Discourse relations in English and German discourse: Local and not-so-local constraints
-
Anita Fetzer,
Anita Fetzer is Professor and Chair of English Linguistics at the University of Wuerzburg. Her research interest is in pragmatics, discourse and intercultural communication. She is the editor ofPragmatics & Beyond published by John Benjamins. Her latest monograph isRecontextualizing context: grammaticality meets appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2004. She also edited several volumes and special issues for journals such asJournal of Pragmatics, Journal of Language and Social Psychology and Language and Communication. and Augustin Speyer,
Augustin Speyer received his PhD at University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia). From 2007 to 2012 he had various positions at the universities of Saarbruecken, Tuebingen, Frankfurt, Marburg, Goettingen. Since 2012 he has been Professor of Historical Grammar of German at Goettingen University.
Abstract
This paper examines the overt and non-overt coding of discourse relations in the argumentative discourse genre of editorial based on a contrastive study of British English and German editorials. Particular attention is given to the linguistic coding of discourse relations positioned adjacently and non-adjacently, and to the question of granularity. The analysis of the German editorials is based on the syntactic unit of sentence, while their British counterpart is based on the syntactic unit of clause.
In the data at hand, the two languages code the discourse relation of Contrast overtly in adjacent and non-adjacent positioning but employ different strategies as regards the overt coding of the coordinating discourse relation of Continuation and the subordinating discourse relations of Elaboration, Explanation, and Comment. The rate of overt marking for adjacently positioned coordinating relations is higher in the German data. In the British data, there is hardly any difference between the overt marking of adjacently positioned discourse relations holding between clauses and sentences. The overt marking of subordinating discourse relations is lower in the German data, and in the British data, there is a clear preference for coding adjacently positioned subordinating discourse relations in an overt manner on the level of clause.
About the authors
Anita Fetzer is Professor and Chair of English Linguistics at the University of Wuerzburg. Her research interest is in pragmatics, discourse and intercultural communication. She is the editor of Pragmatics & Beyond published by John Benjamins. Her latest monograph is Recontextualizing context: grammaticality meets appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2004. She also edited several volumes and special issues for journals such as Journal of Pragmatics, Journal of Language and Social Psychology and Language and Communication.
Augustin Speyer received his PhD at University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia). From 2007 to 2012 he had various positions at the universities of Saarbruecken, Tuebingen, Frankfurt, Marburg, Goettingen. Since 2012 he has been Professor of Historical Grammar of German at Goettingen University.
©[2012] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Discourse relations in English and German discourse: Local and not-so-local constraints
- Lexical-semantic properties and contextual factors in the use of verbs of work with implicit subject arguments in Hungarian
- Politeness in the Holy Quran: A sociolinguistic and pragmatic perspective
- Teachability and bilingualism effects on third language learners' pragmatic knowledge
- In defense of Cognitive Pragmatics: A response to Cummings, Jaszczolt, Yokoyama, Carassa, and Colombetti
- Book Reviews
- Contributors to this issue
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Discourse relations in English and German discourse: Local and not-so-local constraints
- Lexical-semantic properties and contextual factors in the use of verbs of work with implicit subject arguments in Hungarian
- Politeness in the Holy Quran: A sociolinguistic and pragmatic perspective
- Teachability and bilingualism effects on third language learners' pragmatic knowledge
- In defense of Cognitive Pragmatics: A response to Cummings, Jaszczolt, Yokoyama, Carassa, and Colombetti
- Book Reviews
- Contributors to this issue