Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Effects of Additional Food on the Dynamics of a Three Species Food Chain Model Incorporating Refuge and Harvesting

  • EMAIL logo , und
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. September 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, a three species food chain model has been developed among the interaction of prey, predator and super predator. It is assumed that the predator shows refuge behavior to the super predator. It is also assumed that a certain amount of additional food will be supplied to the super predator. It is considered that the predator population is benefiting partially from the additional food. To get optimal harvesting of super predator the Pontryagin’s maximum principle has been used. It is found that super predator may be extinct if harvesting rate increase. It is observed that as the refuge rate increases, predator population gradually increases, but super predator population decreases. Also, it is found that our proposed system undergoes oscillatory or periodic behavior as the value of refuge rate (m1), harvesting rate (E), the intrinsic growth rate of prey (r), carrying capacity of prey (k) and conservation rate of prey (c1) varies for some certain range of these parameters. It is found that this study may be useful for the increase of harvesting of a super predator by supplying the additional food to our proposed system.

MSC 2010: 92B05; 37C75; 37C25

References

[1] A. J. Lotka, Elements of physical biology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, USA, 1925.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] R. M. May, Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, Princeton University Press, NJ, 1974.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] R. M. May and W. J. Leonard, Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29 (1975), 243–253.10.1137/0129022Suche in Google Scholar

[4] J. D. Murray, Mathematical biology I. An introduction, Springer, New York, 2002.10.1007/b98868Suche in Google Scholar

[5] S. Gunog and D. L. DeAngelis, A predator–prey model with a Holling type I functional response including a predator mutual interference, J. Nonlin. Sci. 21 (2011), 811–833.10.1007/s00332-011-9101-6Suche in Google Scholar

[6] W. Liu, C. Fu and B. Chen, Hopf bifurcation for a predatorprey biological economic system with Holling type II functional response, J. Franklin Inst. 348 (2011), 1114–1127.10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.04.019Suche in Google Scholar

[7] V. Madhusudanan and S. Vijaya, Impact of quadratic harvesting on prey–predator model with Holling type-II functional response, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 10 (2015), 43953–43959.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] P. Panja and S. K. Mondal, Stability analysis of coexistence of three species prey–predator model, Nonlin. Dyn. 81 (2015), 373–382.10.1007/s11071-015-1997-1Suche in Google Scholar

[9] A. Hastings and T. Powell, Chaos in a three species food chain, Ecology. 72 (1991), 896–903.10.2307/1940591Suche in Google Scholar

[10] A. Y. Morozov, Emergence of Holling type III zooplankton functional response: bringing together field evidence and mathematical modelling, J. Theor. Biol. 265 (2010), 45–54.10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.04.016Suche in Google Scholar

[11] H. Baek, A food chain system with Holling type IV functional response and impulsive perturbations, Comput. Math. Appl. 60 (2010), 1152–1163.10.1016/j.camwa.2010.05.039Suche in Google Scholar

[12] R. Arditi and L.R. Ginzburg, Coupling on predator–prey dynamics: ratio-dependence, J. Theor. Biol. 139 (1989), 311–326.10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80211-5Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Y. Kuang and E. Beretta, Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system, J. Math. Biol. 36 (1998), 389–406.10.1007/s002850050105Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Y. Kuang, Rich dynamics of Gause-type ratio-dependent predator–prey system, Fields. Inst. Commun. 21 (1999), 325–337.10.1090/fic/021/27Suche in Google Scholar

[15] F. Berezovskaya, G. Karev and R. Arditi, Parametric analysis of the ratio-dependent predator–prey model, J. Math. Biol. 43 (2001), 221–246.10.1007/s002850000078Suche in Google Scholar

[16] T. W. Hwang, Global analysis of the predator–prey system with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 281 (2003), 395–401.10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00395-5Suche in Google Scholar

[17] R. Arditi, J. M. Callois, Y. Tyutyunov, and C. Jost, Does mutual interference always stabilize predator–prey dynamics? A comparison of models, C. R. Biol. 327 (2004), 1037–1057.10.1016/j.crvi.2004.06.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] M. Fan and Y. Kuang, Dynamics of a nonautonomous predator prey system with the Beddington–DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 295 (2004), 15–39.10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.02.038Suche in Google Scholar

[19] R. Arditi and L. R. Ginzburg, How species interact: altering the standard view on trophic ecology, Oxford University Press, New York, 2012.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199913831.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

[20] J. D. Flores and E. González-Olivares, Dynamics of a predator–prey model with Allee effect on prey and ratio-dependent functional response, Ecol. Complex. 18 (2014), 59–66.10.1016/j.ecocom.2014.02.005Suche in Google Scholar

[21] S. Chakraborty, S. Pal and N. Bairagi, Dynamics of a ratio-dependent eco-epidemiological system with prey harvesting, Nonlinear Anal: RWA. 11 (2010), 1862–1877.10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.04.009Suche in Google Scholar

[22] A. Sih, J. W. Petranka and L. B. Kats, The dynamics of prey refuge use: a model and tests with sunfish and salamander larvae, Am. Naturalist 132 (1988), 463–483.10.1086/284865Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Y. Huang, F. Chen and L. Zhong, Stability analysis of a prey–predator model with Holling type III response function incorporating a prey refuge, Appl. Math. Comput. 182 (2006), 672–683.10.1016/j.amc.2006.04.030Suche in Google Scholar

