Levels and types of breaking the maxims: A neo-Gricean account of humor

References

Alexander, Richard J.1997. Aspects of verbal humour in English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore.1993. Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics19(6). 537–558.10.1016/0378-2166(93)90111-2Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore.1994. Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore.1997. Locutionary and perlocutionary cooperation: The perlocutionary cooperative principle. Journal of Pragmatics27(6). 753–779.10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00063-XSearch in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore.2000. Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics32(6). 793–826.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore.2008. Semantics and pragmatics of humor. Language and Linguistics Compass2(6). 1203–1215.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00107.xSearch in Google Scholar

Austin, John L.1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bezuidenhout, Anne.2013. Perspective taking in conversation: A defense of speaker non-egocentricity. Journal of Pragmatics48(1). 4–16.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Brock, Alexander.2011. Bumcivilian: Systemic aspects of humorous communication in comedies. In R.Piazza, M.Bednarek & F.Rossi (eds.), Telecinematic discourse: Approaches to the language of films and television series, 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.211.17broSearch in Google Scholar

Cialdini, Robert B.1993 [1984]. Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: Morrow.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J.Gerrig. 1984. On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113(1). 121–126.10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H.1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta.2008. There is method in the humorous speaker’s madness: Humour and Grice’s model. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics4(1). 159–185.10.2478/v10016-008-0011-5Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta.2009. Humorous garden-paths: A pragmatic-cognitive study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta.2011. “You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics43(6). 1628–1644.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.016Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta.2013a. Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. European Journal of Humour Research1(1). 22–60. http://www.europeanjournalofhumour.org/index.php/ejhr/article/view/Marta%20Dynel/Marta%20Dynel (accessed 10 November 2014).10.7592/EJHR2013.1.1.dynelSearch in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta.2013b. Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature. Intercultural Pragmatics10(3). 403–431.10.1515/ip-2013-0018Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta.2014a. Linguistic approaches to (non)humorous irony. Humor27(4). 537–550.10.1515/humor-2014-0097Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta.2014b. Isn’t it ironic? Defining the scope of humorous irony. Humor27(4). 619–639.10.1515/humor-2014-0096Search in Google Scholar

Epley, Nicholas.2008. Solving the (real) other minds problem. Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(3). 1455–1474.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00115.xSearch in Google Scholar

Garmendia, Joana.2014. The Clash: Humor and critical attitude in verbal irony. Humor27(4). 641–659.10.1515/humor-2014-0094Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr., Gregory A.Bryant & Herbert L.Colston. 2014. Where is the humor in verbal irony?Humor27(4). 575–595.10.1515/humor-2014-0106Search in Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew.2012. Meaning and humour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791536Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving.1955. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry18(3). 213–231.10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul.1975. Logic and conversation. In P.Cole & J. L.Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. [Reprinted in Grice 1989: 22–40.]Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul.1978. Further notes on logic and conversation. In P.Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics, 113–127. New York: Academic Press. [Reprinted in Grice 1989: 41–57.]10.1163/9789004368873_006Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul.1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Yueguo.1993. The impasse of perlocution. Journal of Pragmatics20(5). 405–432.10.1016/0378-2166(93)90038-QSearch in Google Scholar

Gu, Yueguo.1994. Pragmatics and rhetoric: A collaborative approach to conversation. In H.Parret (ed.), Pretending to communicate, 173–195. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Hancher, Michael.1980. How to play games with words: Speech-act jokes. Journal of Literary Semantics9(1). 20–29.10.1515/jlse.1980.9.1.20Search in Google Scholar

Hidalgo Downing, Raquel & SilviaIglesias Recuero. 2008. Humor e ironía: una relación compleja [Humor and irony: A complex relation]. In L.Ruiz Gurillo & X. A.Padilla García (eds.), Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía [Tell me how you ironize and I will tell you who you are: A pragmatic approach to irony], 423–455. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, Lynne.1983. On misapplying the maxims: A Gricean look at wit. Chicago Linguistic Society19. 195–204.Search in Google Scholar

Kasher, Asa.1976. Conversational maxims and rationality. In A.Kasher (ed.), Language in focus: Foundations, methods and systems, 197–216. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1876-0_12Search in Google Scholar

Keenan, Elinor Ochs. 1976. The universality of conversational postulates. Language in Society5(1). 67–80.10.1017/S0047404500006850Search in Google Scholar

Kiefer, Ferenc.1979. What do conversational maxims explain?Lingvisticæ Investigationes3(1). 57–74.10.1075/li.3.1.04kieSearch in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga.2006. Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humor. Humor19(3). 271–304.10.1515/HUMOR.2006.015Search in Google Scholar

Leary, Mark R.1995. Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N.1983. Principles of pragmatics. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Yameng & ChunshenZhu.2011. Rhetoric as the Antistrophos of pragmatics: Toward a “competition of cooperation” in the study of language use. Journal of Pragmatics43(14). 3403–3415.10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.010Search in Google Scholar

Martinich, Aloysius P.1981. A theory of communication and the depth of humor. Journal of Literary Semantics10(1). 20–31.10.1515/jlse.1981.10.1.20Search in Google Scholar

Mooney, Annabelle.2004. Co-operation, violations and making sense. Journal of Pragmatics36(5). 899–920.Search in Google Scholar

Morreall, John.1983. Taking laughter seriously. Albany, NJ: State University of New York.Search in Google Scholar

Morreall, John.2004. Verbal humor without switching scripts and without non-bona fide communication. Humor17(4). 393–400.10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.393Search in Google Scholar

Nash, Walter.1985. The language of humour. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Nemesi, Attila L.2012. Two masters of playing with conversational maxims. In A. T.Litovkina, J.Sollosy, P.Medgyes & D.Brzozowska (eds.), Hungarian humour, 13–30. Kraków: Tertium.Search in Google Scholar

Nemesi, Attila L.2013. Implicature phenomena in classical rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics50(1). 129–151.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.004Search in Google Scholar

Németh T., Enikő. 2014. Intentions and perspectives in the social forms of language use. Argumentum10. 472–485. http://argumentum.unideb.hu/2014-anyagok/angol_kotet/nemethte.pdf (accessed 24 July 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Oring, Elliott.2003. Engaging humor. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Raskin, Victor.1985. Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-6472-3Search in Google Scholar

Raskin, Victor & SalvatoreAttardo.1994. Non-literalness and non-bona-fide in language: An approach to formal and computational treatments of humor. Pragmatics & Cognition2(1). 31–69.10.1075/pc.2.1.02rasSearch in Google Scholar

Raskin, Victor, Christian F.Hempelmann & Julia M.Taylor. 2009. How to understand and assess a theory: The evolution of the SSTH into the GTVH and now into the OSTH. Journal of Literary Theory3(2). 285–311.10.1515/JLT.2009.016Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Richard M. & Roger J.Kreuz. 1994. Why do people use figurative language?Psychological Science5(3). 159–163.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor & M.Belén Alvarado Ortega (eds.). 2013. Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.231Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold.2004. Speech acts. In L. R.Horn & G.Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 53–73. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R.1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny.1995. Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Verschueren, Jef.1999. Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, Haruhiko.1988. How to pull strings with words: Deceptive violations in the garden-path jokes. Journal of Pragmatics12(3). 323–337.10.1016/0378-2166(88)90036-7Search in Google Scholar