Abstract
This study examines the growing presence of English-written neon signs in Almaty’s upscale coffee shops, analysing their role as both markers of global Englishness and carriers of neoliberal ideology. In post-Soviet Kazakhstan, where national identity is being reasserted through Kazakh language revival and a distancing from Russian legacies, the prominence of English signage reflects the country’s integration into global cultural and economic networks. Drawing on linguistic landscape research, semiotics, and sociolinguistics, the paper argues that these neon signs function not merely as aesthetic elements but as symbols of elite identity, consumer cosmopolitanism, and entrepreneurial subjectivity. Drawing on a qualitative, multimodal discourse analysis of 43 neon signs and 45 related Instagram posts collected between 2020 and 2023 and exploring neon signs as “language objects” in semiotic landscapes, the research highlights how English is resemiotised in both physical and digital spaces. The deliberate use of English over Kazakh or Russian in decor and branding indexes modernity, entrepreneurial selfhood, and aesthetic elitism. In the context of Kazakhstan’s trilingual policy, the dominance of English signage suggests a shift in linguistic hierarchies that may undermine the symbolic and practical roles of Kazakh and Russian. Ultimately, by conceptualising neon signs as ideologically charged and semantically indeterminate resources, the study contributes to broader debates on language commodification, linguistic hierarchies, and the socio-political consequences of globalisation in post-Soviet spaces.
References
Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Bureau of National Statistics. 2023. National composition, religion and language proficiency in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Results of the National Population Census of 2021 in the Republic of Kazakhstan. https://stat.gov.kz/upload/medialibrary/cee/3rsfg8ps3xo19orb284esg4rx27ihqf7/%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9%20%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B2.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com.Suche in Google Scholar
Ahn, Elise & Juldyz Smagulova. 2021. English language choices in Kazakhstan and Kyrgystan. World Englishes 41(1), SI: Englishes in Central Asia. 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12552.Suche in Google Scholar
Aitken, Jonathan. 2012. Kazakhstan surprises and stereotypes: After 20 years of independence. Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar
Akynova, Damira, Sholpan Zharkynbekova, Atirkul Agmanova, Aimoldina Aliya & Lyazzat Dalbergenova. 2014. Language Cjoice among the youth of Kazakhstan: English as a self-representation of prestige. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 143. 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.393.Suche in Google Scholar
Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR). 2019. Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers. Available at: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Backhaus, Peter. 2006. In Durk Gorter (ed.), Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape, linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism, 52–66. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853599170-004Suche in Google Scholar
Bacon, Chris K. & So Yoon Kim. 2018. “English is my only weapon”: Neoliberal language ideologies and youth metadiscourse in South Korea. Linguistics and Education 48. 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.09.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Bagna, Carla & Monica Barni. 2005. Dai dati statistici ai dati geolinguistici: Per una mappatura del nuovo plurilinguismo. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata (SILTA) 34(2). 329–355.Suche in Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard. 2001 [1975]. Verbal art as performance. In A. Duranti (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 165–188. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard & Charles L. Briggs. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19. 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423.Suche in Google Scholar
Ben-Rafael, Eliezer. 2009. A sociological approach to the study of linguistic landscapes. In Elana Shohamy & Durk Gorter (eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Ben-Rafael, Eliezer, Elana Shohamy, Muhammad Hasan Amara & Nira Trumper-Hecht. 2004. Linguistic landscape and multiculturalism: A Jewish–Arab comparative study. Tel Aviv: Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research.Suche in Google Scholar
Ben-Rafael, Eliezer, Elana Shohamy, Muhammad Hasan Amara & Nira Trumper-Hecht. 2006. Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism 3(1). 7–30. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599170-002.Suche in Google Scholar
Binkley, Sam. 2007. Getting loose: Lifestyle consumption in the 1970s. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822389514Suche in Google Scholar
Blackwood, Robert, Elizabeth Lanza & Hirut Woldemariam (eds.). 2016. Linguistic landscapes: Multilingualism in the global city. Bloomsbury Academic.Suche in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610295Suche in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845307Suche in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2013. Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783090419Suche in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson. Cambridge: Polity.Suche in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. The social structures of economy. Cambridge: Polity.Suche in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre & Loic Wacquant. 2001. Neoliberal newspeak: Notes on the new planetary vulgate. Radical Philosophy 105. 1–6.Suche in Google Scholar
Bourhis, Richard Y. 1992. La langue d’affichage publique et commerciale au Québec: Plan de recherche pour l’élaboration d’une loi linguistique. Québec: Conseil de la langue française.Suche in Google Scholar
Chun, Christian W. 2018. Neoliberalism, globalization, and critical discourse studies. In John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, 439–452. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315739342-29Suche in Google Scholar
Ciscel, Matthew H. 2003. Linguistic opportunism and English in Moldova. World Englishes 21. 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971x.00257.Suche in Google Scholar
Coupland, Nickolas. 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755064Suche in Google Scholar
Cummings, Sally N. 2005. Kazakhstan: Power and elite. I.B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755620999Suche in Google Scholar
Dave, Bhavna & Peter Sinnott. 2002. Demographic and language politics in the 1999 Kazakhstan census. Washington, D.C.: National Council for Eurasian and East European Research.Suche in Google Scholar
Djuraeva, Madina. 2022. Multilingualism, nation branding, and the ownership of English in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. World Englishes 41. 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12557.Suche in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2002. Language in new capitalism. Discourse & Society 13(2). 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013002404.Suche in Google Scholar
Fierman, William. 2011. The fate of Uzbek language in the “Other” Central Asian Republics. In H. Schiffman (ed.), Language policy and language conflict in Afghanistan and its neighbors, 121–176. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004217652_008Suche in Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4Suche in Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2010. Language as resource in the globalized new economy. In Nicolas Coupland (ed.), The handbook of language and globalization, 349–365. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444324068.ch15Suche in Google Scholar
Howard, Adam & Jane Kenway. 2015. Canvassing conversations: Obstinate issues in studies of elites and elite education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 28(9). 1005–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2015.1077536.Suche in Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick. 2001. Resemiotization. Semiotica 137(1). 23–39.10.1515/semi.2001.106Suche in Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick. 2003. Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication 2(1). 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751.Suche in Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 3–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 2014. Welcome: Synthetic personalization and commodification of sociability in the linguistic landscape of global tourism. In Challenges for language education and policy: Making Space for people, 214–232. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 2015a. Word cities and language objects: “Love” sculptures and signs as shifters. Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal 1(1-2). 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.05jaw.Suche in Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 2015b. Globalese: A new visual-linguistic register. Social Semiotics 25(2). 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2015.1010317.Suche in Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam & Crispin Thurlow. 2010. Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London; New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Suche in Google Scholar
Kamalova, Alina. 2025. Speak Kazakh: Language ideologies in Kazakhstan’s social media in times of Russian–Ukrainian war. Journal of Sociolinguistics 29(3). 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12699.Suche in Google Scholar
Karimsakova, Anara, Kupenova Aigul & Kuzembayeva Gulzhana. 2022. The state policy of languages in the Republic of Kazakhstan. International Journal for Multilingual Education 21. 80–85.Suche in Google Scholar
Kazakhskii rynok kofe ezhegodno rastet na 20%. 2023. BESmedia. https://bes.media/news/kazahstanskij-rynok-kofe-ezhegodno-rastet-na-20-3242/ (accessed 1 November 2023).Suche in Google Scholar
Kulbayeva, Aisulu. 2018. Polycentricity of linguistic landscape and nation-building in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Central Asian Affairs 5(4). 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142290-00504001.Suche in Google Scholar
Landry, Rodrigue & Richard Y. Bourhis. 1997. Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16(1). 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x970161002.Suche in Google Scholar
Laruelle, Marlene. 2016. Which future for national-patriots? The landscape of Kazakh nationalism. In Marlene Laruelle (ed.), Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols and social changes, 155–180. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Suche in Google Scholar
Manan, Syed A. & Anas Hajar. 2022a. English as an index of neoliberal globalization: The linguistic landscape of Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. Language Sciences 92. 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101486.Suche in Google Scholar
Manan, Syed A. & Anas Hajar. 2022b. Guerrilla ethnography: Exploring linguistic landscapes through social media in Kazakhstan. Language in Society 51(3). 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740452200001X.Suche in Google Scholar
Mapes, Gwynne. 2018. Deconstructing distinction: Class inequality and elite authenticity in mediatized food discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(3). 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12285.Suche in Google Scholar
Markova, Anastasia & Tatiana Trubachova. 2021. Kak v Kazakhstane Meniaetsia Potreblenie Chaia i Kofe. Kursiv. https://kz.kursiv.media/2021-04-02/kak-v-kazakhstane-menyaetsya-potreblenie-chaya-i-kofe/ (accessed 2 April 2021).Suche in Google Scholar
Martín Rojo, Luisa & Alfonso Del Percio. 2019. Language and Neoliberal Governmentality. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429286711Suche in Google Scholar
Moore, Irina. 2014. Negotiating public space: The post-Soviet linguistic landscape in Kazakhstan. The International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies 11(4). 1–21. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7882/cgp/v11i04/43635.Suche in Google Scholar
Omniglot. 2023. Kazakh language and alphabet. In Online encyclopedia of writing systems and languages. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/kazakh.htm.Suche in Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa. 2006. Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822387879Suche in Google Scholar
Park, Joseph S.-Y. 2011. The promise of English: Linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 14(4). 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.573067.Suche in Google Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2009a. Language conflict in post-Soviet linguistic landscapes. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 17(1/2). 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.0.0025.Suche in Google Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2009b. Language rights versus speakers’ rights: On the evaluation of Language policies in post-Soviet countries. Language Policy 8(1). 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-008-9112-8.Suche in Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair & Emi Otsuji. 2015. Metrolingualism: Language in the city. Routledge.10.4324/9781315724225Suche in Google Scholar
Piller, Ingrid & Jinhyun Cho. 2013. Neoliberalism as language policy. Language in Society 42(1). 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404512000887.Suche in Google Scholar
Poslanie prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan, N. A. 2008. Nazarbaeva narodu «Novyy Kazakhstan v novom mire. In G. T. Tanibergenova, K. T. Kalilakhanova & R. Zh. Alimbekov (eds.), Poslaniya lidera natsii k narodu, 237–280. Astana: Kultegіn.Suche in Google Scholar
Ross, Nigel. 1997. Signs of international English. English Today 13(2). 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078400009597.Suche in Google Scholar
Saad-Filho, Alfredo & Deborah Johnston. 2005. Neoliberalism: A critical reader. London: Pluto Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Salskov-Iversen, Dorte, Hansen Hansen & Sven Bislev. 2000. Governmentality, globalization, and local practice: Transformations of a hegemonic discourse. Alternatives 25. 183–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540002500202.Suche in Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron & Suzie Wong Scollon. 2003. Discourses in place: Language in the material world. Routledge.10.4324/9780203422724Suche in Google Scholar
Scott, John. 2008. Modes of power and the Re-conceptualization of elites. The Sociological Review 56(S1). 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2008.00760.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Selvi, Ali F. 2011. World Englishes in the Turkish sociolinguistic context. World Englishes 30. 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2011.01705.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Smith, Nicola. 2024. Neoliberalism. In Britannica money. https://www.britannica.com/money/neoliberalism.Suche in Google Scholar
Statista. 2023. Leading social media websites in Kazakhstan from January to September 2023, based on share of visits. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1417934/kazakhstan-social-media-sites-visit-share/.Suche in Google Scholar
Sunuodula, Mamtimyn & Anwei Feng. 2011. Learning English as a third language by Uyghur students in Xinjiang: A blessing in disguise? In Anwei Feng (ed.), English language education across greater China, 260–283. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.29308474.17Suche in Google Scholar
Theng, Andre J. 2021. Precarity and enterprising selves: The resemiotization of neon language objects. Discourse, Context, and Media 39. 100462.10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100462Suche in Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2015. “Tourists’ spectacular self-locations as multimodal travel writing”. In Julia Kuehn & Paul Smethurst (eds.), New directions in travel writing studies, 35–53. Palgrave Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin & Adam Jaworski. 2010. Semiotic landscapes: language. image, space. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin & Adam Jaworski. 2015. On top of the world: Tourist’s spectacular self-locations as multimodal travel writing. In Julia Kuehn & Paul Smethurst (eds.), New directions in travel writing studies, 35–53. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9781137457257_3Suche in Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin & Adam Jaworski. 2017. Introducing elite discourse: The rhetorics of status, privilege, and power. Social Semiotics 27(3). 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1301789.Suche in Google Scholar
Toishibekova, Aisulu. 2016. Pervaia Kofeinia Almaty. Vlast’. https://vlast.kz/food/16157-pervaa-kofejna-almaty.html (accessed 9 March 2026).Suche in Google Scholar
Tussupbekova, Madina & Peter Enders. 2016. Linguistic landscape in Kazakhstan: Public Signs in Astana. International Education and Research Journal 2. 18–20.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Teun. 2006. Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal 14(2). 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee.Suche in Google Scholar
Vitchenko, Olga. 2017. Introducing CLIL in Kazakhstan: Researching beliefs and perceptions of university stakeholders. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 14(1). 102–116.Suche in Google Scholar
Wenzel, Veerle. 1996. Reclame en tweetaligheid in Brussel: Een empirisch onderzoek naar de spreiding van Nederlandstalige en Franstalige affiches. In Vrije Universiteit Brussel (ed.), Brusselse thema’s, vol. 3, 45–74. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, J. & Sholpan Mukhamedzhanova. 2022. The Russian language in Kazakhstan from the perspective of the linguistic landscape (A case study of the city of Nur-Sultan). Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 9. Philology 5. 46–58.Suche in Google Scholar
Zharkynbekova, Sholpan, Dina Akynova & Ainash Aimoldina. 2017. The linguistic landscape in Kazakhstan: Globalization, triglossia and other challenges. Cross-Cultural Studies: Education in Science 2(1). 89–99.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- The globalization of English and the Turkic-speaking countries of the Former Soviet Union: attitudes, policy and implementation
- English in Uzbekistan: language ideologies and teaching practices
- Teaching English in post-Soviet Kazakhstan
- The roles of English in language programmes and public reactions in the Republic of Kazakhstan
- Resemiotising globalisation and elitism: English-written neon signs in Kazakhstani coffee shops and on social media
- Language beliefs, attitudes and practices in contemporary Kyrgyzstan with particular reference to English
- The shifting dynamics of English in local higher education curriculum in Azerbaijan: the role of language policy
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- The globalization of English and the Turkic-speaking countries of the Former Soviet Union: attitudes, policy and implementation
- English in Uzbekistan: language ideologies and teaching practices
- Teaching English in post-Soviet Kazakhstan
- The roles of English in language programmes and public reactions in the Republic of Kazakhstan
- Resemiotising globalisation and elitism: English-written neon signs in Kazakhstani coffee shops and on social media
- Language beliefs, attitudes and practices in contemporary Kyrgyzstan with particular reference to English
- The shifting dynamics of English in local higher education curriculum in Azerbaijan: the role of language policy