential targets for clinical inhibition of glioma development and more directions for glioma treatment.
Content
Recent studies have shown that glioma cells secrete a variety of immune regulatory factors and interact with immune cells such as microglial cells, peripheral macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and T lymphocytes in the TME. In particular, microglia plays a key role in promoting glioma growth. Infiltrating immune cells induce local production of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors. Further leads to immune escape of malignant gliomas.
Summary and Outlook
The complex interaction of tumor cells with the TME has largely contributed to tumor heterogeneity and poor prognosis. We review the immunobiological factors, immune cells and current immunotherapy of gliomas, provide experimental evidence for future research and treatment of gliomas.
Introduction
Gliomas are the most common malignant tumors of the central nervous system. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies gliomas into the following categories: Low-grade gliomas (LGG, grades I and II) are well-differentiated and grow slowly tumors. While advanced gliomas (HGG, grades III and IV) have insufficient differentiation or degeneration, and strongly infiltrate the brain parenchyma. Grade IV glioma, known as glioblastoma (GBM), is characterized by poor survival, high tumor heterogeneity (inter- and intra-tumor), and lack of effective treatment [1]. GBM patients without any intervention have a median survival of fewer than six months. After standardized comprehensive treatment (surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy), the median survival time is only 14–15 months [2]. Although much progress has been made in research on gliomas, the treatment results are still not satisfactory. Due to the high heterogeneity of glioma, its immunogenicity can also change frequently [3]. A notable example is that when targeted therapy is used alone, due to the pressure of selection, the previously targeted antigen tends to be low-expressed when the glioma recurs [4], making the treatment of glioma more difficult. This article reviews the immune microenvironment in which gliomas are located. By describing the cells and various cytokines associated with glioma immunity in the microenvironment, the mechanism of immune escape, progression, and invasion of gliomas is explained in general. To provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of glioma immunity.
The microenvironment of glioma cells plays an extremely important role in the occurrence and development of tumors. Tumor cells, endothelial cells, immune cells, and a variety of cytokines secreted by the cells together form a glioma tumor microenvironment (TME). The immune cells include macrophages, microglia, regulatory T cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), T lymphocytes, natural killer cells (NK), dendritic cells, etc. They interact with tumor cells and together play a role in regulating immune effects in the microenvironment. Among them, GAMs play the most important role, and their roles are wide. GAMs can induce immune cells into a pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory phenotype, manipulate the immune response, reduce the immune system’s attack on tumor cells, and benefit glioma survival. The structure of ECM is rearranged by GAMs and tumor cells are susceptible to invasion [5], [6]. Various types of cytokines in TME can be divided into chemokines, immunosuppressive factors, angiogenic factors, invasive factors, and important GAM polarizing factors, which promote the transformation of GAMs into the M2 anti-inflammatory and tumor-promoting phenotype (see Figure 1).
Immune cells and immunoregulatory factors in glioma TME.
(A) Immune cells include glioma-associated microglia and macrophages (GAMs), T regulatory lymphocytes (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells (TIDCs), natural killer (NK), CD4/CD8 T cells. (B) Immunoregulatory factors include hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/scatter factor (SF), glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), monocyte chemotactic proteins (MCPs), CCL/CCR families, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), interleukin-6/ interleukin-8 (IL-6/IL-8), glycoprotein A repetition predominant (GARP), interleukin-10 (IL-10), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) or its ligand (PD-L1), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), interleukin-4 (IL-4), macrophage and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors (M-CSF, GM-CSF), epidermal growth factor (EGF)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
Immune-related cells in glioma microenvironment
Glioma-infiltrated microglia and macrophages, collectively known as glioma-associated microglia and macrophages (GAMs), is the most multi-functional cells group in glioma TAM. This group of cells can take up to 30% of the tumor tissue volume [7]. The number of GAMs infiltrating is positively correlated with tumor grade and poor prognosis [8]. GAMs have strong plasticity and can be polarized into different phenotypes in different microenvironments. Activated GAMs have at least two phenotypes, M1 and M2. M1 and M2 play opposite roles, while M1 plays anti-tumor effects, M2 phenotype has an immunosuppressive effect and secretes TGF-B, IL-6, IL-1B, EGF, and other cytokines to promote the growth, invasion, and expansion of gliomas by stimulating tumor-related blood vessel formation and tumor metastasis. On the other hand, TME also affects the differentiation of GAMs phenotypes. In brain tumors, GAMs are activated by tumor secretion of IL-10 and TGF-B to become an anti-inflammatory and tumor-promoting M2 phenotype. Colony-stimulating factors M-CSF and GM-CSF in glioblastoma can stimulate GAMs to the M2 phenotype. In a glioma mouse model, the use of CSF-1R receptor inhibitors can shrink tumors and prolong the survival time of mice [9]. In addition, GAMs themselves can greatly increase the number of M2 phenotype GAMs by expressing IL-10 and its receptor IL-10R in an autocrine manner [10].
T regulatory lymphocytes (Tregs) are potent immunosuppressive cells. Their immunosuppressive properties are an important cause of glioma immune escape. Tregs do not exist in normal human brain tissue, while a large number of immunosuppressive Tregs are founded in the glioma microenvironment, and the level of Tregs infiltration in glioma is closely related to tumor origin and pathological grade [11]. FoxP3 is an important factor determining Tregs differentiation and maturation. FoxP3 is also the main transcription factor that Tregs regulate the expression of IL-10 and TGF-β [12]. CTL associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) on Tregs surface, also known as CD152, is generally recognized as an immune checkpoint molecule, which is upregulated in activated CD4+ helper T cells and CD8+ CTLs. Yet, CTLA-4 is constitutively expressed on Tregs and binding to its cognate ligands CD80 and CD86 can induce a lethargy state of matured APCs. Such compromised APCs theoretically lack the ability to activate naive tumor-reactive T-lymphocytes [13]. Tregs can inhibit other immune cells’ functions by secreting cytokines such as IL10 and TGF-β, and induce recruited CD4+T cells in TME to transform into new Tregs, so-called adaptive Tregs [14].
MDSCs are a group of heterogeneous cells, including immature macrophages, granulocytes, DCs, and other myeloid-derived cells at an early stage of differentiation. The infiltration of MDSCs in glioma tissues can exert immunosuppressive effects through a variety of pathways and mediate tumor immune escape. The main manifestations are decreased phagocytosis, increased expression of immunosuppressive molecules IL10, TGF-β [15], and B7H1 [16], inhibited DC differentiation, reduced cytotoxicity of NK cells, and induced T cell apoptosis. CD8+T cells are inhibited by MDSCs through producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) [17] and secreting immune cytokines, as well as inducing Tregs [18]. For CD4+T cells, the expression of PD-1 is induced, which leads to the exhaustion of CD4+ T cells [19]. Elevated GM-CSF levels in the glioma microenvironment can promote MDSCs’ activation, thereby up-regulating the expression of the inhibitory cytokine TGF-β and promoting the formation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment [20]. Various immunosuppressive phenotypes produced by granulocyte-derived MDSCs are related to activation of the STAT3 pathway. Blocking the STAT3 pathway can reduce the gathering of granulocyte-derived MDSCs in the TAM and promote the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+T cells in tumors [21]. The COX2 pathway can directly promote the generation of systemic MDSCs, and inhibit the infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). The use of COX2 inhibitors such as Aspirin will reduce the risk of gliomas [22].
Tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells (TIDCs) can inhibit T cell activation by blocking T cell contact with APCs [23], [24]. In the relationship between DCs and T cells, immature DCs (because of the tumor environment affect) are more likely to cause tumor immune tolerance [25], [26]. Under normal circumstances, DC-derived exosomes promote CTL production while Treg-derived exosomes play a role in inhibition, respectively [27]. However, tumor-infiltrated DCs lose the ability to activate CTL [28]. Researches in DCs are mostly about DC vaccine active immunotherapy for gliomas [29].
Human immune receptor NKp44 expressed by normal natural killer (NK) cells can recognize platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-DD produced by tumors, and then trigger NK cells to secrete IFN-γ and TNF-α, thereby inducing tumor cell growth arrest [30]. Compared with other types of tumors, the number of NK cells infiltrating brain tumors is smaller [31]. At the same time, the effectiveness of NK cells in gliomas is also weaker [32]. NK cells cannot complete the physiological processes of cell recognition and killing due to the strong HLA-E expression inhibits NK cells expressing cognate inhibitory killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and CD94/NKG2A [33]. Some studies have found that lectin-like transcript 1 (LLT1) expressed on the surface of glioma [34], LLT1 can interact with CD161 on the surface of NK cells [35], and inhibits the cytotoxicity and IFN secretion of NK cells [36].
T cells in TME are affected by chemokines. Among T cell phenotypes, there are more CD4+T cells than CD8+T cells. CD4+T cells often show exhausted markers (expressing Immunoglobulin mucin-3 TIM-3 and death protein PD-1). However, although CD4+T cells are exhausted, they can still secrete IFNγ and continue to promote the migration of T cells to the CNS [37]. It can be observed in murine glioma models that CD8+T cells usually first lose functions such as IL-2 production, high proliferative capacity, and ex vivo killing. The ability to secrete tumor necrosis factor is usually lost with the loss of various important functions [38]. CD25(−) is characteristic of disabled CD8+T cells [39]. Immunosuppressive TME inhibits CD8+T cells activation by inducing the expression of high levels of co-suppressing receptors like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 [40]. T cell exhaustion has been found in extensive studies of various tumors [41], [42]. The metabolic restrictions imposed by tumors can mediate a low T cell response. PD-1 overexpressed by T cells mediated the upregulation of glucose transporter-1 GLUT1 through the mTOR pathway to make T cells enter a high glucose glycolysis state. In this state, T cells compete with tumor cells for glucose in TME and gradually fail. They cannot maintain the expression of T cell receptor TcR and lose their ability to fight tumors [43]. Clinically used checkpoint blocking antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 can restore glucose concentration in the TME, allowing T cell glycolysis and IFN-γ production. Blocking PD-L1 in tumors can inhibit glycolysis by inhibiting mTOR activity and reducing the expression of glycolytic enzymes, which reflects the role of PD-L1 in tumor glucose utilization [40].
Immunoregulatory factors
Recruitment factors
Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/scatter factor (SF) is a ligand of transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor c-Met [44]. Its presence in normal tissue is usually mediated by hypoxia, and is also involved in wound repair [45]. The HGF/SF together with c-Met was found upregulated in glioma tissue, positively correlated with the grade of glioma and poor prognosis [46]. HGF/SF plays a role in the motility and mitosis of gliomas [47], also act as a chemokine for microglial cells and BM-macrophages [44]. The mechanism is revealed as HGF/SF upregulates CXCR4 via NF-κB, which leads to enhanced migration [48].
Glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been identified as a potent neurotrophic factor in a variety of neuronal cell populations and is overexpressed in human gliomas [49]. In vitro migration tests showed that GDNF is a strong chemical attractant of microglia but does not affect glioma-induced astrogliosis. GDNF promotes glioma migration and progression in an autocrine manner [50].
Monocyte chemotactic proteins (MCPs) belong to the MCP subgroup of the C–C chemokines family and promote chemotaxis of immune cells [51]. The presence of MCP-1/CCL2 induces microglial proliferation and migration by exclusively binding CCR2 [51]. It was demonstrated several glioma cells mainly express MCP-3 but not MCP-1 [52]. MCP-3 promotes chemotaxis of immune cells by binding to CCR1, CCR2, and CCR3 receptors [53], thus promote the migration of macrophages, monocytes, NKs, T cells, and DCs.
Chemokines and receptors are involved in the development of glioma. CCL5/CCR5 are highly expressed in human glioblastoma and is associated with poor prognosis. CCR5 blockade prevents the M2 microglia phenotype, also significantly reduces microglial migration, which is mediated by inhibition of the AKT pathway [54]. In glioblastoma, increased CCL2 expression is associated with decreased OS. Glioma-derived CCL2 acts on microglia with CCR2 and then produces IL-6 to stimulate the glioma [55]. Tumor cells recruit Tregs and MDSCs through the CCL2 / CCR2 axis to produce local immunosuppression [56]. CX3CL1 expressed by GB cells induces the recruitment of human GAMs through its receptor CX3CR1 and increases the expression of matrix metalloproteases 2, 9, and 14 in GAM, thereby promoting tumor invasion [57]. CXCL12 has been shown to be associated with tumor angiogenesis and tumor cell hypoxia tolerance in an in vivo glioma model [58]. Blockade of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis after irradiation inhibited the recurrence of spontaneous brain tumors in rats [59].
Angiogenic factors
Glioma cells stimulate microglial cells to increase TGF-B production. It plays a key role in the progression of gliomas by inducing several genes involved in many oncogenic processes such as proliferation, angiogenesis, and invasion [60], [61]. TGF-B activates the Ras protein pathway and MAPK pathway to further mediate the proliferation of high-grade glioma cells and up-regulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its downstream receptors [62], [63]. It is worth noting that the abundant VEGF caused a decrease in the accumulation of microglia/macrophages in the surrounding environment of blood vessels, and at the same time reduced the release of pro-angiogenic factors (such as VEGF), indicating that there may be a negative feedback mechanism [64]. At the same time, the hypoxia-inducible factor HIF can also induce the expression of VEGF and promote the formation of the tumor vascular system [65].
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an enzyme involved in the production of eicosanoids acid, which plays a major role in GBM angiogenesis. Its effect is achieved by mediating vascular epithelial growth factor VEGF [66]. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) is also an angiogenesis-inducing factor. FGF can promote the division and chemotaxis of vascular endothelial cells and can participate in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway to inhibit apoptosis of endothelial cells. Targeted inhibition of COX-2 and FGF expression down-regulates VEGF, thereby slowing the process of angiogenesis [67]. COX2 can be metabolized into prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [68]. COX2/PGE2 induces the production of Id1 through the EP4-dependent MAPK signaling pathway and the activation of the Egr1 transcription factor. Id1 can increase the resistance of glioblastoma to radiation therapy [69].
Th2-cytokine (IL-6/IL-8) are both considered major regulators of glioma cell growth and invasiveness. STAT-3 is a downstream signal transducer of cytokine signaling and is positively correlated with tumor angiogenesis [70]. After the inhibition of STAT3 is released, IL-6 activates the STAT3 signal cascade, which leads to an increase in the expression level of VEGF in glioma and contributes to tumor vessel formation [71], [72]. IL-8 strongly promotes angiogenesis, and its mechanism of action is to regulate the survival and proliferation of endothelial cells [73].
Immunosuppressive factors
Glycoprotein A repetition predominant (GARP) is a surface molecule of regulatory T cells and tumor cells. It plays an important role in preventing inflammatory diseases such as allergies and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). GARP is often hijacked by tumor cells to promote tumorigenesis [74]. Recent research indicates that GARP expression was shown in glioblastoma cell lines, primary glioblastoma tissues, and LGGs. GARP is located on the surface of tumor cells and in the cytoplasm of glioma cells. GARP induces Treg differentiation and M2 phenotype Macrophages and suppresses (tumor antigen-specific) T effector cells, thereby contributing to the immunosuppressive TME of primary brain tumors [75].
GBM patients have elevated levels of immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 [5]. IL-10 is usually produced when tumor cells are stimulated by M2 macrophages, which in turn can promote the transformation of macrophages to the M2 phenotype. IL-10 can stimulate the transcription factor STAT3 and induce the expression of anti-inflammatory molecules such as TGF-β and FGL2 [76], [77]. At the same time, IL-10 can also inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory molecules, activate Tregs, inhibit CD8-mediated cytotoxic effects, and silence phagocytosis and antibody expression, which is generally beneficial to tumor survival [78].
Indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is a tryptophan catabolism enzyme commonly found in malignant brain tumors, which is related to the downstream kynurenic acid metabolic pathway [79]. Up-regulation of IDO1 expression in glioma patients is associated with decreased overall survival (OS) [80]. The high expression of IDO1 leads to an increase in the level of kynurenic acid. Early studies suggest that the level of kynurenic acid is related to CD4+T cell apoptosis [81]. Current research shows that kynurenic acid may induce the occurrence of Treg through FOXP3, thereby causing tumor immune escape [82], [83].
Arginase is involved in a variety of cellular activities in the glioma microenvironment, including the polarization of tumor-associated glial cells and macrophages [84]. The increase of arginase in blood samples of patients with glioma suggests that it is related to the inhibitory effect of MDSC on tumor immunity [18]. It is known that the arginase produced by MDSC reduces the level of l-arginine that is essential for normal T cell function, leading to T cell dysfunction [85]. In addition, MDSC also uses nitric oxide synthase (NOS) to convert the raw material l-Arginine into nitric oxide that has a wide range of mediating inflammation, angiogenesis, T cell dysfunction and tumor immune escape [86].
The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) or its ligand (PD-L1) shows activity in several cancer types [87]. B7-homolog 1 (B7-H1) doesn’t express in normal brain tissue [88]. B7-H1 acts as a ligand of PD1 and inhibits the immune response of TH cells [89]. In addition, B7-H1 can also act as a receptor that transmits anti-apoptotic signals, thereby inhibiting the lysis of cancer cells by cytotoxic CD8 T lymphocytes [90]. Other members of the B7 family, such as B7-H3 and B7-H4, are associated with immune escape in many malignancies and are expected to become new targets for targeted therapy [91], [92], [93]. Fibrinogen-like protein 2 (FGL2) is a secreted factor and is overexpressed in glioblastoma compared to LGGs. FGL2 enhances the immunosuppressive effect of glioma by increasing the expression level of PD1, increasing the M2 phenotype macrophages, and increasing the number of MDSCs and Tregs [94]. At the same time, FGL2 promotes glioma progression by inhibiting CD103+ dendritic cell differentiation [95].
GAM polarizing factors
Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) has multiple roles in the process of tumorigenesis. From the occurrence, growth, and invasion of gliomas, TGF-β is involved [96]. TGF-β has three isoforms in mammals, TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3. The three isoforms are roughly similar in structure but distributed in different organs and tissues. Among them, TGF-β2 is abundantly expressed in gliomas and is positively correlated with glioma grades [97]. TGF-β2 works synergistically with prostaglandin E2 to promote polarization by inhibiting the expression of MHC I and MHC class II molecules on the surface of gliomas [98]. TGF-β2 secreted by GAM up-regulates TGF-β receptors of tumor cells and promotes tumor growth [99].
Interleukin-4 (IL-4) is a multifunctional cytokine mainly secreted by Th2 cells, eosinophils, basophils, and stromal cells. IL-4 is known to regulate a variety of immune responses, including the process of T cell and B cell differentiation. It is currently considered to be the best characterizing promoter of M2 polarization in microglia and macrophages [100]. IL-4 promotes microglia M2 polarization through the PI3K pathway and activates the most important downstream transcription factor IRF4. Other members of the IRF family such as IRF7 also participate in a similar process, which is also mediated by IL-4. IL-13 stimulation of microglial cells can polarize the microglia to anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype and repair tissues, playing a role similar to IL-4 [101].
Macrophage and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors (M-CSF, GM-CSF) play an important role in the differentiation and development of macrophages. Glioma has a high expression of GM-CSF, and the expression level is negatively correlated with the prognosis of patients. Glioma-derived M-CSF promotes differentiation of macrophages into the M2 phenotype [102]. Although GM-CSF receptor inhibitors cannot reduce the number of infiltrating macrophages, they can weaken their immunosuppressive function [9]. Regulating the number of infiltrating macrophages in gliomas through CSF inhibitors, or changing the immunosuppressive characteristics of infiltrating macrophages is expected to improve the prognosis of glioma patients. GM-CSF has been widely used as an adjuvant in various tumor cell and DC vaccine-related clinical studies [103].
Invasion enhancing factor
A distinct feature of gliomas is that they infiltrate into the brain parenchyma, and the brain extracellular matrix (ECM) and its regulators play a key role in glioma cell invasion [104]. Fibroblasts found in the cancer microenvironment can exhibit special phenotypes, such as increased expression of α- smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and fibroblast activating protein (FAP), and increased secretion of ECM proteins, including Fibronectin and type I collagen [105]. During the polarization of GAMs to M2 phenotype, lactadherin, and osteopontin released by tumor cells promote actin filament contraction and microtubule rearrangement, thereby enhancing the M2 phenotype migration ability [106]. GAM-derived TGF-β2 and β1 have been shown to increase matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) expression, thereby promoting ECM deposition and promoting glioma invasion [6]. MMP-2 reshapes ECM by degrading type IV and V collagen, promotes tumor neovascularization and helps tumor invasion and expansion [107].
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification is the most common genetic change in primary GBM (about 40%), and high EGFR expression is associated with primary human tumors. The mechanism of glioma cell invasion includes the up-regulation of ECM-degrading proteases and the activation of abnormal signal pathways leading to the degradation of ECM. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) secreted by tumor cells and corresponding immune cells cooperates with up-regulated EGFR to accelerate this process [108]. A mutant form of EGFR, commonly called EGFRvIII or ΔEGFR, is only expressed in tumor cells. EGFRvIII-positive tumors are associated with poor prognosis and short life expectancy. EGFRvIII promotes ECM degradation of gliomas through NF-κB and interleukin 8 pathways while promoting angiogenesis [109]. It is known that EGFR activation promotes MMP-9 expression in different cell types. For example, EGF stimulates ovarian cancer cell migration and MMP-9-dependent invasion [110]. Similar to wild type EGFR, EGFRvIII expression is also closely related to MMP-9 expression. Some scholars speculate that it is regulated by the MAPK/ERK pathway because EGFRvIII is known to activate the extracellular signal-regulated kinase ERK 1/2 in glioma cells, which is a direct regulator of MMP-9 secreted by glioma cells [108].
Interleukin 8 (IL-8) has been shown to be a key regulator of CNS function and development in many CNS0 diseases, including gliomas [111]. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is usually up-regulated in tumor cells, acts on CEBP-β binding sites, and induces demethylation of IL-8 related DNA on CpG islands. At the same time, PGE2 induced H3 acetylation in the IL-8 promoter, which further enhanced its expression [112]. Among different types of tumors, it has been reported that IL-8 promotes tumor invasion through NF-κB [113]. The binding of IL-8 to CXCR2 most effectively triggered the redistribution of VE-cadherin from the junction of endothelial cells. Therefore, vascular permeability is increased, and blood vessels are susceptible to invasion and blood-borne metastasis [114]. Finally, IL-8 participates in cytoskeleton rearrangement, and the IL-8-NF-κB signaling axis promotes F-actin polymerization and mediates epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), promoting the tumor’s growth and invasion [115].
