Startseite Effects of task complexity on the learning of genre specific rhetorical moves and linguistic forms: the case of contrast and argumentative essays
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Effects of task complexity on the learning of genre specific rhetorical moves and linguistic forms: the case of contrast and argumentative essays

  • Maria Pia Gomez Laich EMAIL logo und Naoko Taguchi
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Juli 2021

Abstract

This study investigates whether task complexity improves L2 English learners’ ability to write contrast and argumentative essays as measured by the use of rhetorical moves and linguistic forms characteristic of these essays. The participants were 62 students in an undergraduate-level composition class in a private university in the U.S. The study involved a first phase that targeted contrast writing and a second phase that targeted argumentative writing. In both phases, students were assigned randomly to a simple or complex task group and wrote an essay in dyads. In terms of rhetorical moves, the complex task group outperformed the simple task group in the immediate and delayed post-test of contrast essays. For argumentative essays, this superiority of the complex group was only found in the immediate post-test. As per linguistic forms, the complex task group outperformed the simple task group in the immediate and delayed post-test of both contrast and argumentative essays.


Corresponding author: Maria Pia Gomez Laich, Department of English, Carnegie Mellon University - Qatar Campus, Education City, P.O. Box 24866, Doha, Qatar, E-mail:

References

Byrnes, Heidi & Rosa María Manchón. 2014. Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. An introduction. In Heidi Byrnes & Rosa María Manchón (eds.), Task-based language learning—Insights from and for L2 writing, 1–27. John Benjaminns.10.1075/tblt.7.01byrSuche in Google Scholar

Choong, Kung-Wan Philip. 2014. Effects of task complexity on written production in L2 English. Doctoral Dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Ede, Lisa & Andrea Lunsford. 1990. Singular texts/plural authors. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Frear, Mark Wain & John Bitchener. 2015. The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing 30. 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Gomez-Laich, María Pía. 2017. Effects of task complexity on ESL students’ academic writing. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Gomez-Laich, María Pía & Naoko, Taguchi. 2018. Task complexity effects on interaction during a collaborative persuasive essay writing task: A conversation-analytic perspective. In Naoko, Taguchi & YouJin, Kim (eds.), Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics, 83–109. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.10.04gomSuche in Google Scholar

Graff, Gerald & Cathy Birkenstein. 2010. They say. I say. The moves that matter in academic writing. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2007. Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ishikawa, Tomohito. 2007. The effect of manipulating task complexity along the [±Here-and-Now] dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. Garcia-Mayo (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 136–156. London: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853599286-010Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Mark. 2017. Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing 37. 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin. 2012. Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learners’ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34. 627–658. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263112000368.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin & Naoko, Taguchi. 2015. Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Language Journal 99. 656–677.10.1111/modl.12273Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin & Nicole Tracy-Ventura. 2011. Task complexity, language anxiety and the development of the past tense. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, 287–306. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.2.18ch11Suche in Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit. 2011. Task-complexity and linguistic discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 20. 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2007. Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 45. 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2008. Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 17. 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuiken, Folkert & Ineke Vedder. 2012. Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. In Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, 143–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.32.07kuiSuche in Google Scholar

Loewen, Shawn & Helen Basturkmen. 2005. Interaction in group writing tasks in genre-based instruction in an EAP classroom. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 15. 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.15.1.11loe.Suche in Google Scholar

Manchón, Rosa María & Julio Roca de Larios. 2011. Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners’ perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In Rosa María Manchón (ed.), Learning to write and writing to learn in an additional language, 181–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.31.13manSuche in Google Scholar

Martin, Jim. 1984. Language, register and genre. In Frances Christie (ed.), Children writing: Reader, 21–29. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, Jim. 2009. Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education 20. 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Nuevo, Ana María, Rebecca Adams & Lauren Ross-Feldman. 2011. Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, 175–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.2.13ch7Suche in Google Scholar

Oskoz, Ana & Idoia Elola. 2014. Promoting FL collaborative writing through the use of Web 2.0 tools. In Marta Lloret & Lourdes Ortega (eds.), Technology and tasks: Exploring technology-mediated TBLT, 115–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.6.05oskSuche in Google Scholar

Révész, Andrea. 2009. Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31. 437–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109090366.Suche in Google Scholar

Révész, Andrea. 2011. Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal 95. 162–181.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01241.xSuche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2001a. Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 287–318. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.012Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2001b. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22. 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27.Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2011a. Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance, 3–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.2Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 2011b. Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning 61. 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Funes, Marcela. 2014. Task complexity and linguistic performance in advanced college-level foreign language writing. In Heidi Byrnes & Rosa María Manchón (eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing, 163–191. John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.7.07ruiSuche in Google Scholar

Ruiz-Funes, Marcela. 2015. Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: The effects of task factors and learner variables. Journal of Second Language Writing 28. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomi. 2013. Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847699954Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomi & Gillian Wigglesworth. 2007. Writing tasks: Comparing individual and collaborative writing. In M. P. Garcia-Mayo (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 157–177. London: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853599286-011Suche in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, Parvaneh. 2014. Storyline complexity and syntactic complexity in writing and speaking tasks. In Heidi Byrnes & Rosa María Manchón (eds.), Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing, 217–236. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.7.09tavSuche in Google Scholar

Vasylets, Olena, Roger Gilabert & Rosa María Manchón. 2017. The effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. Language Learning 67. 394–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12228.Suche in Google Scholar

Vasylets, Olena, Roger Gilabert & Rosa María Manchón. 2020. Task modality, communicative adequacy and CAF measures: The moderating role of task complexity. In Rosa María Manchón (ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.56.08vasSuche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0111).


Received: 2020-03-08
Accepted: 2021-06-20
Published Online: 2021-07-08
Published in Print: 2023-06-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Exploring ESOL teachers’ perspectives on the language learning experiences, challenges, and motivations of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK
  4. Thai tonal confusion patterns in the production of L1 Chinese Zhuang students
  5. Lexical measures as a proxy for bilingual language dominance?
  6. Elicited metaphoric competence in a second language: a construct associated with vocabulary knowledge and general proficiency?
  7. Model texts in collaborative and individual writing among EFL children: noticing, incorporations, and draft quality
  8. Investigating Indonesian EFL learners’ knowledge and use of English causative constructions
  9. The relationship between university EFL teachers’ oral feedback beliefs and practices and the impact of individual differences
  10. We thought about it together and the solution came to our minds”: languaging linguistic problem-solving in multilingual Finnish classrooms
  11. Lexical stress assignment preferences in L2 German
  12. Focus on form in task repetition through oral and written task modeling
  13. Prior processing, foreign language classroom anxiety, and L2 fluency
  14. Analyzing trends in the aural decoding errors of Japanese EFL learners
  15. Effects of task complexity on the learning of genre specific rhetorical moves and linguistic forms: the case of contrast and argumentative essays
  16. Glossing and incidental vocabulary learning in L2 reading: a cognitive load perspective
  17. Factor structures of speed and breakdown fluency in EFL learners’ story retelling performances
  18. The acquisition of L3 French present simple and present progressive by adult L1 Chinese speakers of L2 English
Heruntergeladen am 2.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2021-0111/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen