References

Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1999. Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning 49. 677–713. 10.1111/0023-8333.00105.Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. 2013. Developing L2 pragmatics. Language Learning 63. 68–86. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00738.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Z. Dörnyei. 1998. Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 32. 233–259. 10.2307/3587583.Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. & SY. Shin. 2014. Expanding traditional testing measures with tasks from L2 pragmatic research. Iranian Journal of Language Testing 4. 26–49.Search in Google Scholar

Barron, A. 2003. Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.108 Search in Google Scholar

Belz, JA. & C. Kinginger. 2002. Cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes 59. 189–214. 10.3138/cmlr.59.2.189.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, R. & A. Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In TA Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 252–281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1515/9783110805376.252Search in Google Scholar

Chang, YF. 2011. Interlanguage pragmatic development: The relation between pragmalinguistic competence and sociopragmatic competence. Language Sciences 33. 786–798. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

Comité pour l’enseignement du français d’Ewha. 2006. Le Français Contemporain. Seoul: Presses Universitaires D’Ewha.Search in Google Scholar

Coveney, A. 2010. Vouvoiement and tutoiement: Sociolinguistic reflections. Journal of French Language Studies 20. 127–150. 10.1017/S0959269509990366.Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, JM. 2002. Variation, chaos et système en interlangue Française. Acquisition Et Interaction En Langue Étrangère 17. 143–167.10.4000/aile.1030Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, JM. 2004. Vous or tu? Native and non-native speakers of French on a sociolinguistic tightrope. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 42. 383–402. 10.1515/iral.2004.42.4.383.Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, JM. & G. De Angelis. 2011. Introduction. In G. De Angelis & JM. Dewaele (eds.), New trends in crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism research, i–vi. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847694430Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, JM. & G. Planchenault. 2006. “Dites-moi tu”?! La perception de la difficulté du système des pronoms d’adresse en français. In Martine Faraco (ed.), Regards Croisés sur la Classe de Langue: Pratiques, Méthodes et Théories, 153–171. Marseille: Publications de l’Université de Provence.Search in Google Scholar

DuFon, MA. 1999. The acquisition of linguistic politeness in Indonesian as a second language by sojourners in naturalistic interactions. PhD Thesis, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, NC. 2005. At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27. 305–352. 10.1017/S027226310505014X.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, NC. 2011. Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. In C. Sanz & Leow Rp (eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA and bilingualism, 35–47. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2009. Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp & H. Reinders (eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching, 3–25. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691767-003Search in Google Scholar

Ford, MZ. 1995. The power of politeness around the world. Dialogue on Language Instruction 11. 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Gardner-Chloros, P. 1991. Ni tu ni vous: Principes et paradoxes dans l’emploi des pronoms d’allocution en français contemporain. Journal of French Language Studies 1. 139–155. 10.1017/S0959269500000958.Search in Google Scholar

Gardner-Chloros, P. 2007. T/V choices: An act of identity? In W. Ayres-Bennett & MC. Jone (eds.), The French language and questions of identity, 106–115. Cambridge: Legenda.Search in Google Scholar

Girardet, J. & J. Pécheur. 2002. Campus 1. Paris: CLE International.Search in Google Scholar

Hwang, SJ. 1991. Terms of address in Korean and American cultures. Intercultural Communication Studies 1. 117–134.Search in Google Scholar

Kasper, G. 1992. Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research 8. 203–231. 10.1177/026765839200800303.Search in Google Scholar

Kasper, G. & KR. Rose. 2002. Pragmatic development in a second language. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. 2015. How does pragmatic competence develop in bilinguals? International Journal of Multilingualism 12. 419–434. 10.1080/14790718.2015.1071018.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, NK. 1985. The use of personal pronouns and terms for self-reference and address in Korean. Mal Che [Locution] 10. 79–95.Search in Google Scholar

Kinginger, C. 2000. Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In JK. Hall & LS. Verplaetse (eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction, 23–46. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kinginger, C. & JA. Belz. 2005. Socio-cultural perspectives of pragmatic development in foreign language learning. Intercultural Pragmatics 2. 369–421. 10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.369.Search in Google Scholar

Kinginger, C. & K. Farrell. 2004. Assessing development of metapragmatic awareness in study abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 10. 19–42.10.36366/frontiers.v10i1.131Search in Google Scholar

Koo, JH. 1992. The term of address “you” in South Korea today. Korean Journal 32. 27–42.Search in Google Scholar

