“The message is clear”: An L1 business perspective on non-target-like formulaic expressions in L2 German

References

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2009. Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning 59(4). 755–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00525.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2012. Formulas, routines, and conventional expressions in pragmatics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 206–227. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000086.Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Zoltán Dörnyei. 1998. Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. Tesol Quarterly 32(2). 233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583.Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & David Stringer. 2017. Unconventional expressions: Productive syntax in the L2 acquisition of formulaic language. Second Language Research 33(1). 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316641725.Search in Google Scholar

Barron, Anne. 2003. Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.108Search in Google Scholar

Bella, Spyridoula. 2014. Developing the ability to refuse: A cross-sectional study of Greek FL refusals. Journal of Pragmatics 6. 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

Biesenbach-Lucas, Sigrun. 2007. Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language, Learning and Technology 11(2). 59–81. https://doi.org/10.10125/44104.Search in Google Scholar

Boers, Frank & Seth Lindstromberg. 2012. Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000050.Search in Google Scholar

Byrnes, Heidi. 2012. German for specific purposes. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The Encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0454Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Chi-Fen Emily. 2006. The development of e-mail literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language, Learning and Technology 10(2). 35–55. https://doi.org/10.10125/44060.Search in Google Scholar

Conklin, Kathy & Norbert Schmitt. 2012. The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000074.Search in Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 1981. Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, Rune. 2018. Cumulative link models for ordinal regression with the R package ordinal. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clm_article.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12). 3232–3245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007.Search in Google Scholar

Dechert, Hans. 1980. Pauses and intonation as indicators of verbal planning in second-language speech productions: Two examples from a case study. In Hans Dechert & Manfred Raupach (eds.), Temporal variables in speech, 271–285. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110816570.271Search in Google Scholar

Decock, Sofie, Bernard De Clerck & Rebecca Van Herck. 2020. Interpersonal strategies in E-complaint refusals: Textbook advice versus actual situated practice. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 83(3). 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490620904952.Search in Google Scholar

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2011. “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics 43(13). 3193–3215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2021. The effect of first language pragmatics on second language email performance: The case of Greek students’ email requests. In Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis, Milica Savić & Nicola Halenko (eds.), Email pragmatics and second language learners, 151–178. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.328.06ecoSearch in Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Miriam & Bodman Jean. 1986. “I very appreciate”: Expressions of gratitude by native and non-native speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics 7(2). 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.2.167.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024.Search in Google Scholar

Erman, Britt & Beatrice Warren. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 20(1). 29–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29.Search in Google Scholar

Faul, Franz, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner & Lang Albert-Georg. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 41. 1149–1160.10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan & Nick Ellis. 2015. Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics: Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning 65(S1). 228–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119.Search in Google Scholar

House, Juliane. 2002. Communicating in English as a lingua franca. In Susan Foster-Cohen (ed.), EUROSLA yearbook, vol. 2, 242–261. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/eurosla.2.15houSearch in Google Scholar

Kankaanranta, Anne, Päivi Karhunen & Leena Louhiala-Salminen. 2018. “English as corporate language” in the multilingual reality of multinational companies. Multilingua 37(4). 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2017-0077.Search in Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele & Shoshana Blum-Kulka. 1993. Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195066029.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2000. A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 32(5). 605–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00063-6.Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2007. Formulaic language in English lingua franca. In Istvan Kecskes & Laurence Horn (eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, 191–219. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198843.3.191Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan & Monika Kirner-Ludwig. 2019. “Odd structures” in English as a lingua franca discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 151. 76–90.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.007Search in Google Scholar

Ladilova, Anna & Ulrike Schröder. 2022. Humor in intercultural interaction: A source for misunderstanding or a common ground builder? A multimodal analysis. Intercultural Pragmatics 19(1). 71–101.10.1515/ip-2022-0003Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Luijkx, Antoinette, Marinel Gerritsen & Margot van Mulken. 2020. The effect of Dutch student errors in German business letters on German professionals. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 83(1). 34–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619870550.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, John. 2001. Use of address terms on the German speaking test. In Kenneth Rose & Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching, 248–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524797.018Search in Google Scholar

Osborne, John. 2008. Phraseology effects as a trigger for errors in L2 English: The case of more advanced learners. In Fanny Meunier & Sylviane Granger (eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching, 67–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.138.07osbSearch in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew & Frances Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack Richards & Richard Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–226. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Peer, Eyal, David Rothschild, Andrew Gordon, Zak Evernden & Ekaterina Damer. 2021. Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods 54(4). 1643–1662. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3.Search in Google Scholar

Peters, Elke. 2016. The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research 20(1). 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814568131.Search in Google Scholar

R Development Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Search in Google Scholar

Sabaté i Dalmau, Maria & Hortènsia Currel i Gotor. 2007. From “Sorry very much” to “I’m ever so sorry”: Acquisitional patterns in L2 apologies by Catalan learners of English. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(2). 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.014.Search in Google Scholar

Sampietro, Agnese, Samuel Felder & Beat Siebenhaar. 2022. Do you kiss when you text? Cross-cultural differences in the use of the kissing emojis in three WhatsApp corpora. Intercultural Pragmatics 19(2). 183–208.10.1515/ip-2022-2002Search in Google Scholar

Scarcella, Robin. 1979. “Watch up!”: A study of verbal routines in adult second language performance. Working Papers in Bilingualism 19. 79–88.Search in Google Scholar

Schauer, Gila. 2006. Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning 56(2). 269–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x.Search in Google Scholar

Schauer, Gila. 2021. Email communication in English and German. A contrastive pragmatic investigation of German university students’ emails sent to university staff in their native and foreign language. In Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis, Milica Savić & Nicola Halenko (eds.), Email Pragmatics and second language learners, 179–202. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.328.07schSearch in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Norbert. 1998. Measuring collocational knowledge: Key issues and an experimental assessment procedure. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics 119(1). 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.119-120.03sch.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Norbert. 2004. Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.9Search in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko. 2006. Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request in L2 English. Pragmatics 16(4). 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.16.4.05tag.Search in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko. 2013. Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience. System 41(1). 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko & Carsten Roever. 2017. Second language pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4(2). 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91.Search in Google Scholar

Usó-Juan, Esther & Alicia Martínez-Flor. 2015. Assessing EFL learners’ performance of the conventional expressions of complaining and apologising. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 173. 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.030.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, Joanna, Nisha Shanmugaraj & Jaclyn Sipe. 2016. Grammatical versus pragmatic error: Employer perceptions of nonnative and native English speakers. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 79(4). 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490616671133.Search in Google Scholar

Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519772Search in Google Scholar