Immunotherapy of glioma
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
It is currently believed that the immune checkpoint PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1, as well as CTLA-4, are important factors that inhibit tumor T cell immunity. Anti-PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 antibodies have shown the potential for tumor regression [116]. However, the prospect of applying PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to gliomas is still unclear. In terms of expression level, gliomas have limited expression of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint [117], which indicates that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors used alone is limited. In fact, clinical studies using PD-1 inhibitors in recurrent high-grade gliomas have shown a lower response rate [118]. The high expression of CTLA-4 is closely related to poor prognosis [119]. In the mouse glioma model, CTLA-4 inhibitors showed significant efficacy when combined with other immune checkpoint inhibitors [120]. In view of the high heterogeneity of gliomas, a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a good treatment strategy [121].
CAR-T cells
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells can specifically recognize tumor cells and target EGFRvIII, IL-13Rα2, and HER2 antigens expressed by glioblastoma. CAT-T cell therapy has been used in clinical trials [122]. Dual-targeting CAR-T cells against EGFR/EGFRvIII showed specific toxicity to glioblastoma in a study [123]. CAR-T cells that double target IL-13Rα2 and HER2 also show good potential for improving the immune escape of glioblastoma [124].
Vaccine
Similar to the antigen targeted by CAR-T cells, the vaccine target needs to cover tumor-specific antigens such as EGFRvIII and IL-13Rα2 [125]. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity of gliomas and the selective pressure brought by immunotherapy, gliomas that relapse after immunotherapy often lose the expression of specific antigens [4]. Combining vaccines against multiple antigens may avoid this shortcoming, but there is not enough evidence to support this view [122].
Conclusions
The dynamic interaction between glioma cells and their TME plays a pivotal role in the growth and development of tumors, and it also brings major challenges to treatment. TME of gliomas not only inhibit the anti-tumor immune response but also significantly promote the occurrence and development of gliomas. Among various cell types, GAMs play the most critical role. The key problem to be solved is the dynamic observation of changes in the immunological characteristics of GAMs during the development of gliomas, including migration and accumulation in the local area of gliomas Cellular and molecular mechanisms that exert inhibitory effects. In addition, studying immune cells such as MDSC, DC, and Treg and their secreted cytokines, and carrying out targeted immunotherapy may combat gliomas, especially GBM, and can supplement surgery and chemotherapy. Through an in-depth discussion of the above-mentioned series of issues, not only can we make several discoveries in the theoretical study of the local regional immune characteristics of gliomas, but also provide experimental evidence for the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of gliomas’ immune microenvironment. The limited knowledge gained from the research will provide inspiration for future research and treatment of gliomas.
Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 81671193
Funding source: Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2017A030313879
Research funding: The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (Grant No. 81671193) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2017A030313879).
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.
References
1. Lee, E, Yong, RL, Paddison, P, Zhu, J. Comparison of glioblastoma (GBM) molecular classification methods. Semin Canc Biol 2018;53:201–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.07.006.Search in Google Scholar
2. Stupp, R, Mason, WP, Van Den Bent, MJ, Weller, M, Fisher, B, Taphoorn, MJB, et al.. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005;352:987–96. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa043330.Search in Google Scholar
3. Suzuki, H, Aoki, K, Chiba, K, Sato, Y, Shiozawa, Y, Shiraishi, Y, et al.. Mutational landscape and clonal architecture in grade II and III gliomas. Nat Genet 2015;47:458–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3273.Search in Google Scholar
4. Weller, M, Butowski, N, Tran, DD, Recht, LD, Lim, M, Hirte, H, et al.. Rindopepimut with temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed, EGFRvIII-expressing glioblastoma (ACT IV): a randomised, double-blind, international phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1373–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30517-X.Search in Google Scholar
5. Zisakis, A, Piperi, C, Themistocleous, MS, Korkolopoulou, P, Boviatsis, EI, Sakas, DE, et al.. Comparative analysis of peripheral and localised cytokine secretion in glioblastoma patients. Cytokine 2007;39(2):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2007.05.012.Search in Google Scholar
6. Matias, D, Balça-Silva, J, Da Graça, GC, Wanjiru, CM, Macharia, LW, Nascimento, CP, et al.. Microglia/astrocytes-glioblastoma crosstalk: crucial molecular mechanisms and microenvironmental factors. Front Cell Neurosci 2018;12:235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00235.Search in Google Scholar
7. Bowman, RL, Klemm, F, Akkari, L, Pyonteck, SM, Sevenich, L, Quail, DF, et al.. Macrophage ontogeny underlies differences in tumor-specific education in brain malignancies. Cell Rep 2016;17:2445–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.10.052.Search in Google Scholar
8. Quail, DF, Joyce, JA. The microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors. Canc Cell 2017;31:326–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.009.Search in Google Scholar
9. Pyonteck, SM, Akkari, L, Schuhmacher, AJ, Bowman, RL, Sevenich, L, Quail, DF, et al.. CSF-1R inhibition alters macrophage polarization and blocks glioma progression. Nat Med 2013;19:1264–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3337.Search in Google Scholar
10. Roesch, S, Rapp, C, Dettling, S, Herold-Mende, C. When immune cells turn bad-tumor-associated microglia/macrophages in glioma. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020436.Search in Google Scholar
11. Grauer, OM, Nierkens, S, Bennink, E, Toonen, LWJ, Boon, L, Wesseling, P, et al.. CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells gradually accumulate in gliomas during tumor growth and efficiently suppress antiglioma immune responses in vivo. Int J Canc 2007;121(1):95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22607.Search in Google Scholar
12. Latha, K, Yan, J, Yang, Y, Gressot, LV, Kong, L-Y, Manyam, G, et al.. The role of fibrinogen-like protein 2 on immunosuppression and malignant progression in glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019;111:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy107.Search in Google Scholar
13. Chen, J, Ganguly, A, Mucsi, AD, Meng, J, Yan, J, Detampel, P, et al.. Strong adhesion by regulatory T cells induces dendritic cell cytoskeletal polarization and contact-dependent lethargy. J Exp Med 2017;214:327–38. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20160620.Search in Google Scholar
14. Walker, MR, Kasprowicz, DJ, Gersuk, VH, Benard, A, Van Landeghen, M, Buckner, JH, et al.. Induction of FoxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4+CD25- T cells. J Clin Invest 2003;112:1437–43. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI19441.Search in Google Scholar
15. Rodrigues, JC, Gonzalez, GC, Zhang, L, Ibrahim, G, Kelly, JJ, Gustafson, MP, et al.. Normal human monocytes exposed to glioma cells acquire myeloid-derived suppressor cell-like properties. Neuro Oncol 2010;12:351–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nop023.Search in Google Scholar
16. Chen, S, Liu, H, Su, N, Zhang, G, Wang, L. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells promote age-related increase of lung cancer growth via B7-H1. Exp Gerontol 2015;61:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2014.12.001.Search in Google Scholar
17. Ohl, K, Tenbrock, K. Reactive oxygen species as regulators of MDSC-mediated immune suppression. Front Immunol 2018;9:2499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02499.Search in Google Scholar
18. Raychaudhuri, B, Rayman, P, Ireland, J, Ko, J, Rini, B, Borden, EC, et al.. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell accumulation and function in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2011;13:591–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor042.Search in Google Scholar
19. Dubinski, D, Wölfer, J, Hasselblatt, M, Schneider-Hohendorf, T, Bogdahn, U, Stummer, W, et al.. CD4+ T effector memory cell dysfunction is associated with the accumulation of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol 2016;18:807–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov280.Search in Google Scholar
20. Park, MY, Lim, BG, Kim, SY, Sohn, HJ, Kim, S, Kim, TG. GM-CSF promotes the expansion and differentiation of cord blood myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which attenuate xenogeneic graft-vs.-host disease. Front Immunol 2019;10:183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00183.Search in Google Scholar
21. Abad, C, Nobuta, H, Li, J, Kasai, A, Yong, WH, Waschek, JA. Targeted STAT3 disruption in myeloid cells alters immunosuppressor cell abundance in a murine model of spontaneous medulloblastoma. J Leukoc Biol 2014;95:357–67. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1012531.Search in Google Scholar
22. Fujita, M, Kohanbash, G, Fellows-Mayle, W, Hamilton, RL, Komohara, Y, Decker, SA, et al.. COX-2 blockade suppresses gliomagenesis by inhibiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Canc Res 2011;71:2664–74. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-3055.Search in Google Scholar
23. Perrot, I, Blanchard, D, Freymond, N, Isaac, S, Guibert, B, Pachéco, Y, et al.. Dendritic cells infiltrating human non-small cell lung cancer are blocked at immature stage. J Immunol 2007;178:2763–9. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2763.Search in Google Scholar
24. Yu, X, Harden, K, Gonzalez, LC, Francesco, M, Chiang, E, Irving, B, et al.. The surface protein TIGIT suppresses T cell activation by promoting the generation of mature immunoregulatory dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 2009;10:48–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1674.Search in Google Scholar
25. Gieryng, A, Pszczolkowska, D, Walentynowicz, KA, Rajan, WD, Kaminska, B. Immune microenvironment of gliomas. Lab Invest; J Tech Method Pathol 2017;97:498–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2017.19.Search in Google Scholar
26. Strioga, M, Schijns, V, Powell, DJJr, Pasukoniene, V, Dobrovolskiene, N, Michalek, J. Dendritic cells and their role in tumor immunosurveillance. Innate Immun 2013;19:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753425912449549.Search in Google Scholar
27. Seo, N, Akiyoshi, K, Shiku, H. Exosome-mediated regulation of tumor immunology. Canc Sci 2018;109:2998–3004. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13735.Search in Google Scholar
28. Wang, Y, Lu, C, Huang, H, Yao, S, Xu, C, Ye, Y, et al.. A lipid-soluble extract of Pinellia pedatisecta Schott orchestrates intratumoral dendritic cell-driven immune activation through SOCS1 signaling in cervical cancer. J Ethnopharmacol 2020;112837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.112837, in press.Search in Google Scholar
29. Weller, M, Roth, P, Preusser, M, Wick, W, Reardon, DA, Platten, M, et al.. Vaccine-based immunotherapeutic approaches to gliomas and beyond. Nat Rev Neurol 2017;13:363–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.64.Search in Google Scholar
30. Barrow, AD, Edeling, MA, Trifonov, V, Luo, J, Goyal, P, Bohl, B, et al.. Natural killer cells control tumor growth by sensing a growth factor. Cell 2018;172:534–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.037.Search in Google Scholar
31. Stevens, A, Klöter, I, Roggendorf, W. Inflammatory infiltrates and natural killer cell presence in human brain tumors. Cancer 1988;61:738–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19880215)61:4<738::aid-cncr2820610417>3.0.co;2-e.10.1002/1097-0142(19880215)61:4<738::AID-CNCR2820610417>3.0.CO;2-ESearch in Google Scholar
32. Domingues, P, González-Tablas, M, Otero, Á, Pascual, D, Miranda, D, Ruiz, L, et al.. Tumor infiltrating immune cells in gliomas and meningiomas. Brain Behav Immun 2016;53:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.019.Search in Google Scholar
33. Wischhusen, J, Friese, MA, Mittelbronn, M, Meyermann, R, Weller, M. HLA-E protects glioma cells from NKG2D-mediated immune responses in vitro: implications for immune escape in vivo. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2005;64:523–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/64.6.523.Search in Google Scholar
34. Roth, P, Mittelbronn, M, Wick, W, Meyermann, R, Tatagiba, M, Weller, M. Malignant glioma cells counteract antitumor immune responses through expression of lectin-like transcript-1. Canc Res 2007;67:3540–4. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4783.Search in Google Scholar
35. Aldemir, H, Prod’homme, V, Dumaurier, M-J, Retiere, C, Poupon, G, Cazareth, J, et al.. Cutting edge: lectin-like transcript 1 is a ligand for the CD161 receptor. J Immunol 2005;175:7791–5. Baltimore, Md: 1950. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.7791.Search in Google Scholar
36. Halkias, J, Rackaityte, E, Hillman, SL, Aran, D, Mendoza, VF, Marshall, LR, et al.. CD161 contributes to prenatal immune suppression of IFNγ-producing PLZF+ T cells. J Clin Invest 2019;130:3562–77.10.1172/JCI125957Search in Google Scholar
37. Goods, BA, Hernandez, AL, Lowther, DE, Lucca, LE, Lerner, BA, Gunel, M, et al.. Functional differences between PD-1+ and PD-1- CD4+ effector T cells in healthy donors and patients with glioblastoma multiforme. PloS One 2017;12:e0181538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181538.Search in Google Scholar
38. Wherry, EJ. T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol 2011;12:492–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2035.Search in Google Scholar
39. Deleeuw, RJ, Kroeger, DR, Kost, SE, Chang, PP, Webb, JR, Nelson, BH. CD25 identifies a subset of CD4+FoxP3− TIL that are exhausted yet prognostically favorable in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 2015;3:245–53. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.cir-14-0146.Search in Google Scholar
40. Chang, C-H, Qiu, J, O’sullivan, D, Buck, MD, Noguchi, T, Curtis, JD, et al.. Metabolic competition in the tumor microenvironment is a driver of cancer progression. Cell 2015;162:1229–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.016.Search in Google Scholar
41. Wang, Q, Lou, W, Di, W, Wu, X. Prognostic value of tumor PD-L1 expression combined with CD8 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in high grade serous ovarian cancer. Int Immunopharm 2017;52:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2017.08.017.Search in Google Scholar
42. Prat, A, Navarro, A, Paré, L, Reguart, N, Galván, P, Pascual, T, et al.. Immune-related gene expression profiling after PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Canc Res 2017;77:3540–50. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-3556.Search in Google Scholar
43. Wherry, EJ, Kurachi, M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion. Nat Rev Immunol 2015;15:486–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3862.Search in Google Scholar
44. Kunkel, P, Müller, S, Schirmacher, P, Stavrou, D, Fillbrandt, R, Westphal, M, et al.. Expression and localization of scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor in human astrocytomas. Neuro Oncol 2001;3:82–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/3.2.82.Search in Google Scholar
45. Sonnenberg, E, Meyer, D, Weidner, KM, Birchmeier, C. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor, the c-met tyrosine kinase, can mediate a signal exchange between mesenchyme and epithelia during mouse development. J Cell Biol 1993;123:223–35. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.123.1.223.Search in Google Scholar
46. Arrieta, O, Garcia, E, Guevara, P, Garcia-Navarrete, R, Ondarza, R, Rembao, D, et al.. Hepatocyte growth factor is associated with poor prognosis of malignant gliomas and is a predictor for recurrence of meningioma. Cancer 2002;94:3210–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10594.Search in Google Scholar
47. Badie, B, Schartner, J, Klaver, J, Vorpahl, J. In vitro modulation of microglia motility by glioma cells is mediated by hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. Neurosurgery 1999;44:1077–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199905000-00075.Search in Google Scholar
48. Esencay, M, Newcomb, EW, Zagzag, D. HGF upregulates CXCR4 expression in gliomas via NF-kappaB: implications for glioma cell migration. J Neuro Oncol 2010;99:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0111-2.Search in Google Scholar
49. Wiesenhofer, B, Stockhammer, G, Kostron, H, Maier, H, Hinterhuber, H, Humpel, C. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and its receptor (GFR-alpha 1) are strongly expressed in human gliomas. Acta Neuropathol 2000;99:131–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00007416.Search in Google Scholar
50. Ku, M-C, Wolf, SA, Respondek, D, Matyash, V, Pohlmann, A, Waiczies, S, et al.. GDNF mediates glioblastoma-induced microglia attraction but not astrogliosis. Acta Neuropathol 2013;125:609–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1079-8.Search in Google Scholar
51. Hinojosa, AE, Garcia-Bueno, B, Leza, JC, Madrigal, JLM. CCL2/MCP-1 modulation of microglial activation and proliferation. J Neuroinflammation 2011;8:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-8-77.Search in Google Scholar
52. Okada, M, Saio, M, Kito, Y, Ohe, N, Yano, H, Yoshimura, S, et al.. Tumor-associated macrophage/microglia infiltration in human gliomas is correlated with MCP-3, but not MCP-1. Int J Oncol 2009;34:1621–7. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000292.Search in Google Scholar
53. Menten, P, Wuyts, A, Van Damme, J. Monocyte chemotactic protein-3. Eur Cytokine Netw 2001;12:554–60.Search in Google Scholar
54. Laudati, E, Currò, D, Navarra, P, Lisi, L. Blockade of CCR5 receptor prevents M2 microglia phenotype in a microglia-glioma paradigm. Neurochem Int 2017;108:100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2017.03.002.Search in Google Scholar
55. Zhang, J, Sarkar, S, Cua, R, Zhou, Y, Hader, W, Yong, VW. A dialog between glioma and microglia that promotes tumor invasiveness through the CCL2/CCR2/interleukin-6 axis. Carcinogenesis 2012;33:312–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgr289.Search in Google Scholar
56. Morton, TA, Wilson, N, Haslam, C, Birney, M, Kingston, R, Mccloskey, L-G. Activating and guiding the engagement of seniors with online social networking: experimental findings from the AGES 2.0 project. J Aging Health 2018;30:27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316664440.Search in Google Scholar
57. Held-Feindt, J, Hattermann, K, Müerköster, SS, Wedderkopp, H, Knerlich-Lukoschus, F, Ungefroren, H, et al.. CX3CR1 promotes recruitment of human glioma-infiltrating microglia/macrophages (GIMs). Exp Cell Res 2010;316:1553–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.02.018.Search in Google Scholar
58. Wang, S-C, Hong, J-H, Hsueh, C, Chiang, C-S. Tumor-secreted SDF-1 promotes glioma invasiveness and TAM tropism toward hypoxia in a murine astrocytoma model. Lab Invest; J Tech Method Pathol 2012;92:151–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.2011.128.Search in Google Scholar
59. Liu, S-C, Alomran, R, Chernikova, SB, Lartey, F, Stafford, J, Jang, T, et al.. Blockade of SDF-1 after irradiation inhibits tumor recurrences of autochthonous brain tumors in rats. Neuro Oncol 2014;16:21–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not149.Search in Google Scholar
60. Zhu, W, Carney, KE, Pigott, VM, Falgoust, LM, Clark, PA, Kuo, JS, et al.. Glioma-mediated microglial activation promotes glioma proliferation and migration: roles of Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1. Carcinogenesis 2016;37:839–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgw068.Search in Google Scholar
61. Roy, L-O, Poirier, M-B, Fortin, D. Transforming growth factor-beta and its implication in the malignancy of gliomas. Targeted Oncol 2015;10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-014-0308-y.Search in Google Scholar
62. Martin-Fontecha, A, Sebastiani, S, Höpken, UE, Uguccioni, M, Lipp, M, Lanzavecchia, A, et al.. Regulation of dendritic cell migration to the draining lymph node: impact on T lymphocyte traffic and priming. J Exp Med 2003;198:615–21. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20030448.Search in Google Scholar
63. Nickl-Jockschat, T, Arslan, F, Doerfelt, A, Bogdahn, U, Bosserhoff, A, Hau, P. An imbalance between Smad and MAPK pathways is responsible for TGF-beta tumor promoting effects in high-grade gliomas. Int J Oncol 2007;30:499–507.Search in Google Scholar
64. Turkowski, K, Brandenburg, S, Mueller, A, Kremenetskaia, I, Bungert, AD, Blank, A, et al.. VEGF as a modulator of the innate immune response in glioblastoma. Glia 2018;66:161–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23234.Search in Google Scholar
65. Mimeault, M, Batra, SK. Hypoxia-inducing factors as master regulators of stemness properties and altered metabolism of cancer- and metastasis-initiating cells. J Cell Mol Med 2013;17:30–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12004.Search in Google Scholar
66. Gately, S, Li, WW. Multiple roles of COX-2 in tumor angiogenesis: a target for antiangiogenic therapy. Semin Oncol 2004;31(2 Suppl 7):2–11. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2004.03.040.Search in Google Scholar
67. Wang, C, Chen, Y, Wang, Y, Liu, X, Liu, Y, Li, Y, et al.. Inhibition of COX-2, mPGES-1 and CYP4A by isoliquiritigenin blocks the angiogenic Akt signaling in glioma through ceRNA effect of miR-194-5p and lncRNA NEAT1. J Exp Clin Canc Res: CR 2019;38:371. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1361-2.Search in Google Scholar
68. Yagami, T, Koma, H, Yamamoto, Y. Pathophysiological roles of cyclooxygenases and prostaglandins in the central nervous system. Mol Neurobiol 2016;53:4754–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9355-3.Search in Google Scholar
69. Cook, PJ, Thomas, R, Kingsley, PJ, Shimizu, F, Montrose, DC, Marnett, LJ, et al.. Cox-2-derived PGE2 induces Id1-dependent radiation resistance and self-renewal in experimental glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2016;18:1379–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now049.Search in Google Scholar
70. Piperi, C, Samaras, V, Levidou, G, Kavantzas, N, Boviatsis, E, Petraki, K, et al.. Prognostic significance of IL-8-STAT-3 pathway in astrocytomas: correlation with IL-6, VEGF and microvessel morphometry. Cytokine 2011;55:387–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2011.05.012.Search in Google Scholar
71. Miyazaki, T, Taketomi, Y, Saito, Y, Hosono, T, Lei, X-F, Kim-Kaneyama, J-R, et al.. Calpastatin counteracts pathological angiogenesis by inhibiting suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 degradation in vascular endothelial cells. Circ Res 2015;116:1170–81. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.116.305363.Search in Google Scholar
72. Chang, C-Y, Li, M-C, Liao, S-L, Huang, Y-L, Shen, C-C, Pan, H-C. Prognostic and clinical implication of IL-6 expression in glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Neurosci : Off J Neurosurg Soc Australasia 2005;12:930–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2004.11.017.Search in Google Scholar
73. Samaras, V, Piperi, C, Levidou, G, Zisakis, A, Kavantzas, N, Themistocleous, MS, et al.. Analysis of interleukin (IL)-8 expression in human astrocytomas: associations with IL-6, cyclooxygenase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and microvessel morphometry. Hum Immunol 2009;70:391–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2009.03.011.Search in Google Scholar
74. Metelli, A, Salem, M, Wallace, CH, Wu, BX, Li, A, Li, X, et al.. Immunoregulatory functions and the therapeutic implications of GARP-TGF-β in inflammation and cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2018;11:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-018-0570-z.Search in Google Scholar
75. Zimmer, N, Kim, E, Sprang, B, Leukel, P, Khafaji, F, Ringel, F, et al.. GARP as an immune regulatory molecule in the tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153676.Search in Google Scholar
76. Moustakas, A. Smad signalling network. J Cell Sci 2002;115:3355–6.10.1242/jcs.115.17.3355Search in Google Scholar PubMed
77. Nduom, EK, Weller, M, Heimberger, AB. Immunosuppressive mechanisms in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2015;17(7 Suppl):vii9–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov151.Search in Google Scholar
78. Iyer, SS, Cheng, G. Role of interleukin 10 transcriptional regulation in inflammation and autoimmune disease. Crit Rev Immunol 2012;32:23–63. https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevimmunol.v32.i1.30.Search in Google Scholar
79. Zhai, L, Lauing, KL, Chang, AL, Dey, M, Qian, J, Cheng, Y, et al.. The role of Ido in brain tumor immunotherapy. J Neuro Oncol 2015;123:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1687-8.Search in Google Scholar
80. Wainwright, DA, Balyasnikova, IV, Chang, AL, Ahmed, AU, Moon, KS, Auffinger, B, et al.. Ido expression in brain tumors increases the recruitment of regulatory T cells and negatively impacts survival. Clin Canc Res : Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 2012;18:6110–21. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-2130.Search in Google Scholar
81. Terness, P, Bauer, TM, Röse, L, Dufter, C, Watzlik, A, Simon, H, et al.. Inhibition of allogeneic T cell proliferation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing dendritic cells: mediation of suppression by tryptophan metabolites. J Exp Med 2002;196:447–57. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20020052.Search in Google Scholar
82. Nakamura, T, Shima, T, Saeki, A, Hidaka, T, Nakashima, A, Takikawa, O, et al.. Expression of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase and the recruitment of Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells in the development and progression of uterine cervical cancer. Canc Sci 2007;98:874–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00470.x.Search in Google Scholar
83. Chung, DJ, Rossi, M, Romano, E, Ghith, J, Yuan, J, Munn, DH, et al.. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-expressing mature human monocyte-derived dendritic cells expand potent autologous regulatory T cells. Blood 2009;114:555–63. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-11-191197.Search in Google Scholar
84. Zhang, I, Alizadeh, D, Liang, J, Zhang, L, Gao, H, Song, Y, et al.. Characterization of arginase expression in glioma-associated microglia and macrophages. PloS One 2016;11:e0165118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165118.Search in Google Scholar
85. Nagaraj, S, Gabrilovich, DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in human cancer. Canc J 2010;16:348–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/ppo.0b013e3181eb3358.Search in Google Scholar
86. Fionda, C, Abruzzese, MP, Santoni, A, Cippitelli, M. Immunoregulatory and effector activities of nitric oxide and reactive nitrogen species in cancer. Curr Med Chem 2016;23:2618–36. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867323666160727105101.Search in Google Scholar
87. Berghoff, AS, Kiesel, B, Widhalm, G, Rajky, O, Ricken, G, Wöhrer, A, et al.. Programmed death ligand 1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:1064–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou307.Search in Google Scholar
88. Wischhusen, J, Jung, G, Radovanovic, I, Beier, C, Steinbach, JP, Rimner, A, et al.. Identification of CD70-mediated apoptosis of immune effector cells as a novel immune escape pathway of human glioblastoma. Canc Res 2002;62:2592–9.Search in Google Scholar
89. Bloch, O, Crane, CA, Kaur, R, Safaee, M, Rutkowski, MJ, Parsa, AT. Gliomas promote immunosuppression through induction of B7-H1 expression in tumor-associated macrophages. Clin Canc Res: Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 2013;19:3165–75. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-3314.Search in Google Scholar
90. Azuma, T, Yao, S, Zhu, G, Flies, AS, Flies, SJ, Chen, L. B7-H1 is a ubiquitous antiapoptotic receptor on cancer cells. Blood 2008;111:3635–43. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-11-123141.Search in Google Scholar
91. Hossain, MT, Hassi, U, Imamul Huq, SM. Assessment of concentration and toxicological (Cancer) risk of lead, cadmium and chromium in tobacco products commonly available in Bangladesh. Toxicol Rep 2018;5:897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.08.019.Search in Google Scholar
92. Carvajal-Hausdorf, D, Altan, M, Velcheti, V, Gettinger, SN, Herbst, RS, Rimm, DL, et al.. Expression and clinical significance of PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and TILs in human small cell lung cancer (SCLC). J Immunother Canc 2019;7:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0540-1.Search in Google Scholar
93. Nehama, D, Di Ianni, N, Musio, S, Du, H, Patané, M, Pollo, B, et al.. B7-H3-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T cells target glioblastoma and neurospheres. EBioMedicine 2019;47:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.030.Search in Google Scholar
94. Yan, J, Kong, L-Y, Hu, J, Gabrusiewicz, K, Dibra, D, Xia, X, et al.. FGL2 as a multimodality regulator of tumor-mediated immune suppression and therapeutic target in gliomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv137.Search in Google Scholar
95. Yan, J, Zhao, Q, Gabrusiewicz, K, Kong, L-Y, Xia, X, Wang, J, et al.. FGL2 promotes tumor progression in the CNS by suppressing CD103 dendritic cell differentiation. Nat Commun 2019;10:448. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08770-5.Search in Google Scholar
96. Peñuelas, S, Anido, J, Prieto-Sánchez, RM, Folch, G, Barba, I, Cuartas, I, et al.. TGF-beta increases glioma-initiating cell self-renewal through the induction of LIF in human glioblastoma. Canc Cell 2009;15:315–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.02.011.Search in Google Scholar
97. Zhang, C, Zhang, X, Xu, R, Huang, B, Chen, A-J, Li, C, et al.. TGF-β2 initiates autophagy via Smad and non-Smad pathway to promote glioma cells’ invasion. J Exp Clin Canc Res: CR 2017;36:162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-017-0628-8.Search in Google Scholar
98. Strepkos, D, Markouli, M, Klonou, A, Piperi, C, Papavassiliou, AG. Insights in the immunobiology of glioblastoma. J Mol Med (Berl) 2020;98:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-019-01835-4.Search in Google Scholar
99. Li, W, Graeber, MB. The molecular profile of microglia under the influence of glioma. Neuro Oncol 2012;14:958–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos116.Search in Google Scholar
100. Liu, X, Liu, J, Zhao, S, Zhang, H, Cai, W, Cai, M, et al.. Interleukin-4 is essential for microglia/macrophage M2 polarization and long-term recovery after cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2016;47:498–504. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.115.012079.Search in Google Scholar
101. Orihuela, R, Mcpherson, CA, Harry, GJ. Microglial M1/M2 polarization and metabolic states. Br J Pharmacol 2016;173:649–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13139.Search in Google Scholar
102. Quail, DF, Bowman, RL, Akkari, L, Quick, ML, Schuhmacher, AJ, Huse, JT, et al.. The tumor microenvironment underlies acquired resistance to CSF-1R inhibition in gliomas. Science 2016 352:aad3018. New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad3018.Search in Google Scholar
103. Hilf, N, Kuttruff-Coqui, S, Frenzel, K, Bukur, V, Stevanović, S, Gouttefangeas, C, et al.. Actively personalized vaccination trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Nature 2019;565:240–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0810-y.Search in Google Scholar
104. Ferrer, VP, Moura Neto, V, Mentlein, R. Glioma infiltration and extracellular matrix: key players and modulators. Glia 2018;66:1542–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23309.Search in Google Scholar
105. Erdogan, B, Webb, DJ. Cancer-associated fibroblasts modulate growth factor signaling and extracellular matrix remodeling to regulate tumor metastasis. Biochem Soc Trans 2017;45:229–36. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst20160387.Search in Google Scholar
106. Ye, X-Z, Xu, S-L, Xin, Y-H, Yu, S-C, Ping, Y-F, Chen, L, et al.. Tumor-associated microglia/macrophages enhance the invasion of glioma stem-like cells via TGF-β1 signaling pathway. J Immunol 2012;189:444–53. Baltimore, Md: 1950. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1103248.Search in Google Scholar
107. Fonseca, ACCD, Romão, L, Amaral, RF, Assad Kahn, S, Lobo, D, Martins, S, et al.. Microglial stress inducible protein 1 promotes proliferation and migration in human glioblastoma cells. Neuroscience 2012;200:130–41.10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed
108. Keller, S, Schmidt, MHH. EGFR and EGFRvIII promote angiogenesis and cell invasion in glioblastoma: combination therapies for an effective treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061295.Search in Google Scholar
109. Bonavia, R, Inda, MM, Vandenberg, S, Cheng, SY, Nagane, M, Hadwiger, P, et al.. EGFRvIII promotes glioma angiogenesis and growth through the NF-κB, interleukin-8 pathway. Oncogene 2012;31:4054–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2011.563.Search in Google Scholar
110. Ellerbroek, SM, Halbleib, JM, Benavidez, M, Warmka, JK, Wattenberg, EV, Stack, MS, et al.. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in epidermal growth factor-stimulated matrix metalloproteinase-9 production and cell surface association. Canc Res 2001;61:1855–61.Search in Google Scholar
111. Kosmopoulos, M, Christofides, A, Drekolias, D, Zavras, PD, Gargalionis, AN, Piperi, C. Critical role of IL-8 targeting in gliomas. Curr Med Chem 2018;25:1954–67. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867325666171129125712.Search in Google Scholar
112. Venza, I, Visalli, M, Fortunato, C, Ruggeri, M, Ratone, S, Caffo, M, et al.. PGE2 induces interleukin-8 derepression in human astrocytoma through coordinated DNA demethylation and histone hyperacetylation. Epigenetics 2012;7:1315–30. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.22446.Search in Google Scholar
113. Zhao, W, Ajani, JA, Sushovan, G, Ochi, N, Hwang, R, Hafley, M, et al.. Galectin-3 mediates tumor cell-stroma interactions by activating pancreatic stellate cells to produce cytokines via integrin signaling. Gastroenterology 2018;154. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.014.Search in Google Scholar
114. Dwyer, J, Hebda, JK, Le Guelte, A, Galan-Moya, E-M, Smith, SS, Azzi, S, et al.. Glioblastoma cell-secreted interleukin-8 induces brain endothelial cell permeability via CXCR2. PloS One 2012;7:e45562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045562.Search in Google Scholar
115. Kahlert, UD, Nikkhah, G, Maciaczyk, J. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal(-like) transition as a relevant molecular event in malignant gliomas. Canc Lett 2013;331:131–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2012.12.010.Search in Google Scholar
116. Topalian, SL, Drake, CG, Pardoll, DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Canc Cell 2015;27:450–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
117. Hodges, TR, Ott, M, Xiu, J, Gatalica, Z, Swensen, J, Zhou, S, et al.. Mutational burden, immune checkpoint expression, and mismatch repair in glioma: implications for immune checkpoint immunotherapy. Neuro Oncol 2017;19:1047–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox026.Search in Google Scholar
118. Reiss, SN, Yerram, P, Modelevsky, L, Grommes, C. Retrospective review of safety and efficacy of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in refractory high grade gliomas. J Immunother Canc 2017;5:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-017-0302-x.Search in Google Scholar
119. Liu, F, Huang, J, Liu, X, Cheng, Q, Luo, C, Liu, Z. CTLA-4 correlates with immune and clinical characteristics of glioma. Canc Cell Int 2020;20:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-1085-6.Search in Google Scholar
120. Saha, D, Martuza, RL, Rabkin, SD. Macrophage polarization contributes to glioblastoma eradication by combination immunovirotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Canc Cell 2017;32:253–67.e255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.006.Search in Google Scholar
121. Huang, J, Liu, F, Liu, Z, Tang, H, Wu, H, Gong, Q, et al.. Immune checkpoint in glioblastoma: promising and challenging. Front Pharmacol 2017;8:242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00242.Search in Google Scholar
122. Sampson, JH, Gunn, MD, Fecci, PE, Ashley, DM. Brain immunology and immunotherapy in brain tumours. Nat Rev Canc 2020;20:12–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0224-7.Search in Google Scholar
123. Jiang, H, Gao, H, Kong, J, Song, B, Wang, P, Shi, B, et al.. Selective targeting of glioblastoma with EGFRvIII/EGFR bitargeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell. Cancer Immunol Res 2018;6:1314–26. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.cir-18-0044.Search in Google Scholar
124. Hegde, M, Mukherjee, M, Grada, Z, Pignata, A, Landi, D, Navai, SA, et al.. Tandem CAR T cells targeting HER2 and IL13Rα2 mitigate tumor antigen escape. J Clin Invest 2016;126:3036–52. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci83416.Search in Google Scholar
125. Wang, H, Xu, T, Huang, Q, Jin, W, Chen, J. Immunotherapy for malignant glioma: current status and future directions. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2020;41:123–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2019.12.003.Search in Google Scholar
Article note
The online version of this article offers reviewer assessments as supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2019-0001).
© 2020 Houminji Chen et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Original Articles
- Training strategies for a sustainable medical care: a survey among assistant and chief physicians in a tertiary care hospital in Germany
- Predictive factors of early outcome after palliative surgery for colorectal carcinoma
- The modified Blumgart anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective single center cohort study
- Case Report
- Primary renal Ewing’s sarcoma in an adult: an enigma
- Review
- Immune response in glioma’s microenvironment
- Original Article
- The influence of subventricular zone involvement in extent of resection and tumor growth pattern of glioblastoma
- Case Report
- Primary aortoduodenal fistula – overlooked because of guidelines?
Articles in the same Issue
- Original Articles
- Training strategies for a sustainable medical care: a survey among assistant and chief physicians in a tertiary care hospital in Germany
- Predictive factors of early outcome after palliative surgery for colorectal carcinoma
- The modified Blumgart anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective single center cohort study
- Case Report
- Primary renal Ewing’s sarcoma in an adult: an enigma
- Review
- Immune response in glioma’s microenvironment
- Original Article
- The influence of subventricular zone involvement in extent of resection and tumor growth pattern of glioblastoma
- Case Report
- Primary aortoduodenal fistula – overlooked because of guidelines?