Labben, A. 2016. Reconsidering the development of the discourse completion test in interlanguage pragmatics. Pragmatics 26. 69–91. 10.1075/prag.26.1.04lab.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, N. 2014. A reconsideration of the omission of first and second person subjects in modern spoken Korean: Focusing on the pragmatic meanings of the overt subject expressions. Dahmhwa-Wa Inji [Discourse and Cognition] 21. 145–163.10.15718/discog.2014.21.3.145Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Liddicoat, AJ. 2006. Learning the culture of interpersonal relationships: Students’ understanding of personal address forms in French. Intercultural Pragmatics 3. 55–80. 10.1515/IP.2006.003.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, R. 1994. The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics 15. 263–287. 10.1093/applin/15.3.263.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & J. Rebuffot. 2002. Acquisition des pronoms d’allocution en classe de Français immersif. Acquisition Et Interaction En Langue Étrangère 17. 51–72.10.4000/aile.842Search in Google Scholar

McCourt, C. 2009. Pragmatic variation among learners of French in real-time chat communication. In R. Oxford & J. Oxford (eds.), Second language teaching and learning in the net generation, 143–154. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

McNamara, T. & C. Rover. 2006. Language testing: The social dimension. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Morford, J. 1997. Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7. 3–37. 10.1525/jlin.1997.7.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Oh, M. 2011. A pragmatic/sociolinguistic approach to 2nd person pronominal in English and Korean. Hyundai Munbup Yungoo [The Study of Modern Grammar] 66. 273–289.Search in Google Scholar

Pae, YS. 1974. Semantics of ‘you’ in Korean. The English Language and Literature 51. 558–566.Search in Google Scholar

Paradis, M. 2004. A neurolinguistic theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.18.Search in Google Scholar

Paradis, M. 2009. Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.40 Search in Google Scholar

Park, JW. 1997. Hankwuke hochinge cheykyey [Address terms in Korean]. Sahoyenehak [The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea] 5(2). 507–527.Search in Google Scholar

Peeters, B. 2004. Tu ou vous? Zeitschrift für Französische Sprache und Literatur 114. 1–17.Search in Google Scholar

Poisson-Quinton, S., MML. Coadic & A. Vergne-Sirieys. 2008. Festival 1. Paris: CLE International.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, KR. 2000. An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22. 27–67. 10.1017/S0272263100001029.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. 2001. Attention. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003Search in Google Scholar

Song, JJ. 2005. The Korean language: structure, use and context. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203390825Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. & S. Carroll. 1987. The immersion observation study. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins & M. Swain (eds.), The development of bilingual proficiency, vol. 2, 190–341. Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Modern Language Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. & S. Lapkin. 1990. Aspects of the sociolinguistic performance of early and late French immersion students. In R. Scarcella, ES. Andersen & SD. Krashen (eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language, 41–54. New York: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, S. 2000. Transfer in interlanguage pragmatics: New research agenda. Studies in Languages and Cultures 11. 109–128.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, J. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4. 91–112. 10.1093/applin/4.2.91.Search in Google Scholar

Ullman, MJ. 2001. A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2. 717–726. 10.1038/35094573.Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, RA. 2010. Towards a sociolinguistically responsive pedagogy: Teaching second-person address forms in French. Canadian Modern Language Review 66. 445–463. 10.3138/cmlr.66.3.445.Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, RA. 2013. From verbal protocols to cooperative dialogue in the assessment of second language pragmatic competence. Intercultural Pragmatics 10. 71–100. 10.1515/ip-2013-0003.Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, RA. 2014. Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783091409Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, RA. 2015. Native and non-native perceptions of appropriateness in the French second-person pronoun system. Journal of French Language Studies 25. 45–64. 10.1017/S0959269513000471.Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, RA. & A. Henery. 2014. Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning 64. 549–578. 10.1111/lang.12054.Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, RA. & C. Kinginger. 2013. Promoting metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research 17. 282–302. 10.1177/1362168813482917.Search in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, RA., L. Williams & C. McCourt. 2011. A corpus-driven study of second-person pronoun variation in L2 French synchronous computer-mediated communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 8. 67–91. 10.1515/IPRG.2011.003.Search in Google Scholar

Vincent, D. 2001. Remarques sur le tutoiement et le vouvoiement en Français parlé au Québec. Actes du colloque La journée du Québec, Institut d’études romanes, Université de Copenhague, 11–22.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfson, N. 1983. An empirically based analysis of complimenting in American English. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, 82–95. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar