The indivisibility of the nation and its linguistic divisions

Amir Hassanpour,

doi:10.1515/ijsl-2012-0049

Article

The indivisibility of the nation and its linguistic divisions

Amir Hassanpour,

Published/Copyright: September 14, 2012

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal International Journal of the Sociology of Language Volume 2012 Issue 217

Abstract

Kurdish has four “geographical” dialects divided arbitrarily and forcibly among five neighboring countries of Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Syria and Armenia. It has three literary dialects, two standardizing varieties, numerous norms and three alphabets. Further complicating this linguistic landscape since 1918 is the crisscrossing of dialect areas by international borders and subjecting them to state policies ranging from linguicide (Turkey, Iran, Syria) to officialization on the local (Iraq before 2005; USSR) and national levels (Iraq since 2005). Under these conditions, dialect divisions were overshadowed by the linguicidal situation which threatened the survival of the language. The formation of the Kurdistan Regional Government in 1991 and the officialization of Kurdish as one of the two state languages of Iraq in 2005 have removed the external (state) threat, and raised, once more, the question of the dialect base of the standard language. While Iraqi rulers had in the past used dialect pluralism as justification for denying Kurdish official status, now the Kurds themselves have to cope with the linguistic fragmentation of their nation. This article examines the conflict over the adoption of one or two of the major dialects, Sorani and Kurmanji, as the official standard language in Iraq.

Keywords: dialect and language; nationalism and dialects; standardization; sociolinguistic theory

Published Online: 2012-09-14

Published in Print: 2012-09-13

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2012-0049

Keywords for this article

dialect and language; nationalism and dialects; standardization; sociolinguistic theory