[24] T. K. Kar, Modelling and analysis of a harvested prey–predator system incorporating a prey refuge, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 185 (2006), 19–33.10.1016/j.cam.2005.01.035Suche in Google Scholar

[25] S. Jana, M. Chakraborty and K. Chakraborty, Global stability and bifurcation of time delayed prey–predator system incorporating prey refuge, Math. Comput. Simul. 85 (2012), 57–77.10.1016/j.matcom.2012.10.003Suche in Google Scholar

[26] R. W. Campbell, D. L. Hubbard and R. J. Sloan, Location of gypsy moth pupae and subsequent pupal survival in sparse, stable populations, Environ. Entomol. 4 (1975), 597–600.10.1093/ee/4.4.597Suche in Google Scholar

[27] S. Chakraborty, P. K. Tiwari, S. K. Sasmal, S. Biswas, S. Bhattacharya and J. Chattopadhyay, Interactive effects of prey refuge and additional food for predator in a diffusive predator–prey system, Appl. Math. Model. 47 (2017), 128–140.10.1016/j.apm.2017.03.028Suche in Google Scholar

[28] J. Ghosh, B. Sahoo and S. Poria, Prey–predator dynamics with prey refuge providing additional food to predator, Chaos. Soliton. Fract. 96 (2017), 110–119.10.1016/j.chaos.2017.01.010Suche in Google Scholar

[29] D. Pal, P. Santra and G. S. Mahapatra, Dynamical behavior of three species predator–prey system with mutual support between non refuge prey, Ecol. Gen. Genom. 3–5 (2017), 1–6.10.1016/j.egg.2017.05.001Suche in Google Scholar

[30] S. H. Lee, Dynamics of predators and prey with hunting and escaping activities in a landscape with a prey refuge, J. Korean. Phys. Soc. 2 (2018), 533–538.10.3938/jkps.72.533Suche in Google Scholar

[31] S. Saha, A. Maiti and G. P. Samanta, A Michaelis–Menten predator–prey model with strong Allee effect and disease in prey incorporating prey refuge, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos. 28 (2018), 1850073.10.1142/S0218127418500736Suche in Google Scholar

[32] S. Wang, Z. Ma and W. Wang, Dynamical behavior of a generalized eco-epidemiological system with prey refuge, Adv. Diff. Equ. 2018 (2018), 244.10.1186/s13662-018-1704-xSuche in Google Scholar

[33] P. D. N. Srinivasu, B. S. R. V. Prasad and M. Venkatesulu, Bilogical control through provision of additional food to predators: a theoretical study, Theor. Popul. Biol. 72 (2007), 111–120.10.1016/j.tpb.2007.03.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] S. Samanta, A. K. Mandal, K. Kundu and J. Chattopadhyay, Control of disease in prey population by supplying alternative food to predator, J. Biol. Syst. 22 (2014), 677–690.10.1142/S0218339014500272Suche in Google Scholar

[35] K. Chakraborty and S. S. Das, Biological conservation of a prey–predator system incorporating constant prey refuse through provision of alternative food to predators: a theoretical study, Acta. Biotheor. 62 (2014), 183–205.10.1007/s10441-014-9217-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] D. Kumar and S. P. Chakrabarty, A comparative study of bioeconomic ratio-dependent predator–prey model with and without additional food to predators, Nonlin. Dyn. 80 (2015), 23–38.10.1007/s11071-014-1848-5Suche in Google Scholar

[37] K. S. Chaudhuri and S. S. Ray, On the combined harvesting of a prey–predator system, J. Biol. Syst. 4 (1996), 373–389.10.1142/S0218339096000259Suche in Google Scholar

[38] S. Gakkhar and B. Singh, The dynamics of a food web consisting of two preys and a harvesting predator, Chaos. Soliton. Fract. 34 (2007), 1346–1356.10.1016/j.chaos.2006.04.067Suche in Google Scholar

[39] R. P. Gupta, P. Chandra and M. Banerjee, Dynamical complexity of a prey–predator model with nonlinear predator harvesting, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B. 20 (2015), 423–443.10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.423Suche in Google Scholar

[40] H. Yang and J. Jia, Harvesting of a predator–prey model with reserve area for prey and in the presence of toxicity, J. Appl. Math. Comput. 53 (2017), 693–708.10.1007/s12190-016-0989-8Suche in Google Scholar

[41] B. Sahoo and S. Poria, The chaos and control of a food chain model supplying additional food to top-predator, Chaos. Soliton. Fract. 58 (2014), 52–64.10.1016/j.chaos.2013.11.008Suche in Google Scholar

[42] F. G. Martin and J. B. Dianne, Lates calcarifer in fishes of Australia. Accessed on 12 May 2017, http://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/4643.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] G. Birkhoff and G. C. Rota, Ordinary differential equations, Ginn, Boston, 1982.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] B. D. Hassard, N. D. Kazarinoff and Y. H. Wan, Theory and application of Hopf bifurcation, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 41, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 1981.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelidze and E. F. Mishchenko, The mathematical theory of optimal processes, Wiley, New York, 1962.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-10-15
Accepted: 2019-06-25
Published Online: 2019-09-06
Published in Print: 2019-11-18

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.4.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnsns-2018-0313/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen